casinobitcoin
|
|
August 07, 2015, 12:43:28 AM |
|
How hard would VNL to be implement in an existing service?
|
|
|
|
pseudonymdude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 07, 2015, 01:10:36 AM |
|
How hard would VNL to be implement in an existing service?
What do you mean by existing service? Do you mean an exchange or something like BitPay? It's different from a bitcoin clone so exchanges may need help if their wallet operators aren't skilled. Poloniex and Bittrex both did get theirs up and running, of course. BitPay would need a very liquid VNL/USD exchange, so we would have to get on something like bitstamp, bitfinex, perhaps btc-e, or another exchange with a lot of USD buyers and sellers. Although, GoCoin takes Doge and Doge/USD volume is extremely low.
|
|
|
|
etoque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 07, 2015, 01:20:48 AM |
|
Darkcoin 2014 Vanillacoin 2015 Close enough ?
|
|
|
|
Dimitry
|
|
August 07, 2015, 02:01:24 AM |
|
Darkcoin 2014 Vanillacoin 2015 Close enough ? Nope decimal all wrong
|
|
|
|
CryptoClub
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
cryptocollectorsclub.com
|
|
August 07, 2015, 02:46:37 AM |
|
Darkcoin 2014 Vanillacoin 2015 Close enough ? The patterns over time are quite comparable. Along with the tech angle and loyalty. At the time Darkcoin was offering interesting technology and it developed a strong loyal community. So whatever manipulations happened, buyers kept stepping in and getting more and driving it higher. There are differences though, Evan not being anonymous, and Vanillacoin perhaps having better technology.
|
...
|
|
|
pseudonymdude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 07, 2015, 02:55:27 AM |
|
Darkcoin 2014 Vanillacoin 2015 Close enough ? The patterns over time are quite comparable. Along with the tech angle and loyalty. At the time Darkcoin was offering interesting technology and it developed a strong loyal community. So whatever manipulations happened, buyers kept stepping in and getting more and driving it higher. There are differences though, Evan not being anonymous, and Vanillacoin perhaps having better technology. Not perhaps, imo. Masternodes are a gimmick.
|
|
|
|
nickhiggins123
|
|
August 07, 2015, 03:03:52 AM |
|
Darkcoin 2014 Vanillacoin 2015 Close enough ? The patterns over time are quite comparable. Along with the tech angle and loyalty. At the time Darkcoin was offering interesting technology and it developed a strong loyal community. So whatever manipulations happened, buyers kept stepping in and getting more and driving it higher. There are differences though, Evan not being anonymous, and Vanillacoin perhaps having better technology. Not perhaps, imo. Masternodes are a gimmick. Nobody has ever thought Masternodes were a great idea. Greed drives opinion however.
|
|
|
|
CryptoClub
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
cryptocollectorsclub.com
|
|
August 07, 2015, 03:42:10 AM |
|
Darkcoin 2014 Vanillacoin 2015 Close enough ? The patterns over time are quite comparable. Along with the tech angle and loyalty. At the time Darkcoin was offering interesting technology and it developed a strong loyal community. So whatever manipulations happened, buyers kept stepping in and getting more and driving it higher. There are differences though, Evan not being anonymous, and Vanillacoin perhaps having better technology. Not perhaps, imo. Masternodes are a gimmick. I was just trying to be fair. VNL appears to have ground breaking technology on many levels. If it is truly the fastest and most secure and most distributed, how can that be beaten?
|
...
|
|
|
Nthused
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1001
|
|
August 07, 2015, 04:11:54 AM |
|
Darkcoin 2014 Vanillacoin 2015 Close enough ? The patterns over time are quite comparable. Along with the tech angle and loyalty. At the time Darkcoin was offering interesting technology and it developed a strong loyal community. So whatever manipulations happened, buyers kept stepping in and getting more and driving it higher. There are differences though, Evan not being anonymous, and Vanillacoin perhaps having better technology. Not perhaps, imo. Masternodes are a gimmick. I was just trying to be fair. VNL appears to have ground breaking technology on many levels. If it is truly the fastest and most secure and most distributed, how can that be beaten? Satoshi comes back and gives away all his bitcoin, that's how
|
|
|
|
1.25L
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
August 07, 2015, 04:29:45 AM |
|
vnl will be in the top 5 just hold on to what you have and wait easy money
|
|
|
|
merc84
|
|
August 07, 2015, 06:33:23 AM Last edit: August 07, 2015, 07:45:53 AM by merc84 |
|
anyone get hw errors on smelter miner with faq config (280x?) 1:0 A:1452 R:9 HW:3 Speed: 2.35GH/s 5s: 2.34GH/s using config from faq with 1000/1250 clocks.
|
|
|
|
1.25L
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
August 07, 2015, 08:02:17 AM |
|
who has the balls to hold there vnl for longest and make the real money ;p
|
|
|
|
SpringfieldM1A
|
|
August 07, 2015, 08:10:22 AM |
|
who has the balls to hold there vnl for longest and make the real money ;p
Imho it's not a question of balls, but of common sense to hold.
|
|
|
|
1.25L
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
August 07, 2015, 08:12:15 AM |
|
who has the balls to hold there vnl for longest and make the real money ;p
Imho it's not a question of balls, but of common sense to hold. that is true poor old dashs days are numbered
|
|
|
|
1.25L
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
August 07, 2015, 08:32:20 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
SpringfieldM1A
|
|
August 07, 2015, 08:39:36 AM |
|
Let's keep this thread civil and refrain from rejoicing over trouble of other coins. Let's not draw first blood so to speak.
|
|
|
|
1.25L
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
August 07, 2015, 08:40:35 AM |
|
Let's keep this thread civil and refrain from rejoicing over trouble of other coins. Let's not draw first blood so to speak.
yeah guys common be human john conner already drew first blood
|
|
|
|
smolen
|
|
August 07, 2015, 10:42:36 AM |
|
from another thread
"Immediate concerns would be that UDP isn't a guaranteed delivered protocol (so packets may well never arrive), that the "Security Considerations" section of the paper is wrong (not sure how they got the impression you can't forge UDP origin), in fact very wrong (MiTM attacks, attacks on routing infrastructure), and simply skips most of the detail. Further concerns would be that any major network split seems inevitably likely to fragment the coin horrifically as there's no reconciliation mechanism I can see. It also seems incredibly optimistic about network propagation times - if we were confident about network relay speed, block times would be down in the seconds range (because why not?), rather than minutes.
Emphasis concerns, this is my quick eyeball over the paper without time to look at the code. Hopefully others can comment more meaningfully."
Long ago I privately ranted about possible network isolation attacks and even found and sent some academic research about it, so John should be aware of it. Let's wait for updated whitepaper.
|
Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
|
|
|
smolen
|
|
August 07, 2015, 10:48:48 AM |
|
I'm very sorry, new Smelter version with bugfixes and better diagnostics was almost done when I was distracted by other, non-crypto things anyone get hw errors on smelter miner with faq config (280x?) 1:0 A:1452 R:9 HW:3 Speed: 2.35GH/s 5s: 2.34GH/s using config from faq with 1000/1250 clocks.
Looks almost OK, perhaps GPU clock should be lowered a bit. Memory is not used, so memory clock is not significant. What is the best AMD driver for for smelter miner?
The kernel is precompiled, there should be no speed difference.
|
Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
|
|
|
1.25L
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
August 07, 2015, 11:17:54 AM |
|
drinking a beer laughing that il be rich soon love you vnl
|
|
|
|
|