cs54
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2014, 04:50:59 PM |
|
AMHash1 IPO is 18% filled ....
I see ~3.7% (186650/5000000) Hmm I'm seeing on Havelock 812,969 remaining out of 1,000,000 units. Perhaps they are only offering the first tranche atm?
|
|
|
|
mrlupin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2014, 04:52:40 PM |
|
Has AMHash been advertised on Reddit and Zapchain?
Seems like the people with money are hanging out there rather than here these days... (please don't take it the wrong way... there was a thread on Zapchain about bitcointalk and a lot of the folks there said they had stopped coming because of the lack of community management / trolls / scams going on here)
|
|
|
|
Blazed
Casascius Addict
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1119
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2014, 05:17:35 PM Last edit: October 27, 2014, 05:31:03 PM by Blazedout419 |
|
IPO is going down for the same reason every asset in bitcoinland is going down.. which is because bitcoin itself is crawling. no more momentum, enthusiasm or confidence caused by the previous bubble.
Not true...look at Etherum it sold a bunch in hours. This is not selling because everyone has finally learned that buying mining contracts/securities always looses you money. If you invest 50 BTC into this your chances of getting those 50 BTC back are slim to none... Anyways I will stop posting about it...not trying to thread crap here or anything.
|
|
|
|
nycgoat
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2014, 07:12:49 PM |
|
People are also apprehensive about holding anything on Havelock because of the regulatory uncertainty.
|
|
|
|
glendall
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1018
PredX - AI-Powered Prediction Market
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2014, 07:35:14 PM |
|
True, after having btc stolen in Jon Montrolls bitfunder robbery and coming to realize that at least half of exchanges seem to run off deposits (or legitametly get hacked) I've apprehensive to invest in anything. Havelock is after all the one of 4 exchanges left selling am shares.
Re AM1hashing fund, I think there is still lots of trust for AM but its more that most btc world investors see cloud mining with a slim chance of returns in mining these days. You know that the price can only go down after purchase, its not like a stock, so its not an encouraging investment.
Personally speaking I think the price needs to be lower before buying any. The price is about par for the mining hardware, so for myself personally who had always got a roi in asicr mining only after mining a few months than selling the used hardware, and only ever losing btci the cloud mining I've done, its a tough sell.
I think it would been a far more successful IPO launch to offer a tremoundous price per hash for the IPO, which would then attract investors and stimulate the buying and selling on havelock after the IPO. The way it is priced now, although a decent and fair price, you can only really imagine the price going down and that's even if the IPO gets filled at all.
|
|
|
|
cs54
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2014, 08:27:31 PM |
|
I think it would been a far more successful IPO launch to offer a tremoundous price per hash for the IPO, which would then attract investors and stimulate the buying and selling on havelock after the IPO. The way it is priced now, although a decent and fair price, you can only really imagine the price going down and that's even if the IPO gets filled at all.
So, a loss leader? I would worry about expectation-setting for AMHash2, if that contract will be structured like AMHash1.
|
|
|
|
havelock
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2014, 08:46:46 PM |
|
In the case with AMHash1 the BTC invested are transferred to Rockminer the manager of the funds.
They will control those funds.
So as you purchase those units on Havelock that are a part of the AMHash1 Fund they will be in control of the Fund managers Rockminer which works with Friedcat.
The only BTC we hold online and for a brief time is the amount to pay the dividends with.
All other BTC are offline or with the Fund Managers.
Havelock Investments
|
|
|
|
xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3934
Merit: 8493
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2014, 08:56:46 PM |
|
I think it would been a far more successful IPO launch to offer a tremoundous price per hash for the IPO, which would then attract investors and stimulate the buying and selling on havelock after the IPO. The way it is priced now, although a decent and fair price, you can only really imagine the price going down and that's even if the IPO gets filled at all.
So, a loss leader? I would worry about expectation-setting for AMHash2, if that contract will be structured like AMHash1. You people are looking at this way too deeply. You get a miner without paying the shipping AND you run 1 TH for a buck sixty three per day without the need of buying a power supply! The div per share is the same as the theoretical reward you would make from a 1 GH miner per second. Really this is like a gift from AM
|
|
|
|
DebitMe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1012
Get Paid Crypto To Walk or Drive
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2014, 09:16:16 PM |
|
Can Rockminer or Friedcat comment on what happens to the remaining hashrate that doesn't sell during the IPO? Will it be used as self mining or reissued at a lower price?
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2014, 09:48:23 PM |
|
I think it would been a far more successful IPO launch to offer a tremoundous price per hash for the IPO, which would then attract investors and stimulate the buying and selling on havelock after the IPO. The way it is priced now, although a decent and fair price, you can only really imagine the price going down and that's even if the IPO gets filled at all.
So, a loss leader? I would worry about expectation-setting for AMHash2, if that contract will be structured like AMHash1. You people are looking at this way too deeply. You get a miner without paying the shipping AND you run 1 TH for a buck sixty three per day without the need of buying a power supply! The div per share is the same as the theoretical reward you would make from a 1 GH miner per second. Really this is like a gift from AM +1
|
|
|
|
Whtwabbit
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2014, 09:53:52 PM |
|
Can Rockminer or Friedcat comment on what happens to the remaining hashrate that doesn't sell during the IPO? Will it be used as self mining or reissued at a lower price?
Somehow I don't think you will be receiving an answer on that one, I would hazard a guess that its all self mining until sold or reduced in price as the hash rate goes up
|
██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████ ██████████ Monero
|
| "The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy." David Chaum 1996 "Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect." Adam Back 2014
|
| | |
|
|
|
stompysteve
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 28, 2014, 03:48:00 AM |
|
Can Rockminer or Friedcat comment on what happens to the remaining hashrate that doesn't sell during the IPO? Will it be used as self mining or reissued at a lower price?
Somehow I don't think you will be receiving an answer on that one, I would hazard a guess that its all self mining until sold or reduced in price as the hash rate goes up im sure they are self mining with it right now until the ipo starts, they said its already been tested why wouldnt they be mining
|
|
|
|
rockxie
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 28, 2014, 10:16:47 AM |
|
Can Rockminer or Friedcat comment on what happens to the remaining hashrate that doesn't sell during the IPO? Will it be used as self mining or reissued at a lower price?
If we can't sell out all of 5P,there are several ways to deal with the remaining hashrates : 1 Sell to big customers directly,some of customers who want to buy lots of hashrates are contacting with us. 2 Sell them with another IPO at HaveLock,such as AMHash2... 3 Sell them at our own website,like other cloud mining companies did. 4 Be always self mining.
|
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 28, 2014, 10:25:38 AM |
|
I think it would been a far more successful IPO launch to offer a tremoundous price per hash for the IPO, which would then attract investors and stimulate the buying and selling on havelock after the IPO. The way it is priced now, although a decent and fair price, you can only really imagine the price going down and that's even if the IPO gets filled at all.
And how would that be good for AM? AM only earn money from the initial purchase. Havelock are the ones who profit from the trading.
|
|
|
|
Puppet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 28, 2014, 11:16:51 AM |
|
How much does AM profit from this deal anyway? For every GH sold on havelock, how much does AM get ?
|
|
|
|
ThunderSheep
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
The sheep who walks through walls.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 28, 2014, 11:29:31 AM |
|
How much does AM profit from this deal anyway? For every GH sold on havelock, how much does AM get ?
I don't have the answer you seek, but for clarity, are you asking what the split between RM and AM is?
|
|
|
|
Dexter770221
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1029
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 28, 2014, 11:39:55 AM |
|
How much does AM profit from this deal anyway? For every GH sold on havelock, how much does AM get ?
I'm understandig this AMHash thing that way: AM is selling tubes/prismas in bulk with a little lower price than 1.0BTC/TH to RM. With delayed payment agreement. RM is building a farm (adding PSU, infrastructure etc.) and selling shares of that farm (1.25BTC/TH). When IPO will close RM will pay for hardware to AM. If not all shares will be sold RM will mine for AM, taking maintenance fee (or AM will be the owner of shares). Deducted from previous answers of rockxie.
|
Under development Modular UPGRADEABLE Miner (MUM). Looking for investors. Changing one PCB with screwdriver and you have brand new miner in hand... Plug&Play, scalable from one module to thousands.
|
|
|
DebitMe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1012
Get Paid Crypto To Walk or Drive
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 28, 2014, 01:28:32 PM |
|
Can Rockminer or Friedcat comment on what happens to the remaining hashrate that doesn't sell during the IPO? Will it be used as self mining or reissued at a lower price?
If we can't sell out all of 5P,there are several ways to deal with the remaining hashrates : 1 Sell to big customers directly,some of customers who want to buy lots of hashrates are contacting with us. 2 Sell them with another IPO at HaveLock,such as AMHash2... 3 Sell them at our own website,like other cloud mining companies did. 4 Be always self mining. I appreciate the reply Rockxie, that answers some questions, but I guess I was getting at what a few other people mentioned afterwards, namely, who currently owns the units? Were they sold to Rockminer by AM? Or are they just being franchised by RM, in which case, are normal franchising fees being paid on these units? Is there some other arrangement besides the aforementioned?
|
|
|
|
Gws24
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 28, 2014, 02:26:43 PM |
|
Number 2 seems like a longshot if AMhash1 doesn't sell. You would need to make a much better offer then even though Amhash1 is already very good when it comes to cloud mining.
I also think that going through Havelock is a mistake. All others are using their own website and using Havelock just confuses customers. Is it a stock or is it cloud mining? Also, the convoluted way of describing associated costs/profits is just lol. As seen in this thread people don't get it and you need to do some math to understand it. It makes it a lot less appealing!
EDIT: What I mean is that with the right website and marketing this could be a great enterprise but the way it is done right now....
|
|
|
|
lucasjkr
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 28, 2014, 03:33:10 PM |
|
Number 2 seems like a longshot if AMhash1 doesn't sell. You would need to make a much better offer then even though Amhash1 is already very good when it comes to cloud mining.
I also think that going through Havelock is a mistake. All others are using their own website and using Havelock just confuses customers. Is it a stock or is it cloud mining? Also, the convoluted way of describing associated costs/profits is just lol. As seen in this thread people don't get it and you need to do some math to understand it. It makes it a lot less appealing!
EDIT: What I mean is that with the right website and marketing this could be a great enterprise but the way it is done right now....
If anything, I think going through havelock is preferential to all the other cloud miners out there. Doing so Guarantees a secondary market, rather than being locked in for the duration of the contract like so many others. True, it could be explained better, but the difficulty is that friedcat is offering a lot more information than you generally get from cloud miners. Whether amhash1 will be a profitable investment is another story.
|
|
|
|
|