If governments would like to forbid cryptocurrencies then using it might be hard without some proxies like tor. Besides missing acceptance merchants the government could force the ISP's to look out for certain ports and connections that lead to the assumption someone is using bitcoin.

At that point it might be needed to use things that were developed by filesharing software devs. Things like dynamic port change, encrypted traffic and such. I think emule, and especially the mods, had alot of ways to stay hidden.

Well of course it can't help against agents taking part in the network and finding your IP. For that only proxies and such are helping.

The logic behind the thread is simply fear of their own miners being rendered useless in an instant.

I might think similar if I would have invested alot in mining but cancelling the halving is never happening. Not even the biggest mining companies would fork the chain to achieve that. They know the community would stay on the old chain and they would mine worthless blocks.

It is an attack since the sole purpose is not to misuse the chain but the attack itself.

Well, we don't need attacks anymore to have trouble getting transactions confirmed. There are hours a day where the blocks are full all the time nearly. Even with high fee it takes a couple of blocks then. And imagine what will happen if everyone pays high fees. Right... we would have the same situation. Unconfirming transactions, only all transactions getting included and that are waiting have way higher fees. No, higher fees are no solution at all. It is survival of the fittest only. And a payment network that plays the survival of the fittest game is surely a payment network that won't survive in the survival of the fittest against cheaper alternatives.

Well, we are not there yet. But the result is clear. Not linearly rising fees, exponentially rising fees is what has to come when nothing happens like bigger blocks or segwit implemented with a timeframe of making an effect that is considerable.

Why? Only because occassional offtopic posts like our two posts now?

That happens in every thread and is not avoidable as long as it is no self moderated thread.

Instead often enough it is about trading and how to do it.

Though I see the "Buy low, sell high" nonsene happening here slowly too. Clear sign of sig spammers exploiting the tread slowly. I mean it can happen occassionall but in other threads it happen way too often to make sense.

What you describe is a life in fear. You are good because you fear the wrath of god or better the damages coming from middle age punishment rules. What good is it to life a better life out of fear?

And education... I'm not sure what you speak about. The real radicals are closing schools for women. And what would be teached? I'm sure it's not different from radical christians in the US. That god created world and NO, of course there is no evolution and such unholy stories.


I know that women are seen that way. Still you can do anything with them. How does it end often enough when a girl is raped? Who is guilty? There is no equality.

And if you really would have experience with woman then you would know that they would not want to be heightened like a princess when it means they have to hide and are incarcerated. They want to be equals. If other men are like carnivores who will hunt every woman that is not hidden then these men are at fault. The solution is not to punish the women with having to hide.

Besides that... isn't it allowed to beat your wife as a husband? And what about honour? Killing your own daugther to reestablish your honour? That might be anachronistic but it happens. And you want the sharia, where people are stoned and hands are cut off. I really don't get you. Don't you see that in fact you demand violence in your life? You will get everything.


I'm not sure who exactly kills the own daugther, but it happens regularly in countries muslim immigrated to. It only can be worse in the countries they are coming from since for sure the bigger radicals will not move to a country full of sin, right?


Naked women with freedom like animals... I you only could read that sentence out of a mind that has no religious rules in mind. You would wave your head over it.

And what is that? "But that is man's freedom. Not woman's." You really think men have to rule or what? You still live in very patriarchalic thought worlds. Everyone should be free. And there is no rule besides those coming from religions that say that woman have to be ruled by man.

I think for 99,99% of the cases this will be the truth. Though I wonder what will that mean for scammer proofs coming from walletexplorer. Guess it does not serve as a total proof now.

At least it can't be exploited by scammers to frame someone. The privkey of another person or shared wallet would be needed. On the other hand, some people sell their private keys. It might mean a risk though I think a small one in the cases I know.

The 750KB limit was the standard soft limit implemented in the core wallet. That limit was only met shortly before the 1MB blocksize increase discussion came up. And it was simply changed by the miners because 1MB blocks were possible all the time.

But I did not hear about spam being blocked because of the 1mb block restriction (includin 750kB soft limit) before the blocks were nearly full.

I now saw that every order someone creates costs a fee of at least 0.0003 bitcoin. That's $0.13 for every order. And then you have the restriction of the order staying alive for 6 days only. I guess an order can't be cancelled?

Man, this all disappoints me. I neve got the idea that it would not be possible to establish a normal orderbook on counterparty.

Guess the only option is to handle an orderbook on a thread or on otc or so. :/

So superBTC are a official currency that is backed by the network or so? But still it sounds like a hassle. What's the difference in exchanging bitcoin to nxt and pay out those to exchanging bitcoin to superBTC and pay out this? (Taking that every shareholder does NOT need a btc address attached...)

Why are orders limited to 6 days? I checked and there is no field or option I missed when I created the order. And of course I don't want my order to disappear. Real orderbooks should start to appear but with this option it surely is very hard.

magnific61


I'm not sure what you say. I know there are civilized islam countries. But you coming up with the sharia... comeon... those are NOT the civilized muslim countries we speak about. Those would rather free rapists because the women was not hidden correctly with a burka.

Or even worse killing the own daugther only because she wants to be free.

Don't tell me that is hearsay... it happens in my country too. Results of twisted minds destorted by rules coming from dark ages.

You know what... you exactly sound like one of these shitheads that would prefer living in the civilized country but cry about not having the sharia here. Guess you would be more happy living where the sharia rules right? Well, I doubt you would. I'm so very sure that you do so many things here and live in so much freedom that you would not want to stay there.

Well, I might be wrong but I know alot of those guys. Babbling nonsense because they feel like not getting what they deserve. Speaking about things they would surely not like having in their live. I wonder how you would feel having to see someone being hacked off the hand. Though maybe you watch beheading videos and it doesn't concern you? Not sure.

I'm only sick of these kids that want to live in the dark age but don't want to live in the dark age. You can't have both.

Well, I'm not afraid. There are enough people that would fight for freedom against religious domination. Well, in a way george bush did holy wars too. Babbling something from god told him to attack the irak and such bullshit. But the problem there are the other radicals. Christian radicals. Something everyone should be aware of too.

When did it serve that purpose? Spam happened all the time with spam transactions over blockchain.info to show up spammy website url's and such. But the 1MB Limit was never met. It only was met now when the blocks are nearly full, in fact they are full on certain hours nearly all the time now.

But before this discussion there was no real spam that was blocked by the 1MB limit. Or was there?

You mean bitcoins on coinbase are insured? Well, there is still the option of the exchange "get hacked" and I wonder if they have found any insurance company that would back such a risky business. The damage would only have to be big enough.

Guess you see I can't trust any centralized exchange anymore.

When you say it this way then it has to be that way. I think it might be interesting to check out the fundamentals of the protocal a bit mire. I did not bother yet about that besides multisig though that something I believed in now is not true anymore is interesting.


I meant walletexplorer.com is for finding connected bitcoin addresses so that you know that they have to be owned by the same wallet. Though now that doesn't sound like something trustworthy anymore. Even when inputs come from 2 address into a transaction, it is maximum a strong hint that they have the same owner. So even that can't be proof of anything.

Well, the thing is that we gave him our money years ago already. We lost it already. Everthing that now comes back is a plus that lowers our loss.

The thing is a bit different than running a stranger away because we can push him forward... The circumstances are that way. So if things don't get into smooth roads soon, now that everything is readymade and he only needs to send the divs each month, we can push.

To be honest, I gave up long ago to believe any of his promise. I can't get my hopes up anymore now. Though I still work on things because I know that we make babysteps at least. We won't sit around silent when things went worse.

For the shareholders... it seems cannabit is up and running on counterparty. The share has a strange name though but it has the real name in comment.

A small div was sent, the issuer claimed he could not get the amount he wanted from his exchanger. He will try to gather the remaining coins in the next days. Let's hope this will happen... soon.

Regarding trading on counterparty. It is very hard to trade shares against bitcoin but against xcp works. Though for some reason there is a timeout of 7 days. Need to ask if that can be avoided.

When creating an order in xcp you might check http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/counterparty/#markets to see the current value.

Hope this will move on it's own from now. Next step remaining divs, step 2 monthly divs coming in regularly... well, one can dream, right?

Sounds like superBTC is only an asset. Another layer to trust then I guess.

I know it is theoretical possible but not out of the box. It would have brought trouble because it would have meant for the issuer that he could pay some in btc, those who took the work to set things up on them, but the rest can't receive btc so he would have to pay nxt. Which would mean more work than simply sending nxt at all.

Hi,

I use okcoin to trade with leverage and lately I tried the add margin feature. It seems it puts more money into the deal and lowers the risk of being called because the threshold moves further away. And the profit or loss is nearing more against zero when I did that.

So what happens exactly? When I buy a contract at 20x leverage and then add margin for the same amount I paid for the contract then would I effectively have the same like I would have had when I would have had done a 10x leverage?

Thanks!

Yobit codes will be sent to me via private message. I then can know for sure who has the right to give me the DUBNX-Address that belongs to that transaction.

The DUB-Address can be used too, thought Yobit codes are better since the DUB wallet seems to be not so reliable. Signatures are not working with the DUB-Wallet is seems because it crashes then. So the scheme for sending via a normal transaction would be to add a certain number of satoshies to each investment. In fact the last 4 numbers of the senders bitcointalk.org user account. Then the user who sent this transaction sends me a pm and I can check the last 4 digits in the transaction value, then check the username of the person claiming he sent it. When it matches then it is very sure that he sent that transaction.

Though that will be explained in detail later.

I did not know that it is possible at all to send bitcoins from different wallets in one transaction. That possibility would make it impossible to surely judge from a transaction with 2 input addresses to the outcome that both addresses were in the same wallet and belong to the same person. Or one could connect his own wallet with another wallet to make it harder to find him.

Or is this only possible with multisig addresses and/or can it be done  with normal addresses too and does the transaction look differently than signed from the same wallet? If so then services like walletexplorer.com has a serious flaw.

Guess one should not get a stubborn one in your way with that scheme...