What's the point of posting your findings in this thread if you're not going to use it as a reference for trust feedback? Besides, your trust review that you leave will help other investigators in the future.

By the way, if you don't give your trust feedback, other members will never add you to their trust lists, and as a result, you won't become a DT. It's sort of like a chicken and egg situation.

Croatia 4-5 Spain

Indeed, it was an incredibly challenging game, Both teams gave it their all, and there were some real nail-biting moments. Spain win on penalties! Congrats!

Croats dominate the stands! The atmosphere is truly impressive. It appears that the Croats have a considerably larger presence than the Spaniards, and they are certainly making more noise. 

However, both teams have yet to score any goals. They are putting up a strong fight and seem evenly matched. Each side has had a few attempts, but the Spaniards have failed to hit the target so far, while the Croatians have managed three shots on goal.

My interpretation doesn't require your agreement to be valid. Bitcointalk.org strives to embrace a free-speech-maximalist approach, and that's its charm - everyone has the right to be delightfully wrong!


Nope. For that to apply, moderators would have to go through the entire account history and evaluate each individual post to see if it was made for personal or business reasons. Obviously, that would be impossible.



For this very reason, adopting such an approach to manage business presence on the forum is flawed. Right now, the forum platform doesn't have the option to create official business profiles like some other platforms do, for example Facebook. So, each account is tied to one person and should ideally be used by just that person. But that doesn't mean businesses can't have more than one representative or staff member on the forum. Each of them can maintain their own accounts and contribute to official threads or answer questions. If one of them gets banned for breaking the rules, the rest are in the clear, and the business presence remains intact.

I respectfully disagree with your interpretation of the forum (not mine) rule. (Again).

The rule specifically states that you cannot "use or create accounts" as long as one of your accounts is banned. I don't see what is not clear and open to interpretation. Nowhere is the distinction made between "personal" accounts and "business" accounts. I don't know where you got that from.

So, if account X (owned by person X) is banned, then person X is not allowed to manage company Y's account (or any other account) on this platform. The ban evasion rule would not make any sense otherwise.

But, I'd still appreciate hearing more opinions from other senior members or moderators regarding this matter. After all, anyone can make a mistake and misinterpret a rule, just like you have done in the past.



I'll get back to this later because I need some time to gather references.

Well, the thing is, statistically speaking, the chances of him going hungry are quite high if he opts for the casino route.  

Yes, I agree that taking a risk is the only way to win big in gambling, but you shuld assess whether it's a risk you can afford to take. I don't think gambling with your grocery money is a smart move.

What types of business? Is it sole proprietorship, or perhaps a self-employed person?? A partnership? Limited Liability Company (LLC)? Corporation? 


So, you're saying that someone who gets banned can easily create a new account, pretend to represent a fictional (or real) business, and continue using the forum without any consequences? It seems you overlooked the fact that the Cratoon account was active across multiple boards and forum threads, not solely limited to discussions about Paradice casino. Additionally, there is evidence of a merit hunt in the WO thread, where the user received a significant number of merits from his alt accounts (naim027 and AnotherAlt), and sent them to build his other alt accounts (Crypt0S0ul and John Abraham). That can't be right, can it?

I think "ban evasion" is a very simple forum rule. This is how I understand it, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong: If one of your accounts is banned, you, as an individual, are no longer allowed to use this platform, regardless of who you represent or work for. The ban applies to the person, not just the account.



That's exaggerated to the point of absurdity. But, if the owner of a grocery store is aware that one of their employees is involved in criminal activities, including being a killer, and fails to report them to the authorities, they bear responsibility as it is their legal obligation to do so. In such a scenario, as a customer, would you feel comfortable patronizing such a grocery store?

Out of sheer curiosity, would you happen to know the whereabouts of these remarkable arbitrage/value bet scanning services? It's for a super important school project, you know.

Basically, you can't really say for sure if both accounts on the bitcointalk forum are controlled by the same person or not? If you think back and recall the interactions you had with them, is it possible that they could be the same individual?

The evidence presented by forum members in this thread, linking the two accounts, appears to be indisputable. Do you have any evidence that contradicts this conclusion?

Even if what you claim is true, your explanation falls apart when you consider that two or more users participate in campaigns using the same wallet addresses and social media accounts. How do you explain the connection between two accounts if not that they are owned by the same user or group?


The whole point of this thread is to expose cheaters like you: greedy and selfish jerks who take advantage of their fellow campaign participants.

I also think that is not the case. It seems that most casinos offer some type of signup or first deposit bonus, which tends to attract new, inexperienced gamblers. Some of these gamblers may not carefully read all the details of the bonus terms, or they may not fully understand the requirements. For instance, if a casino has a 30x or higher wagering requirement on the deposit amount, many players don't realize that the house edge makes it difficult to achieve a positive outcome.


Also, some players may not have enough knowledge about this, so they will be confused about it. As a result, many players go through the same situation and end up losing their money. Which is ultimately very favorable for the casino; and closes a cycle that can continue indefinitely; so long as there are new players to replace those who quit playing.

It would be much more effective if you could explain your point a little more clearly so that we don't have to play guessing games here. I have read your post very carefully, and I can't help but wonder what the whole point is.

At one point, you mentioned your scheme to make gambling a permanent source of income. Then, you stated that there is no 100% surefire method to win in gambling (which I personally agree with). Afterward, you discuss topics such as control, scammers, your years of experience in gambling... which adds to the confusion and makes it difficult to grasp the overall message you're trying to convey.

I totally agree with that! As a general rule, if there's no bad news and the market isn't under negative pressure, Bitcoin tends to pick up its upward trend after a short period of trading sideways. This is because there's a limited supply of new coins and a consistent increase in demand. But here's the catch: we never really know what unexpected curveballs might be lurking around the corner. Who knows what surprises, like the SEC's potential actions and their potential negative impact, may come our way? It's always a bit of a guessing game in the unpredictable world of cryptocurrencies.

I have a hunch that the Netherlands might secure the third-place spot, despite Italy having the upper hand on paper and I agree the home advantage might give the Netherlands a chance to come out on top. Although, Italy put up a strong performance against Spain, it's worth considering their recent form and how well they performed. I agree with your prediction of both teams scoring, and I might even consider placing that bet myself. Good luck if you decide to go ahead with it!

Yeah. While many are focused on the outcome of the final match, we should also pay attention to the match for third place between Italy and the Netherlands. Both teams have a rich history in football and have been struggling in recent years. Italy, once one of the most feared teams in international football, has failed to qualify for the World Cup 2018, and again in 2022. A four-time winner of the tournament and Euro 2020 champions! The Netherlands has been on a gradual decline in their performance ever since clinching the bronze medal at the 2014 World Cup in Brazil, although they did manage to make it to the final of the Nations League in 2019, only to be defeated by the host country, Portugal.

What are your predictions, folks? Which of these two teams do you think will secure the third-place spot?

By the way, unless I'm mistaken, the match is scheduled to take place tomorrow at 15:00 CET, not in a few hours as you mentioned.

Yeah! I've been hanging out on this forum for a while now, and I'm starting to see the same topics pop up again and again. I bet it's even more noticeable for you two "old-timers" who have been around here for a while. You guys have probably seen it all! It's probably pretty rare to come across a brand new topic that hasn't already been talked about before.

I think it would be really cool if we could compile a list of all the most common questions and topics, like a wiki or something. Then, we could just link people to that post when they ask something that's already been covered.

That's true. But some casinos offer deposit bonuses that have conditions so unfavorable to new gamblers that it’s difficult for them to use them. And it's important to be extra cautious in such cases, especially when the conditions are not clearly stated and are hidden in the terms of use, which are often not thoroughly read by users. For example, some casinos offer deposit bonuses that can only be used on slots games. If you like table games and video poker more than slots, this is not good for you. You will be required to play only slots games and lose your money before you can use the bonus.

This is a great topic to discuss in the forum, and I bet many newbies have no clue about it or how to crunch the numbers.

OP, I couldn't help but notice you didn't mention something important. Lots of casinos offer deposit bonuses that come with a catch - you gotta meet specific wagering requirements by playing certain games. Usually, they'll focus on slot games, roulette, or some card games. Why? Well, 'cause these games tend to have a lower Return to Player (RTP) compared to other classic casino games like dice.

I totally agree with what you're saying. The thing is, this guy hasn't really given us any solid evidence or tried to refute any of the points made against him. We've been waiting and waiting, but nothing!

Maybe he's worried about giving away his personal addresses or showing his blockchain transactions. But hey, we're not asking for his life story here, just some basic evidence to back up his claims. Without that, it's hard to take him seriously.


He said: "Think logically. I don't have to disclose my private data to prove that we are not the same person. You will eventually find it if you do your own research with a positive mindset."
So, I just try to think logically and with a positive mindset.



Exactly! It does seem quite convenient that naim027 has kept a record of the entire chat history with Mahdirakib, especially if there's some tension between them after the exposure of his previous alt accounts. But he conveniently deleted all the chat messages he supposedly had with John Abraham? It's definitely raising some eyebrows. Or, for example, he claims to have sent a portion of the earnings from signature campaigns to his personal Binance account, but he has not shown a single transaction of this kind on the blockchain. If there's nothing to hide, why not share ALL the evidence?

Yeah, I'm with you on that one. The whole gambling addiction thing can be a recurring theme around here. But hey, if it's not your cup of tea, just scroll on by, my friend. Ignore it like a pesky pop-up ad. On the other hand, if you feel like it's getting out of hand or becoming a broken record, don't hesitate to hit that report button and let the mods do their magic.

But, people should have the freedom to open topics they're passionate about unless it's crossing any forum rules, of course. At the end of the day, we're all here for different reasons and interests. So, as long as the rules are intact, let the discussions flow and the diverse voices be heard. It's what makes this forum a lively place to be.