Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 09:31:13 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 ... 238 »
1121  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Cloudmining overview on: November 21, 2014, 12:06:46 AM
Good job Puppet! Look what you done: http://www.coindesk.com/chinese-bitcoin-mining-firms-transparency-push/  Grin
1122  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: November 21, 2014, 12:05:44 AM
FYI: http://www.coindesk.com/chinese-bitcoin-mining-firms-transparency-push/

Quote
A consortium of major Chinese bitcoin mining firms including ASICMiner, Gridseed, Rockminer, XBTec and ZeusMiner has pledged to be more transparent in its operations, specifically on the source of cloud mining payouts.

I am still waiting for transparency of the self mining that started this July...
1123  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: November 21, 2014, 12:04:11 AM
It didn't work out, but I don't think it was a scam.

True I believe Ken to be largly incompetant, not a scammer

I have always maintained that this was not a scam, merely a failed business.

What gibberish!  A scam is premeditated.  But if it makes you feel better, call it what you want.

I dont see him as a scammer too but at least he made a lot bad business decisions.

I have to disagree with all of you. This was a scam from day 1. I will tell you my reasons:
1) This was the only company in the mining ecosystem that had a trademark on their chip. Intellihash was the biggest lie from the start. I think that any chip designer can confirm that. Everyone is talking about how easy is to do SHA260 on a chip, that a student can do it, yet Ken had something different than everyone;

2) I would like to see some solid hard proofs that he actually intended to had a chip ready. All we saw was a retard NDA signed with eASIC, nothing else. That NDA could be just an informal talk nothing else. We still don't know or saw any proof that he actually sent money to eASIC to start the job. Even if he did wtf happened? I would like to see the failed project, but there isn't one and never was one;

3) After the so called failed eASIC project what are the proofs that he tried anything else? All I saw is that he bought some third party chips and he tried to sell some hashing boards on a '90 design webshop;

4) Also never saw any proof about the so called mtgox failure. Ken never published all his wallets right?

At least in HashFail we know that they were so dumb to spend all the money on chips, PCBs and components. What Ken did with all those money except buy some third party hardware?

Prove me that I am wrong.
1124  Other / Meta / Re: 2 missing users on: November 20, 2014, 07:07:30 PM
Some of us have life outside the forums...

Of course, but from time to time we all come back here...

There was another thread mentioned both DeathAndTaxes and DannyHamilton were gone at the same period, and suggested they were the same person lol.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=848437.0

Except that DannyHamilton was online today...
1125  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1.3 TH] DeepBit.net PPS+Prop,instant payouts, we pay for INVALID BLOCKS too on: November 20, 2014, 12:20:02 AM
So he closed down the site and ran with our money?

How much?
1126  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: bitcoin deletion project. 21 million to 20 million. on: November 19, 2014, 11:36:27 PM
Don't worry OP. Satoshi already did that in a way.

But this is a very tard idea anyway.
1127  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: "The Hive" a $14,000usd Bitcoin Art Piece on: November 19, 2014, 11:34:51 PM
I am very excited to get this piece. I have not decided on how to keep it though..in a fancy display case or just hang it on the wall? I guess I will decide once it arrives!

Congrats! Looks damn nice.

OP please post a pic where we can see the real size of this thing. Thank you.
1128  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: November 19, 2014, 11:31:11 PM
Ripple Sidechains will blow everything off very soon.

FTFY!
1129  Other / Meta / 2 missing users on: November 19, 2014, 08:25:58 PM
I noticed that 2 long-term and decent users are missing.
1) DeathAndTaxes is inactive since 7 October while his last post is from 29 August;
2) BurtW is inactive since 14 October while his last post is from 11 October.

Both users were pretty active and being offline for 1 month seems to me a bit strange. Anyone knows anything?
1130  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: November 19, 2014, 05:18:20 PM
sry aint gonna feed you more guys, i want these issues, kindly articulated by those venerable members, to be addressed first.

Again a biased reaction. When I raised issues you accused me of trying to sell SP-Tech gear. When someone else raises issues it's ok. When I post a picture it's not ok. When you or someone else posts pictures it's ok. I got used with your biased reactions, don't worry!
1131  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: November 19, 2014, 04:13:20 PM
ffs roadstress, this is AM security thread, not HW. i believe every people watching over this thread also check the HW one. no need to cross post it like the whiny little prick you are.

Really? What about:
IMMERSION COOLING



Also I don't see you criticize this post either:


here's where he intially posted it
This is what i call <image removed> burned miners ;-).

I love biased replies!
1132  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: November 19, 2014, 02:53:29 PM
FinFET isn't magic word that alone can reduce power consumption 10 times (vs 20nm planar). It allows to power devices with little bit lower voltages, and this maybe a secret of 0.07W/GH - low power mode. But performance will be ~1/3 of nominal. At normal operation speed it will be more like 0.15W/GH (0.2W at wall).
Of course KnC propably will decide to operate @ low power modes becuse they have access to cheap chips, so it's better for them to put 3 times more miners than have 2 times more power costs.

+this
...
25 MW worth of 0.07 w/gh hardware is ~350 PH/s. A dozen wafers will get them nowhere.
with new node proccess and yield @ 50%....

Can KnC get a better yield after they receive and test the first set of wafers? If yes then it's a matter of 3-4 months until they can fill their DC.

On another note:



Kaboom!
1133  Economy / Securities / Re: AMHash1: Cost-Effective Mining Contract on: November 19, 2014, 10:39:17 AM
AMHash has 5 Ph/s to sell. There will be as many "IPOs" as required to sell that. They've currently sold 0.63 Ph/s.

Cheapest $/GH and still not selling. Your main argument for selling miners/hashpower just went down.
1134  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: November 19, 2014, 10:36:00 AM
According to http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/36064-tsmc-volume-production-of-16nm-finfet-in-2h-2015 TSMC isn't doing mass production of 16nm FF until late Q2/Q3.  Ergo: KnC is full of shit.  As for 0.07w/GH I'll believe it when i see it.

KnC doesn't need "mass production". A dozen of wafers isn't mass production and that's what KnC needs. Mass production may be for Samsung, not for KnC. What should worry anyone is that they are upgrading their DC to 30MW and only BitFury can compete with that amount of power. No other hardware manufacturer can compete with these 2 giants. And i will not point it towards AM. I'm looking at everyone right now. If they miss the power by a factor of 3 it means they will hit 0.21W/GH. 30MW should bring you A SHIT TON of hashpower that will be deployed and controlled by KnC in their DC. That means less hassle with shipping and assembling miners. We all know they prefer to use skeleton miners (just like BF).
1135  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: November 19, 2014, 10:30:08 AM
KnCMiner web site is currently down, so can't find more details there.

I'm a bit miffed that I found out about this from CoinDesk rather than by an email from KnCMiner. Are they not offering their 3rd gen SHA256 hardware to consumers?

You shouldn't be. KnC announced that they will end their sales towards customers and they will focus on their own big farm AFTER THEY HAVE DECLARED THAT THEY WILL NOT DO IT!
1136  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Mining ASICs Technologies Promises 6TH/s Bitcoin Miner And 200 MH/s Scrypt Miner on: November 18, 2014, 11:59:47 PM
I find out about MAT on google and was reading a lots on coin forum. Why should someone always have to joint a forum if there want to start in scrypt or some coin. Is that a must?? And i am not defending MAT there make a lots of mistakes but that doesnt mean there are bad. I am also waiting for my miner like ever body els!!
Why start a war? There is a say: you are innocent until proven guilty. Is there a lawsuit yet? Maybe it is a scam that is my problem, so dont call me a puppet dude you dont know me. Why hate the newbie? Because he is late at this game? That makes no sens....So i have to proof to someone i dont know i am real yeah right what kind of world are we living in....

Yes because every regular miner decides to jump on a forum to defend a random company. Yes that makes much sense. It's too obvious that you are lying.

SCAM ALERT!

oh - I have plenty to say - but it's already been said in the threads that have beaten those companies to death - at least MAT is delivering machines!

To how many customers they have delivered so far? 3? Or 5?
1137  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Mining ASICs Technologies Promises 6TH/s Bitcoin Miner And 200 MH/s Scrypt Miner on: November 18, 2014, 11:14:38 PM

Please eat more shit! Delivering a couple of miners means nothing. As the above quote says they have ~45 units. Of course they will show a couple to try to fool more idiots into sending them money without any plans to deliver products.

Quote
Mining Asics told already several weeks that they have already shipped miners to their customers. But only a few customers will receive their miners because MAT does have only less than 45 pieces of Excalibur 5 miners. MAT doesnt have more miners in stock and no money for production or for customer refunds.
MAT is a big SCAM Company and Mining Asics Technologies B.V. is not able to deliver any miners to their customers.

SCAM ALERT!
1138  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Mining ASICs Technologies Promises 6TH/s Bitcoin Miner And 200 MH/s Scrypt Miner on: November 18, 2014, 10:59:16 PM
eat your hearts out haters!

That proves nothing. As it was already posted MAT paid for some third party chips to be painted with their logo. And yes they have delivered a few miners to a couple of "customers". That still doesn't prove they aren't a scam with so many sock-puppets accounts. This is AMT all over again.

I just joint the scrypt and MAT was my first investment in an miner so that is why i never been here before.
Still is not right just calling people puppets of MAT that is a insult dude!! You dont know me like i say i am just a customer so dont call me what i am not. That is just rude bro!!! Who do you think you are bro...ever body have to start somewhere. So i am a bit late to joint the scrypt that make me a puppet bro you are a sick dude!!!

How did you find out about MAT miners? Why haven't you joined this forum long before today? Why join today to defend MAT?

@to both of the above: Feel free to throw all your shit towards me. It only shows that you are avoiding legitimate and reasonable questions which is making this SCAM more and more obvious!
1139  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Mining ASICs Technologies Promises 6TH/s Bitcoin Miner And 200 MH/s Scrypt Miner on: November 18, 2014, 10:01:05 PM
First i am not from MAT and i dont know someone at MAT. I am just some one with a order. Just because you didn't got your miner yet doesnt mean there are a bad company. A lots of people aready got there miner and there dont what to share the info. If you call ever body some sock puppet of MAT that is insulting dude. I think you should think before you speak bro!

Why did you come to post here right now if you are not MAT? How come that you weren't present here before?
1140  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: November 18, 2014, 09:56:04 PM
What is the power consumption for a Titan that does 320MH/s?
Pages: « 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 ... 238 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!