Hey, another update for everyone. I tweeted out that the last of the core code for payouts was finished yesterday. I'll be doing some additional testing and if all goes well the 1.0 balances will start being shifted into available balances (yes, for withdraw) slowly starting Saturday.
That's all fine and dandy but none of my previous balances show up. I don't think I'm the only one either. It wasn't much but why don't they show up? |
|
|
|
I finally had to ignore someone. Just can't stand reading shotxjai9robfowbcjbla12408's spew anymore. The amount of time he spends clucking here is
just silly. If he want's to crusade against something there are far better ways to spend time than trying to chase people off of a coin.
To be honest we might be seeing signs of a mental disorder in him. I'm wondering if there is someone we should contact so they can try to
help this schmuck.
Hmm, my recent posts were nothing bad about DRK. Strange. Mental disorder? There are plenty of other individuals that post in this thread that you should be ignoring if mental disorder is your criteria. But to each his own I guess. You have the right to ignore me and I have the right to not care. |
|
|
|
|
Like clockwork, the price of DRK starts to rise after I make a series of posts.
|
|
|
|
I can be sensible when I want to be.
Those links were just a couple I found with a quick search on google. One was closed for bidding on May 28th with an average bid of $5,785.71 and I don't know the outcome as that information isn't available. But I would pay that amount for an FPGA X11 miner and I'm sure many others would as well. If I did I definitely wouldn't want anyone to know about it. I'd secretly mine and make as much as I could. Another thing that could happen is that a good programmer that has not been involved in crypto could see a job request like that, do a little research and figure out that they could make a fortune coding it and keeping it for themselves. I'm convinced that X11 FPGA miners exist and if people disagree that's fine.
It's just hard to believe that with the amount of possible profit involved that someone hasn't done it. We have private GPU miners mining coins before public ones are released so It's most likely the same with FPGA's. There are some very intelligent and extremely competent coders involved in crypto. People are definitely experimenting and most likely have been successful.
Statement 1: I'm convinced that X11 FPGA miners exist and if people disagree that's fine. Statement 2: But I would pay that amount for an FPGA X11 miner and I'm sure many others would as well. Conclusion - well, then why don't you go for it? This is nothing to fight with your logic on the secret mining - that is sound. But if you were so convinced there are easy money to be made I would be surprised you would not go for it and rather talk about it on the forum. I don't think that I could find anyone willing do it because they stand to make much more coding it and keeping it for themselves. My coding skills are not good enough to do it or else I would be on here proclaiming that X11 FPGA miners don't exist, where's the proof? While I mine away in secret not telling a soul. If anyone is interested in coding a working X11 FPGA miner with significant hashrate increase over GPU's not just something hacked together that works, I'll pay $5000. I doubt I'll get any takers. Just like thefrog didn't get any response. Why sell something for $5000 that could make you rich? |
|
|
|
Shojayx, that was actually quite a sensible post. Nevertheless it is still just a fishing attempt on freelancer website carried out by the same person. Interesting but not a proof. I have also placed some projects on freelancer which later turned out to be much more difficult than originally intended.. But who cares, it only cost about 3$ to put one of these up. I can be sensible when I want to be. Those links were just a couple I found with a quick search on google. One was closed for bidding on May 28th with an average bid of $5,785.71 and I don't know the outcome as that information isn't available. But I would pay that amount for an FPGA X11 miner and I'm sure many others would as well. If I did I definitely wouldn't want anyone to know about it. I'd secretly mine and make as much as I could. Another thing that could happen is that a good programmer that has not been involved in crypto could see a job request like that, do a little research and figure out that they could make a fortune coding it and keeping it for themselves. I'm convinced that X11 FPGA miners exist and if people disagree that's fine. It's just hard to believe that with the amount of possible profit involved that someone hasn't done it. We have private GPU miners mining coins before public ones are released so It's most likely the same with FPGA's. There are some very intelligent and extremely competent coders involved in crypto. People are definitely experimenting and most likely have been successful. Edit: I want to point out that I am not saying it is bad for DRK like the post that started this conversation. In my opinion it wouldn't be a big deal for DRK. What it is a big deal for are new X11 coins getting raped by private FPGA miners at launch and then dumped for a quick profit essentially killing the coin. Oh wait that doesn't sound too bad. An X11 FPGA miner that has a negligible effect if any on Darkcoin but effectively destroys the plethora of X11 shitclones that come out daily. I would think that DRK supporters would want to get a public X11 FPGA as soon as possible to prevent a private miner from having an unfair advantage with regards to mining costs and profits. So instead of denying they exist or fearing them they should embrace them. |
|
|
|
That shojayxt fool must have a hickup.. He is only posting "This user is currently ignored." "This user is currently ignored." "This user is currently ignored." "This user is currently ignored." over and over again.
Crypto cancer back, again? Cancer? Don't you know by now that everytime I post the price for DRK goes up? But back to one of the points I made in a few posts up regarding people being attacked for being anything but 100% Cheerleader. I raised some valid points regarding X11 FPGA's and pointed out the fact that the most vocal people telling people to hold are the early adopters. And because of that I'm cancer. I could go on and call you names but I won't. You know the same things I do. I just talk about them while you and the rest pretend they don't exist. |
|
|
|
Except if you are a day-trader expecting 20% down this Week-end, stop telling the worst phrase ever : "When DRK is open-source, reviewed and RC5 released, DRK will soar"
Let's study what is the immediate effect on different kinds of people :
- Noob's point of view : "It won't rise until centuries, I want to be rich in a month time, let's find another copycoin with better timeframe"
- Twitter guru : "sell, no point to talk of DRK to my 3000 followers, they are doing nothing bankable until 2015, I cant earn money with a panic buy"
- Day-Trader : "I can buy for less in a week, sell 10K DRK on Mintpal
- Technical Analyst : Sell, the first pump is over, the trend is blablabla
- Experimented trader : "good coin, but sell because of all the things above"
- Honnest DRK holder : "Wow, it is the best coin, I buy more at these cheap prices. Let's borrow some money or use kids savings"
Then again
- Honnest DRK holder: "Why I am becoming poorer ? Why did I buy at 0.02 ? Why ddin't I sell at 0.1 ?...Kids won't go to college..."
- Day-trader : "I was right, I have 15K DRK with only 1K a few months ago."
- (Ancient) noob : "I made 50 % more with the other coin, and there is no news here since !!! I fully support the other coin now (becoming honnest other coin holder) "
- Twitter guru : DRK is still alive ?
- Experimented trader : "good coin, but sell again because of all the things above"
Everytime people write "As soon as...", "Hold until review, RC5, open-source,whatever", "2015", "long term", they are just making smart people flee from DRK, especially the few who can make a difference in price.
Please ban these words :
- I use DRK everyday for basic privacy reason, no need to say "In 2015..."
- By the way, it won't soar when open-source, reviewed and RC5 released, stop lying to noobs. They are loosing confidence and will support other coins.
Conclusion, no other altcoin will ever have a chance. Each new coin will maybe have a organiced pump to scam noobs and thats all the altcoingame offers until there is no noob over and whale eats whale. Game over There is also the echo chamber effect prevalent in many coin threads. You get the guys that attack anyone for questioning anything. They call them "weak hands" if they don't want to hold for some unknown long term point in time. Just in this thread the people that were most vocal are the early adopters that got cheap coins early. They are still in profit even at this price. Anyone that bought and held mid May is underwater right now despite having plenty of exit points. It's too bad that they got manipulated into holding their coins while those telling them to hold and hyping the coin were selling for mass profits. This chart says it all:  All we've been hearing from these same people for the last three months is Hold Hold Hold while the price went Down Down Down. It's not surprising that people have lost all faith. Especially considering the abusive nature these people have exhibited towards anyone questioning anything or voicing valid concerns, or raising any doubt. |
|
|
|
Where is all the proof that ASICs are coming or FPGAs are mining... not seeing it. So far these have all been speculation and rumors.
You doubt that there are people mining X11 with FPGA's? |
|
|
|
X11-asic is coming,not a good sign for DRK.  Why? That's fantastic news if true. I would love to have a small USB ASIC that can mine X11 more efficiently than a whole rack of GPUs... (if true) the fact that a manufacturer is willing to fund, research and develop ASICs for a specific coin tells you how valuable they think this coin is. I doubt an ASIC would be developed just for DRK but there are many other X11 coins now so it makes more sense. |
|
|
|
X11-asic is coming,not a good sign for DRK. People have been mining X11 with FPGA's for awhile now. ASIC's will just open it up for more people. ASIC's have been discussed in this thread. From what I remember it was determined to be just a natural progression in the evolution of the coin. Similar to the way bitcoin mining evolved. |
|
|
|
Except if you are a day-trader expecting 20% down this Week-end, stop telling the worst phrase ever : "When DRK is open-source, reviewed and RC5 released, DRK will soar"
Let's study what is the immediate effect on different kinds of people :
- Noob's point of view : "It won't rise until centuries, I want to be rich in a month time, let's find another copycoin with better timeframe"
- Twitter guru : "sell, no point to talk of DRK to my 3000 followers, they are doing nothing bankable until 2015, I cant earn money with a panic buy"
- Day-Trader : "I can buy for less in a week, sell 10K DRK on Mintpal
- Technical Analyst : Sell, the first pump is over, the trend is blablabla
- Experimented trader : "good coin, but sell because of all the things above"
- Honnest DRK holder : "Wow, it is the best coin, I buy more at these cheap prices. Let's borrow some money or use kids savings"
Then again
- Honnest DRK holder: "Why I am becoming poorer ? Why did I buy at 0.02 ? Why ddin't I sell at 0.1 ?...Kids won't go to college..."
- Day-trader : "I was right, I have 15K DRK with only 1K a few months ago."
- (Ancient) noob : "I made 50 % more with the other coin, and there is no news here since !!! I fully support the other coin now (becoming honnest other coin holder) "
- Twitter guru : DRK is still alive ?
- Experimented trader : "good coin, but sell again because of all the things above"
Everytime people write "As soon as...", "Hold until review, RC5, open-source,whatever", "2015", "long term", they are just making smart people flee from DRK, especially the few who can make a difference in price.
Please ban these words :
- I use DRK everyday for basic privacy reason, no need to say "In 2015..."
- By the way, it won't soar when open-source, reviewed and RC5 released, stop lying to noobs. They are loosing confidence and will support other coins.
Spot on! |
|
|
|
It feels good knowing that after I dumped my DRK I put it into other coins and have made over 20% off that BTC that was wasting away on a masternode paying maybe 1 drk a day. It must be frustrating to be watching all these other coins going to the moon while sitting on a few thousand drk in masternodes making a couple dollars a day at most. So many people are missing out on profitable opportunities while they sit waiting for some release candidate to . I actually feel sorry for them. I sold my DRK awhile back except for 1000 wasted on a masternode with pathetic returns and this validates my decision: This is where I put some of that BTC:  Any questions? |
|
|
|
aleix is camo's little bitch. That ignorant loser camo get's his panties all in a bunch so his little loverboys come out to attack me. Too funny. Ignore me! Ignore Me! Ha ha ha! Looks like you have another mutt in the darkcoin community that needs a muzzle. |
|
|
|
|
This is a bitcoin forum, not a "Why do some people hate me?" forum.
There is no reason to make a thread about yourself when this is a cryptocurrency forum. Oh wait.............it's all about attention isn't it?
This thread should be deleted as SPAM.
|
|
|
|
Just wanted to point out.....
StealthCoin will implement (Sublinear signatures) "Chandran Signatures" - this is ring signatures WITHOUT the block chain bloat
Ring signatures provide TRUE anoniminity - there is no doubt about that - but they suffer from bloating the block chain - this is why sublinear signatures are a good way to do anon - but wihout the bloat
Ring Signature coins (Crypto Note Coins) are not feasible for high volume transactions - the chain would grow to large to fast if people started using it like bitcoin or litecoin is used - Stealthcoin wont have this problem - which means stealthcoin could handle VISA or Mastercard type volume without being bloated out to butt fuck no where
Chandran signatures are square root in size - so it means that a 36KB ring signature now becomes a 4KB Chandran signature - means less space eaten on the block chain (faster synch times etc)
Crypto Note coins are impractical due to the large space requirements - this is why stealth will utilize "Sub linear Signatures" or "Chandran signatures" and be immune to the bloat - it allows to handle bitcoin volume like transactions
Chandran signatures (sublinear signatures) were conceptualized at UCLA (they are a real thing that DOES work) - stealth coin will be the FIRST coin to implant such thing
BBR (Boolberry) was close to solving the bloat problem by pruning and expiring signatures - but this is not the optimal way to do it - "Chandran" SubLinear signatures is the PROPER and optimal way to do it - by means that the signatures themselves will no consume near the space - so no need to prune
AND THAT'S WHY XST WILL SEE AT LEAST A 10m MARKETCAP. THIS IS JUST THE BEGINING.
You have a whitepaper nothing more |
|
|
|
Yeah right. All they have is a whitepaper. Talk is cheap but is good for a pump in cryptoworld. Nothing more. |
|
|
|
Proof or GTFO. That ID doesn't mean anything. EDIT: rofl. One of the Devs   |
|
|
|
|
Of course it's possible. I don't know how and if I did I would never be that malicious. But I'm sure there are those that could succeed at destroying it.
A better question is how did this thread grow to 7 pages when the answer to your question can be answered with one word. YES
|
|
|
|
also, the main thread is not self-moderated, unlike darkcoin, xc, etc.
The darkcoin thread is not moderated, stop lying. You got that right. Although I think I have caused some members of that community to wish it was. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
