goodluckpool
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 12, 2014, 10:01:52 AM |
|
over 30% of DRK being mined are mined by multipools who will instantly sell them for BTC or LTC ... not good for the DRK prices...
That is interesting, can I ask you how did you find the number of DRK mined by multipools? Also, if I am counting correctly, at current prices darkcoin worth 28 BTC are mined a day so 9 BTC a day would be instantly sold by multipools for BTC/LTC - which is about 2% of daily volume on a very slow trading day - does this really have a significant impact on the price of DRK? You are correct, they are only selling 9 BTC per day... I found the 30% multipool number by counting the multipools from this website http://drk.poolhash.org/poolhash.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even if you use Bitcoin through Tor, the way transactions are handled by the network makes anonymity difficult to achieve. Do not expect your transactions to be anonymous unless you really know what you're doing.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
GhostPlayer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:02:23 AM |
|
Now THIS made me laugh!!!   I wonder I wonder, why not 0.10.11.6 ... any takers? |
|
|
|
|
shojayxt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:05:04 AM |
|
Please repost ! (as long as it takes) ….>>  Are you serious? Did you even stop and think about what you were doing before you made this post? A picture of a terrorist with a gun? Really? Do you think this is funny? You ass wipes have been threatening people and now you post this shit? I have buddies that died on foreign soil fighting scumbag terrorists like this guy. You make me sick. First a cop now a terrorist. Well we finally see what the Darkcoin community is all about. Your true colors are in full display. I'm going to mine on the non-compliant pools and feel good about not letting you extortionists steal 20% of my mining proceeds. Then I'm going to sell it and use the proceeds to buy cryptonote coins that offer anonymity without this bullshit masternode network that taxes the poor and gives to the rich. Some guy posted some pages back about making 1 btc a week running his masternodes. How many miners even get a fraction of 1 btc a week mining darkcoin? Yet these same miners are now being forced to give up 20% of what they mine so some guy with 50,000 DRK can make a btc a week while they likely don't even break even. This entire masternode tax is nothing more than a scheme that allows the rich to get richer while the miners get screwed. And don't give me that argument about the price increasing and it will help the miners. Guys are making btc running masternodes and the price of Darkcoin keeps going down. What a joke. I would have left this thread alone but when some jackass posts a picture of a terrorist with the words "Do it now or we have to come over there" there is no way I'm going to just sit back. I saw the rubble of the Twin Towers in Manhattan a month after they came over here. Anyone wanting to boycott the 20% tax taken from the poor and given to the rich please use the following pools listed below.
Last EDIT: July 12th
These are the major pools that pay 20% more DRK
nicehash.com
ghash.io
x11.ltc1btc.com
darkcoin.cryptocurrency.tw
dark.hashrate.eu
dark.v2.dedicatedpool.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drobek
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:05:41 AM |
|
That is interesting, can I ask you how did you find the number of DRK mined by multipools? Also, if I am counting correctly, at current prices darkcoin worth 28 BTC are mined a day so 9 BTC a day would be instantly sold by multipools for BTC/LTC - which is about 2% of daily volume on a very slow trading day - does this really have a significant impact on the price of DRK? [/quote] You are correct, they are only selling 9 BTC per day... I found the 30% multipool number by counting the multipools from this website http://drk.poolhash.org/poolhash.html[/quote] Thanks! So I assume you must know which of those pools are multipools then :-) |
|
|
|
|
|
dark-sailor
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:06:10 AM |
|
Thanks bud.. yes cheaplin Is a genius as well as all the darkcoin team Thanks to them all |
|
|
|
|
thelonecrouton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:16:39 AM |
|
Evan's restraint in deploying the Fist of God is amazing. I would flip the switch without hesitation, in fact this would be the ideal time to do so - get the message across and verify that God Mode works before RC4. I'm struggling to see the benefit of effectively allowing pools to mine on outdated and uncompliant code - it's like they have forked anyway and we're helping them insert and integrate incorrect blocks for... what...  |
|
|
|
|
doubleredrolex
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 211
Merit: 100
I Believe
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:19:12 AM |
|
I think i need to buy some more DRK before RC4 gets launched... We'll never see these prices again.
|
|
|
|
|
GhostPlayer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:34:01 AM |
|
Evan's restraint in deploying the Fist of God is amazing. I would flip the switch without hesitation, in fact this would be the ideal time to do so - get the message across and verify that God Mode works before RC4. I'm struggling to see the benefit of effectively allowing pools to mine on outdated and uncompliant code - it's like they have forked anyway and we're helping them insert and integrate incorrect blocks for... what... Not half an hour ago I sent a message out asking exactly that. We're at 75% compliance now, we were up to 85% yesterday, but them damn x11.ltc1btc.com got a chunk of the pie and brought us back down a little. I'm not qualified to make such judgments, but seems like a good time to flip the switch, get near instant network consensus, and get going! Guess I'm just a little too anxious, which is why I really appreciate Evan taking a big step back and thinking things through. |
|
|
|
|
|
dotnetmin
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:37:20 AM |
|
over 30% of DRK being mined are mined by multipools who will instantly sell them for BTC or LTC ... not good for the DRK prices...
plus you forgot to add that 20% of DRK being "mined" for free almost and dumped at any price, way below the price a proper miner can sell for profit Where should these 20% come from for free ? |
|
|
|
|
toknormal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1188
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:37:24 AM |
|
I'm struggling to see the benefit of effectively allowing pools to mine on outdated and uncompliant code - it's like they have forked anyway and we're helping them insert and integrate incorrect blocks for... what... I think Evan wants to respect the decentralised mining ethic as much a possible (well - he doesn't have much choice). "God" is a centralised concept. Ultimately, it isn't god who "flips the switch", it's the mining population. Unless they agree, it's a no show for RC4. So we want a nice, smooth *concensual* transition, not a versioning battle between the devs and the miners. Evan has got the right approach. I don't give sh*t about my few missed masternode payments - keeping all players on board this ship is much more important. EDIT: Hey !! I just noticed I got "senior poster" status. That makes me feel kind of geriatric. Might have to get myself a "newb" account to revitalise myself. |
|
|
|
|
shojayxt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:39:33 AM |
|
Whoever just dumped those 9k coins... You are smart.
|
|
|
|
|
GhostPlayer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:41:13 AM |
|
I'm struggling to see the benefit of effectively allowing pools to mine on outdated and uncompliant code - it's like they have forked anyway and we're helping them insert and integrate incorrect blocks for... what... I think Evan wants to respect the decentralised mining ethic as much a possible (well - he doesn't have much choice). "God" is a centralised concept. Ultimately, it isn't god who "flips the switch", it's the mining population. Unless they agree, it's a no show for RC4. So we want a nice, smooth *concensual* transition, not a versioning battle between the devs and the miners. Evan has got the right approach. I don't give sh*t about my few missed masternode payments - keeping all players on board this ship is much more important. +1 ... I'm overly excited seing my nodes get payed when it was at 50% consensus, let alone now! |
|
|
|
|
toknormal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1188
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:42:15 AM |
|
Whoever just dumped those 9k coins... At least it keeps the supply of "fried goat testicles" buoyant. |
|
|
|
|
thelonecrouton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:51:37 AM |
|
I'm struggling to see the benefit of effectively allowing pools to mine on outdated and uncompliant code - it's like they have forked anyway and we're helping them insert and integrate incorrect blocks for... what... I think Evan wants to respect the decentralised mining ethic as much a possible (well - he doesn't have much choice). "God" is a centralised concept. Ultimately, it isn't god who "flips the switch", it's the mining population. Unless they agree, it's a no show for RC4. So we want a nice, smooth *concensual* transition, not a versioning battle between the devs and the miners. Evan has got the right approach. I don't give sh*t about my few missed masternode payments - keeping all players on board this ship is much more important. EDIT: Hey !! I just noticed I got "senior poster" status. That makes me feel kind of geriatric. Might have to get myself a "newb" account to revitalise myself. I think a successful demonstration of spork enforcement would be very good for the coin. Consensus is a mutable term - if uncompliant pools don't want to play by the same rules as the rest of us, they are free to go away and play on their own worthless fork. At the moment, Evan has a switch instead of that switch being nonexistant and the software simply orphaning uncompliant blocks by itself - the mining population remains free to mine wherever they want. You'll never get a 'nice, smooth *concensual* transition' in a world full of dunderheads. Play the game or get off the pitch... |
|
|
|
|
shojayxt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:53:13 AM |
|
Constantly amazes me. the last 2000 pages have been full of people trying to bring down darkcoin.
I still don't know why.
Missed the boat, jealousy, early miners dumped too cheap, other coins losing miners. Who knows.
$5trillion changes hands each day around the world, and Darkcoin is a threat to people?
Envy pure and simple. There are many people invested in various copy coins. Since DRK is a brilliant idea, it cannot die and it will not die. You idiots are doing fine on your own. Is the terrorist with a gun your new spokesman? Disgusting |
|
|
|
|
stealth923
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:57:57 AM |
|
I am a worthless donkey
The only terrorist here is you. |
|
|
|
|
GhostPlayer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:58:29 AM |
|
There is good and bad in every corner of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
ziggurat
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:58:53 AM |
|
Stop spamming same shit over and over again, moron. Nobody takes your bullshit seriously here. |
|
|
|
|
shojayxt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:01:09 AM |
|
I'm struggling to see the benefit of effectively allowing pools to mine on outdated and uncompliant code - it's like they have forked anyway and we're helping them insert and integrate incorrect blocks for... what... I think Evan wants to respect the decentralised mining ethic as much a possible (well - he doesn't have much choice). "God" is a centralised concept. Ultimately, it isn't god who "flips the switch", it's the mining population. Unless they agree, it's a no show for RC4. So we want a nice, smooth *concensual* transition, not a versioning battle between the devs and the miners. Evan has got the right approach. I don't give sh*t about my few missed masternode payments - keeping all players on board this ship is much more important. EDIT: Hey !! I just noticed I got "senior poster" status. That makes me feel kind of geriatric. Might have to get myself a "newb" account to revitalise myself. Consensus is a mutable term - if uncompliant pools don't want to play by the same rules as the rest of us, they are free to go away and play on their own worthless fork. At the moment, Evan has a switch instead of that switch being nonexistant and the software simply orphaning uncompliant blocks by itself - the mining population remains free to mine wherever they want.You'll never get a 'nice, smooth *concensual* transition' in a world full of dunderheads. Play the game or get off the pitch... The only dunderheads are the arrogant assholes like you that think anyone that isn't a crazy Darkcoin Cult Member like you is a worthless piece of shit. Then you have your nonchalant attitude towards miners making statements like "the mining population remains free to mine wherever they want". Will the network function without miners? Will new coins be mined without miners? You better shut you cack smacker and start showing the people that this coin needs to survive the respect they deserve instead of being in such a hurry to put your greedy hand in their pocket to take 20% of their coin. The arrogance and feeling of entitlement in this thread is disgusting. Don't like what I have to say? What are you going to do? Send your terrorist buddy over here to get me? |
|
|
|
|
shojayxt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:05:42 AM |
|
I'm struggling to see the benefit of effectively allowing pools to mine on outdated and uncompliant code - it's like they have forked anyway and we're helping them insert and integrate incorrect blocks for... what... I think Evan wants to respect the decentralised mining ethic as much a possible (well - he doesn't have much choice). "God" is a centralised concept. Ultimately, it isn't god who "flips the switch", it's the mining population. Unless they agree, it's a no show for RC4. So we want a nice, smooth *concensual* transition, not a versioning battle between the devs and the miners. Evan has got the right approach. I don't give sh*t about my few missed masternode payments - keeping all players on board this ship is much more important. +1 ... I'm overly excited seing my nodes get payed when it was at 50% consensus, let alone now!Screw you and your nodes. ghostplayer "Gee this is great! Look at all the BTC I get to take from those miners". Miner "Damn, I wasn't even breaking even and now I have to give 20% so ghostplayer can get paid". Doesn't that scenario remind anyone of anything? |
|
|
|
|
|
