That was an unofficial site created by SmiGueL. And he was getting the information from the newspaper? There was some kind of official information about the hashrate because otherwise how could he create the site? I am sure he wasn't making up the hashrate posted there. My problem is not with the design team, it's with the management, sales, support and PR. FC seems to just be hiring his friends who don't know what the hell they're doing. That's why I suggest looking into buying out BitFountain, so we could put some people in place who actually have a clue what they're doing. I have stated in the past that FC found out a method to get money out of the company without paying the shareholders (hint: rockxie mining), but you bashed me back then. I am glad to see you coming back to earth. |
|
|
|
If this is true then the next logical question is why is the hashrate not posted? I seem to remember the company telling shareholders that once self-mining is operational the hashrate would be posted up as previously in Gen1.
According to FC, AM have been self-mining since mid-July. Also, as far as I can remember, the hash rate was never posted by AM for gen 1. But we were told that we'd get a hash meter this time round, so fuck knows what's going on with that or anything else related to AM I think it's time us shareholders started asking about buying out bitfountain. It was posted for gen1 chips: http://www.asicminercharts.com/live/ |
|
|
|
If this is true then the next logical question is why is the hashrate not posted? I seem to remember the company telling shareholders that once self-mining is operational the hashrate would be posted up as previously in Gen1.
When I asked the same question the angry shareholder group accused me of promoting SP-Tech. Let's see what's the answer now. |
|
|
|
Stop talking out your arse. I have no problem with criticising AM and AM shareholders and have been extremely vocal in that regard myself, for example: It's my opinion that a lot of investors simply don't understand how mining works. If they did, then they would understand that AM hardware and shares are vastly overpriced.
............
All you do though, is try to wind people up. You did it all wrong. You raised an issue about the Blades that were selling like hot cakes. The blades were a good business decision at that time in my opinion. I have a problem with the 2014 decisions. Show me a proof of you criticizing AM this year because in my view the fall started this year, not last year. Last and this year are totally different things. |
|
|
|
Price announced for AMHash2: 0.0012. 500,000 units available
1) available tomorrow, they just screwed over all the amhash1 ipo buyers 2) it's a 500th cloud, that rather than be another ipo round in amhash1, decided to be a seperate fund for no good reason. 3) the ipo is entirely copied and pasted from amhash1. pricing, 5ph claim, everything is a total copy and paste job under the guise of a new asset. This is total nonsense. Glad I passed on the first round, since these guys have no clue what they are doing Wow, what an idiot. You are not buying shares in a company you are buying hashing power in chunks of 1 GH/s. Does AM selling more reduce that? Of course it doesn't? All "shares" are still worth 1 Gh/s. I don't even know why AMHash is even talking about "IPOs" and crap like that. The mining contracts should be constantly available to purchase. More anger from a sad AM shareholder and more bad decisions made by the AM team. Go AM go! To da moon! |
|
|
|
..<snip>I remembered that and now I want to stick it into all shareholders face because it was a stupid argument.</snip>
How old are you Roadstress? Five? I'm 6 actually! It may sound stupid for you, but for me it shows that I was right and it gives me momentum to continue in doing what I'm doing. Carry on. |
|
|
|
I cannot express how glad I am I sold my SP20 immediately for exactly what I paid for it given they have 0 regard for those who purchased early (as show in the lowering of prices 1 week after delivery without equal compensation to early supporters).
Lowered the price 1 week after delivery, but shipping is one week later so that makes it 2 weeks. Also you should know by now that mining hardware price is always going down. I don't think you were expecting the same price until the end of the year. The hardware was actually shit too, hence why they had to stop selling it to sort the problems out.
They had issues with shipping, not with the actual hardware, but yes feel free to spread your anger/shit here. |
|
|
|
ActiveMining....... whole different kettle of fish. next you will be comparing AM with labcoin. I applaud your do gooder efforts, have the chocolate teapot award, you deserve it. so again you come here to question people about how much money they have made in the last year...... or should we rephrase that to how you really meant it, how much money have AM share holders lost this year? you get kicks out of pointing out the obvious....... I pity you more than those who bought shares at 4.5btc  I am not comparing. I was giving an example of another company that was slowly going down. In my view it's exactly where AM is right now. Slowly going down and I stated the reasons of why I think this way in the past while being accused of trying to promote another company. Yes I come here to question people about how much money have they made in the last year because in the past I was told that this company is the best and that we shouldn't question their business decisions because they paid shareholders 6x what they invested. I remembered that and now I want to stick it into all shareholders face because it was a stupid argument. AM is still operating on the profits they earned from the capital they raised from IPO and have already paid shareholders 6x what they invested. That's the difference. |
|
|
|
Your constant antagonizing of the sittuation with AM does not really do anything or have an effect.... i mostly yawn when i see your name these days, your as bitter as some of the harcore early miners who sold 20,000 btc at $1 and didn't look back until they heard the price hit $50..... go take your significant other for a nice night out and stop concerning yourself with a company you don't even own shares in....... I honestly don't think i have come accross such a tiresome poster as yourself..... i prefer notlambchop or puppet.
You are wrong. My antagonizing of the situation makes Mabsark magically pop on SP-Tech thread. It is a fun game for now. Edit: Oh and I did this for other companies too (like ActM) so you are not so special. It's just something that I do. Accept it. Second edit: Those "IPOs" are idiotic. AMHash isn't selling shares in some company. They're supposed to be selling hashing power yet had no shares up for a good few days and the price went above IPO price. So AMHash could have sold more shares but didn't. To limit the amount of time those shares are available to purchase is simply lunacy, they need to be available to purchase round the clock.
And they need to be promoted too. I've seen fuck all in that regards except unofficial promotion by shareholders. As stated before FC took numerous bad business decisions. I did outline some of them in the past, but instead of discussing them you chose to bash me. I have no problem with that, but I'm glad that you start to realize them. Gen 4 tape out was in September. It's already been paid for. Why JUST self-mine, when you can self-mine and sell hashing power simultaneously? Selling hashing power gives you cash up front, self-mining strings is out over months and it could turn out less profitable than selling the hashing power.
Except that FC wasn't self-mining from the start, and he isn't doing it right now on a big scale like other big farms.(KnC, BitFury etc) |
|
|
|
I'm truly surprised SPT managed to sell any SP20's at all. The value it offered has always been terrible compared to the competition and I've been pointing that out (with the maths to back it up) since it was announced.
Again coming here after I poke AM in their thread. I should make a counter for this. This is the fourth time  Being so surprised shows how clueless you are regarding everything and I will reply to you with a quote from another AM shareholder: for each seller, there is a buyer.
|
|
|
|
we are a wealthy group of naive investors  I wish you good luck. |
|
|
|
So how much money did someone who purchased AM shares 12 months ago earn? I know that from start until now the shares gave a x6 ROI. But the start was in 2012 so that info is outdated right now.
do you honestly not have anything more important or more constructive to do other than poke a dying bear with a stick? edit: let me rephrase that, do you not have anything better to do with your life? I do, but I am multitasking. |
|
|
|
|
So how much money did someone who purchased AM shares 12 months ago earn? I know that from start until now the shares gave a x6 ROI. But the start was in 2012 so that info is outdated right now.
|
|
|
|
new SP20 price! $795
If it was shipping today it would probably be an easy sale, but November 18 is 5 weeks away, or about 3 difficulty increases (~25% cumulative increase?)
November, NOT December November 18 is just one week away! |
|
|
|
Wow, we have the entire unholy trinity of RoadStress, NotLambChop, and Puppet in here today...methinks this might mean the 3 (or honestly, you might all be the same person) are trying to grab a few last shares at IPO before the financials and divs are released?
Yes we are the same person. Nailed it! +1 to what Pupped posted above. It's a very nice summary to what happened to this company. |
|
|
|
I have received the following information via a PM and I was asked to publish it. While this is unverified it seems to be on par with what is happening with this SCAM ASS COMPANYSome very explosive informations about MAT and the truth behind MAT Mining Asics Technologies B.V. and the CEO Marc Coumans
First some very interesting informations about the trustworthy and creditworthiness of Marc Coumans CEO of Mining Asics Technologies B.V.
Just some weeks ago the German Company of Marc Coumans went bankruptcy.
Mining Asics told already several weeks that they have already shipped miners to their customers. But only a few customers will receive their miners because MAT does have only less than 45 pieces of Excalibur 5 miners.
MAT doesnt have more miners in stock and no money for production or for customer refunds.
MAT is a big SCAM Company and Mining Asics Technologies B.V. is not able to deliver any miners to their customers.
The intention of MAT is the desperate searching for some big deals in order to get more money the proceed production. But as there is a financial lack of more than $ 1,5M. It is impossible to solve the problems with the delivery of all miners to their existing customers.
Customers will never get back their refunds and no miners too.
There is no 3th Party failure as in the statement this week from MAT! Thats a additional lie!
Against the statement from MAT. MAT is not able working together with a well respected Cloud Mining Company in the Mining Scene, because MAT does not have any miners for a cloud mining operation (MAT does have only 38 pieces of miners).
Any offers from MAT serves only the purpose to save some time, for what ever maybe to prolong a bankruptcy. |
|
|
|
I have received the following information via a PM and I was asked to publish it. While this is unverified it seems to be on par with what is happening with this SCAM ASS COMPANYSome very explosive informations about MAT and the truth behind MAT Mining Asics Technologies B.V. and the CEO Marc Coumans
First some very interesting informations about the trustworthy and creditworthiness of Marc Coumans CEO of Mining Asics Technologies B.V.
Just some weeks ago the German Company of Marc Coumans went bankruptcy.
Mining Asics told already several weeks that they have already shipped miners to their customers. But only a few customers will receive their miners because MAT does have only less than 45 pieces of Excalibur 5 miners.
MAT doesnt have more miners in stock and no money for production or for customer refunds.
MAT is a big SCAM Company and Mining Asics Technologies B.V. is not able to deliver any miners to their customers.
The intention of MAT is the desperate searching for some big deals in order to get more money the proceed production. But as there is a financial lack of more than $ 1,5M. It is impossible to solve the problems with the delivery of all miners to their existing customers.
Customers will never get back their refunds and no miners too.
There is no 3th Party failure as in the statement this week from MAT! Thats a additional lie!
Against the statement from MAT. MAT is not able working together with a well respected Cloud Mining Company in the Mining Scene, because MAT does not have any miners for a cloud mining operation (MAT does have only 38 pieces of miners).
Any offers from MAT serves only the purpose to save some time, for what ever maybe to prolong a bankruptcy. |
|
|
|
I have received the following information via a PM and I was asked to publish it. While this is unverified it seems to be on par with what is happening with this SCAM ASS COMPANYSome very explosive informations about MAT and the truth behind MAT Mining Asics Technologies B.V. and the CEO Marc Coumans
First some very interesting informations about the trustworthy and creditworthiness of Marc Coumans CEO of Mining Asics Technologies B.V.
Just some weeks ago the German Company of Marc Coumans went bankruptcy.
Mining Asics told already several weeks that they have already shipped miners to their customers. But only a few customers will receive their miners because MAT does have only less than 45 pieces of Excalibur 5 miners.
MAT doesnt have more miners in stock and no money for production or for customer refunds.
MAT is a big SCAM Company and Mining Asics Technologies B.V. is not able to deliver any miners to their customers.
The intention of MAT is the desperate searching for some big deals in order to get more money the proceed production. But as there is a financial lack of more than $ 1,5M. It is impossible to solve the problems with the delivery of all miners to their existing customers.
Customers will never get back their refunds and no miners too.
There is no 3th Party failure as in the statement this week from MAT! Thats a additional lie!
Against the statement from MAT. MAT is not able working together with a well respected Cloud Mining Company in the Mining Scene, because MAT does not have any miners for a cloud mining operation (MAT does have only 38 pieces of miners).
Any offers from MAT serves only the purpose to save some time, for what ever maybe to prolong a bankruptcy. |
|
|
|
Which boards are using Hashfast chips?
You can find that out by simply reading this thread. HF Yoli, Habanero, and a couple of others use their chips. It's not Uniquify's fault that HF failed, if that's what you're (passive aggressively) trying to imply. WHAT? I thought HF didn't fail. What are you saying over here? |
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee and Erdogan please learn how to snip quotes. BIG quotes are hurting everyone's eyes.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
