|
Well that's how the trust system works, they are on untrusted feedback and you should not care about it and even less make a thread about it, i myself have a good amount of untrusted neg feedback but i don't give a shit. You still show as +1 to me so what is the problem? If they start spamming with neg trust you can call a mod to delete the feedback, they sometimes do.
|
|
|
|
you gotta think about it..on average you shouldnt be able to double your start of bitcoins so with those odds you would bust on ~ 40 btc profit you will get 20streaked just a mather of time...but you can try your luck=P
The thing is that if he wants to try his luck he could use the method i mentioned instead of having to bet millions of times which would take waayy to long and it even has lower odds, so why not save time and have a slight advantage? |
|
|
|
I don't if users, us, will pick the winner logo anymore but i can say that franckuestein's logo is the best and the comptetition is not even over, it's clean and it represents your site, it looks like those tickets for lottery or some gambling games. 10/10 |
|
|
|
and assume started with 0.00005 BTC (5000 satoshi) with automatic betting , every 1 second 1 bet
to lose all he got (and here is 52.4288 for example) , with Martingale technique he got 20 chance to win 50% for each
-snip-
There are few things that is off with your "calculations" that you forgot to take into account : #1 If you actually has ~52 BTC you wouldnt want a dust bet of 5000 satoshis. It is much better to play at a higher base bet and not to use martingale at all. It is proven many times that martingale could be one of the worst strategy however a variances of it could be used for better chance to win #2 Roulette has an edge of ~2.7 % for single zero wheel and ~5.4 for the double zero wheel and if you actually want a 2x payout martingale then dice would be a better option because of its lower house edge or even BlackJack for the 1% < house edge #3 The probability to get over 20x loss streak is not actually "rare" is most cases it will happens at 0.00011637 % chance . Number is actually close to zero however this happens quite a lot References : http://dicesites.com/toolsDont spread lies -snip- doing it right can make you have a slight advantage over the others. Take your time to read ( bolded in case you missed that out ). Also you should be aware of this that there are some "strategy" that actually able to "lower" the edge against you. Most people are not aware of this and just gamble it off "blindly" instead of "smartly". Smart strategy including taking advantages of bonuses, giveaway and also some cashback . Most people are not aware of this and just gamble it blindly and hope the goddess of luck struck them some profit . As for the "doing it right" words, thats merely not true because most people use bot to start a martingale sequences and there is nothing about "doing it right" because once you start the bot it will be based on your luck and nothing about "doing it right" because you are not manually doing it Here is an 81 pages about martingale , mostly repeated answer and even read some of your post that you actually despise martingale https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=610339.0Yep, doing it right would make you have better chances to win: "True. But it's better still to play a single martingale sequence than to make a single bet. Instead of betting 2 units at 1.5x (66%) to get to 3 units, with a chance of success of 66%, try betting root(3)-1 units with a multiplier of (3 + root(3))/2, and if you lose, bet the rest at the same multiplier. If either bet wins, you'll have 3 units. Your chance of success is 66.1768%, which is higher. The single martingale sequence has a lower expected risk, and so has a lower expected loss." Quoted from dooglus, as you can see if you know how to do it you can have a slight advantage as i said in my previous post but it's a really small advantage |
|
|
|
|
It would be pretty interesting but why not just advertise it on this forum as a survey, Afterall this forum has the largest amount of bitcoin users from all around the world, this way it's easier and it's free, if the survey has only a bunch of questions im sure people would complete it for free.
|
|
|
|
Si pueden hacer leyes como estas sin ningun tipo de problema me pregunto que otras leyes haran dentro de nada sin que podamos hacer nada.
Poder, sí que podemos. Bastan… no me acuerdo si eran 100 o 500k firmas para poder llevar cualquier proposición al congreso. El problema radica en juntar tantas firmas, lo que viene a significar que no queremos hacer nada. Si pueden hacer leyes como estas sin ningun tipo de problema me pregunto que otras leyes haran dentro de nada sin que podamos hacer nada.
Poder, sí que podemos. Bastan… no me acuerdo si eran 100 o 500k firmas para poder llevar cualquier proposición al congreso. El problema radica en juntar tantas firmas, lo que viene a significar que no queremos] hacer nada. Viva la revolución!!! No me jodas tocayo.  Aunque asi sea el caso, reunir 100k firmas no seria para nada dificil pero estoy seguro que aunque lo hagamos y llevasemos la proposicion al congreso les sudaria la p.. y no pasaría absolutamente nada Esa ley es una locura y lo unico que hace es demostrar cuanto poder tienen los de arriba y cuanto poder tenemos los de abajo (nada)
Grave error de calculo. Tu crees que hay alguien en españa que le parezca bien la ley mordaza? Porque estoy seguro que el 99.9% de los ciudadanos no la quieren y por buenas razones, entonces la pregunta es, como es posible que una ley asi haya sido aprobada si ningun ciudadano la quiere? Lo que me da a pensar que la gente tiene 0 poder. |
|
|
|
and assume started with 0.00005 BTC (5000 satoshi) with automatic betting , every 1 second 1 bet
to lose all he got (and here is 52.4288 for example) , with Martingale technique he got 20 chance to win 50% for each
-snip-
There are few things that is off with your "calculations" that you forgot to take into account : #1 If you actually has ~52 BTC you wouldnt want a dust bet of 5000 satoshis. It is much better to play at a higher base bet and not to use martingale at all. It is proven many times that martingale could be one of the worst strategy however a variances of it could be used for better chance to win #2 Roulette has an edge of ~2.7 % for single zero wheel and ~5.4 for the double zero wheel and if you actually want a 2x payout martingale then dice would be a better option because of its lower house edge or even BlackJack for the 1% < house edge #3 The probability to get over 20x loss streak is not actually "rare" is most cases it will happens at 0.00011637 % chance . Number is actually close to zero however this happens quite a lot References : http://dicesites.com/toolsDont spread lies, martingale is not proven to be one of the worst strategies, such thing does not exist, all the strategies are bad, in fact martingale, doing it right can make you have a slight advantage over the others. |
|
|
|
|
No te fies demasiado, el trading en btc es muy dificil y a menudo requiere de suerte ya que no es como otras inversiones que harias en la bolsa, por ejemplo. El bitcoin y las demas monedas virtuales son altamente volatiles y es imposible predecir a corto tiempo lo que vaya a pasar, incluso a largo plazo es muy dificil ya que el precio muchas veces puede variar solamente debido a la especulacion sin ningun tipo de apoyo financiero.
|
|
|
|
|
Esa ley es una locura y lo unico que hace es demostrar cuanti poder tienen los de arriba y cuanto poder tenemos los de abajo (nada) Si pueden hacer leyes como estas sin ningun tipo de problema me pregunto que otras leyes haran dentro de nada sin que podamos hacer nada. Basicamente pueden hacer lo que quieran un grupo pequeño de personas y nosotros tenemos que aguantarnos. Es esto una dictadura? Porque dentro de poco lo va a parecer.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know if that is a virus or not but it is kind of useless, there are already faucet rotators which are pretty much the same thing you have here + lists of many more faucets, all of them having timers and other details not to mention that you wont have to download anything. You will have to include other features if you want people to download it.
|
|
|
|
|
Sites with provably fair are usually fair but you will lose, eventually, in any of them, my recommendation is not to gamble for money, dont play dice, it's a waste of time and you won't get any profit, play other games that you might enjoy. It's definitely better than slots tho, that's for sure.
|
|
|
|
I doesn't matter, Signature campaigns managers or owners usually doesn't check why did you get or how did you get the negative feedback. They just check if it is red or not  That's all, good luck. the people who are smart enough will check before providing, unlike those people just looking at the outlook, sometimes it isn't relevant to scamming in negative trust. The thing is that campaign managers dont like the red mark no matter if it is truth or not, they are looking for advertisement and if you wear their signature while having red trust you are giving their site bad advertisement |
|
|
|
|
Im pretty sure this is a scam but you stated that you can prove it so i would like to see the tickets (probably photoshopped) but it will still be fun, riot stated multiple times that they do not unban accounts.
|
|
|
|
I continue to hope for the best
You continue to break the rules, you have been posting with this account outside the meta section plenty of times, how can you even think that your account will be returned to you? You should get banned with this account as well. |
|
|
|
|
The problem is definitely the ponzies that are hidden in other services, the ones in the ponzi section are obvious ponzi and are advertised as such so the people that "invest" in them know what they are doing and there is really no problem with that. The ponzies hidden in other services will be marked with negative trust in this forum if they are caught although they wont get banned
|
|
|
|
As informed you in chat, termonilogies have been updated.
In other words, the OP was correct all along. DADICE had misleading information and was, in fact, exposing investors to more risk than their Kelly. It's good to have that straightened out. I would have agreed to that if leen (i) wasn't one of the beneficaries of investment program, (ii) didn't know about max. payout being 20 BTC, she could lie as usual but she cannot deny her own roll with payout over 18 BTC. (iii) hadn't lied about skype conversations and twisting words, (iv) after processing her withdrawal requests right on the moment, she was told the we will talk to her next morning, (v) went behind our back and contacted our ex-staff. (vi) leen has history of slandering dadice and associating lies with us, this happened in earlier months as well. Well in that case it seems that leen knew about it so she can't really complain personally BUT the issue was there anyways. I see that you are changing it and i think that's the way to go if you and your team want to be trusted again. |
|
|
|
I don't get why people like to waste their time on lottery games. I mean these types of lottery with crazy high jackpot. Don't you think the odds are too low?
It's true when you win you will be a rich man, but chances are so low that for me it is waste of time. Dice, blackjack, poker, almost every casino game has better odds.
Desperate people vying for a last chance. Well that's debatable, first of all in euro millions you have the chance to win, as of right now, 15 million euros, the last jackpot was 40m. for the cost of 10-20€ with a 1 in 116 million chances. The chances are really slim but remember you can win a lot for a somewhat small cost. In a dice game without house edge(0%) you would need to set the chance to win to 0.000067%~ to get 15 millions with a starting bet of 10, 0.000067 is 1 in 1.49 millions, far better odds than any lottery BUT you will never be able to do that since most sites have their min odds set to 1% and i saw even 0.1% but not 0.000067% I didn't even calculate the percentage chance, but now that you say it that way the people must be REALLY desperate. What do you mean by desperate, anyone who gambles to get rich is desperate in my opinion, lottery is no different and you have at least a huge jackpot, most people that play lottery only do it occasionally, most gambling addicts are addicted to dice and other games |
|
|
|
I don't get why people like to waste their time on lottery games. I mean these types of lottery with crazy high jackpot. Don't you think the odds are too low?
It's true when you win you will be a rich man, but chances are so low that for me it is waste of time. Dice, blackjack, poker, almost every casino game has better odds.
Desperate people vying for a last chance. Well that's debatable, first of all in euro millions you have the chance to win, as of right now, 15 million euros, the last jackpot was 40m. for the cost of 10-20€ with a 1 in 116 million chances. The chances are really slim but remember you can win a lot for a somewhat small cost. In a dice game without house edge(0%) you would need to set the chance to win to 0.000067%~ to get 15 millions with a starting bet of 10, 0.000067 is 1 in 1.49 millions, far better odds than any lottery BUT you will never be able to do that since most sites have their min odds set to 1% and i saw even 0.1% but not 0.000067% |
|
|
|
Well as of today seems like litecoin is more alive than ever, second on coinmarketcap with a significant lead on ripple, the price got to 8$ and its still growing, i mean the ratio BTC/LTC is higher than it was in 2014. Im not really sure if this will last long since it's sustained by nothing but speculative parties but we will see.
It is a massive Pump and Dump, nothing else. The Litecoin thing has exactly same real value as before, that value is precisely zero. The thing used by no real world applications whatsoever except by day traders in China, and I can assure you (even if you make millions in short term on day trading) that is a not a sustainable business model. Over $200,000,000 in market cap value is a little more than zero value IMO. To have that cap put on it WITHOUT real world applications says something different to me...imagine its potential WITH applications. It is purely speculation at this point, but to write it off as a Pump and Dump is a little premature. You can see now that didn't last for too long, as i said i wasn't really sure for how long it will mantain that price since it was pumped for no reason or in other words without any support of anything other than people who wanted to pump it |
|
|
|
Now angry ex-employee cunts  they should name this "cunt-thread"  What happened to this nice discussion about the Kelly criterion and how DaDice misleads their investors into thinking they apply some kind of bankroll management? All infighting between various scam-cunts and spam-cunts is derailing the thread. Please move the PR dispute somewhere else and let us OCs get back to the real topic at hand. Indeed, let's bring back the discussion about the Kelly criterion. Because Dadice didn't implement the kelly criterion well I lost more bitcoins than i was supposed to lose, which shouldn't happen. That's a fact. Please tell me this other fact,, you have been invested in dadice for quite some time from what I read. March? In all this time has anything changed with the way dadice works meaning has it always not used kelly? If it has not and you have been a happy camper all this time when you have been making money why cry when you get a small loss? I don't really care either way but you lied/twisted saying they would not pay, they never said that did they. I also want to know why the fuss right now after all this time knowing exactly how dadice is run, sore loser? Again derailing from the real deal which is that dadice is misleading and potentially scamming people with bad information about their investment system, it doesnt matter if OP lied about anything else, dadice staff still failed to provide any evidence that their system was working correctly and instead tried to accuse OP of other things and insulting everyone. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
