~
Well, I did some research and first connection looks suspicious. For second connection, I have found this thread: My wallet on MEW is compromised. Someone stole all of my tokens from there. I think they hacked my desktop computer.
Now i expect to receive new tokens on this address and is too late to change with new address.
Is there any chance to change my private key, or to lock them wih password or any 2fa
 IIRC few similar cases exist, one ring has been caught lying that their address was hacked, while after "hack" they used address somewhere. Not saying this is the case, but, it is very strange that hack happened to 2 users with various connections. Account dradin posted this email: That looks like a name from ex-yu space. Perhaps, better connection between account pickupcoin and examplens is this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1322698.msg13600183#msg13600183https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1756173.msg17627460#msg17627460@examplens can you sign message from this address 15QLwhoYgaVt7nMUm5NCV1Z13VCqD12x9f ? |
|
|
|
loughlin appears to know many languages: He speaks serbian (Jan 18, 2019) ( Dec 25, 2018), Russian (Oct 17, 2018), and Croatian (June 1, 2018) examplens knows many languages: He also speaks serbian (Dec 13, 2017) ( May 24, 2019), Croatian (June 13, 2019) This is not true, unless you can tell us difference between Serbian and Croatian  In Jan 2017, examplens enrolled in a signature campaign with the address 15QLwhoYgaVt7nMUm5NCV1Z13VCqD12x9f and roomfirst (UID 904327) enrolled in the same campaign with the same address. roomfirst posted several times in indonesian local https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1575966.msg17554050#msg17554050. examplens also posted this: Name: roomfirst
Rank: Member
Current post count: 163
Bitcoin address: 15QLwhoYgaVt7nMUm5NCV1Z13VCqD12x9f
Thanks.
Hey, why you use my bitcoin address to participate in this campaign?
I guess that is an unintentional error, You have to be careful when you copy/paste from someone else postexamplens likes to change his password: Is a proof of changed password. examplens also sent merit to loughlin Is a proof that examples sent merit to loughlin. Also, I think there is a high probability that examplens is a sold account (see above PW changes) as of Dec 2017, so it is probably unfair to punish him for this. He posted something in 2015 and I suspect owner of account didn't change hands: It was seen by Novak's body language that is not enough in a match. Frustrated
Is there anyone that has earned the Serbia winning?
I mean that Wawrinka i can't repeat success two tournament in sequence. Djokovic is favorite no.1 only Murray, and maybe Federer may to affect.
Errr...better example from 2015: very little chance that Dinamo Zagreb scored any goal. perhaps only penalty or own goal. Bayern will not play indifferently like Arsenal. You have to be from ex-yu area to understand "terminology"...unless I am wrong  About address connection - they could be alt accounts, friends, trading....need better proof. I've PMd him link to your post. |
|
|
|
Citam redom komentare i fakat ne kontam sto su covjeka banovali i u ovom komentaru nadjem odgovore  Ja nisam toliko aktivan na ovom forumu (tu i tamo zavirim na forum procitam sta me zanima i eventualno ponesto pitam ili odgovorim ako znam) tako da i ne poznajem pravila osim onih standardnih - nemoj spamat, budi kulturan... Hah razlog za ban presmijesan, znaci covjek vidio neku vijest i objavio je na forumu i dobio ban c c c. Ovaj forum ima previše problema sa spamom i kopiranjem tuđih postova tako da se što se ovoga tiče većini korisnika ne gleda kroz prste, još pogotova ako su ti postovi iskopirani samo zato da korisnik popuni tjednu kvotu postova za signature kampanju. Recimo, kad je theymos uveo merite bila je doslovno navala plagiarizma i hrpa bananih računa. I, naravno, 2017. kad je bitcoin išao prema vrhu i u ICO-e se ulagalo nemilice i bountiji bili profitabilni. Mislim da se sve to nekako sad svelo na minimum al eto, sad se love ljudi koji su prije negdje nešto iskopirali. |
|
|
|
Report the thread or report the post?
Thread. 17. Trading of goods that are illegal in the seller's or buyer's country is forbidden. I am not sure about post because it doesn't reveal anything except they want to discuss something, although developing site which will be used to sell illegal goods should also fit in this category. |
|
|
|
Is lyks15 part of stake's signature campaign or has been removed? Proof of spam: That is a great project. Because all we know that all of us need protection because we are here in crypto world that a number one in scam and fraud issue and problem. All we know that we have on digital society so there is a big possibility that you will become of a victim of every illegal transaction like scam. It is good to have this kind of project to develop security features here in crypto industry.
This is posted in game-protect's thread. Game-protect has nice feedback from Stunna: Blackmail/Racketeering. Promotes known scam websites and offers fake legal advice/services to players for upfront pay. And, game-protect has very nice opinion about stake: Primedice and Stake paying a bunch of mentally ill blatant liars and criminals highly indicates that Primedice and Stake itself is run by criminals!
Another example: Looks good but I did not tried it yet. I hope I can enjoy all the features and freebies about this project on this site. But I hope this project will have a good and more security features that no one can immitate because all we know that this is the top concern of every crypto investor and gamers.
This is posted in Seuntjies DiceBot's thread. Seuntjies dicebot is....dice bot. There are no freebies. Why lyks hopes 6 year old project will have " good and more security features"? They are spammer, that's why. If moderator have time to check recent spam from this account.... |
|
|
|
No one see Satoshi Nakamoto, but every one use his ivention!
If I saved 1$ every time I have heard this excuse I would have a new car by now. To be frankly we having had some negotiations inside team about this, and due to security reasons decided to not use own names and photos first.
Why did you choose to use photos of random persons from internet instead going anonymous then? |
|
|
|
And then you said this: It is not made up. I don’t think you want this specific issue addressed. And then killyou72 said this: No I do, please come out and say you are a global mod with proof please. It will make my day So you should continue from that post, not from the middle of conversation. |
|
|
|
~
Ok. I think you didn't see this: If owner is unknown, again, to whom will Hhampuz return money? If I borrow someone money and I disappear, how will someone reach me if no one can find me and I don't contact anyone?
(assuming that hhampuz didn't return money)
|
|
|
|
|
Lol I missed that one. Probably most remixed crypto scam ever.
|
|
|
|
your post is not removed it is there for all to read.
I am pretty sure my post is removed:  Start with our own feeback since there are not as yet other member of the union?
I might check feedback when you share your opinion about this case https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105750.0, give me your review and give your opinion on flagging account Rambotic in that thread. And, after you give me answer to this question: Reverse or counter all feedback that you can not demonstrate direct clear connection to scamming.
Again, which feedback should I counter or remove? Then start a trust flag for the proven scamming of lauda relating to the lying and scamming over the xcoin instamine.
I believe you can create flag yourself. Go and create one, see how it will work. |
|
|
|
As my on topic reply has been removed from self moderated thread and I am not allowed to post there any more until I counter some Lauda's tags I have to ask here: A UNION TO ENSURE THE FAIR AND EQUAL TREATMENT OF ALL MEMBERS OF THIS BOARD (and nothing more)
[...]
Do you have a trust flag raised or red trust (old system) against you that is unfair? have you never scammed or acted in a way it is clear that you are intending to scam someone?
[...]
Set up your flags or present flags where you have been abused. Let's review them together.
Can you review my case? I have been wrongly tagged by 2 accounts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1099851https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2493489Look:  These abusive idiots abused trust system and placed wrong feedback on my trust wall and no one cares about it. Please review and when you are done with these 2 cases I have more of this abusive behavior. We don't want double standards here, equal treatment for all! Those look to be incorrect feedbacks from the initial review. Although you fall under the direct support of scammers (with direct regard to their scamming) category (we have added) for your direct support of laudas proven scamming actions. Unless you want to prove us wrong right now. We will quote your post before we delete it to demonstrate this is the action we will take against any persons seeking to use the union for their own ends but are not prepared AT ALL to support its true goals. When we take note that you have countered LAUDAS tags and flags where observable instances of financial wrongdoing are not present you may apply via pm to be part of the union. Until then do not post again. Others that have supported lauda and trust abuse previously will be deleted without being given the SAME explanation. Anyone here that seeks to disrupt the union by any means will be deleted. Any not considering that FAIR may choose not to join this union. If you have used the trust system previously to create an initial attack that is not directly related to financial wrong doing you are a trust abuser. This is not a one way street. You want the union to ensure YOUR OWN fair treatment then you must ENSURE the fair treatment of others. We believe focusing on flags should be the primary initial concern. The old system is now correctly viewed as meaningless subjective junk. This part: When we take note that you have countered LAUDAS tags and flags where observable instances of financial wrongdoing are not present you may apply via pm to be part of the union. Until then do not post again. Others that have supported lauda and trust abuse previously will be deleted without being given the SAME explanation. Does it apply to every DT who does not counter lauda's feedback or there will be no equal treatment for all members? And as I don't know which lauda's feedback is wrongly placed (OP of that thread didn't say which one is abusive), how should I know which to counter? I see bunch of words there and my post is removed from thread with edited topic. Perhaps OP should update that thread with wrongly placed -ve so we can discuss it?
Oh, yes, not self moderated. It is not cool to self moderate "fair treatment for all". |
|
|
|
|
Can you add red color for flags 2/3?
|
|
|
|
Absolutely illegal.
Report them, moderator should be able to handle this. |
|
|
|
It's sad to support that flag because it practically does nothing. I wish someone who actually got scammed starts a level 3 flag so that warning is visible on their profile.
Yeah, well, that's the whole idea I guess. Didn't see that one, will check it. And how to know if a supporter of this initiative is themselves a scammer OR accused?
I don't think bitconnect will come here to support this. Speaking in general, you don't. If they support initiative against them that is fine, but I don't think they will. And, are these flags having levels too like we have for DT?
read this |
|
|
|
|
It would not surprise me if they don't, victims usually choose to remain silent, especially in this space where chance to get your money back is nearly equal to zero. We shall see...
Side note - do we have statistics how many scammers are "red flagged" at the moment?
|
|
|
|
|
Supported first 40 will do other accounts later. I figured that it would be easier to link account's trust pages because they have tags and flags visible and it would spare some supporting or not supporting flags.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
