Bitcoin Forum
June 14, 2024, 02:00:15 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 [102] 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 ... 510 »
2021  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT on: May 13, 2016, 11:14:58 PM
things are only this calm because of the agreement.

a significant amount of 'economic majority' want hard fork asap and most likely 'economic majority' want a 'reasonable' hard fork soon.

Are you going to provide the extraordinary evidence required to prove your extraordinary claims?

Or should we just swallow whatever ridiculous assertion you dream up, like Gavin did in L'affair Hoaxtoshi?   Grin
2022  Other / Politics & Society / Re: What's your opinion of gun control? on: May 13, 2016, 11:08:29 PM
I bet Gun Broker is kicking itself now after seeing the taste they could have got of that $65 mil. As a former Gunbroker.com customer, next time I buy a gun online, it will not be there.

The wailing and gnashing created by the auction is a thing of beauty.   Grin

Behold:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/05/12/1525719/-He-murdered-Trayvon-and-now-he-seeks-to-auction-the-bloody-gun

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/05/12/1525767/-George-Zimmerman-announces-plan-to-auction-the-gun-he-used-to-kill-Trayvon-Martin

The low information types living in their tribal reality bubble just can't understand why

A. the gun isn't a murder weapon because the jury (and DOJ) declined to indicate GZ committed murder, and

B. it's the height of hypocrisy to advocate lynching GZ "BECAUSE CIVIL RIGHTS."

Tray-Bon Nebber Hert Nuffen®   Cry
2023  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT on: May 13, 2016, 09:37:47 PM
Seeing Luke grovel like a fool in front of Mircea and his handful of irc lackeys...

Gregory calling Adam, Luke, and Peter dipshits...

The JJG infection spreading and metastasizing in iCE's very own treehouse...

*Advocates of Bitcoin's Great Purge unfazed as their arguments are reduced to hurling accusations of "Bankster Trolls!"  Cheesy

Does this day get any more perversely satisfying?

What a bizarre rant; I'm glad you now feel better about XT/Unlimiturd/Klassic getting rekt like Stannis at Winterfell.   Smiley

Luke wasn't groveling, he was just doing a survey.  What's wrong with that seemingly constructive, potentially productive, act of diplomacy?

Adam is Greg's boss; that such (insubordinate?) free expression is accepted speaks well of Blockstream's non-hierarchical, free-thinking corporate culture.

What is "JJG" and why would it infect my treehouse?   Huh

And what makes you think I've ever so much as logged on to #BA?
2024  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT on: May 13, 2016, 09:16:37 PM
As luke admits it, the fork only aims at showing "the industry that a hardfork and consensus is a possible thing".

It has never been about blocksize or anything but governance.

If only it was for some security reason, surely a HF would have naturally be adopted, yet here the situation is different and only serves the marketing purpose of parasitic corporations interests.

You keep relying on the word "only" to make your argument, but luke already (even in the irc log) specified "some security reason."

Quote
luke-jr: asciilifeform: things I'd like to see in it would be merged mining, additional inputs to the generation transaction, and maybe fix block withholding

"Fix block withholding" = "some security reason"

Block withholding isn't the only security improvement on the Hard Fork Wish List.

It's possible to both A. improve the external+internal optics of Bitocoin governance and B. improve Bitcoin security AT THE SAME TIME.

I hope this obvious statement isn't considered thoughtcrime in tmsr; I'd hate to chastised with a "$down" for my insolence.   Grin

The "hard forks should only happen in exigent circumstances, and may never be elective" position certainly has my sympathy, but my default support wavers when you start irrationally distorting, twisting, and misrepresenting the arguments in favor of the opposite approach.
2025  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Theymos: “Bitcoins Belonging to Satoshi Should Be Destroyed” on: May 13, 2016, 08:22:00 PM
Hitler

... And there goes the thread, "A wild Hitler appears!".


Importing fake /r/btc stories about "zomg thermos gonna sensor ship satoshi's coinz" shows how bored we drama addicts are now the Civil War is over.   Cheesy

Bitcoin Judas using the absurd rumor for click bait also demonstrates he's desperate for traffic, as his interest in his rump forum evaporates (in the manner of XT) like a dream in the morning.

I bet (but not on casino.bitcoin.com) Ver is glad the Fake Satoshi story distracted everyone from his self-publicized inability to understand you can't spend unconfirmed outputs (duh!).
2026  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin: Civil War on: May 13, 2016, 12:03:31 AM
Adam Back as Vision was a interesting perfect choice.

Phlegmatic, stoic Dr. Back seems incapable of being perturbed by the silly antics of the drama queens surrounding him.   Cool
2027  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation on: May 12, 2016, 11:39:59 PM

For anyone looking at "commits ahead", bear in mind that part of his work is already merged into master with this particular PR:

https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/pull/728

2028  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Theymos: “Bitcoins Belonging to Satoshi Should Be Destroyed” on: May 12, 2016, 11:32:20 PM
    Bitcoin == Drama

It was true when I joined, it has been true the entire time I have been involved.

That is what makes it fun.

Can confirm; came for the liberation technology, stayed for the endless popcorn.

2029  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT on: May 12, 2016, 07:46:22 AM
Read this JJG: http://blog.earthbenign.com/post/143966444120/dr-craig-wright-very-well-could-be-satoshi

"though I’m not a “trained PhD psychologist”, I have a very strong feeling that Dr. Craig Wright actually is Satoshi Nakamoto."



2030  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy? on: May 12, 2016, 07:33:22 AM
Trump is a better choice than Hillary the KGB double agent:

REPORT: Hillary’s Emails Hacked by Russia – Kremlin Deciding Whether to Release 20,000 Stolen Emails (VIDEO)

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/05/hillarys-emails-hacked-russia-kremlin-deciding-whether-release-20000-emails-hacked/

CIA vs FBI?

Civil wars are so trendy right now.
 Shocked

https://goldstandard.wordpress.com/2016/02/07/just-how-bad-are-the-hillary-sap-compromises/

Quote
WHAT ALL AMERICANS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON’S ALLEGED SAP COMPROMISE–
MAJ. ED COET, USA (RET)
[COURTESY: CAPT Les Horn, USN (Ret)]


My name is Ed Coet. I am a retired US Army Intelligence Officer.
In my last job in the army I was the Chief of the Human Intelligence Branch for the US European Command in Stuttgart, Germany.
In that capacity I was also the Designated Program Manager for a Special Access Program (SAP) like the SAP that Hillary Clinton is alleged to have compromised in the most recent State Department Inspector General report to congress and which has been widely reported in the news.
Here is what I personally know about SAP’s and what I can attest to in an unclassified forum:

1. The names of each SAP are themselves classified Top Secret because the information within the SAP are far and above Top Secret.

2. SAP’s are so sensitive that even people who have security clearances giving them access to Top Secret Sensitive Compartment Information (TS SCI), an enormously high security clearance level, cannot have accesses to a SAP’s unless they receive a special indoctrination into the SAP based on an operational “must know” that exceeds all other “need to know” standards.

3. Being “read on” for a SAP is far more then acknowledging in writing that you have been briefed on the SAP.  It is an in-depth “indoctrination” into the given SAP, and each SAP is itself compartmented separately from other SAPS. Having access to one SAP does not give you access to another SAP, and in fact rarely does. Only a tiny handful of people have knowledge of all SAP’s. SAP’s are the most stringently compartmented and protected information in the entire US government.

4. Unlike Top Secret SCI which is maintained in highly secure Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilitates (SCIF’s) managed by specially trained Special Security Officers (SSO’s) at various levels of command, every single SAP is managed by an individually designated Program Manager for each individual SAP covering an entire theater of operations. In other words, SAP Program Managers are far fewer in number than there is SSO’s. SSO’s are not cleared to even know about SAP’s or to maintain information about them in their already enormously secure SCIF’s. How SAP’s are secured cannot be discussed because of the sensitive beyond Top Secret nature in which it is done.

5. Unlike individuals with the highest Top Secret SCI access security clearances, who must undergo a special background information with periodic “bring-up” background investigation, those tiny few who have access to SAP’s must also endure periodic polygraph tests in addition to the most comprehensive of special background investigations. I used to have to schedule four-star generals and admirals to be polygraphed in order for them to maintain their access to my SAP. Many generals and admirals who obviously have the highest security clearances still did not rate being indoctrinated into my SAP. In fact, they didn’t even know the SAP existed.

6. Compromise of a SAP is the single most dangerous security violation that can ever happen to the USA. Even the enormously damaging revelations of the Edward Snowden’s TOP Secret SCI security compromise does not reach the level of a SAP compromise.


7. To put SAP information in to an unsecure sever like Hillary Clinton’s unsecure server is a class one felony that could, in some cases, result in life in prison. That is because such a compromise is so dangerous that it could and likely will result in the death of people protected by and within the scope of the SAP.

As a former SAP Program Manager I believe it is inconceivable that if it is verified that Hillary Clinton’s server actually had SAP information on it that she could possibly escape indictment and criminal prosecution. As hard as it is to imagine, that would even be worse then electing to not prosecute a mass murdering serial killer because even they could not inflict as much damage on our country as the compromise of a SAP. Compromise of a SAP not only could — but without doubt would — cause serious damage to our national security.

If it is true that Hillary Clinton had SAP information on her unsecure server, whether it was marked or not, you can be sure that the FBI will strongly recommend that charges be brought against Hillary Clinton and continue in an exhaustive investigation to trace back to every single person that had even the tiniest role in this unbelievable security compromise.

If the Attorney General, through “prosecutorial discretion,” elected not to prosecute this crime, I believe congress would have no alternative but to impeach her, and the FBI would then have no choice but to conduct a criminal investigation of her for a deliberate cover up –- so grave is this security violation.

If President Obama were to pardon Hillary Clinton for a compromise of this magnitude he would render himself in the historical record as an “enemy of the state,” and could himself face criminal prosecution –- so grave is such a security compromise. Nobody, not even the POTUS could gets away with something like this in our system of government

If anyone could escape persecution for compromising a SAP, we are deep trouble as a nation. No president who loves this country and is ttrue to his oath would ever allow anyone, not even his or her closest and most loved relative, to get away with a SAP compromise. It is simply unimaginable that this could ever happen.

If the ongoing investigation finds that Hillary Clinton compromised a SAP, then we all should know with certainty, regardless of political persuasion, that she is entirely unfit to hold public office of any kind let alone President of the USA — and ALL Americans should never tolerate it. Compromising a SAP is an absolute “disqualifier” for public office and access to our nations most sensitive information – period.

ED COET
Major, US Army (Retired)
http://www.bewilderingstories.com/bios/coet_bio.html

P.S. It is my sincere hope that each of you will share this article, to help other Americans understand how grave Hillary Clinton’s alleged SAP compromise is. We can’t allow anyone so careless with this level of information to have access to any classified information ever again for as long as she lives. This would surely render her unqualified and unfit to hold any public office let alone POTUS if this allegation proves to be true.


Semper Fi,
Chapes
2031  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Theymos: “Bitcoins Belonging to Satoshi Should Be Destroyed” on: May 12, 2016, 07:20:59 AM
Thats a no no no no no no no no no no move. Whats the point of Bitcoin when someone can destroy some coins which are sitting in some dude wallet since 5 years ago? Like the above reply I agree bitcoin shouldn't have existed at all if some dude can just go and destroy someone else's bitcoin. Security is 0 this way. No no no no this should not happen.

Satoshi's Holy Hoard isn't useless.  To the contrary, it exemplifies Bitcoin's utility as a successful, radically deflationary store of value with a strictly enforced/upheld social contract.

It also serves as a canary in case of a successful exploit, because that prize is first in line to be stolen.

As a bug finding bounty they are the ultimate incentive, and so their continued security and value demonstrate Bitcoin's bespoke resiliency and longevity.

When Satoshi's coins are priceless, perhaps He will use them to fund a long term space colonization program, including life extension and nanotech....
2032  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Theymos: “Bitcoins Belonging to Satoshi Should Be Destroyed” on: May 12, 2016, 06:07:15 AM

If you really want to save Bitcoin, Theymos should be destroyed.   Angry

If some random sysop can destroy Bitcoin, it never deserved to exist.   Roll Eyes
2033  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Theymos: “Bitcoins Belonging to Satoshi Should Be Destroyed” on: May 12, 2016, 05:36:34 AM
Satoshi has the right of his coins if he is still alive if he's no longer on the scene or not alive then they should burn them but as long as he wants them no point burning them.

Exactly.

The Holy Stash is the ultimate dog food feast; if Bitcoin is to serve as a radically deflationary store of value, it will do so primarily for its Creator.

We can't change the social contract to screw Satoshi without destroying Bitcoin for everyone.   Cool
2034  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT on: May 12, 2016, 12:27:13 AM
How do you account for the fact that CSW was able to sign a message from block 1 for Gavin? Have we explained that part away yet? How?

2035  Other / Off-topic / Re: TV Series Recommendations... on: May 11, 2016, 06:11:06 PM
Flowers
2036  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin IS basically DESTROYED on: May 11, 2016, 11:18:54 AM
Bitcoin is basically destroyed now with 70% of the mining controlled by China, soon to be 98+%, and with Blockstream implementing their SegWit soft fork Trojan Horse so as Matonis admits can end up increasing the 21 million coins limit.

The entire ecosystem is headed for a clusterfuck.

I honestly believe this is the truth.  What is there to add ?

~CfA~



BitcoinObituaries.com   Cry
2037  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs on: May 10, 2016, 11:47:12 PM
Pre-ordering ASICs is thought of as risky because lying so-and-so's like yourself made it risky.

How rude!   Roll Eyes

Pre-ordering ASICs is risky for a large number of reasons.

In Spondoolies' case they blamed TSCM for the chips failing to meet speed and efficiency specs, in a perfect example of cascading counterparty risk.
2038  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency on: May 10, 2016, 11:02:02 PM
Transitive property. If A = B and B = C, then A = C.

If blockchains are decentralized databases

And Monero has the most advanced database

Then monero is the most advanced blockchain.

Performance branch for the win.

https://gist.github.com/hyc/33f3eec6bae83246209d
TL;DR

Monero v0.9.0.0
Elapsed (wall clock) time (m:ss): 18:57.16

Monero v0.9.3.0
Elapsed (wall clock) time (m:ss): 16:50.76

Perf branch bc69d842cc4982ea48eaa4338247a179b5f8a082
Elapsed (wall clock) time (m:ss): 7:54.48


Is no one paying attention? Does anyone else notice that only monero is actively improving and developing its database machinery? THIS WHOLE TECHNOLOGY CENTERS ON A DATABASE!

I think everyone a bit worn out from the constant dumpage. Where the fuck do all those coins come from! It's tough to keep up the spirits when you see the market getting so manipulated and your holding for altruistic reasons.

I hear ya. I guess botnet miners, I don't know... It is weird. Why dump at so cheap, unless panic?  Huh

A legitimate altcoin with truly disruptive tech like Monero is a threat to all the shitcoins with bad crypto and snake oil marketing.

Thus, we are all of their common enemy.  Plus, we goad them into attacking, to better our distribution and antifragility.   Grin
2039  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [XMR] Monero - Marketing Team & Tactics on: May 10, 2016, 10:56:20 PM
The main Monero thread is not self-moderated: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.0




No, wrong, it's moderated son, we all know that.

TIL ceti can't even the difference between self-moderated threads and not.   Grin

But we already knew DashHoles aren't exactly the brightest stars in the altcoin galaxy.   Roll Eyes
2040  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation on: May 10, 2016, 10:29:05 PM
snip image

Still hodling. If it breaks to 131k sats it'll be tough. Will have to decide to send the coins to cold storage or sell for a loss. Probably the former.

GUI will be out before that happens.

And then all that sweet sweet gooey money will roll in.

Pages: « 1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 [102] 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 ... 510 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!