Na on Wednesday morning I go reward d person wey go get d analysis with 2 buckets of colele wata from my fridge. Make una keep d comments coming. One luv my people.

Honestly, Lauda was an enigma (and dramatic if I must add 🙄 though). The user's account was self destroyed in 2020, yet till date it has more posts than most active members here. Somehow, I still miss them not being present here, on that account.

In my opinion, that thread should be one thread every member who has crossed the newbie status should take seriously. People shouldn't wait until their account is hacked before they do the needful of simply staking their BTC address there. OP should find a way to sign a message from either of the two accounts user rat03gopoh linked their hacked account and that should be able to solve his hack issue.

That was what I thought too. I hope that AAX (take note of the X too 🤔) isn't affiliated to SBF's business. This whole Luna and FTX crashes have made the market vulnerable at this time. A November that I've speculated to rally up is now digging for the southern pole. It's even looking safer to short Bitcoin than to long it now.

It's a shame to really let "once" a good app like that go. I checked mine as soon as I made that post to see what's gwan with the app. It didn't load and I let it be. Now that I read your post I had to force myself to reality and then delete it. As for the allegation of FTX assessing customers funds linked with their bank accounts, that will really be the height of criminality.

You meant physically challenged? I think that's the universal word for those who are impared  bodily in one way or the other.

I guess you're asking for ways to earn passively. Staking or farming offers that. However, there are risks too associated with either staking or farming. Otherwise, there isn't any trading strategy that can guarantee you that range on daily basis.

Wrong move! You've just indirectly invited scammers in the form of sales reps to yourself. They're going to PM you to invest in whatever pseudo programmes they've just to scam you. You've to be extremely careful here.

You're trying to give Sam and his men benefit of the doubt, so they can sincerely explain their involvement in the ongoing crisis speedily. Going forward on that perspective you gave, I also believe that most projects that end up as scam may not genuinely have been set up to scam people but for the unfortunate incidence that most of them end up not achieving what's on the blueprint and thereafter abandon it.

I've the FTX tracking app I use to keep my portfolio in check. I hope the alleged malware doesn't affect it, anyway. In all honesty, I was sympathetic to SBF when the news first broke that his exchange was having financial crisis but with what's emanating now I'm beginning to think that dude is a criminal. If truly there's a hack, he's more likely the arrowhead. To even think he was reported to have used investors funds for stocks which crashed and led to his exposure, and now this hack. Dude is not clean whichever way we want to look at it.

How come we didn't hear cries about them being scams before their crashes? People are quick to say, "I told you when things get fucked up" even when they didn't know a thing about the situation and quick to claim sagacity when it goes down well.

If we're going to be factual on that, I will tell you that advice will only suit investors not traders.

But of course, that's the honest truth. However, most people have that mindset that it's their main reason of being in this game. They want it quick and short, forgetting that there's no shortcut to success.

😆 Yeah, I remember that era. How that fizzled out quietly too like other trends before it. This too will sooner than later become "old school". Whoever thought ICO or IEO will be a thing that doesn't entice investors anymore? Sadly, that's what's happening now.

That cap is nice looking (on soft copy). I won't mind wearing one of such with a nice t-shirt and a pair of jeans to match offline. Hoping that it looks as good as it's looking here on real cap.

This is the same thing I've said repeatedly in different threads talking about Satoshi and wanting to unearth his identity. The dude doesn't want to be known (at least not now), and I think it should be kept that way. To be honest with you, there are times I thought to myself that the Satoshi thing could even be several individuals in a group under that name. That's there's no single individual with that Identity. BTW, this whole forum is about Satoshi and Bitcoin in the first place. It's unnecessary trying to dedicate a sub-forum to such an exercise in futility.

No matter how determined you're to save people what many have termed entrapment in centralized exchanges, it's not going to be enough. No one can save the world. There are still going to be people who just stare at the message but go ahead to do whatever that pleases them. After all, isn't it their money? Now the interesting part is that there isn't anyway everyone can take their coins off exchanges even when they know the risk involved. Maybe investors shouldn't leave their coins there but not daily traders.

1,000 pages is 20,000 posts, bearing in mind that a page is 20 comments. That's even more than a mega thread by my judgment. I want to believe that user meant 1,000 comments and not pages. Anything above 50 pages is already a mega threads in my books. Let me quickly add, while I agree with that user that at a certain number of pages signature display should stop, that not every mega thread is a spam thread. There are some threads which have to continually run to maintain balance in discussion, perspective and knowledge exchange, using local boards as an example. For me, the easiest way to checkmate spam posting is for campaign managers to read the riot act to hunters and restrict them from posting in mega threads.

The bolded is very important. Although I haven't done any P2P on Binance I heard someone can still be swindled there. A friend who uses it regularly told me the best way to screen out fraudsters on that app is to only transact with merchants who have done so many trades. Don't get blinded or fooled by the cheap sell rate they offer. Check their profiles up first before dealing.

I think not. Perhaps it was a P2P done through any of WhatsApp or telegram handles.

Dem nor dey ask He-goat where im sleep. Na whether im wake from sleep or not dem dey ask am..

Abeg, I go like make someone analyse dat proverb and still tell us situations where we fit apply am.

This whole current inflation thing reminds me of the 2008 global financial meltdown and the consequences it heralded. The small sized company I worked for which was barely starting up then was severely hit to the point that a good number of staff were let go. Some people have opined that the aftermath of that recession birthed Bitcoin. Let's see what will be birthed as this global inflation heightens by next year. May be another phenomenon? I'm only worried that it will get worse by next year.

Go to the Binance homepage and look for P2P. Click on P2P and it will open up a tab as shown in that picture below. BTW, I use the Binance app in case your setting looks different from mine. If you use the web version, look for "More" or just go around it until you find P2P.



Oh no! You misunderstood BlackHatCoiner on that. What he meant in our local parlance was "buy am like sey tomorrow nor dey." By the way, DCA means Dollar Cost Averaging. Using that method will mean that you buy in bits whenever there's a reduction in price to keep increasing the quantity you've.

For a few exceptions, basically what signal channels and groups do is to make calls on certain unknown shitcoins and then watch the mad rush to place orders by people who should know better but don't care. That's why after the pump most of those tokens die off. There's no use case for them. It's interesting to know that the owners of those channels commonsensically buy in first before the rest of the followers get in. Let no man deceive you again. BTW, it's obvious that there's no accuracy of prediction when it comes to trading.

You would innocently believe their grouse is about transparency? I doubt that. I think it goes beyond that and runs into ego challenge with both men. They want to flex muscles a bit, forgetting that it will rub off negatively on the industry. Some people are even of the opinion that CZ may not have even sold off his holdings of FTX tokens that he only wanted to FUD and shake the other dude. There's a possibility to that. Otherwise, why would he make his selling off public instead of quietly doing it.

That's exactly my thought too. It's not even about who wins but the scar that will be left on the crypto industry. Those two are major players in this industry and for them to dance naked publicly shows the unnecessary display of ego in man. Now, these two elephants are fighting; it's the grass that suffers it. Again, this incident is more likely to make SEC and other regulatory bodies begin to poke their noses into both exchanges. Unnecessary invitation.