How do you feel about the fact that some exchanges sell personal customer`s data into the Dark Web due to the users must pass a KYC. KYC is the personal data that an exchange actually receives and there are no guarantees of security, only trust
If any exchange use our data or sell our data we cant do anything if we cant proof either they sold our document or not. If we can proof and they break any terms of service then we may try to make dispute. But better to use trusted exchanges those who will never use or sell their customers data. There is no fully regulated and trusted exchange yet. I wonder if SIX Group's SDX , SCX or bakkt will be that? |
|
|
|
Biggest Shitcoin List: 1. Tron 2. IOTA 3. Cheesecoin 4. Dentacoin 5. Dogecoin Reihenfolge steht zur Debatte, weitere können hinzugefügt werden  Ich würde mit eth anfangen.  Nichts, was mit nicht besser mit BitCoin ++ bauen kann |
|
|
|
He is pretty much going against all the 'old crypto establishment', so no wondered that he s getting into the biggest social media crypto shitstorm ever. I know from what to speak a bit, since I m kind of last big blocker and anti Segwit guy in that forum here. |
|
|
|
Are those the same documents from 2011 or 2012 that was later exposed as fake, because the font that was used was not invented until 2015?
How was that really 'exposed' ? Did you see proper forensics ? Nope - just folled the herd  See the news:  While the presented deed of trust document is ostensibly dated Oct. 23, 2012, the metadata of the file indicates that the document was actually created after the death of Kleiman, as Palley found. The trust document apparently uses a 2015 copyright notice related to Calibri, the Microsoft Word font, indicating that the document could not be from earlier. Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/craig-wright-uses-falsified-docs-to-prove-innocence-in-kleiman-caseFaketshi will eventually be unmasked as a big fake. He is a shame for the crypto world. for a guy who claims to be satoshi he's reveals to be a guy with serious mental problems OK, we are talking about the same court documents. I first saw it from a lawyer's tweet, https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1146522818949144577hv_, are you actually trying to defend Craig Wright? You can start telling everyone how good "Satoshi" is in hiding his real identity. He is actually having it proven in court that he's not "Satoshi". Hahahaha! I just recommend anyone to do proper research and not listen to biggest noise and hobby tweeters E.g. find the full transcript of the hearing/ questionary. It s out. |
|
|
|
Then this is a cause for celebration?Since we will get rid of this impersonator 😂 Put that guy in a cell!!
If someone makes something like Bitcoin and wants to remain anonymous, why on earth would that same person start talking about it once his work is done?
You got it right mate,exactly as you’ve mentioned,.this was created for anonymity and someone’s coming from nowhere will claim to be the creator?so irritating stupid person Nope, the herd is getting it wrong - as usual https://www.yours.org/content/forensic-analysis-of-kleiman-vs-craig-s-wright-pdf-documents--fontgat-521e436954c1 |
|
|
|
Tasty! Get some ginger strips. |
|
|
|
Are those the same documents from 2011 or 2012 that was later exposed as fake, because the font that was used was not invented until 2015?
How was that really 'exposed' ? Did you see proper forensics ? Nope - just folled the herd |
|
|
|
Same old story, over and over again. How many times do we have to prove that Craig Wright is not the Satoshi Nakamoto.
I've not seen anywhere that 'we' have proven. So he is |
|
|
|
 I don't understand, Craig Wright would have lied  
https://cointelegraph.com/news/craig-wright-uses-falsified-docs-to-prove-innocence-in-kleiman-case
from https://cointelegraph.com/news/craig-wright-uses-falsified-docs-to-prove-innocence-in-kleiman-caseBy Helen Partz Craig Wright Uses Falsified Docs to Prove Innocence in Kleiman Case: Report 19465 Total views 283 Total shares Listen to article 1:41 Craig Wright Uses Falsified Docs to Prove Innocence in Kleiman Case: ReportNEWS Self-proclaimed Bitcoin (BTC) creator Craig Wright has allegedly provided fabricated court documents to prove a trust deed with his plaintiffs, as seen from documents revealed by trial lawyer Stephen Palley on Twitter on July 3. https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1146527019326496769?fbclid=IwAR1dUaIH43GVrHwLgj7CkM0h42O4P-jixgdqnzh37NbeGfY2KjNciY7-ajMAccording to Palley, the self-styled Satoshi Nakamoto has failed to prove his case by presenting court documents that Palley alleges to be fake, as they contain multiple chronological discrepancies. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/kleiman-v-wright/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=descAmong the exhibits filed with the District Court for the Florida Southern District on July 3, there is a document submitted as proof of cooperation between Wright and the now-deceased David Kleiman, whose lawyers filed the case against Wright in February 2018. Kleiman’s lawyers accuse Wright of stealing hundreds of thousands of Bitcoin — at press time valued at over $5 billion — after Kleiman’s death in April 2013. While the presented deed of trust document is ostensibly dated Oct. 23, 2012, the metadata of the file indicates that the document was actually created after the death of Kleiman, as Palley found. The trust document apparently uses a 2015 copyright notice related to Calibri, the Microsoft Word font, indicating that the document could not be from earlier. Alleged falsification of trust deed documents by Craig Wright Alleged falsification of trust deed documents by Craig Wright. Source: Stephen Palley Following the apparent accusation of Wright for forging the court documents, Palley wrote: “I mean it makes sense that the inventor of bitcoin can time travel. Your honor.” In late June, Wright declared that he cannot comply with a court order to provide a list of all his early bitcoin addresses, claiming that he gave a key piece of information regarding the funds and wallets to Kleiman before his death.
Can someone explain to me what's going on? Is this guy a liar or not? 
How poor is that ? Who provided those docs ? When fabricated ? What u want to tell / beleive here ? nothing |
|
|
|
To be honest, I'm really tired of reading threads like this. CSW is not Satoshi but is Faketoshi-t. If he really goes to the jail for stealing Bitcoins then he can just give money and bail out but base on the post of the OP, no Bitcoins were stolen so in short this is a CLICKBAIT!!!  . @LogitechMouse these kind of threads are interesting, and help newbies realise that Craig is not Satoshi. The original post is now outdated as new evidence has come to light which shows that Craig forged documents and submitted them to the court, he’ll not get away with a fine if this is proved. Stephen Palley the trial lawyer has published these documents on Twitter, which is a baffling move considering that the matter is in court I feel he should not have published it online. News Source: https://www.cryptonewsz.com/craig-wright-presents-fabricated-documents-in-kleiman-case-to-prove-his-innocence/30081/Was that uploaded by CSW or plaintiff ?? hmm dig for yourself |
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qLI3VIHuKUGavin claims Craig signed in his presence block 1, Yet his claims are not he cannot sign and has no access to the keys today. Now if this is the case it would have been impossible for this to have happened back then if now today he claims that he has none of the keys and they are slip with shamirs secret sharing. His claims of "Bonded" delivery's of keys are still to happen must be fake his claims now in court do not sit with the previous history of events he created. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shamir%27s_Secret_Sharing He Claims he cannot access blocks > 70 Do not beleive what is PoSM |
|
|
|
Jep - just too much noise from trolls and haters - nobody realy does own PoW and looks behind to find the truth. |
|
|
|
I'm convinced. If you write out the bullet points as "facts" and you make them large and bolded, then they must certainly be true. They have been so much true, that it had to be deleted here... so hope others will dig it up ( do your own resarch !) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
