If this is the case then it's bad news for all altcoin,the only preferable crypto currency is Bitcoin,but these altcoin can set up their own usage,I doubt if they can match Bitcoin in terms of merchant adoptions,bitcoin has 100k plus so a long shot for all altcoins.
sorry r u saying bitcoin has 100k plus merchant adoption? lol seriously is there even 100 people on the planet actively regularly using bitcoin as a proper currency be pretty poor sales in btc for those 100k merchants
|
|
|
using bitcoin hasn't been worth the hassle for the longest time move onto something that works and let wallstreet have this sucker
|
|
|
p.s. FTC (Feather) is one of the biggest pump and dump shitcoins of all times that hasn't yet stopped pumping and it has at least one major pump each year for no reason.
while i can't deny it gets a big pump (n dump) from time to time, i wouldn't class it as a shitcoin, ftc has a decent community following and proper continual development since its beginning. (though i am not a big fan of pumps even i have to admit they are most entertaining )
|
|
|
I like this coin, but i found the original thread, and this coin was delisted from Poloniex, Bittrex, C-cex And i really think will be very hard to get listed again. So idk... Not impossible with trex. yes goldcoin did it delisted then later relisted trex so is this UIS worth a look at?
|
|
|
when u look at Max's crypto history, well one off it could we brushed off as incompetence (but good profit and good timing on getting out for himself), but multiple times; well then its provable intent.
i was in maxcoin when it happen, so once bitten i wasn't about to go startcoin, (i came here as you know to give you guys the headsup on what i could see coming), however if i'd got suckered into startcoin where intent looks easier to prove i'd be looking at class action type approach or getting some regulators or authority to atleast look at his repeat actions.
perhaps the maxcoin amd startcoin communities look at working together on this?
|
|
|
The problem is there are many coins with good names : sexcoin, paycoin (the original whose name was stolen by Garza the scammer), ... Goldcoin needs more ! well its does have more going for it then just a name, just one example; tis had a strong support team since 2013 (thats kinda rare around these parts).
|
|
|
i say its a scam because it was a giveaway coin where the giveaway was gamed, and it was gamed by the distributors which most definitely makes it a scam in anyone's language.
|
|
|
look at its distribution at the start, the giveaway where the distributors claimed many shares for themselves, was exposed and then openly admitted too..................................so yes a BIG scam
like most giveaway coins so easy for distributors to claim as many shares as they like.
|
|
|
The game was, is and will be to extract more BTC from community, nothing else. They will pack it into "We are helping 3rd world!" or some other shit but in the end they just care for themselves.
exactly, sad part is this has been Max Keiser's game in several crypto's, and why stop? he makes free btc here and no repercussions and he can still have his program raving on about the greedy banker elite when he is worse then them, he's a hypocrite of the worst kind.
|
|
|
Out of all the arbitrary lines you could draw between "legit" coins and the rest, drawing it at Litecoin is just unreasonably silly.
i think its pretty much spot on where the line needs to be draw if we were honest about crypto. (there are a few odds and ends of legit cryptos and devs, but they are few and far between).
|
|
|
Game Over.
so you now see it? i'm not here to gloat, i was genuinely trying to warn, so others wouldn't get burnt. i'm genuinely upset (even without being a startcoin holder) that others got suckered in. CrowdWhale, others might have a go at you, but you weren't part of the play and you got played like the rest of them. no one should be angry at you for having faith and being optimistic. optimists do do better on markets and in life....well normally.
|
|
|
"Hi all, video update coming tomorrow. Will be providing update on the development of V2, some big updates on StartJoin and couple of significant updates regarding StartCoin. I'm in San Fran right now so it will come out before noon Pacific time." - Karl Gray
so he's handing StartCoin over to the community just gets better and better like wtf ...... well that was a significant update
|
|
|
whats the point of being an alternative to the greedy bankers system if we ourselves become the greedy bankers The greedy bankers system we have today concentrates more and more power to the greedy bankers. Ie, because they have money, they can get more money, because they are in charge of the interest rates etc they can affect the economy. In a cryptocurrency greedy banker scenario as the banker "consumes" his wealth (stake in the crypto currency) he becomes less relevent because as a percentage his share is going down. eg: I realease a coin and pre-mine 50% of the coins. People start buying the other 50% and put the price up, so I decide i'm going to dump 50% of my holdings, I make some nice alternate currency (ie, USD) and feel very happy, fat and greedy, but, now I only own 25% of the currency. Thats not really how it goes in the current system of greedy bankers, where they get rich, spend it, the print some more and give it to themselves. i think you really misunderstand what i meant by crypto's greedy bankers. your example is comparing apples with oranges; ie comparing fiat bankers with the premine scam coin pump and dumpers (which are far removed from the new breed of greedy bankers forming in crypto).
|
|
|
What about Litecoin ?
litecoin is bitcoin without the premine
|
|
|
yes litecoin, a long time ago, became my reserve crypto for no other reason then it simply worked for me way better then bitcoin, i often wonder whether 99% of the bitcoin enthusiast actually use it, because if you did use it they'd notice tis not user friendly at all and hasn't been for the longest time.
|
|
|
Whereas, telling me not to creating the Bitcoin Killer advance because you don't want me to get paid what I am worth, is nonsensical. If you could somehow stop me, then I would go work on some other project not in crypto and earn the (up to) $350,000 a year I used to earn before.
then please do, if this is your opinion then honestly the development of a 'bitcoin killer' isn't for you Communists have never been wrong. tis nothing to do with political ideology in facts its the lack there of. @AusKipper refuted your logic. Auskipper's point had little to do with what i was referring to by greedy bankers.
|
|
|
Whereas, telling me not to creating the Bitcoin Killer advance because you don't want me to get paid what I am worth, is nonsensical. If you could somehow stop me, then I would go work on some other project not in crypto and earn the (up to) $350,000 a year I used to earn before.
then please do, if this is your opinion then honestly the development of a 'bitcoin killer' isn't for you Communists have never been wrong. tis nothing to do with political ideology in facts its the lack there of.
|
|
|
so anyone else up for making that objection, or looking into pursuing other avenues?
|
|
|
Whereas, telling me not to creating the Bitcoin Killer advance because you don't want me to get paid what I am worth, is nonsensical. If you could somehow stop me, then I would go work on some other project not in crypto and earn the (up to) $350,000 a year I used to earn before.
then please do, if this is your opinion then honestly the development of a 'bitcoin killer' isn't for you. lost on most the crypto crowd is the entire point behind the development of a true p2p currency. its not about developing another payment system, seriously the world doesn't need a new visa or paypal etc etc etc yes bitcoin was essentially premined and one of the many reasons i think its more a distraction then the future of p2p currency. the only good thing todate to come out of cryptocurrency is the idea. whats the point of being an alternative to the greedy bankers system if we ourselves become the greedy bankers
|
|
|
also seems to be lost on the current XEM crowd is that the distribution was a scam, one of the distributes admitting to having claimed a big stab of the giveaway shares
|
|
|
|