I told you what I posted I am not reposting it word for word because I know some scum sucking dirt bag like you will push for some scammy temp ban for reposting deleted material. The state the board is in it would probably wash too.

Do you deny that is what I posted? and that is what you reported? if so then state the reason you reported it you cant be that dumb to have forgotten the reason surely.

Let's see on the other thread that you just insisted that I open when there is closer examination of huge black womans post and then my own reply.

Please girl stop dreaming. I have seen what you apparently look like and it is certainly nothing like that. Talk about dishonesty. Imagine that level of false advertisement. Now that would be a SUPER scam worthy of a perm ban and lifetime jail.

I will see what rules I am breaking then we can decide on that. Perhaps they are just suchmoon rules?

Defecation? anyway you are little. 

There was no rule violation as I just demonstrated. Present the rule. Present the example of the violation. You can not therefore I call false accusation.

I just demonstrated how it was both on topic and relevant to you. I see no rebuttal except some observable double standards blathering and excuses.

NO just because merit is kept within a tight circle for control purposes does not mean 250 merits is at all hard to replicate if one gets knocked out if you have an alt or friends in the inner circle. They can do nothing at all to speed up activity so you lose a 5 year old account it will take 5 years to replace it. You lose a 250 merits account it can be replaced far more quickly if you have alts pals in the merit merry-go-round.

250 gamed and cycled merits can be earned very quickly by alts of merit sources, ass kissers and other established members of the merit circle.

As I have also stated there are other reasons for activity to be more suitable to trust.

Is suchmoon a secret mod here now?

I would like clear detailed explanation for why 3 of my posts have been deleted today.

I would also like to know who reported them. Suchmoon already confessed to taking me off ignore today so she can get my posts deleted. This is completely out of control.

I would like to know which mods deleted them and if they even reviewed those posts?

I actually see nothing worthy of deleting them in any of them at all. I am tired of suchmoon having her own way here on every single matter. This is doubly annoying since she insisted my merits were removed and then they were and stingers deleted from merit source.

This is all getting far too 1 sided.

You have a bunch of proven untrustworthy scoundrels trying to take control of every aspect of the board.

I mean this snitching bitch obviously reports 100s per day so most are auto deleted but this is getting crazy.

You are still explaining/excusing yourself.. so there is not need as yet to start the other thread.

Although your explanation is bullshit and observably double standards and does not detail at all WHY it is off topic and not relevant. It just states that you personally believe (others but not yourself) should not bring in a persons proven history to a post even if it is totally on topic and clearly relevant and they have just posted false accusations and insults about you.

It is clear you have no explanation only a bunch of excuses that make you appear stupid and as having double standards. Both of which are obviously hard to disguise anyway in your situation.

I am enjoying watching you post your usual standard of double standards junk that makes zero sense.

I am also waiting to bitch slap you with this thread everytime you bring someones history into your replies.

Confessing in public you took me off ignore so that you could get my posts deleted is completely crazy. Disgusting little turd.

But then again cycled merit is not related to zero waste merit. Sometimes people are confused. We must show patience and forgiveness. Anyone can make a simple error.

It was answered.

The cycling takes place and is very clearly observable. Im glad that you see that now.

Not only I suspect are there more with 1500 + I would also suspect you will not find an obvious and direct connection between many of them over the years. Preventing collusion is key in a decentralised system or else it is pseudo decentralisation.

Still DT is a tiny tiny subset and it is also a very much connected and observably tight knit group. This is not at all a good start to a decentralised system.

Imagine having some DT1 that do not hang in meta 24/7  and are not observably part of the merit-merry-go-round.

whiny to idiots like such moon = legitimate questions

Let me spell it out to you because as i have demonstrated in the merit cycling debates you are a full on dip shit and need to start making ludicrous claims to hold on to your side of any argument

1. my post and the details regarding the facts of the pharmacists background are ON TOPIC and RELEVANT to
a. his claim my views on the elections, and dt are incorrect and that makes me a baffoon
b. his claim that the dt should remain as it is because it is unworkable to try and please everyone and it works best as it can right now
c. the op that is questioning the current DT system vs elections.

2. now any relevant back ground pertinent to the OP or a statement made regarding the OP must be made on a separate  board and not mentioned on thread or it will be deleted. Who says?? you suchmoron??

You are more of a dirty snitcher for minor infractions than a whiner that is likely because at present you enjoy some pseudo power and favour here and have little to whine about since you get to instruct theymos to remove merits, mods to delete posts, display openly double standards with no comeback, support liars, suspected extortionists,  and proven trust abusers and proven greedy sneaky sig spamming troll puppets for DT positions and cycle your merit source loot. Not much to complain about I guess at the moment.

I wonder when you will break down again and start spewing out ludicrous statements. I'm glad you're back. Where have you been of late? I see minimal posting in meta from you?

LOL so here we have it. Suchmoon says no more mentioning a persons proven dirty background if they are her pals and colluders. I see her mentioning everyone elses background when it suits her. Og, QS, TS and anyone else gets their pasts or her variation of their pasts dug up when she starts colliding with them in threads.

However, even when a suchmoon colluder pal makes invalid and incorrect claims on your personal views and your character you must not present facts to demonstrate why those views regarding the topic and yourself could certainly be invalidated and propose obvious and observable events from their past to substantiate your views.

I see.   Well let's look through your post history shall we and start making the same comparisons and have them all deleted shall we?

I've missed you actually. I have forgotten what a last word imbecile you are for demonstrating your own double standards

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5109647.msg49728142#msg49728142

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106712.msg49728054#msg49728054

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106712.msg49724251#msg49724251

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106712.msg49713758#msg49713758

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg49491374#msg49491374

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100061.msg49340042#msg49340042

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5098584.msg49336299#msg49336299


more on the way all need to be reported and deleted for being background - - not allowed..

So now facts that are obviously relevant and important to refute false accusations and claims regarding the specific topic are not allowed. Especially if they reveal proven dirt on suchmoons pals.

Are you serious?

The pharmacist aka huge black woman the person who got busted for sig spamming racist trolling under a sock puppet to earn more btc dust for spamming an extra sig and even then was so greedy got caught trying to leave one campaign for a higher paying one starts making false accusations about me out of the blue.


I was alerted to this accusation about myself directly so

1. I told the truth that he was busted for being sneaky and greedy and sig spamming under a puppet account for extra btc dust

2. i told the truth that when i asked him his greatest achievement here he told me it was getting on a highly paid sig campaign

3. I pointed out inlight of this why I disagreed with his views on the DT selection and elections and on myself being a baffoon voicing incorrect  stupid unworkable views ( can't please everyone argument).. and why he may be making these false claims.

It is obviously on topic because he is commenting on the elections and the trust system and actually telling people my views are incorrect and that I am a baffoon and his views that it is all working perfectly are the correct views?this  is of course likely motivated by the fact that even such a person of proven untrustworthy repute as him and his master lauda can still be given powers of trust and rewarded for essentially gaming the systems.

So suchmoons you say he huge black woman.. can say my views are incorrect and I look like a baffoon (all unsubstantiated bullshit from a proven untrustworthy scumbag) and I have to have my post deleted for presenting facts as to his background and why he is saying this about me and the lack of need for any changes to the DT system and elections are not required or even worth debating??

Now explain how it is off topic and non relevant?

I await your explanation.

It is clearly just an attempt to silence facts that demonstrate your DT inclusion pal and merit fan and receiver cycling pal the pharmacist is clearly a sneaky and greedy and untrustworthy person.

This by your own definition suchmoon makes you untrustworthy ...again from yet another source.

You are starting to look very shady indeed. I see you colluding with all manner of observably untrustworthy individuals. You need to be watched very closely.

Ha so you are refusing to present it now?  what a chicken shit piece of snitching dirt you are.

1 hour then I will start the thread that demonstrates just how you are trying to silence a facts based reply to a false accusation that one of your "circle" of merit pals and DT inclusions made.

tick tock bring to me now your case.... copy and paste the "case" you sent to the mod.

I will title it something like..

suchmoon instructs mod to delete facts and observable events rebutting false claims and accusations from his pal huge black woman.

this actually is not as bad as the lauda incident but it nicely lends itself to being very similar in nature.

seems like a person trying to cover up the proven wrong doing of their friends and DT inclusions and merit pals to me.

Post the pharmacists aka huge black womans post about myself and then my own post in reply then explain how mine is off topic and deserves to be deleted

I challenge you to do it right now. If not then you have no case that you care to present. If you can easily prove mine should be deleted and his left there then fair enough.

If not I want you to message the mod and have it replaced.

Please newbie have some respect - - for yourself. Stop asskissing and begging to be a merit source over and over.

Review my entire post histroy.
My contributions here are far more than you can dream about.

Just to mention a few

1. first person to break the dark coin scam and with a few friends, we forced an air drop to be offered that has a value of possibly 2 Billion dollars. Was accused of stopping that becoming the number 1 on coinmarket cap by several of their scammy supporters. So arguably being responsible for stopping btc pushed off top spot ever in its history. I totally believe them that it would have rivaled btc for number 1 position if this huge war on the alt board did not break out about the captive instamine.

2. picking 6 of the top 10 rising projects in the last bull run. Was thanked in pm and in public from persons who went from nothing to millionaires by investing in them. REAL projects that are working to slot in the missing pieces of the end to end trustless decentralised arena here. Yes I shared this knowledge in public before they shot up.

3. First to spot and highlight many LARGE scams and take them on head on in alt discussion when that was actually the main hub here, not reporting and snitching on them just straight head on confrontation and slamming them in public... not the 2 bit crap scam icos only absolute fools would invest in that you seem to think you are preventing. Whilst achieving fuck all apart from whack a mole now.

4. Trying in the face of many gangs like in meta now to force fairer distributions. Later to witness many who fought against me saying later I was correct to push for changes.

5. Making honest and insightful posts like my thread of the year in meta. This is without doubt the most important thread here in the last year. These systems are changing bitcointalk forever. I see no refutation there I see nothing but merit being given to a net negative post that is nothing other than a faux and empty rebuttal.

You are just a nothing noob ass kisser I see nothing except some minor ico crap that nobody ever would invest in anyway except themselves pumping their own apparent investment and some feltching of suchmoon who bestows some merit on your begging ass.

LOL legend wanna be.

Keep begging to be a merit source so you can join the merit merry-go-round, im sure you will get there in the end.

When I see you telling me legends with less cycled merits than you are not your equals I laugh. I can only imagine what smooth, gjhiggins or dzimbeck or any number of real legends would do to your tiny mind in any kind of debate.

You reported it

STATE YOUR CASE NOW

YOU deemed it needing removal. NOW PROVE IT.

I mean you are snitching around on this board day and night for minor shit I bet the mods barely look at the reports since you create so many.

You are scared to present your case because you know you have NO case.

The pharmacist made false accusations about me and I replied with facts and observable events regarding him.

Now you reported it .... prove it should have been removed in the context that it was made.

What are you scared of? that I will tear your case to shreds like every other conflict we have had and you will end up spouting ludicrous drivel that I will be able to bitch slap you around with forever?

This is exactly the sort of silencing of facts that are on topic and relevant EVEN in response to  false claims they are allowed to make about you ?

Why stop there? just be like lauda and give red trust for presenting facts and reasonable statements based on those facts and observable events.

I want you to prove it is off topic or else I want it put back there or yes I will make a thread about it.

Bring the proof within 1 hour else I make a thread about it and insist the post is replaced.

1. it is factual
2. it is on topic
3. it is in reply to a post he referenced me in and made incorrect statements regarding myself else I would not have taken time to give my factually correct and valuable reply.

Now stop trying to silence the facts that don't suit your agenda.


the pharmacist is aka Huge Black Woman. The sneaky, devious , greedy racist trolling sock puppet sig spammer

Do you deny this?? suchmoon?

1. bring the pharmacists post about me
2. bring my post and demonstrate how it is off topic and needs to be deleted.

Yes scunter is his pet name for me unless you wish to try and deny this too.


Do you suggest that the pharmacist aka huge black woman has the right to call me scunter and make false accusations about myself. HOWEVER my factual and reasonable post that I can provide evidence and observable events to substantiate must be removed???

I will post on topic , relevant facts in response to false claims regarding myself whenever I feel like it and if they are deleted I will be making a huge fuss about it and highlighting that you seem to be having way too much influence over free speech here.

Well, I very much doubt someone could reach legendary or even hero based upon spam only.

However, yes, I have said many times this is point of merit and for that it works well there should be no other function of merit as it stands now.

Activity tells you how long you have been a member and how active you have been. The post history is there to review. I very much doubt you will find many 2000 activity spammers. Although according to suchmoon "most" pre merit legends are spammers.  I mean plus they need 100 earned merits so they will need to have have some of this too.

Yes this is what I mean so if you look at a board and see the moderated is X but then a global mod Y can moderate all boards .... then how to know which deleted for sure?

Does it not show somewhere who deleted?

As per the title.

How to tell which mod deletes a post?

Do Global mods have the powers to moderate all boards or are there boards that have their set mod and that is that?

Yes but that is my point.

HISTORY is important. Who do you trust more someone who has not cheated you in the first 5 seconds you are talking to them or someone who has not cheated you for years and years that you have known them?

If I told you to research the post history of someone with 2000 activity and their interactions here and then told you to research someone with 200 activity then you will see you have a lot more material to go on

Merit has nothing to do with trust. History and TIME being honest (free from observable scamming or telling lies or greedy sneaky behaviour for financial reward) does have a bearing on trust (where finances are concerned)

Of course trading history should really be part of the trust system but again I never use it so I am not sure how easy that is to game.

There is NO GAMING/CYCLING/COLLUDING possible with activity.