I disagree this project is getting a little long in the tooth. I think many got involved and then walked away over time. I think the Airdrop needs to start ASAP, especially as the advertising platform first needs a large amount of users to be viable and also we don't even know when it can be built, great if it can be done in a couple of months but if its another year say I definitely say we cant wait.

To get a perspective on airdrop and price. Getgems when giving away 1 gems a day was actually giving at least 10,000 gems a day (prob a bit more) so 25,000 isn't going to drastically crash the price. Plus they could always moderate how much the airdrop will be anyway....


My point is we had a bit of a pop when the 1 gems giveaway started and fb likes etc. Its the key to getting more users onboard. Thats the early focus IMO. We got to get the airdrop done and also personally need to use some of these competition winnings for some high profile advertising/articles. $250,000+ could buy an awful lot i expect in some tech online magazines etc...pay some kid with 1 million subscibers on Youtube to profile it etc. This thing is ready to go viral with the airdrop...we need to get going IMO.

well if everyone actually bought the coin and not at bargain basement prices then maybe we could get a rally on and maintain a more respectable floor price.

Put your money where your mouth is and buy if these coins are gonna be worth 1$ in a year or two....it looks like the low is possibly in.

Which is where the problem lies, many here do think the price will rise a lot at some point but so far I have yet to see a coin make any substantial gains so late into its development. Most coins price peeks are actually within a month or two or release. The ability to say hey our coin is unique is often a narrow window looking at the history of crypto. I hope you guys arent too arrogant or too defensive to miss it....I fear you might already have done honestly.

As long as you guys are happy to hold a great tech that never gets used and gets overlooked then cool....don't let me stop you.

Communities need some discernment otherwise they look like a weird bunch of hillbillies who don't like intruders. If there is anything that has a negative impact on a coin it's this.


Talking about a code review is about answering your critics...for holders sake. Not everyone is out to get you...and it's immature assuming everyone is.


I've said it before and I'll say it again, this continues this coin dies just cause everyone gets pissed with the community and it builds up a rep as a hated coin. Qora was trolled to death by NEM and NXT to open source the code and was FUDed it was a clone. It pretty much missed its window of moving up with NXT as a brand new code and by the time it did open source no one cared cause there was 5 other coins which also were new codes. Just dont make this mistake.....another coin could rip VNL off now and everyone could pile into them and leave VNL in the dust. There already are a few people who seem to think they will have a coin that does something similar.

Well I guess that's a good problem.

But surely you don't need to be a genius to understand the work of one. Just to throw another random name out this guy helped out Qora....I do believe this forum has some talented people though conflicts of interest makes it tricky for sure.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=44572

I know many are looking toward Dark++ as a kick start to VNL but they might be disappointed...it may at best just produce a short pump and another flood of destructive FUD. I don't see how you can build and market a feature like anominity when of everyone thinks the coin is a scam already and expect a positive result..


One thing I learnt from QORA is great tech doesn't win.....convincing others something is great tech wins.

I'm not an expert but I would of thought Bitcointalk is actually a perfect place to find an early reviewer. There definitely are some legit coders here who aren't just scammers.

This guy after a minute of looking.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=710099.0

Ok fair enough on this particular guy but if Polinex did a 'code review' for nothing then you would think someone would be willing who is trustworthy and wont ask for a million bucks surely???

Ok but where is a solution to the problem that VNL could be the most amazing coin ever made but no one believes in the tech and it dies on the vine? I mean eventually someone else will steal just enough of JC's ideas to make their coin and and not look like it was a direct steal. I see that happening in the next year.


I dont see why a review has to cost that much and even if it is flawed it a start to get the ball rolling. 

I messaged him and asked if he would do one. It's a start I guess. It's the communities responsibility to do this, we don't need to bother JC, he has done the work it's not his role to justify his open source material it's others.


Maybe a small Bitcoin fund can be gathered by someone trustworthy in the VNL community. Of course a review could make the price drop but if he finds it legit then it's actually in everyone's best interest to chip a little in. And look if you don't want to support one then let others do so. I'm sure some would prefer to gather more cheap but there are the kind of people who are happy to FUD the coin for their self interests. But I see no reason for those who want this to make it happen.

So why hasn't there been one? There is one thing being cool and not caring what people think bit there is another thing completely throwing the success of a coin under a bus. Prove critics wrong, community should be the better man....or woman...and pay for one.

I Truely can't think of a better FU than buying tons at this low and then laughing your asses off when the price explodes when a peer review shows the coin is unique.

Let's get this friken clear cause I can't believe Bitcointalk has drifted to the low it has.


You are saying someone called MrPump is not trustworthy......well color me surprised. I think the clue was in the name.


Bitcointalk RIP...

I know it might seem a bit unlikely but we need to get someone one in the right area to promote and mention Getgems as a tool that 'democratises' social media. The first person that came to mind who has a big online following of the people group that might use it and has shown some interest in crypto is Russel Brand. He is very into the idea of people sharing the profits in a company so Getgems is bascially that. Personal I find his ideas too communist sounding but something like this if put in front of someone like that could get behind the concept possibly. Maybe just posting on his YouTube shows might succeed. Long shot I know but still worth a shot maybe?

Since when has an online game been part of the project?

One darknet application? Does this mean darknet++ or something else? I don't know what a darkness application even would be?

What would the community have against a peer review?

VNL IS claiming quite a significant jump in tech so get a peer review and be above reproach. VNL is still very undervalued and this is due I think to the ability of FUD to stick at the moment cause of this lack of review.

your instincts are to simply attack anyone who doesn't agree with your community rather than try to listen to what they are saying. I never said VNL was the same in terms of tech. The issue is if a coin is allowed to die on the vine by a community too stubborn or arrogant or both to address concerns for a coin then it doesn't actually have a right to expect anyone to buy it.

Simple, get a peer review, show you don't need to hide. Cause if you don't soon you will look like you hiding. Communities make or break a coin, please tell me there is a sane person here that gets the coin needs to answer critics with a peer review and then we can move on.

I'll post this one more time.


I went through this exactly the same with Qora. The tech was amazing, the developer was seen as a genius and the community just stuck their head in the sands until eventually the coin is regarded as crap even though its as good as ETH, NXT and NEM combined.





Coins have a sell by date and VNL is running out. This community IF they want their coins not to be worthless and unable to even sell due to low vol forever need to listen up, and listen good.



This community NEEDS to meet FUD of the coin with a peer review of the coin. This will completely cancel out any FUD that has destroyed the price....

I won't warn you guys again, arrogance was what killed Qora...it can kill this coin too..I warned you.

Look people......lets play the game they want to play.




The only thing people can FUD VNL with is saying its not legit and saying something works isn't enough.


So I ask that the community get VNL peer reviewed....play their game and be holding as much as we can when we do it...



Why wouldn't we if we are confident?

Where are we at in the project......seems pretty dormant at the moment?