Once airdrop and IOS is in place we need to use this on a decent article in WIRED etc.

I think Koinofy is a Counterparty wallet, but i still wouldn't have it sat there, it was only really designed as a temp wallet but that's a personal thing. I would be more concerned about Polinex, nearly all the big exchanges have been hacked now, they are very very risky at this point. It almost seems as soon as one gets big enough it becomes ripe for hackers.....or possibly the owner to run off?


* Counterparty has a cold wallet, not tried it but I guess that's a serious option if security is the issue.

Surely your GEMZ Counterparty wallet is the safest?
I wouldn't keep anything on Polinex I wouldn't be willing to lose.

I can't send photos on my app now, gallery won't open?

On the subject of exchanges we are down to one major one now with BTER not likely to be up and running anytime soon. I personally we need at least another major exchange. Going along with that the bigger picture is we need to get rid of centralised exchanges completely and have a user friendly way to buy Gems.

I'm not against it but let's not overplay it. Let's not forget it's already on the Telegram app and probably many of the clones of Telegram of which there are quite a few. The focus on what Gems has that is different to others is the most important surely. It's a cryptocurrency app that users earn real 'money' and that democratises social by sharing the profit of an app with its users. That's the big hook as I see it.

I have a hunch the market won't skip a beat and will shrug it off, I mean it's not like the coins are out of circulation but are more likely to be horded even, in theory supply wise it should increase the price!

And I'm sure a lot of bad people already own Bitcoin, now they own a few more.  . Nothing to see.

On thing I love about Gems is its almost FUD untouchable. If it gets users absolutely no one will care what they post on this little niche site. That's why we haven't really had much FUD. The only possible thing FUD can do is lower the price at this early development stage, personally I think that's all good.

I speculate you are a middleaged man sat in his underwear in his living room watching game shows.

I'm not saying you're wrong, I've never traded BTC but it still has a market of over 3 billion! I cant see how that can easily be manipulated? It's only a hunch but I have a feeling the worst is over for Bitcoin for a while, we have come out of a very bad patch but it seems we may be on the cusp of going mainstream.

Now I actually am going into speculation..but I think if you look at the 1 year chart it wouldn't be crazy to conclude that we have bottomed and have turned a corner.

http://imgur.com/vwMtJV9

This one does. Now in the words of well you Fuck off you are ignored.

Scumbag

By being so obnoxious it was hard for even supporters to keep going to the thread. When we needed developers he scared them off. great job. Plus I'm pretty sure he is a NXT boy trying to scare any nxt like coins away.

You need to get rid of this guy as soon as possible. He singlehandly destroyed Qora.

It would piss me off completly cause I had over 5% at one point. I actually think it's a stronger hint than it seems. I mean people were already making the link to BCNext Qora was clearly aware of it. And appart for. All the coincidences in their behaviour if you combine the combination of leaving a coin just like BCNext did AND making exactly 231 posts like BCNext then I guess the logical conclusion is that Qora was definetly making a point even if he isn't BCNext. That logically seems clear or at least very likely.

No risk they simply would use it as way for people to buy fiat into the Google pay system and also they can convert to USD rapidly. No risk to them, just potential revenue increases.

I'm crap at maths and Im no economist but surely people have got it wrong about it being detrimental when companies like Microsoft etc take BTC cause the thinking is that they will quickly convert them to Fiat so it pushes the price down.

Can someone correct me if I'm wrong but surely as Bitcoin has a wider use and thereofre is stretched over a much wider network the price will definetly increase as the coin becomes more scarce. I mean we only have 10m or so in supply so even a small amount of mainstream use and you will start to get liquidity issues in BTC. Sure I get the short term potential for drops but the bigger picture is its one step back and two steps forward?

Why wouldn't they? If they know Bitcoin will be the future then Google would be the first to want to be a part of it even if it threatened their payment system. If you can't beat them join them etc.

It being a bad idea or not doesn't really affect the significance of the move by Google IF the rumors turn out to be true, which they seems quite likely.

It's annoying that I was seeing what looks like a stealth rally in Bitcoin but no News that would back it up, so when I asked it got stuffed into the dark world of the speculation thread. The Mods on here don't have much nuance in deciding where topics should be.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=954500.0




So what news could be fuelling this move? Is it the Google Pay story?

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/google-may-introduce-bitcoin-new-payment-system/

Bingo I think you might be right. It's annoying this got moved to speculation cause I wasn't wondering about the price move but the possible News that that be causing it.