I have followed various sporting activities and I noticed something that hardly make complete sense to me and that is the rationale behind firing a coach when the players do perform poorly. What drew my attention to this is a news flash about Jose Mourinho's case in Roma. According to the article, Mourinho left Roma angry and feeling betrayed by the players. Is it even possible that players will intentionally lose matches because they want their coach out at the expense of their own careers? If this is true, why will the club management reprimand the coach and not the players? I know some people will argue that the coach is the leader of the team and should be responsible for building the unity and love the team need to play in high morale, but in a case the players happen to have hated the coach and have decided to lose matches as punishment for their coach, is it right to fire the coach?

Many of us know about Bitcoin. But due to a lack of funds, we regret about Bitcoin investment. Many people, particularly those from low-income families, regret when we can't invest in Bitcoin. Though we can't solve this problem, we can struggle to achieve our goal. For our daily needs, we must need money to survive. Sometimes we spend money on unnecessary things. So we can avoid spending unnecessary money because we can survive without it. And we can start investing in Bitcoin with that money. We have to find a solid income source, even if it is small. So we can go ahead with our bitcoin investment. If we struggle now, we may build a bright future. Even students could save some money from their daily spending and invest in Bitcoin.

They definitely can find trustworthy reviews of this scam site if they are willing to do some research before depositing their funds. Problem here is that most people are very lazy due to which they directly invest without doing any research.

This is how 1xbit continues making money and staying afloat despite the rising negative criticism against them.

At a recent time some of the organization and basically some legendary people try to launch "Cashless system" which transactions are conducted electronically. without the need for physical currency such as coins or banknotes. In a cashless society or economy people rely on electronic forms of payment such as credit cards, debit cards, mobile payment apps, and online banking transfers (EFT) to make purchases, pay bills and conduct financial transactions. This trend has become increasingly popular with the advent of digital technology and the widespread adoption of electronic payment methods.

Bitcoin becomes the primary medium of exchange replacing physical cash entirely. Several obstacles would need to be overcome for this to happen such as Bitcoin would need widespread adoption as a means of payment.

Bitcoin's current transaction throughput is limited compared to traditional payment systems like Visa or Master card. Should be improvement of Lightning Network. Governments and regulatory bodies may pose challenges to Bitcoin becoming the primary medium of exchange due to concerns about control, taxation, and compliance with anti-money laundering (AML). Even to be know customer (KYC) regulations.
A powerful infrastructure supporting Bitcoin transactions would need to be in place.

Hopefully it's possible for Bitcoin to become a cashless system in the future it!

Check official website and Youtube channel.

https://funtoken.io/
https://www.youtube.com/@funtoken_io

There you can find current roadmap and other announcements.

Binance just announced they are delisting privacy coins included but not limited to, XMR and Zcash.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5484277

If you own any privacy coins on that exchange, the deadline is February 20.

We are slowly getting cornered.

The question is, will theymos ban privacy coins too if the regulatories take action against them? Now, that would be the end of the forum because that would mean banning legit crypto projects, it ain't the same as banning mixers.

The companies do not have time to keep track of these things and they will hire Signature managers who will be responsible for ensuring that the participants are wearing the required signatures, doing the required amount of posts and are being paid for the constructive posts by the end of the week.

I just want to share this with my fellow bettors.
Have you ever taken such a huge risk on gambling before?
Yesterday I experienced what I have never experienced before but I am very much happier because my risk wasn't in vain.

A friend of mine sold her bet to me 20k Nigerian naira and I bought it because there was a cash-out on the bet, and the cash out was 20k Nigerian naira.
Besides, the games are 21 in total and 19 out of the games have entered so the games was remaining just 2 and that was why I bought the bet with a whole 20k Nigerian naira.

This is the highest risk I have ever taken on gamble.  :)Why I called this the highest risk was because if the remaining 2 games lose I will be the loser and not my friend, so that risk was very terrible but I just have to take the risk because I already have in mind that you can not win if you do not risk. But to cut long story short, I win the bet, this was like sharing the money equally with my friend.
So have you ever taken such a risk on gambe before?

Tesla initiated the last Bitcoin bull run? Rubbish.

I saw this on Twitter yesterday. You can see it yourself: https://twitter.com/rovercrc/status/1754146791576985665?t=oYWn43cKg08NR--EAR3gDg&s=09

Bitcoin was at $3800 in March 2020. It fall abruptly from $8000 to $3800 in just an hour or so and increased back to $5500 not quite long. 2 weeks to halving 2020, bitcoin was around $8200 and its price was not far from that after halving. After halving, bitcoin later increased over $19000 and fall back to $16900 or so.

Michael Saylor, Grayscale, institutional investors and retail investors all played their own part as some people also continue to fomo. No Tesla until the price of bitcoin increased above $43000. Tesla bought bitcoin around that price and bitcoin price increased above $50000. Later it got to $63500. Before bitcoin get to $63000, Tesla accepted bitcoin for payment.

Elon Musk later said Tesla will no longer accept bitcoin for payment and the price of bitcoin deceased below $46000. He later said Tesla will accept coin that is using 1% of bitcoin energy for mining. We all knew he was manipulating and only wanted to make people know about doge. He accepted doge. He only manipulated bitcoin price.

Later China banned bitcoin mining and bitcoin got below $30000.

Like 6 months after, bitcoin increased to $69000 which was the all-time-high of no Elon Musk influence as it was before.

How is Tesla the cause of the bull run? It is just rubbish to praise what manipulated bitcoin price when it is even not what that started the bull run.

That works, as long as users are dealing with Bitcoin. Now imagine an ETF holding a million Bitcoins in the future: "withdrawing" all Bitcoins means selling them. The Bitcoin market will crash hard, and boom again when they buy back after the Fork.

I guess we're going to disagree on this. A Fork is like dividend: any other ETF takes care of the dividend for it's users, and in exchange they charge their users a "fund fee".

Progress is still being made: slowly, but surely. Even with the crash in FUN price I was making nearly 1% profit monthly. However, I decided to cashout a portion of my BTC funds from the platform, so the daily extra BTC income has decreased from 0.00003260 to 0.00001853BTC.

To say the truth, as the experiment has been running for more than 1 year and we have already seen everything it has to offer, I would like to retreat to 12,500 FUN tier level, as it's the best cost-benefit package. However, I'm in a delicate situation, because FUN is too cheap, and by selling it I'm also going to lose a percentage of daily extra income over BTC balance. So, it's probably better to keep holding and locking FUN for some extra profit, for now.

2020 was supposed to be an amazing year for me after buying some BTC and altcoins back in 2019 but the Corona virus came and had to dispose by crypto bag for survival before the bullrun came. It's a year I would never forget coz my life would have changed drastically if Covid 19 hadn't messed things up.

Fast forward to 2023, I have been able to accumulate some few BTC from my monthly pay check and the news of Bitcoin spot ETF approval arosed my hope again that BTC might kickstart the mini bullrun before the halving but the reverse was the case as BTC fails to hit the $50k mark.

While reading some crypto news earlier today, I came across a survey conducted by Bitget towards the end of last year in several region of the world where crypto investors share their anticipation and investment plan in crypto ahead of 2024 pre and post BTC halving and seeing 84% of the people saying BTC will cross the previous $69k ATH while also confirming they are increasing their investment ahead of the pre-halving makes me feel 2024 might be another good year for me.

Although some expert suggested that people should be careful as BTC might trade around $30k - $60k within this period which makes it even a more dicey situation but overall, I think the post halving might bring the good news everyone has been anticipating.

What are your thoughts, do you think this survey reflect the true percentage of what to expect or not?

I don't think this will force miners to do anything. Some will mine Bitcoin, some will mine whatever Fork they want.

I think it would have been better if their terms would say the value of any potential Fork is added to the total ETF. I get they don't want to deal with each worthless Fork. I can create Bitcoin LV (Loyce Vision) today and nobody cares. That's okay. But if a Fork has value, they should not just choose the most valuable Fork, they should sell the other Forks and pay dividend to the ETF holders.
Then again, I also get that this could become complicated: what if Bitcoin LV is initially worthless, but after 2 years it's worth $42. That would mean they can still sell the Fork, but the ETF holders at that moment are different than the ETF holders during Fork days. So distributing the divident to the right people is complicated.

Should I report this with all my evidence to the internet crime authority and illegal gambling manufacturers and internet police on all websites? I want my part of the deposit back because I don't deserve you stealing my own money.
All pictures are made before the account has been closed, I make it because it is crypto betting platform and I need to have some evidence of my account because of these situations.
If my deposits refunded, I am going to delete the review on this website and another websites for reviews.

I used to use them a lot back in the day, when they were still .info. I had around 0.05~ BTC in there, and then almost two days ago I sent $100 to a friend. I should around 0.049~ left, but my balance remains the same as before making the transaction. Because of this, my available balance is $0 when I go to send more. I called my friend and he did tell me he received the BTC, so it's just odd. I didn't even remember setting up an email on there, but I checked the account and it shows messages that I sent out money (the $100), and that I successfully used my phrase to recover my account. This problem is continuing on both iOS and the browser version. What is good?

I miss that beeping sound it would make when you'd receive money. I seriously hope this just fixes itself soon because this is just meant for basic transactions lmfao

The difference between sports betting and political betting is that when you are betting on the sports, you are betting on something that is inconsequential, whereas when you are betting on the political things, you are betting on something that will change years on a nation. Remember, even if the president of any nation doesn't do much, like he doesn't even run the nation to the ground, if he is not a nice person, that does tell our kids that you can be a bad person, because if the president is not nice, why should the kid be?

Hence, political betting is far more dangerous, we are betting on the future of a nation, it doesn't matter if your team even gets relegated, sure you would be upset, but it doesn't change a thing in your life, presidential elections does.

If I will view this as a general question applicable to all gambling site, I think it's not wise to incorporate a bitcoin mixer to a gambling site since gambling site are suppose to be regulated but mixers does not have a good impression on the regulators. It will only put the business at risk, so better separate if a gambling site intend to operate the kind of business.

I wonder why you are not promoting properly on X/Twitter , the only social beside Bitcointalk displayed on your site, you are offering the lowest House Edge provably fair game out there ( at leat am not aware of a provably fair game with a lower HE than yours).
This is in my opinion a huge strength that you could take advantage of with little effort but I only see 8 followers to your twitter handle.
There are some cheap methods out there to increase your social visibility, thinking about stuff like Gleam, TaskOn and so on, or maybe you could do some twitter giveaways ( small amount work as well) with an autoraffle feature between followers/retweeters etc etc.

I don't agree with this point of view, there are a lot of reasons why Bitcoin fell after the approval of the ETF.

Approval could help regulate and stabilize the market more, but it is not true that it is no longer possible to make more profits like before. On the contrary, I expect that the coming days will witness a significant rise in Bitcoin, especially with the approach of halving. We have already begun to see the beginnings of this rise and we are waiting for more. in the coming days.
Volatility is still there now and there is more manipulation.