I don't think this would even work with huge amounts, but i am talking about $1000 - 50k transactions to cash or cash equivalent.

Current tight AML laws made it sure that evading regulations became harder. Privacy coins are being delisted, mixers banned, crypto ATMs, at least in finland require KYC, so what's left? Are people still tradning person to person. I know they are lending usdt etc but to cash money <-> crypto without kyc? Localbitcoins used to have pseudonymous accounts but now they require kyc as well.

At some point you had an opportunity to buy pay cards for google play, paysafecards and buy stuff with those. Are those still not requiring kyc to buy?
Because those seem to be options that scammers at least are still using while pretending to be mircosoft helpdesk or what ever.

I am guessing that one of more  some of the scammers operate with stolen KYC that most likely becomes

Disclaimer: I don't need this kind of service, i am just interested if this is still possible, and with how large amounts?

PS: please include urls

Sounds like he doesn't understand how digital money works, but someone has told him that we should be scared of asset digitalization.

In short: They can freeze your accounts and assets already. They can confiscate anything you own. They have been able to do that for ages now. No matter how ignorant he is, he definitely must know this and is misleading people.

CBDCs are planned for cheaper and easier money tracking to prevent corruption and money laundering more efficiently. And in best case of scenario, it would be more energy sufficient, removing needs for ton on monetary infrastructure that's needed today. Also CBDCs could have confidential transactions.

Sure, in worst case scenario, line in china, that can be used for surveillance, but they can also build it for Zero knowledge L1 with zero knowledge contracts. And by that they could have confidential transactions, and depending on the token issuer, different levels of privacy and rights. With money, it would be build to comply with regulatory needs, and needs of the citizens in mind. And no surprisingly, at least in EU they have plans for this. Also this same platform could be used for digital identity, that would make identity thefts way harder.

But he doesn't need to understand this, he doesn't even need to make sense. He is talking to his followers and fear is sells well.

The part about taxes is spot on. Saving your money for taxes is smart, and lets you sleep easily as one just might end up to prison from tax fraud.

But as you said, you don't use crypto. It's your choice, but your reasons for that aren't nothing but misinformation. Stake.com for example among many others are regulated in the United States, the United Kingdom and New Zealand and Australia.

There obviously are more shady places no matter if they are crypto or not, that are dealing with finances and stealing money, but that's no crypto centric problem. That's a scammer problem, and crypto is among one of those assets that aren't going to be pseudonymous for much longer. Last ways to cash out that anonymously are buying anonymous prepaid cards and selling with small amounts for cash by meeting people physically. That's not exactly worth of putting up a casino. Or mansion / yacht money.

Basically only solution that comes into mind is making new kind of protocol, but that is also making the user experience even harder, it would be most likely highly centralized compared to current system, and collecting biometrics or such data would create problems with EU:s privacy rules. Because users would need to have a possibility to opt out afterwards, and with blockchain tech, it would need a whole new structure i guess.

Other one would be that the issuer who makes the contract has a possibility to freeze assets and with new kind of tech, even reverse transactions. And that's harder puzzle to solve without going full centralized systems and permissionless transactions and immutability would be thrown out of the window as well. And to be clear, those are the very things that make blockchain tech valuable in the fisrt place.

I would be concerned as she usually doesn't gamble at all. So i would ask the reason for change. But in generally i wouldn't mind as it's her money to do as she wish.

However seeing old people (men and women) front of slot machines was a common sigh in here years ago, that was before regulations change tighter. Now in at least in finland, amount of people gambling, in the first time of history has dropped radically. Even shops are just removing their slot machines as they take space

Corona, mandatory kyc and spending limits affected a lot as people moved online to play and apparently never moved back to physical slot machines fully. And if they remove physical cash, i am guessing people mostly stop playing them at all. So in short: No one would see her gambling as she would do that in home, with a phone. And to older people it's not the same as gambling, like a bingo was more like a gathering socializing and one reason to stay outside.

I can't even remember how many of these crypto islands there were planned since 2014, and maybe before it. There were even several icos trying to fund them, but everyone of these ideas collapsed as people were overestimating the need for it. And the problems for retailers when it's converted to cash. I guess this could work in some places, but it just makes me think that these people haven't thought this trough. There's a reason why advertising mixers was banned in here and regulations are getting so much tighter on centralized exchanges. That's because people don't want / can't escape these regulations for much longer.

If some major power shift doesn't happen in finance regulatory, it doesn't take too much time before crypto spend on these kind of islands need a kyc as well. Even if they were outside of FATF regulatory regions, at some point that btc needs to turned into fiat money. Even if we would remove the fiat money out of the picture, the regulations would most likely stay. So i can't really see any difference of spending btc with debit cards to paying directly with crypto.

I can only speak for myself and that i was in here for the token, i totally shilled the betfury because of it and i am ashamed of it.

And i didn't get it for nothing. They literally advertised that we can get it by "mining" it (spending the money for it in the casino). Admins themselves made a big deal about the value of it, and never forget that they distributed the tokens first to themselves to take advantage of ridiculous price at the start.

Holding USTD doesn't advertise itself by giving profits by holding it and none of us did free candy here, we got a promise of being rewarded for creating volume in the casino, which we did. But the main reason we are complaining, is BFG could have been so much more if the devs listened to any of us and figure out any working game theory for the tokenomics. They had time to do it, but i guess misleading investors by promising dividends and growth was less work.

Microcap, lowcap, and marketcap are subjective definitions and they will change when markets grow. Top 10 mc coins would have considered to be mid caps just few years ago. But not ANY investment for $10M marketcap is solid. In fact huge majority of them are not solid investments

If they don't mess with tokenomics really hard, they can't pretend or cheat being lowcap, and i haven't seen any project that would have done that. It's a mathematical valuation, not pretending. No matter if they are a scam or legit.

I am glad someone has found out this too. I would choose new lowcap coin / token over old lowcap any day, if i liked the fundamentals well enough.

JeffBrad12, Just out of interest, this got me an idea, but i haven't thought this trough yet:

Back in time i have found at least 3 more or less 1000x that i can remember and that i bought and sold with huge profit. All of them crashed down later but that's not relevant as most of them do anyway.

Main problem for me finding these gems is that i am quite busy these days, and even if i wasn't, it's hard word and time consuming. If there would be a small or big group of like minded people that wouldn't be in it for shilling their own bags, but for genuinely reviewing new tokens with shared spreadsheet or something, would you for example be interested to take a part with something like this? Because at this point, with my lacking capital, that's what it takes to become rich. Pm me if you are interested and lets form a plan.

As a disclaimer, i don't currently own any tokens or coins. I don't even have any interest to form any kind of pump and dump or target price group. I wouldn't have capital for that anyway.
Before buying anything for this year i am setting up new kind of spreadsheet system for recording. Pm me if you are interested. Let's talk. It could take some time to pull this off but i might know some relevant people who would be interested.

While it is a spectrum, those words still hold meaning in any country that has a working democratic government, because they basically still are grouping same values as they did in france where it started.

From the values standpoint, Right is still heading for the monarchy in terms of finances and conservatism in terms of values. And left for distributed power and progressivism. These ideologies affect economy and how taxes are spent.

There's an authoritarian-democratic axel as well and higher we get on authoritarian with that axel, more left and right start to lose meaning, as democratic government itself loses meaning. But when we still operate in democratic country, left and right have meaning. Constitution and other laws are there to keep any radical changes somewhat moderate, and countries more stable so that no one party or one man can corrupt everything.

There are people who are technically outside of this spectrum, because they only serve themselves, not the political parties or countries. But if we had to choose, serving yourself is far closer to far right, as it's closer to monarchy. And if outcome is what far right wants, their policies are often called far right, even if these people themselves wouldn't be far right or far left.

And you were oversimplifying it. Fascist right wants state surveillance and censor opposition as well, like they have done it in the past. Current far right is very much echoing same arguments from the past.

Good luck with your investment on toilet paper, but toilet paper isn't scarce. One tree can cover year of toilet paper for 6 people, and you can make more by recycling paper. Just because it run out from some shelves from shops momentarily, doesn't mean it would be running out. Why would shops even use too much space for something like it, it takes ton of space to keep dry and they can just get it more if it runs out.

You can make more of it by recylcling paper, so stating it's somehow in danger to run out is just weird.

I don't think they are supposed to be "worth" the spending, but a nominal bonus. I am not even sure how much it would should be that would make it worth for only.

Excellent ideas! Although organizing poker events could be more work, even if just monthly, it sill would be pretty cheap and effective advertising.
It would be even more relevant and effective if they had plans to offer player vs player poker tournaments inside the casino, but we can't have everything.

Putting your faith into stablecoins you are putting your faith in governments and banks. Stablecoins aren't "full crypto" by any means. They are highly centralized with backing of that very currency you wanted to avod.

And good luck with your tax avoidance, that can bite you hard in the future when you need to pay them back with interest or go to jail. I am not sure where you live, but if you don't like taxes, i am guessing you have those and you live in a country that's under ever growing tighter regulations. So just hope that country you are hiding your income from has nice jails.

Also when it comes to freedom, you can have financial freedom by having enough capital to pay your taxes and live with it. Now paying taxes you'll end up literally losing your physcal freedom.

Hold on, putin isn't left or right, he is outside of political spectrum. Even if he once was part of a country that called itself communist, there's nothing left of that expect corruption.

He only wants power, and total control just like trump, that's why trump praises him, because he wants to be him. More handsome with total control and power and more people praising him. Less regulations or opposition. That's why he has praising most authoritarians.

Putin is also a dictator who is mostly praised by far right and conservatives, as he has "traditional" values that appeals more to right wing with conservative values then left, with progressive values. He also wants to use political extremists and trolls for his gains, which ever would suite him, but mostly he aligns with values of right wingers. This confuses people to think that he is either left or right. He is outside of it, and nothing but a dictator who has personal interests in mind, not the citizens.

Imho the whole token for arbitrum is pointless and counterproductive. Arbitrum was working fine without it, and while the idea of it was probably to make it more decentralized, it's now centralized among the few whale token holders. That's probably good for the devs, so that they are not that much in control (if they don't own most of them). But changes are that those token holders just want to support changes that bring them more tokens or makes the token valuable. Actual innovations might get overlooked and disproved.

This makes sense, there are lots of gamblers that don't have the time to rank up, but who would be affected by this kind of advertisement and check the shuffle out. They might become fans just for knowing that they might enjoy this kind of benefits in the future.

Also as a someone who is not a vip host i would appreciate such an opportunity. But as they wouldn't want to angry their vip hosts, there should be both kinds of games, so vip hosts could enjoy their exclusive club benefits more.

Yeah, i've made profit from them, but i've also lost with them. But if you need to ask it they are legit, i would say that you should ignore them, as whole premise of your question is too broad. There are legit icos, as there are legit private sales, idos and ieos and what not, but over 99% of them are not legit. And the way you ask your question makes me think you most likely wouldn't find the legit ones. Even if you would find legit one, even if you did everything right, some scam most likely moons way better then your investment. 

There are so many things that can be red flags, that you would need lots of experience to DYOR.

I think in bitcointalk too, there are some good threads on how to find good icos, but frankly you might be better of investing something that's currently undervalued. Icos can be overvaluated as well.

It's psychologically healthy to stop, when losing is gettin to you, it doesn't help with the outcome of winning or losing, except you'll make risks that you wouldn't otherwise. That can be either profitable or the opposite.
But otherwise your advices seem to be basically that we should stop gambling. Which is counterproductive, as we don't win without gambling.

Strategizing might work in some cases. But i would summarize your advices to: "Take a break when it's not fun anymore, or you have doubts that you should". Also if you are going over your budget is a good time to take a breath.

If you are not talking about parlay, i would like to see links on these claims and who exactly these experts are saying so. Because mathematically you have same changes winning every single time.

Parley i would get, because if that would be for tossing a coin for example, guessing 10 throws with 50/50 changes would give you 1/1024 change of guessing every one of them. But if you take them seperately you have a 50/50 change of winning every time, minus the house edge. In fact you probably have better change on guessing winners of sport events correctly, even though you wouldn't have 2x multiplier minus house edge with every bet like with coin.

I have heard something along these lines from my dad. That it keeps him active and social. I personally think that he didn't accept the idea, that he was poor. And gambling would somehow be his way out of the poor life that he was so ashamed of. He didn't want to seem like a poor man so he kept quite a good car. When he smoked cigarettes, he refused to roll them as it would make him seem like a poor man.

So when he won a bunch of money he lived like a rich man for a week or a day, and it was immediately back to being ascetic.

Another reasoning i've heard is from my friend was that he felt it with such a passion that this day would be his lucky day in casino. So he bought a beer in a casino, converted everything he had on wallet to chips. It was couple hundred euros or something like that. He put all the chips to one specific number (i can't remember which one), and lost. Right after he drank his beer and left to home. Even though it was over in a moment, i admit, it was a rush to watch. He just said to me that it wasn't such a good idea, and maybe he shouldn't trust his guts on matters like that.

This reminded me that as this was a third party poker site, i wanted to ask if you have plans in the future to breach out and build poker events inside your casino?
I understand that it's a whole another beast to build, but one can dream.

Poker tournaments are more intense past time to me then regular casino and sports, as it requires constant awareness.
But i would happily do it from time to time for money especially if it would happen in the casino i liked and if i might get an airdrop from it with shfl .