Personally I think that Crash is a bit of a boring game. You should take more professional games. The offer on roobet.com is very limited.
Why not choose professional software and offer hundreds of games?
Small games can also be nice to play with. and when you start with gambling, it is a good way to start. It’s not that boring when you get your adrenaline rush. And yeah, it’s nice and easy to play. Also, I saw this big multiplier a few hours ago.  1,800.09 on crash. Anyone saw this multiplier too? Or won on this multiplier maybe?  |
|
|
|
we can't push people to learn. when they get enough benefits from bitcoin, they will it by themself. let's support the simplicity of bitcoin. tell them that "bitcoin is money too" and how to receive/send bitcoin. we don't need to tell them about how it works, what is blockchain, etc. just like the "sell me this pen/pencil" question. do you use a pen/pencil? if the answer is no, then don't go for another question. |
|
|
|
-snip- I do love the crash game and the way it shows crashes in middle like how much who cashed out is actually quite unique, I mean as the rocket moves ahead there are various cashouts from users and you can feel the tension in real time and sometimes it tempts me to cashout. It goes quite high every now and then as I was typing I saw this one already going so high:  mines and towers are my favorites games on roobet. few hours ago I played crash game for the first time on roobet. I change my favorite game list on roobet to crash, mines, and towers I played crash because I saw some players share their high multiplier screenshot on that game. yeah just like you. it did works for promotion. at least to attract me to play the game |
|
|
|
|
I vote for "YES" because I did read the ToS.
but since I am an affiliate marketer, I only read the ToS for the affiliate program.
I don't care much about the ToS for their main service because I only bet a small amount of money.
|
|
|
|
-snip-
I agree that currently playing home has no effect, because there are no spectators at the stadium. That's why many teams end up losing
when they play home.
-snip- even manchestster united haven't won a match at old trafford yet. every match will be played on a neutral field
city draw against west ham. pep are you okay with this premier league season?
in less than 2 hours, united will play against chelsea, bad defense on both sides. we can expect to see a bunch of counter-attack on this match. over 3.5 I think. |
|
|
|
tomorrow's big matches to watch. Arsenal 1.92 Draw 3.72 Leicester City 3.9 Manchester United 2.38 Draw 3.58 Chelsea 2.9 I wish cavani to have a nice debut tomorrow against his former teammate, thiago silva. also, telles should be played as well. I love the way he played against PSG a few days ago. however, united will give us unexpected surprises like usual. better to place the bet on the opposite side if you are a united fan |
|
|
|
|
usually, after there's bad news about bitcoin, mainstream media will explain what is bitcoin, the price, etc.
but I hope it won't leave a bad impression about bitcoin in India.
in 2015, there was a bomb terror at a well-known mall in my country. the terrorist wanted 300 BTC to the mall.
the bomb exploded and became big news on media.
it wasn't related to something related to religion.
it just a one-man-show terror with poor economic background.
also, I read that 1 week later, the mall sent him $50 in bitcoin. lol
|
|
|
|
|
I am sorry if this is a common problem or has been discussed before.
since I used this bot, I've already got 2 notifications from posts without a mention or quoting my post.
it's was not an edited post too.
is it because the poster clicked the quote button from my post but then decide to delete my post before its first published?
|
|
|
|
|
They are not spreading FUD. Google news is a news aggregator service by google.
All people can apply to be accepted on google news content distribution.
I also have a website that accpeted to become publisher on google news.
Whenever new post updated on my website, it will be pushed to google news.
The content will be visible on your smartphone if your interest meets the google news algorithm for my content.
When you read a news from google news, you may consider to double check the source.
|
|
|
|
-snip-
we all know and need to accept the fact that we cant use bitcoin everywhere
with paypal adoption bitcoin have a higher chance of merchant accepting bitcoin independently
-snip-
yeah, I am thinking of the same thing. we cant use bitcoin as payment via Paypal. but.. when merchants accept PayPal as a payment method, we already have a chance to pay them with bitcoin indirectly. we can contact them to offer p2p bitcoin payment with a little bit of bridging about bitcoin integration on Paypal. |
|
|
|
|
buying bitcoin on PayPal is currently useless.
people use Paypal for payment, but you cant use bitcoin as a payment method in your Paypal.
you can only hold bitcoin with no private key in PayPal.
then, why people should use Paypal to buy bitcoin.
however, I vote for "maybe" and "I will wait and see".
but I still don't have any reason why and in which condition that I could possibly need to buy bitcoin from PayPal.
|
|
|
|
I used Paypal since 10 years ago I think. I used it for online microtransactions. in 2015-2015, Paypal limited my account. Unfortunately, I still had funds on in Paypal account. I can't use my PayPal to send or withdraw my money before I follow their instructions. I need to send my ID, billing address, etc. That was my first online KYC. When I heard that Paypal will have Bitcoin integration, I was like.. duck you P, you will make users complicated when they need it  let them promotes Bitcoin. but don't use it  |
|
|
|
#Proof Of AuthenticationBitcointalk Name: TedMosby Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=753396Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 955 Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 44 BTC Address: bc1q8zf9rz8pwlfakfdny2uhj6n2pcqzv5hcgyqpdc I'll wear signature and avatar if accepted. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
What if someone tap my finger into my wallet and make a transaction? You would lost your coin, but if someone have access to both hardware wallet and your finger at same time, that someone also could steal your Bitcoin another way such as intimidation or violence. Was there any case about a device that could be accessed through fingerprint authorization where the owner was murdered and then cut the finger to access a stolen device? Finger print authorization is now the new technology trend, I wonder soon criminals would still the owners finger too lol. I've read different reactions about this new hardware wallet, though this is a great innovation, but It's also unnecessary for some who isn't a fan of collecting shitcoins. AFAIK no since there are many easier ways to obtain fingerprint such as detailed photos of one's finger. But if someone is stupid enough to claim that he uses hardware wallet with fingerprint authorization and store lots of cryptocurrency there, it might happen  It's not clear if the fingerprint is the only way to authorize the transactions or it is just an option or additional security level. but one thing that is clear is the fingerprint will be needed if a brute force attack detected. I prefer to have the fingerprint recognition feature as an optional security layer. If this feature is the main and only way to authorize the transactions, your life and assets are in danger . gate.io announcement and official website of this hardware wallet: https://www.gate.io/th/help/annlist/17919https://pro.wallet.io/hardware |
|
|
|
PSG simply were unfortunate have lost against Manchester United, really?
According to the reports I read, Manchester was better and deservedly won.
Didn't PSG lose to Manchester 2 years ago in the same competition?
Are you saying that Manchester wins PSG every time just because they have more luck?
Have you seen the match back then? That's one of the luckiest wins I've ever seen. Last night, however, wasn't luck. Manchester United played well and deserved to win. PSG missed a lot of opportunities, but they weren't significantly better than United, compared to the 2018/2019 CL match. nope, here are the stats for that match. they were dominant with the ball possession, but has the same amount of shots on target as united on that match. https://www.stadiumastro.com/sports/champions-league/match/stats/psg-vs-manchester-united/10d9y1l13o0v3xtsz4wxeapnuthe same thing happened yesterday. even worse, they got fewer shots on target. and it happened when they had neymar on the field. wan bissaka and axel tuanzebe were a deadly duo to cut neymar and mbappe yesterday. telles also has a good start. he played calmly. and rashford, he did it again. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
