You can only get to heaven through Jesus Christ.
What did the humans do before he was born then? His birth was a very recent event in the scheme of things remember. |
|
|
|
Yes, religion isn't going anywhere soon. Religions change, old ones die out, man invents new ones, some go out of favour, others flourish. Oh dear, looks like Christianity is on terminal decline. Bet they wish they could turn back the clock to the "good old days". You know, the days they used to beat to death unbelievers for not joining their cult. That never failed to boost numbers. |
|
|
|
More importantly, God doesn't approve of the lasciviousness.  Oh dear, looks like a nasty case of WGW (What God Wants) syndrome rearing it's ugly head again. You need to nip that problem in the bud my friend, it will only get worse you know. He destroys the lascivious people. More WGW I'm afraid. What your trying to say is YOU want God to destroy lascivious people because of your lack of fulfillment. |
|
|
|
Another oppressive instrument to divide humanity!
What are your referring to here, timezones or Windows OS?  |
|
|
|
Most are just sitting around now. I may do something with them in the future.
Same here. I think that what happens to most of them. The novelty wears off and they get left in a drawer. |
|
|
|
People I am not a believer but I haven't heard never a religious (from every part of religion) to tell: people don't do sex. Sex is bad and you must abstain to it. they condemn the degeneration, the sex with more than one women or out of the marriage but not the sex on itself. So I don't understand this confrontation between the religion and the sex.
Baffles me too. There's some thoughts on the sex preoccupation issue here at number 9, entitled "Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex." http://www.seesharppress.com/20reasons.htmlOh and at number 10 as well. Here's 15 reasons why you should ignore the religious "going to hell for masturbating" nonsense as well. http://www.logicalspiritualism.com/Default.aspx?action=list-view&id=15 |
|
|
|
Unlike the devil, Beliathon has a chance to gain eternal life with us. Who wants to spend eternity with a bunch of God brown nosers? Sounds like hell. People that wish heaven remind me of king Midas and his foolish wish. There are 2 kinds of pain in Hell. 1. The weaker pain is the pain of having your soul destroyed. It is like the pain of pure burning sensation throughout your whole body. It will be eternal because your soul is eternal. Even if you have no body, the sensation will be there, because your soul is the thing that interprets you bodily sensations anyway. 2. The greater pain will be the absence of the joy that could have been there for you in the presence of God and all the saved people, and the angels. Take it or leave it. Through Jesus, the choice is now yours. Either: 1) You've been to hell yourself and somehow come back to life so you can tell us in exact detail what it was like. Or 2) Talking out your backside, with crazy wild speculation built on soft sinking sand. Now I wonder what one it is.  I wonder indeed. |
|
|
|
Unlike the devil, Beliathon has a chance to gain eternal life with us. Who wants to spend eternity with a bunch of God brown nosers? Sounds like hell. People that wish heaven remind me of king Midas and his foolish wish. |
|
|
|
Annnnd.. we're back to throwing shit again.
LOL If people walk around wearing a T-shirt that says "throw shit at me" do they have a right to complain when shit gets thrown at them? Edit: Please restrain your answer to a simple yes or no if possible. Thanks. |
|
|
|
Obviously heading back to UK. No need to worry. With our solid iron curtain of border control, there is no danger of him sneaking back in. |
|
|
|
They cannot explain flat earth without sweeping other scientfic proofs out the window, which in turn sweeps other scientfic proofs out the window, which in turn sweeps ............................., in the end they are questioning how we think atoms work. Hundreds of thousands of experiments over thousands of years rejected and thrown in the bin. Good luck with that.
Ah... but scientists don't know how things like atoms work, do you? You missing the point. In order for the flat earth myth to stand, the flat earth people would have to explain EVERYTHING in the universe in a completely different way to support their myth and then perform experiments to prove them. You and I know this is never going to happen. Flat earth is, and will stay, a prehistoric myth. Only time will tell. I notice there still isn't an answer as to why the UN's logo has the flat Earth map on it, or why the National Weather Service shows it's information on a flat Earth map... If they happened to choose a round earth as their logos would you then be using this as evidence the earth is round? I think not. Lol. That's not an explanation. Most places use globe Earth maps, the UN is weird! The fact remains if the logo was a sphere earth the flat people would of ignored it as evidence, yet because it's flat it must be evidence! Well if the UN logo was a sphere, some countries would be at the back and missed out. As the UN is a global thing, it would be fair to assume they didn't want countries left out. Nothing weird about that. Your reading into it far too much. Nothing to see here. Anyway I've wasted too much time on this thread already. Over and out. |
|
|
|
They cannot explain flat earth without sweeping other scientfic proofs out the window, which in turn sweeps other scientfic proofs out the window, which in turn sweeps ............................., in the end they are questioning how we think atoms work. Hundreds of thousands of experiments over thousands of years rejected and thrown in the bin. Good luck with that.
Ah... but scientists don't know how things like atoms work, do you? You missing the point. In order for the flat earth myth to stand, the flat earth people would have to explain EVERYTHING in the universe in a completely different way to support their myth and then perform experiments to prove them. You and I know this is never going to happen. Flat earth is, and will stay, a prehistoric myth. Only time will tell. I notice there still isn't an answer as to why the UN's logo has the flat Earth map on it, or why the National Weather Service shows it's information on a flat Earth map... If they happened to choose a round earth as their logos would you then be using this as evidence the earth is round? I think not. |
|
|
|
|
OP, this is a very good question.
I'm not sure, a political motivated attack is the best I can come up with.
|
|
|
|
They cannot explain flat earth without sweeping other scientfic proofs out the window, which in turn sweeps other scientfic proofs out the window, which in turn sweeps ............................., in the end they are questioning how we think atoms work. Hundreds of thousands of experiments over thousands of years rejected and thrown in the bin. Good luck with that.
Ah... but scientists don't know how things like atoms work, do you? You missing the point. In order for the flat earth myth to stand, the flat earth people would have to explain EVERYTHING in the universe in a completely different way to support their myth and then perform experiments to prove them. You and I know this is never going to happen. Flat earth is, and will stay, a prehistoric myth. |
|
|
|
Nice to see you've cut down on the flying crap and insults.  However, this is what a mirage looks like:  Yes that's a mirage, but there are different types of mirages such as inferior mirages and superior mirages. Please educate yourself on the subject before posting again. Thanks. |
|
|
|
{img}
This would be true if the earth had no atmosphere. In reality due to atmospheric refraction, more of the ship would be visable to the observer in the lighthouse. How much light would be refracted would depend on air temperature, pressure and humidity. So you see, light refraction allows us to see further round the earth than the maths says we can, NOT because the earth is flat. That's so funny. Yeah I've heard of it before. Just goes along with all the assumptions people believe thanks to scientists. To believe in the sphere Earth you really have to believe a lot of assumptions based on scientists' studies. And this is a "mirage" Mirage of Chicago skyline seen from Michigan shoreline Yes, correct this is a type of mirage. Because light waves are bent around the earth due refraction. If the Earth was flat, light rays that bend down would soon hit the ground and only nearby objects would be affected making these types of mirages impossible. I see you are finally coming round to understanding the Earth is round. Not so much. The most reasonable explanation looking at the Chicago skyline from the Michigan Shoreline would be to believe you're actually seeing Chicago because the Earth is flat. Remember Occam's Razor? "among competing hypotheses that predict equally well, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected."A person who believes in the flat Earth and sees a city skyline from 60 miles away, doesn't have to explain anything. A person who believes in the globe Earth and sees a city skyline from 60 miles away, they have to explain.... The flat Earh person has to explain MUCH more than the global Earth person because they are assuming every scientific experiment that has every taken place and been proved is wrong, because of the domino effect. You see that's the very problem flat people have, and why their position is impossible to stand by. They cannot explain flat earth without sweeping other scientfic proofs out the window, which in turn sweeps other scientfic proofs out the window, which in turn sweeps ............................., in the end they are questioning how we think atoms work. Hundreds of thousands of experiments over thousands of years rejected and thrown in the bin. Good luck with that. |
|
|
|
{img}
This would be true if the earth had no atmosphere. In reality due to atmospheric refraction, more of the ship would be visable to the observer in the lighthouse. How much light would be refracted would depend on air temperature, pressure and humidity. So you see, light refraction allows us to see further round the earth than the maths says we can, NOT because the earth is flat. That's so funny. Yeah I've heard of it before. Just goes along with all the assumptions people believe thanks to scientists. To believe in the sphere Earth you really have to believe a lot of assumptions based on scientists' studies. And this is a "mirage" Mirage of Chicago skyline seen from Michigan shorelineYes, correct this is a type of mirage. Because light waves are bent around the earth due refraction. If the Earth was flat, light rays that bend down would soon hit the ground and only nearby objects would be affected making these types of mirages impossible. I see you are finally coming round to understanding the Earth is round. |
|
|
|
This would be true if the earth had no atmosphere. In reality due to atmospheric refraction, more of the ship would be visable to the observer in the lighthouse. How much light would be refracted would depend on air temperature, pressure and humidity. So you see, light refraction allows us to see further round the earth than the maths says we can, NOT because the earth is flat. |
|
|
|
Notice how the only thing the round-earthers can do is throw shit and attack anybody who disagrees with them.
Come on, the flat earth joke was funny at first but it's wearing thin now, time to stop. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
