Today I took my time to go round the market, there are more than 9000 cryptos in the market, but bitcoin is still the king. Now that many other cryptocurrencies are seriously pumping can they take over from bitcoin? If they take over from bitcoin can they last in that position like bitcoin?
What is your opinion.

As much as possible if we were able to buy it at price that seems low from its ATH then buy. Bitcoin is too volatile to predict when will the price go high and up to how much it can reach. What’s good about it is the price is able to go higher whenever there is hype or bull market occurs. The price increase depends on the bype crypto gets from personalities and economy so if we have some to save and plan for long term buying it and waiting for bull market  make us gain profit.

This project is very good, but I always worry that things like this is scams. I have seen some terrible "behind the scene" footage of illiterate people holding up posters for something that they do not benefit from and then scammers taking the proceeds of these scams. (Important Note : I am NOT saying this is one of those scams)

I hope this is not one of them and that the proceeds of this goes to the correct cause. (You are 100% correct... Christmas has been over commercialized) 

This just goes to shows that anyone can become a millionaire if they invest wisely in crypto and bitcoin. People normally waste their investments by selling it too early and are happy with few X profits when they could literally make much more than that. There are many coins which can still make us millionaire, but we need to invest wisely.

When we start ignoring all the services which are asking to clear KYC, we could solve this. But, in this busy world everyone (including myself), goes for KYC mandatory services (for exchanging, gambling, etc) for quick and ease access and killing the true purpose of bitcoins.

We must develop community based P2P exchanges to skip centralized exchanges and should support only gambling services which are promising about No-KYC-forever. I guess we cannot lead a life without dependent on any of centralized services but we could stay anonymous by  protecting our privacy/identity to ensure the decentralization.

people that bought at say $50k-$65k want 2 things.

1. to get the price up (more bull) to $100k-$130k so they can profit and exit
2. to get the price down (a bear) to $25k-$32k so they can buy more at 50% discount than initial purchase

India won the toss and elected to bat in the first Test against South Africa. They have collected 72 runs without losing any wicket. My prediction about this match is that India will win this match without any major obstacles. I don't think the South African team is too strong now. . Their performance is of average quality. On the other hand, the Indian team is very experienced.The match between India and South Africa is likely to be more competitive than the one-sided match between Australia and England.

Pakistan's youths against Indian youth played very well and won. After a long time, Pakistan won against the young team of Indian. For some time Indian cricket is going bad time. Their national team performance and not very good. The players of this young group of India are very talented. They thought it would be defeated.

Revenues around the world of cricket are split entirely based on the viewership and popularity, in this case, also it's basically the proportion of salaries of players that the boards are earning, as we all know it's primarily the Australian and English players who dominate IPL it's obvious that they are going to get a much larger chunk as compared to others, Nepal board is lucky that they are having that one player because of which they are getting even this much amount because there are many boards which aren't really getting anything. But this type of revenue sharing with boards would ensure one thing that the boards would avoid keeping any international fixtures at the time of IPL to ensure that their players play in IPL.

It's just a sham. In no other sport this can be seen. They call themselves as the UAE national team, and didn't had a single citizen of UAE representing them. The same with several other teams like Kuwait and Oman. Foreigners playing for T20 franchises is OK, but how can a national team be entirely comprised of foreigners? That takes away the whole idea of "national cricket team". The end result is that more deserving teams like Nepal and Malaysia (which are entirely comprised of natives) lose out to these mercenary teams.

Even right now no one can compete with Indian craze but sometime quality also matters in West Indies series mostly peoples were already predicting this series is going to be whitewashed so just because of this there were no interest and secondly Covid-19 restrictions are still having some big impact just because of these factors we have very fewer fans, but peoples still love cricket and enjoying. In Pakistan now mostly peoples love to enjoy at home with family which is also now very good way of enjoying and having some good time with family, hopefully in near future things could be better and more peoples will be able to watch games in stadiums.

LOL... after such pathetic performance from England, you still expect them to win? You sure that you are not being overly optimistic? And I would say the same for India vs South Africa as well. The tracks are going to be bouncy, and supportive of seam bowling. I heard that Nortje is injured, but there is no dearth of pace bowling talent in South Africa. Still, it would be interesting to see how the South African batsmen fare against the Indian seamers (especially Quinton de Kock, Temba Bavuma and Aiden Markram).

Lets see how things will develop over the month and how many players will be pulling out citing injury  . Pakistan wont be earning much of the ticket revenue if the match is played outside Pakistan soil and all the ticket revenue will go to the UAE Cricket board, but they still have the broadcasting revenue. I am not exactly sure how much they are earning selling the broadcasting rights but BCCI is always ahead in this aspect and that is how they are earning the majority of the revenue.

@eaLiTy that’s the key factor if big player’s of Australia pull out of this series then fans won’t turn up in stands, and won’t even watch the match on TV which will further hurt PCB finances. However if all big player’s participate, then PCB should get handsome returns from ticket sales and broadcasting revenues.

I am not surprised. Ajaz managed to pick 10 wickets, only because the match was being played in a dust-bowl, and the other two spinners (William Somerville and Rachin Ravindra) were out of form. I don't think that he'll be much effective in the green and bouncy tracks in New Zealand and IMO the selectors did the right thing by dropping him. Personally I still think that Mitchell Santner is a level higher than Ajaz Patel (Santner also didn't managed to find a spot. The spin bowlers are Rachin and Daryl).

Not a single local player and 99% of players in UAE squad are Indians. UAE cricket association looks like big scam and joke to me. They along with Asian cricket council making mockery of Asia cup. Only valid reason of this quackery i can think of is, illegal satta market, that's it.

India has a population of 1.3-1.4 billion, which is almost 8 times that of Pakistan. It automatically means that the market for cricket there is much larger than that in any other country. Even if the PCB had launched PSL at an earlier date (which I really doubt whether they could have done, given the lack of interest from SENA players to visit that country), I don't think that it could have overtaken IPL at any point. IPL is entirely another level, compared to the other leagues such as BBL, Hundred, BPL, PSL, CPL and SLPL.

Payment time has not expired so why complain here, when you take part in a campaign learn to read the rules.

The spreadsheet has been updated but i have not got the funds yet....any one got ??