when will they let me stake bitcoin? josh garza had plans to stake bitcoin. maybe ion team should pay him a bounty?

I didn't realise that... its amusing does korvas or wildshark want to respond on why this might be the case? Surely its a question for the team on why if the ionomy is the future and whales heavily invested shouldn't they question the lack of taking ion exclusively which provides no use for the investment in ions and atoms they are so involved in financially?

Garza did this same thing and people said why not take paycoin... he couldn't come up with a decent reason.

Did you lose your s somewhere? Plenty of good investigators here maybe they can help you find it? Maybe those removed posts too

Its Kermy now not skermy

Don't forget that electrons aren't actually a blockchain asset they are just a database entry. On top of this nobody else can utilise electrons in their ecosystem i.e. make a competing electron like wallet. So this becomes a centralised single point of failure use device for games. When their microsoft access database goes down or their $5 vps isn't paid at months end you can't access your upgraded $5 electron vault.

Seems to me they tried to use ion in their games but apple and google didn't allow it so they went to electrons and now ion doesn't actually really do anything except give them a crowd fundraiser to make money at the start.

At least paycoin tried to use their coin....

There is about a billion of them on bittrex at 1 sat... knock yourself out but it would be a stupid investment.

Arjan is the new wallet released yet? i shutdown my wallet yesterday.

why is it you say something they ask for proof. you ask for something they link a document and say find the answer yourself? if korvas believed the statements he makes he'd mentionthe innovations he believes in. being vague on his answer with a doc i think all should assume his answer as invalid.

my take on ionomy couldnt find a coin that met their requirements is true. its blackcoin meets dash with parameter tweaks. the part that doesnt meet their need is controlled premine. no coin caters to controlled premine thats why people make their own. this is the truth. if korvas disagrees with this he'll have to back it up with his opinion and reasoning. linking a whitepaper isnt an answer.

Post the links please. They can't be slack channel references to Huey saying we are doing that as thats not actually factual. Its like josh garza saying yes we have the hash rate. Without supporting evidence to prove the hash rate it means nothing.

Korvas you asked for a point it was given now your take on it is just because its not on the internet doesn't mean its not true. Shit i can't find proof of unicorns on the internet but that doesn't mean they are real because someone said on a forum they are.

I disagree as well i think the company name is VERY important. Would you invest with a person that says his name is tom and you find out later its actually bob and thats why you couldn't find info about him?

If they can't represent themselves correctly then thats the start of some very bad flags coming their way as it shows their attention to detail and motivation to do the entire thing correct. I don't think you should be glossing over it as unimportant. If you do im sure anything presented to you would be dismissed in the same way.. o thats not important

greed is a sin and people are in crypto are there for a profit. best cash out your wallet.

Not only that the games only feature electrons a second non blockchain based asset. Essentially electrons are just an ingame currency like gems, coins etc that all other app store games use. If the game was good and you bought items for electrons why would you want to be involved in ion? The only reason is that maybe the price rises on the market due to others buying packs and payment driving price up.

However this relies on the fact good devs take huge cuts and pass their profits onto the community and ionomy team. WTF would you as a dev with the knowledge and skill want to lose 66% profit to give the community money and ionomy. There is no reasonable explanation.

Ionomy seems to be a mess of confusion in layers of coins and systems. Broken down its essentially this

A platform that features
-> a coin

-> a non blockchain asset called atoms
--> this pumps out a non blockchain asset called electrons
---> electrons only exist because ion can't be used on a playstore as a payment method to circumvent apple, google cuts

-> a game (not yet released)
--> that uses an api that takes money from devs to fund a community at dev expense

80% of the platform is just layers of rubbish as hacks and gimmicks to get around service terms. None of these actually really tie into ion in any way other than floor v2.0.

Ion has no specific use other than to acquire more and get more masternodes. Its not usable in any way and yet again its another coin thats a clone and expects the community to make the stores etc while they sit on their laurels with a premine hoping the community gives them a price rise to make profit. Pretty much any premine is a joke and shows a coin creators true motives.

Ionomy still hasn't spent any of the money they received in ways other than paying themselves. Name a single non ion bounty where they have used the money to actually advance the platform they want to supposedly grow so much?

Here's a teaser for you lord of the internet... it'll make everyone throw up in their mouth though.

Delisting message is gone and the daily volume has been healthy at 0.5btc approx. Be good if we can get it to an average of 1btc a day if more people use the coin.

From that website of atom holders if its accurate korvas is #1 holder/#1 whale in their terms. Its just natural with the amount invested that korvas is going to be less likely to review and acknowledge info contrary to how deep he's in.

These gaming specific coins just don't work. Voxels failed misserably and thats done by halsey minor (spelling?) who actually has business sense or rather did in the past. Huey has no real experience nor skillset in IT/computing so that makes it even worse of potential investment in my books.

Nobody wants or needs a gaming coin. Take voxels... the official currency of virtual reality.. who made it official? its official because they said its official. Nobody wants more currency and gaming currency just because the name says it is. People want services and platforms that use existing currencies. The only reason to make a currency now is to milk some cash from ico's etc. There is literally hundreds of currencies out there that can be used to launch your product with and im sure one fits what you need, shit you only really have to find an active dev one and a block time that suits.

By doing this you don't have to worry about the burden of broken wallets etc and can focus on the product.

How do you know they are sorting it or filing reports factually other than them saying they are doing it? Have they shown that they do indeed own graval pte? How have they shown they are updating it. If its a website where you can update i don't see how it should take so long.

Your chance to mine solo on your cpu or gpu is low. I used to mine on tbf (the blocks factory) qubit pool with my cpu or sha256 with my asics.

I did it more for fun. Don't expect to win too many blocks unless you join a pool or have a higher hashrate.

To most people it would matter as a legitimate identity is something that should be a focus. However those that are heavily invested "want" to believe so ignore it. I do find it strange that korvas has these issues raised but will dismiss them with a simple reply from huey saying we are busy focusing on the game. The point of them paying and having a company (i say this supposedly) in singapore that does their incorporation means they don't have to do anything to fix it, its that companies role.. if you pay for something and don't get it you move your business.

Korvas asked for a fact of them being misleading this one was provided but he seems to have glossed over it as not important. I tend to disagree as the company identity and legitimacy is the very core of any business they do. If they can't do that then i don't see how they can be trusted. Seeing as how they all like to mention microsoft and other companies and how their plans aren't transparent because of trade secrets i'll ask korvas this... how many of those companies don't have their registration and incorporation accurate? How many of them take 6+ months and blame snail mail?

There really is no excuse and honestly i feel sympathy for the investors as they seem to willingly want to put their own heads in the ground ignoring it.

They also seem to reassure themselves that any negative press or comments MUST mean people want cheaper coins or are trolls or something else... anything BUT hey this does seem strange.

I believe if you asked them to name some things that concern them about ion they would say there is nothing its all awesome. Actually might be a good question for korvas.. Hey korvas... can you list some things that concern you about the ion project? Nobody is 100% onboard any decision they make in their life. Everyone has that little nagging question in the back of their mind.. Whats yours korvas?

Are you the one that emailed the singaporean government arm that does the business registration stuff? Could you post the email chain that shows this if so as korvas was after facts. If this info is posted maybe korvas can ask huey to clarify why he said snail mail contrary to the singaporean governments comments.

can you please reference this transparent info showing its a crypto evolution? you constantly make statements as fact and never show the facts. then when asked to reference your info you ignore the request

ionifier maybe?

notice craig there? he lost a shit tonne to gaw im surprised he was ready to try again...