Post counts completed, payments rolling out in a bit.
|
|
|
~snip~
Your signature offends me. everybody knows it's luptin, gorshdammit.
Based on BPIP, you would be looking for DeaDTerra, OgNasty or Blazed. Whether or not they want to trade in general, want to trade the items youre looking to trade or want to trade with you, is another question however.
|
|
|
That does make it different, still don't understand your defensive attitude.
I'm explaining a situation to you, which you dont seem to be fully aware of. Not sure why listing facts and explanations is considered "defensive", but you made a comment about the fees and I explained why they are in place. You need to pay 1mbtc to deposit the funds, and also some to withdraw. So there's a 40+$ loss right there.
Fees for transactions arent a loss, you pay for moving your BTC (you're paying for a service offered by the bitcoin network). Arguably, that has gotten a lot more expensive with bitcoin shooting up by over 700% this year alone in fiat value. In total, that should still only amount for 0.002 or 0.003 BTC, which are $25 combined right now, not $40 or more. I didn't know about the 21 day rule, thanks for that info
You should read the FAQ regarding bankroll investments before placing one. The terms are outlined clearly there. I mean, I have 1BTC deposited, and a 0.002BTC loss just to divest my funds isn't okay for me.
Meaning you invested into the bankroll without informing yourself about the rules and conditions of your investment? We charge additional divest fee for short-term investments. This is to prevent abuse. The fees are as shown below: For investments younger than 7 days, there is a 0.3% divestment fee For investments younger than 14 days, there is a 0.2% divestment fee For investments younger than 21 days, there is a 0.1% divestment fee For investments older than 21 days, there is no divestment fee Divestment fee is calculated based on the total investment value, not on the profit/losses.
|
|
|
Ofcourse they're network fees, but it needs to be mentionted on top of transaction fees there's no reason for a 0.2% divest fee.
Yes there is, the divest fee encourages investors to stay in the bankroll for a longer time and rewards loyal bankroll investors. It reduces short term bankroll speculation and the swings the bankroll would experience due to them, allowing the site to offer more stable max bet and profit limits. You're also ignoring that after 21 days, the fee vanishes and you can divest without being charged any fees for it. Another possible way to ensure this would be increasing the minimum investment time from 24 hours to a longer timeframe. Would you rather have the minium time being 21 days, and not being allowed to divest earlier, no matter what? In that case, the fee wouldn't be needed anymore. that's a good negative balance
Your initial post makes it sound like between divest fees and transaction fees, all your bitcoin are taken in fees, while in reality, the divest fees are just 0.3/0.2/0.1%, meaning you'd get back 0.997 BTC out of a 1 BTC investment, should you decide to divest it early (ignoring the profit you might have made in your time being invested).
|
|
|
You guys should really decrease your divest fee It's 0.002BTC
The divest fee is based on your investment size, not fixed (0.002 BTC would equal the fees for an investment of ~1 BTC). On top of that, it decreases over time, and there's no fee for investments older than 21 day. count in the transaction fee and that's a good negative balance
Transaction fees aren't charged by the site directly, they are network fees.
|
|
|
Hi i'm practising making banners for forum posts on photoshop, what is the width of forum posts (in pixels)?
Did you consider, that it depends on the screen/window size you are viewing the forum from?
|
|
|
I think their point was how ridiculously easy signatures are to copy, and mine was "all things matter"
So we got a creative guy here that includes free doodles with any order (note that the doodles are not the order, but the pennies are, doodles are just freebies on top of it), and everything we can discuss is how easy their signature is to fake? Kudos BP, keep being awesome
|
|
|
"Wait for it" is the key point of that image. Apparently i know someone (<--) that will join the desperate line queue for a long time
You only get to complain once you're over 900.
|
|
|
If you check https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;sa=forumProfile you can see the global signature restrictions. Signature: Signatures are displayed at the bottom of each post or personal message. BBC code and smileys may be used in your signature. Signatures taller than 42px will be cut off.
That is 42px, not 42pt (42px are 32pt afaik).
As for restrictions based on ranks, check the sticky topics in this section. - Newbie: No styling (including links) allowed. Max 40 characters. - Jr. Member: Links allowed. Max 100 characters. - Member: Unlimited length. - Full: Color allowed. - Sr. Member: Size allowed - Hero: Background color allowed
|
|
|
This thread has been discontinued and has been archived.
|
|
|
This thread has been discontinued and has been archived.
|
|
|
Payments processed ( 52886688884a3b52a9d17e4e219cebed628eb2f2cea26e26538c6ef997dc3028).
Hello, i'd like to apply for this campaign. I'll change the avatar and signature immediately after being accepted.
Accepted, set your things. User: mpet5000
Enrolled on probation.
What is the proper way to report people participating in this signature campaign if I believe they are spamming?
Via PM. Hi again Lutpin, I would also like to let you know that I’ve just been upgraded to Full Member and changed my signature immediately after. I would be grateful if I was included as Full Member for payment next week.
If you're wearing full member signature and avatar (as you are) at the start of a round, your posts will be counted with full member rates.
|
|
|
But then it’s when I’ve realized that he is wearing the same signature as I am, so he is in a SMAS campaign. I’ve checked the posting history and doesn’t look great to me. So I don't know what to do in this case, that's why I am asking here. I thought about PMing the campaign manager and about reporting.
Yes, reports about behaviour like that can be made via PM to me. Besides, as mentioned above, triple posts in a short period of time should be reported to a moderator, regardless whether the user is in a signature campaign or not.
|
|
|
I do believe that the accusation here is that Edwardard ran a campaign that wasn't sanctioned by DMarket and that some of the signature code (?) contained malicious code.
I've checked the signature code, unless altered later (or unless I did miss something), the links seem to be genuine and leading to the correct sites. If the whole basis of this accusation is that Edwardard ran a successful campaign advertising DMarket that wasn't sanctioned or funded by DMarket, then I don't see any scam happening here, especially not from the side of Edwardard (the hidden runner, the one who hired them could have disclosed they aren't running an official campaign). I see this similar to eg me hiring aTriz to advertise my affiliate link for CoinBase via a signature campaign. Everyone gets paid and the campaign completes. Would this make either me or aTriz a scammer? I don't think so.
|
|
|
Do you think this user deserves negative trust?
Point out where the scam happens for me, please. Edwardard ran a campaign that paid what it promised to pay, right? The signatures used in the campaign were linking to the official website, right? Who lost anything due to the campaign, what damage was caused to whom?
|
|
|
Hey, just a quick info, payments will be rolling out tomorrow morning with a slight delay, as I won't have access to the escrow wallet before. The new round has started on 0:00UTC earlier today as every week, so no shift there.
Are you still accepting Junior Members for the week?
We've got open spots for all ranks, I'll announce enrollments with the payments.
|
|
|
Hey, just a quick info, payments will be rolling out tomorrow morning with a slight delay, as I won't have access to the escrow wallet before. The new round has started on 0:00UTC earlier today as every week, so no shift there.
|
|
|
|