hashrate stablising over 100exa again.. (finally)
more hashrate = more competition=less reward per user

this makes more users want to just buy instead of mine it.
this makes the price go up.
then more users see the price increase.. meaning they can make profit mining.
so they mine..
.. rinse and repeat less reward per user. =more buyers

problem with pakistan is. . only offering 200k doses a day in a populous of 220million..
even if everyone was willing to have a vaccine. especially a 2 dose vaccine.
would take upto 2000 days to inoculate everyone (6 years)

pakistan should not be putting so much tight rules on those not wanting getting a vaccine in a situation when there is not enough vaccine to get.

in numbers
if 200k a day for 6 months = 36mill of 200mill (18% single dose(or 9% double dose))

imagine that there is a 70% desire for vaccine
thats still 52%-61% waiting for a vaccine(single or double). unable to have a vaccine, and hindered by rules aimed at the 30% refusers but affecting 52-61% of the desirers

anti vax people are not the caring type of wanting whats best for other people.
they are the selfish type of thinking they are the immortal gods and everyone else are just avatars in the matrix..
its the mindset of darwinism. fight to the death the survivor wins the losers deserved to die

they dont care about other peoples health or reactions to actions of the antivaxxer. all the antivaxxer cares about is the pretense that they are immortal and no one else matters

yes they want everyone else to catch a virus. so then the virus just dissipates out of society so that they can avoid getting the virus once they venture out of the basement(herd immunity. get everyone else done first)

they dont care that million died generations ago from spanish flu. they just care their grand dad survived.

their natural approach is get everyone infected by something that can kill. and those that die.. deserved to die

just the first 10 seconds had me facepalming

"vaccines are the mass murder"

well strangely the population is increasing over the last 60 years exponentially.. much faster then pre vaccine days
strangely people are living longer over the last 60 years. much longer than the pre vaccine days

so where is all this mass murder??

and no dont shout out some nonsense about "its killing kids".. childhood survival rate has increased due to vaccines.

the reason why you dont hear from many non-vax generations is. because the disease without vaccine kills more

im actually more socialism/liberal
im not into government control of citizens. but happy that they should regulate industry to protect citizens
if businesses want citizens money. they should earn it the right way

anyways
what you are forgetting in regards to the hormone (hunger/reward) cycle is

your body needs glucose(simple sugar) for energy.
if you eat simple fat. your body has to if active break that down into sugar. to then feel the reward.
if inactive, keep it ready for later convertion

i call this the christmas turkey delay. you know the lathargic feeling after you eat because your body is (even when sat down) working hard to convert it.
going for a walk after christmas dinner converts it to sugar and you feel good in a slow progressive manner of feeling the energy.. but not 'buzzed' in an instant.

where as having candy/energy drink/sugar in coffee. your body has a sudden acces to sugar so is an instant high of feel good

however
lazing around after a christmas dinner. it converts it/keeps it as free flowing fat.
lazing after candy and water.. converts it to harder fats.

the more complex fat. the harder to convert down to sugar so you then get the 'hunger' feeling more
this is why candy eaters get hungry feeling alot even if they had more calories than body needs.
its converted to lard and then begs for sugar because converting it back takes too long

industry changed first. where by people needed to change eating habits due to more sedentary life.
(working less hard in an office and more days off for weekends to sit and watch tv)

this caused more weight gain. the balanced diet came in response to it.
issue is industry had a louder voice. and people dont stick to diets. nor research science. instead they just follow the tv adverts

its not a simple thing of ignore governments balanced diet plate. its about understanding it.

to maintain weight
if you are an active person that jogs in the morning. for about 30 minutes. a sugar breakfast diet pre-run is best(instant burn). and not best post-run
but if you are a slow starter. a sugar breakfast is worse. as it just converts to lard fat because your not instant burning it.

if inactive post-run/jog
having sugar breakfast(milk+sugar in cereal.. coffee.. orange juice and milk) just turns to lard as your no longer active after run so body does not need the sugar.
.. having a free flow fat diet. meat and veg and fibre is better then a milk+sugar/oj breakfast
as the free flow fat stays free flowing for hours to have a consistant long term access to energy

in short sugar is for active need within 90mins of consumption.
free flowing clean fat is for the consistant energy over 3-6 hours(one meal no snacking)

also moderation is good

yes its more then calorie in calorie out..
its the TYPE of calorie(carbohydrate)

sugars are simplex easy burn calorie. body uses these first.

having a high sugar high water but lack active exercise in 90mins = skips the liquid fat and goes straight to lard(thick solid wide fat)
because you then lack the free flowing fat once the sugar is converted/burned. your body goes into hunger signals because it has to work extra hard to turn the lard back into free flowing fat to then convert into glucose to then burn for energy

sugar(glucose) is what your body burns for energy. its soo active that not having free flowing glucose really sends out the signals for more. and rewards you fastest when you get it.

ingesting fat wont reward you because your body then needs to convert it down to glucose. so your reward feeling has a delay effect and a more smoother effect


things like coffee and energy drinks are the wrong balance of calorie-water intake
if your not doing enough movement/energy burn in the same 90 minutes as consuming it..
expect to get podgy love handles if you continue this scenario regular

different sugars are needed/used by the body first

its not a question of will power. its a question of lack of education and lack of activity
yes government dont fund enough food education at school.
yes government dont fund enough food options at school lunch rooms
yes government dont fund enough sport/PE curriculum at schools. causing kids to sit and eat fries/pizza

but thats more government incompetence/ignorance/lack of involvement(emphasis lack of involvement)
compared to the levels of involvement and investment the food industry put into peoples minds

yes government incompetence to not regulate food industry.

but its the food industry that make the stuff and advertise the stuff that end up in your mouth.

its government lack of involvement. by not being involved in whats on your plate. that seems to be the topics reason to blame government. and why are they not involved..
.. oh look capitalism.. yet again

capitalism is the economic philosophy of favouring industry control over government/citizen control
communism is the economic philosophy of favouring government control over industry/citizen control
socialism is the economic philosophy of favouring citizen control over government/industry control

i dont blame government. they did not make the food nor put the plate infront of me, nor make me eat it.

capitalism caused more glossy adverts tempting people to eat less than nutritious food(KFC adverts)
capitalism caused excess of less than nutritious food to be available. (10 fastfood restaurants per fresh veg grocery store)
capitalism caused more work places to offer sedentary jobs

if people were to eat a balanced diet they wouldnt get fat. but its when people self- decide, get tempted by little extra's. even a 10% excess of a balanced diet. these 10%'s add up over time. and in a couple years you look in the mirror and realise it.

its just common sense

if people in the 1950's were working on farms from 6am to 3pm 7 days a week (9 hours x 7 days =63hours)
(3200cal maintain weight)
if people in 2021 are working in an office 9-5, 5 days a week(8 hours x 5 days=40 hours)
(2100cal maintain weight)

if someone in an office job is eating the same diet as an active worker. the office worker would gain 50% excess calories per day, every day, and with less exercise happening to a point of atleast 50%.
thats 100% too much
(basal (minimum function ~1600) vs 3200 cal)

other things occur too.
fluid intake.
drinking 2 litres of water and having about 4 full bladder urinations a day is a equal balance of water in water out.
but drink more. but urinate less(cant take pee breaks at work) means you retain that fluid which is then forced to convert sugars and simplex fats with water to become complex fat.(hydrogenated fats)
..
ever notice when using cooking oil. if you put too much water into the mix, when it cools it becomes harder more solid white fat instead of staying yellow fluid.. well that white hard fat is hydrogenated fat. which sits on your body more then fresh liquid fat.

when you metabolise carbohydrate(burn it for energy)
your body wont process this white fat until it has run out of the free flowing sugars and fats that are easier to process first. which is why to lose those 'love handles' people need to do extreme dieting/exercise to force body to use up all the free flowing carbohydrates first to then burn the white solid fat

..
over all i would not say government are causing obesity.
capitalist industry is. but it seems the government are not doing enough to educate people and not doing enough to regulate industry to prevent capitalism from making people fat

wrong for many reasons but lets pick the top 2.

1. man made
- hundreds of thousands of studies have seen the virus sequence. they know it so well and compared it that they can also see the natural wild changes as it mutates in public. they can see the variances of symptomology to know which strains are of significance..

but most importantly. they can look at the alpha sequence and see that it still has palindromes and introns
(2 things that disapear when editing in a lab)
it also lacks indels(sequences added when editing in a lab)
thus no editing had occured..

2, gain of function
-the much publicised NIH-WUHAN research. was not gain of function.. it was infact decrease of function. without using any gene editing..
taking older viruses like the older sars. and actually attenuating them down.

in short they turned down the lab temperature and let it incubate at near freezing. thus slowing down the replication rate. and while the virus learned to survive at lower temperatures.. meant it didnt like higher temperatures like body heat

and so would not replicate in body heat scenarios..

this is not gain of function. this was loss of function study.
no gene editing. no covid sequence. no splicing

the sequence used in the NIH-WUHAN study was not even the same lineage as what covid was.
there is no lineage associated virus in wuhan that can explain covid existance

but here is the thing. though loss of function virus is a good candidate for a vaccine.. guess what. loss of function then becomes a poor candidate as a mass produced vaccine for the world.

3. mRNA lack of research
there is massive amount of studies. the lack is in jetcash.. HIM lacking to research the research.
mRNA breaks down in a couple of days.
mRNA creates protiens. lacks the length of code to do the more complex taska of gene editing/replicating
the protein it creates appears on the cell that created it(its not blasted into the bloodstream)
the protein breaks down in a few weeks if not handled already by your immune system earlier

at 79 means he was born in 1942
so he didnt have childhood vaccines.. not out of choice. but out of being born in such an early era

he didnt have measles vaccine because he was born before it was invented(1963)
he didnt have chicken pox vaccine because he was born before it was invented(1995)

yet it did have some vaccines before he turned 20. (1962)
so i guess when he was old enough to walk and talk and make decisions.. he chose to have vaccines

so is he apologising for admitting he is not an antivaxxer because when they did become available he had them.. (as a late teen)

many people dont have or need vaccines 20-65. and having the flu jab at 65+ is not compulsory.
so its not a badge of honour to say he didnt have any vaccines after his 20th birthday.. its pretty much normal

..
and no you dont need to wear a condom when your giving yourself a one hander while peaking at the nudes outside your camper van.. you need some tissue and yes some hand sanitiser..

"rubbing-alcohol available at a nudest camp"... is not an invitation to perv

sorry but no one should be shaking your hand after you had a sneaky peak at the nudist beach. especially if you say when you do have sex(i presume with your partner) that its been decades before she had anyone else.. but with that said... i hope she knows about your sneaky spank sessions perving at the nudest beach.. she atleast needs to know about your hand hygiene before cooking her salmon. or she will have diarrhoea like you did last year.. and your partners friend did this year.

oh and yes apologise to your gut for leaving the salmon out in the open overnight which you described last year

mRNA is not new science. mRNA research has been done for years
mRNA breaks down in days. the protein(spike) it instructs to make breaks down in weeks. if the immune system has not dealt with it sooner.

mRNA does not have the lengthier code needed to pass the nucleus membrane.
mRNA does not have the lengthier code needed to change DNA

mRNA code goes to the ribosome to create a protein..
mRNA does not create a length of genetic material
there is no replication of more mRNA
there is not genetic editing

.. if you have an egg in the kitchen.. its not fertilised to produce a chicken which then produces more eggs. instead it is used to make an omelette

the ribosome(fryingpan) cracks the egg and cooks it into a new protein along with some other ingrediants
the egg does not go into a incubator
an egg cant even open an oven door to even be incubated. it lacks the hands needed for that job

you know less than you think you know. and not willing to learn the bits you dont know

to create a 'live virus' that is attenuated to not replicate as much. requires incubating it at low temperatures, over multiple generations until its attained a function that at normal body temperatures it cant function its replication effectively

this was the NIH/Wuhan study of 2016-2020 that conspiracy idiots thought was covid research. . yep they used 2002 sars from bats found 2008-2018 and tried to attenuate them down into being 'live virus that does not replicate'.. and results is. it was to long a production process and unable to be done to then mass produce a vaccine for the world.. yep its not a GAIN of function found in the study. it was actually a study on attenuating down the function..

EG its like
(send a man to the arctic to have kids, grandkids, great grandkids where they get used to having sex in the snow.. then you will find if you take that multi-generational descendant to the carribean. he will be too sunburned and sweaty and heat stroked and not wanna have sex.)

this is the method that usually takes a long time to produce. and does not always work

some say that a live virus has more then just the spike protein identifier and having more then just the spike identifier means more things for immune system to learn about a virus.
the problem is the more different things it tries to learn to attack. the less it can concentrate on any single battle plan. thus making the immune system too diluted with too many differing antibodies.

EG its like
instead of one army training camp trained to recognise al-queda by the black flag with white writing. jetcash's idea is a training camp with small groups of troops. one trained to attack anyone with a head scarf. another small set to attack anyone with sandals and another small troop group to attach anyone without caucasian skin

best action is all troops should go after the guys waving the al-queda flag

by identifying one aspect that really does affect the body. like its spike 'key' into a cells 'lock' to open a cell up for invasion. this can be used more effectively to identify the virus holding the key before it gets to a lock. or identify an intruder if it gets to a cells door with the key

by having antibodies (small little Y shape) trained for the spike. these can latch onto the spike(key) and block it from being able to fit the lock. thus no invasion into a cell. and then send a message to kill the thing they just blocked with the other immuno cells

but if you have a mix of antibodies lokking for different things. the amount of antibodies that wil latch onto the spike is decreased

more varied antibodies=less antibodies for specific function..

in short the simpleist solution is the quickest solution

crypto can validate and officiate a vote of who is a country leader. but a blockchain wont replace the human brain, mouth hands and legs of a nations leader. even if america 2016-2020 showed it had a brainless orange as a leader

some political  decisions during the 4 year term do need a brain and a mouth and even a handshake and some feet to walk around on.. things a blockchain does not have
though we can debate that some nations leaders dont really use their human attributes well

quoting breitbart.. that links to coindesk.. that says 'we received a draft'.. but doesnt disclose it..

yawn
but from what it does suggest:
is not users making transactions
is not users depositing into services/custodians

its, if people on licenced exchanges trade $10k coin for other currencies whether it be cash or other cryptocurrencies, file a report the same way the exchange files reports of cash over $10k

so calm down they just want to enhance the standard aml rules of exchange/MSB regulations that already exist.

its nothing to do with all businesses, all users
it highlights exchanges and market places as brokers. not users. not retail stores

i think this is less about taxing users. and more about defining exchanges and market places(even decentralised ones) as things that require having a MSB licence and then be required to follow rules, where they can make money on licences and fines for not reporting

i think badecker and trump type of people are not on this planet to learn things. they are on this planet to wiggle their butts and do the opposite to everyone else just to show of that they are not normal

even if it makes them look like idiots. that to them is a gold star as it makes them feel noticed.

seems tvbcof and badecker and tash are not complaining about science.. they are just complaining about american doctors..

well thats their capitalism for them

in the UK doctors dont get commission. in many countries doctors dont get commission.
there is no 'pill mill' drug problem in the UK where doctors write scripts for cash.

guess this proves badecker and co dont like capitalism after al and would prefer it if doctors treat patients as patients and not customers. as that is all badecker and co keep displaying when they argue about american medical system.. the money making doctors  act funny.. and that includes the links to badeckers influencers that pay doctors to say foolish things like advertise herbal remedies and drugs not made for the conspiracy influencers adverts.

but hey, capitalism so even if badecker hates doctors for it. he then loves doctors for it. making badecker and co.. hypocrits

rainbowkun has atleast shown that he has put some thought into his articles before writing it. but its more philosophical rather than matter of fact.

more "bitcoin should be a one world reserve currency" in about 5 posts i seen of his. as one example of his mindset.

you can tell he has put some sitting back and thinking time, and then some time to write them. but as a newbie he has still alot to learn about bitcoin.
i have corrected a few misconceptions he has made and he has adapted a few things. but he is still in the learning process.

nothing wrong with opinion pieces of philosophy. but trying to write them out as if they are bitcoin matter of facts is a different story. he is still too early in his learning to be trying 'matter of fact' stuff

he is getting there. and i probably would give him merit in future. but just parts of his articles still rub me the wrong way and remind me that he is still a newbie. so not yet at a point of winning merit.
(one article said bitcoin first, blockchain second. .. another article said the opposite way round.. another article said its a database. ..  i had to correct him by saying its a ledger not a database. as ledgers have more meaning and better definition of structure and function)
there are other examples where he still does not get the full concept of bitcoin, and just seems too philosophical like he is trying to hype promote bitcoin to newbies without realising for people to be on this forum they have already been though the promotion part to have found and joined the forum.

i have nothing against the deep thought stuff. and its this that makes me half want to award him merit as its surprising to come from a newbie. but he still lacks something which just ends up with me holding back from awarding merit.

nothing against anyone giving merit to him for the little snippits of detail he does get right. but overall. still not always all right as a whole post. so he has some more learning to do.

i think he needs to spend a couple more months asking questions before making posts pretending to give answers. .. he just isnt quite yet there to be giving out 'matter of fact' style articles.

my view.
companies/communitys come and go/change. make and lose money..
so yea having them loyalty card 'credits' may seem good now. but no guarantee they will be a thing in 2-100 years

governments are (in best case) advocates voted in by the citizens. so they represent the citizens. and a government would always exist longer than any company would

governments should monitor and regulate the general citizen 'money' to ensure there is always something people can use as a general medium of exchange recognised nationally and stable(wishful thinking) but governments should not stop companies/communities from having their own optional extra choices of other currencies
EG whether it be grocery store loyalty token accounts
EG whether it be community tokens
EG whether it be national tokens
EG international medium of exchange to hedge against fiat remittance markets

replacing government regulated currencies. and just have a single crypto that all citizens are pegged to. is not a free option. it becomes the only option. which in of itself would become its own problem

being a second option a free option. solves more problems than it would create being the 'single world currency'

andreas, although he has some bias to pander to certain ideals, is willing to atleast say things as they are most of the time and even be professional when he goes to explain things to even government senates, parliaments and government commitee's

adam back just tweets his desires for bitcoin direction like a typical manager