Arrête de te battre et tire toi.

Il n'y a rien à sauver dans un pays où la majorité accepte largement sa propre soumission.

Les gens veulent ça. Ils veulent des CRS SS, ils veulent des soldats dans les rues, ils veulent ne pas avoir à réfléchir, ils pensent en grande majorité que les pauvres le sont surement parce qu'ils l'ont bien mérité.

On ne peut pas forcer un âne qui n'a pas soif à boire. Tu ne peux pas sauver un pays qui se jette la tête la première dans un consumérisme à outrance, une soumission totale aux USA et aux banques, et qui recrute des policiers plutôt que des médecins.

Barre toi et laisse les crever. Ils ont ce qu'ils méritent.

It's rather easy to compare 1984 thought police to KGB of course.

But the whole fake Goldstein book in 1984 is denouncing the current capitalist market and the use people in power have of war and consumation.

Orwell is both against right and left manipulation, whatever the source. He denounces both of the extremes and their abuse of English language. That's his main stance.

Sure, but I don't know if that's so alarming. Confirmation bias is strong everywhere on the web, I guess we all ignore things that are against our ideas not because we refuse to see them but because we're not even informed they exist.

My only points were:
-Orwell isn't especially against the left, he's against manipulation through language abuse
-No one here is saying we should put the kids in jail except maybe coin4commies

Your whole post is irrelevant concerning those 2 parts.

I find all this to be a bit of a non debate.

There is no such thing as pro choice or pro life in most cases. Of course you got some crazy guys saying a woman shouldn't be able to have any kind of abortion even when it's a rape child, and some saying abortion should be given automatically on a simple demand whatever the state of pregnancy.

But truth be told I think there is no real answer and anything is defendable as long as you're in the middle of this.

How can be a 5 months limit be better or worse than a 6 months limit?

As Theymos illustrated, abortion is simply a socialy accepted limit between a foetus and a some-kind of human.

For me anything below 1 year old isn't really humand because that's more or less the age you get self-consciousness which is the real difference betwee human and animals. But that's not something socially acceptable I guess ^^


Anyway what's sure:
-Abortions are part of human society, if you get them illegal they'll continue, only putting more danger for the mother.
-You can't force someone to be a parent. That's impossible.
-Accidents DO happen, not only talking about rape but you can be on the pills and wear condom and still be freaking unlucky.
-Abortion IS an important process that MUST be avoided 99,9% of the time. It's not a light medical act and the first priority is to prevent situations in which abortion can become a necessity. Prevention is far better than anything here.

So as long as a society do whatever it can to educate the people in contraception, ease the access to contraception, educate people on sexuality and sexual practices, and allow abortion in some way for anyone, I don't think you can really be right or wrong. There is nothing factual about what is good and what is bad in putting some kind of deadline... It's just a question of personnal perspective.

Anyone doing so is politically dead.

Not saying you're wrong and they won't do it though.

But it's a bit like if Trump can't delivers the wall before the end of his terms. If he doesn't, he's dead.

blah blah blah blah

No one has been able to explain you why the kids shoudl be under scrutiny because no one here says they should be so. Except maybe a bit coin4commies but no one takes him seriously, it's like you or BADECKER who would seriously listen to such people?

Don't try to make yourself some kind of victim. We're on a clear pro-freedom forum. No one here will say we should put kids on the radar because they had a MAGA hat. No one says so, not even the leftists you hate so much.

You clearly never read Orwell.

His books don't talk about left and right but about control of the powerful over the people through manipulation and language transformation.

There is no political stance in Orwell's work concerning economical regulation, market or anything like this. It's only about institution, language and freedom.

What? Oo

Hmm... No... I was merelly asking for a bit more details if they have some. I just happen to like the data pages you can get on gambling sites that's all. That was merely a small suggestion as all this data is already available for Primedice so putting them in a table shouldn't be lots of work and I'm sure i'm not the only one who would appreciate it.

That's all. There is nothing more, I'm not adressing any issue Oo

Calm down r0ach.

Calm down.

Now click on this red cross on the top right of the screen.

Stand up and go out.

Find a forest and stay here for a while please.

Like a century or two. You'll be better after trust me.

I kind of understand what he says.

I mean that's a bit too much but the difference between blockchain and banks is that you can have a total control over it, but in exchange you have also a responsability.

You know, rights and duty. Can't expect everyone to do it for you.

You have only two things to assess a value for a domain:
-Name price: it nearly doesn't exist. It's not something you can evaluate, it's just a question of what someone (a precise client) would accept paying. No one can tell you this. You'll have to find the right client yourself.
-Traffic: this one has an objective price. If you already have traffic it's the same as selling a brand

Ok.

Was asking because I think even if the site is really well made, it's lacking a bit of the... You know, informative page?
Live stats and all.
You got some but I guess it could be a bit deeper.

Hey.

You seem to be a bit new here. Look at game protect trust rating.

it simply means you should ignore the guy. That's all you need to do

cheers

I especially believe that leverage trading with altcoin is pure gambling.

Cause on btc you can see the big waves... But on alts? With the BTC price ratio?
Lol you can't see shyit don't kid yourself.

Hodl refers to what you believe in.

BTC was seen as a dubious innovation some years ago. A shitcoin now can become a very useful tool in the future.

Hodl is a state of mind about you believing in a tech rather than trading for more fiat. That's all.

Ah oui mais là le mot utopie est presque un euphémisme.

Enfin bon ce n'est qu'un ajout de plus à cette société qui a pris son virage sécuritaire et dérégularisé il y a déjà une trentaine d'année.

Depuis Mitterand on ne fait que ça... Et depuis Mitterand les choses ne font qu'empirer...

Un lien?

Tout va bien.

On a plus le droit de manifester et de masquer son visage pour se protéger du lacrymo.

Tu veux pas respirer du lacrymo? Tiens 15k€ d'amende.

Pays de merde.

Yeah, say it on the P&S board.

Half topics are to explain you vaccins cause autism, climate change is a lie and earth is flat.

You can't fight science with logic. But you can still shit on it.

I don't see why anyone would play thousands of bets on auto mode with a 5% house edge...

The most numerous the bets the more important the house edge becomes.
Don't do drugs kids,  do maths. Not meth.

That's.... Original

And after all why not?
The fact thatyou made an exchange already made you develop the longest and hardest part of all gambling sites, hence the security.
You must have the best security features for the exchange so why not mutualize the cost by adding gambling functionnality.

That's interesting. But don't know if the target is the same ^^