Oh, you've quietly downgraded your spam link from "proof" to just "evidence" now have we.  Thought you'd slip that passed us without anyone noticing did ya. LOL. |
|
|
|
I have not heard any adequate rebuttals from skeptics to the Scientific Evidence for the Afterlife that I have presented.
This shows me that the truth is out there but people will simply NOT bother to read it.
What's the afterlife got to do with proving god? People always use anything that is supernatural to prove God, somehow i dont know how... And we should make a difference between Bible God or just God as a superior being One of those gods is a bully, who threatens people into believing him or else.... The other doesn't ask or require belief and certainly doesn't demand worship. Guess which one is the devil tricking you. God made everything. He made it so that it all worked together perfectly. If you feel that God is bullying you, accept this thing that you call bullying as gentle exhortation and admonishment. Pulling yourself away from the perfection that you were made for - the thing you do when you deny God - is going to be far worse for you than any gentle "bullying" that God might seem to be doing to you.  What god are you talking about? Which one? |
|
|
|
I have not heard any adequate rebuttals from skeptics to the Scientific Evidence for the Afterlife that I have presented.
This shows me that the truth is out there but people will simply NOT bother to read it.
What's the afterlife got to do with proving god? People always use anything that is supernatural to prove God, somehow i dont know how... And we should make a difference between Bible God or just God as a superior being One of those gods is a bully, who threatens people into believing him or else.... The other doesn't ask or require belief and certainly doesn't demand worship. Guess which one is the devil tricking you. |
|
|
|
I have not heard any adequate rebuttals from skeptics to the Scientific Evidence for the Afterlife that I have presented.
This shows me that the truth is out there but people will simply NOT bother to read it.
What's the afterlife got to do with proving god? |
|
|
|
Perhaps they should consider running a decentralized Silk Road with taxpayer money in order to keep bullets from flying around in the streets.
Yes because while Silk Road was open for business, all drug crime on our streets stopped didn't it. |
|
|
|
I`m using NOD32 Antivirus 5 and I have only got virused with about 2 maximum 3 adwares from the internet.
Only infected with 2 viruses? You shouldn't have any at all! |
|
|
|
Remember again that:
a) Science cannot conclude upon that which cannot be directly observed.
b) By definition, an intelligent designer cannot be directly observed.
c) Therefore, science cannot cannot conclude upon an intelligent designer.
So, again, it is an absolute, logical impossibility for scientific evidence to constitute proof for God's existence.
Quit calling that garbage "proof."
Thank you for explaining the precise reason that Big Bang, age of the universe, evolution-produces-life, black holes, dark matter and energy, parallel universes, chaos, and quantum anything, are all theories. The point remains. The evidence expressed at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 is proof that God exists. Strawman. The joint never said anything about Big bang, black holes etc... being theories or not. Your "proof" was challenged and you had no defense Not even a weak defense. Nothing, zilch, zero. |
|
|
|
|
Watching BADecker trying to dig himself out of that hole he dug, is like watching a train crash in slow motion.
|
|
|
|
Doesn't talk about God at all. Even if the times are correct here (we don't know that they are because laws of physics of the distant past may have been different), this only suggests that God did it differently than the religions say. This author, himself, agrees that God exists when he says at the bottom of http://www.biblicalnonsense.com/outro.html: One day, perhaps, we’ll all be free of conditioned thinking and learn to rely on observable and testable evidence when examining religious claims. One day, perhaps, we can all peacefully coexist. Whatever force might be watching us now probably realizes that the majority of us are currently incapable of achieving these goals. If this being is observing our planet during a search for an enlightened race that’s ready for the deepest secrets of the universe, it should probably try us again later. While the Big Bang has not been proven to absolutely have not happened, the current descriptions and times that modern science applies to Big Bang happenings, have been shown to be wrong by electric cosmos information. See http://electric-cosmos.org/indexOLD.htm. Science and astronomy have made tremendous strides in knowledge about the universe over the last hundred years. Most of the knowledge is a hodge podge of pasting new findings into old. This process has turned the whole understanding of astronomy and cosmology into a complete mess, even though astronomers are ashamed to admit it... ashamed that they could have been so bold as to believe all those silly cosmology assertions of former astronomers and cosmologists. The evidence for this is found at http://electric-cosmos.org/indexOLD.htm and the pages following. Follow the thinking in Internet searches for "electric cosmos," and you will see how it is gradually replacing current popular understandings about the universe, simply because it makes way more sense. You can keep believing in your thing but there are the solid proofs against god
You can keep on setting yourself against God for awhile, by believing that He doesn't exist. Yet, some of the most important and basic evidences that prove God exists are found here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. Proofs against god: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earthhttp://www.biblicalnonsense.com/index2.htmlhttp://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~yukimoon/BigBang/BigBang.htmhttp://www.hawking.org.uk/the-origin-of-the-universe.htmlYou can keep believing in your thing but there are the solid proofs against god There are no proofs against God in the common methods for finding evidence that proves something. The evidences at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 are scientific evidences that scientists use everyday to prove aspects of nature and the universe around us. These evidences also prove the existence of God. The religion of atheism has become strong these days. And I don't understand why. Why are people who are out to find the truth (or so they say) so adamantly against one of the basic truths of the universe, that God exists? Accepting the fact of the existence God doesn't hurt them at all. They can still go on being good (or bad, in some cases) scientists. Personally, I think it is a political ploy, pushed by the super rich, to mix up the common people, so that they can control the world more easily. A couple questions: 1) In your view, what is the difference, if any, between evidence and proof? 2) In your view, does "proof" always equate to 100% certainty? Why or why not? Depends. He can change the definitions around to suit the situation. That way he gives the illusion his arguments have substance. I know, he butchers and tortures the English language repeatedly. This is basically me experimenting with various approaches to see if he responds differently to any of them. There's a part of me that likes to believe that 'nobody' who is capable of living on their own is that stupid, and that he knows when he signs off his account that he's dead wrong on so many things, but simply can't admit it because he's already invested so much time and energy trying to cast a certain impression (i.e. that he's super-duper smart and nobody except him understands the awesomeness of his logic...you know, because faith and stuff). It's called getting the info across. I call it deliberately misleading people. Telling people you have proof when you don't is not "getting the info across", it's just lying. |
|
|
|
Doesn't talk about God at all. Even if the times are correct here (we don't know that they are because laws of physics of the distant past may have been different), this only suggests that God did it differently than the religions say. This author, himself, agrees that God exists when he says at the bottom of http://www.biblicalnonsense.com/outro.html: One day, perhaps, we’ll all be free of conditioned thinking and learn to rely on observable and testable evidence when examining religious claims. One day, perhaps, we can all peacefully coexist. Whatever force might be watching us now probably realizes that the majority of us are currently incapable of achieving these goals. If this being is observing our planet during a search for an enlightened race that’s ready for the deepest secrets of the universe, it should probably try us again later. While the Big Bang has not been proven to absolutely have not happened, the current descriptions and times that modern science applies to Big Bang happenings, have been shown to be wrong by electric cosmos information. See http://electric-cosmos.org/indexOLD.htm. Science and astronomy have made tremendous strides in knowledge about the universe over the last hundred years. Most of the knowledge is a hodge podge of pasting new findings into old. This process has turned the whole understanding of astronomy and cosmology into a complete mess, even though astronomers are ashamed to admit it... ashamed that they could have been so bold as to believe all those silly cosmology assertions of former astronomers and cosmologists. The evidence for this is found at http://electric-cosmos.org/indexOLD.htm and the pages following. Follow the thinking in Internet searches for "electric cosmos," and you will see how it is gradually replacing current popular understandings about the universe, simply because it makes way more sense. You can keep believing in your thing but there are the solid proofs against god
You can keep on setting yourself against God for awhile, by believing that He doesn't exist. Yet, some of the most important and basic evidences that prove God exists are found here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. Proofs against god: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earthhttp://www.biblicalnonsense.com/index2.htmlhttp://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~yukimoon/BigBang/BigBang.htmhttp://www.hawking.org.uk/the-origin-of-the-universe.htmlYou can keep believing in your thing but there are the solid proofs against god There are no proofs against God in the common methods for finding evidence that proves something. The evidences at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 are scientific evidences that scientists use everyday to prove aspects of nature and the universe around us. These evidences also prove the existence of God. The religion of atheism has become strong these days. And I don't understand why. Why are people who are out to find the truth (or so they say) so adamantly against one of the basic truths of the universe, that God exists? Accepting the fact of the existence God doesn't hurt them at all. They can still go on being good (or bad, in some cases) scientists. Personally, I think it is a political ploy, pushed by the super rich, to mix up the common people, so that they can control the world more easily. A couple questions: 1) In your view, what is the difference, if any, between evidence and proof? 2) In your view, does "proof" always equate to 100% certainty? Why or why not? Depends. He can change the definitions around to suit the situation. That way he gives the illusion his arguments have substance. |
|
|
|
|
Heartbeat.
Reminds me of the heartbleed bug.
|
|
|
|
atheism has become strong these days.
I'm not so sure about this. Churches around here on a Sunday are full up. I know this because they seem to think parking laws don't apply to them, so they park their cars wherever they choose, blocking everyone in. Also most people I've spoke to believe in a god. Only a small handful believe in religion though, which a different thing altogether. But as I said, the churches are full so it must be still popular. |
|
|
|
^ I'm surprised the mods haven't given you a warning about that link you keep spamming all over the thread. Spamming links is generally frowned upon.
The link is supposed to be used. I could rewrite the whole thing every time. Or I could copy and paste. The link makes for brevity. This way people who have seen it can read through what is written more easily, and go to the link for a refresher. So, it is NOT spam. It is explanation, done in a wise way. If you think it's important just stick it in your signature. No need to spam the main board with it every five minutes. I see by your posts, that like it or not, you are finally coming around.
I'm surprised you can see anything with your eyes so tightly sealed shut. If you would open your eyes and read the things at the link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, you would see that it is you with your eyes shut... not I. Maybe I should develop it into an audio, so that you can get it with your eyes shut. Your link points some disconnected random thoughts. You've been told this before. The thoughts at the link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 only seem disconnected to you because... Your thoughts are random and disconnected because they are random and disconnected. Obviously.  |
|
|
|
^ I'm surprised the mods haven't given you a warning about that link you keep spamming all over the thread. Spamming links is generally frowned upon.
The link is supposed to be used. I could rewrite the whole thing every time. Or I could copy and paste. The link makes for brevity. This way people who have seen it can read through what is written more easily, and go to the link for a refresher. So, it is NOT spam. It is explanation, done in a wise way. If you think it's important just stick it in your signature. No need to spam the main board with it every five minutes. I see by your posts, that like it or not, you are finally coming around.
I'm surprised you can see anything with your eyes so tightly sealed shut. If you would open your eyes and read the things at the link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, you would see that it is you with your eyes shut... not I. Maybe I should develop it into an audio, so that you can get it with your eyes shut. Your link points some disconnected random thoughts. You've been told this before. |
|
|
|
^ I'm surprised the mods haven't given you a warning about that link you keep spamming all over the thread. Spamming links is generally frowned upon.
The link is supposed to be used. I could rewrite the whole thing every time. Or I could copy and paste. The link makes for brevity. This way people who have seen it can read through what is written more easily, and go to the link for a refresher. So, it is NOT spam. It is explanation, done in a wise way. If you think it's important just stick it in your signature. No need to spam the main board with it every five minutes. I see by your posts, that like it or not, you are finally coming around.
I'm surprised you can see anything with your eyes so tightly sealed shut. |
|
|
|
|
^ I'm surprised the mods haven't given you a warning about that link you keep spamming all over the thread. Spamming links is generally frowned upon.
|
|
|
|
|
Now that you started changing the definition of words, nobody can believe a word you say. Not really sure why your still posting on here. It all gets labelled the same (even the truth) and pops straight in the bin.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
