Shipping Dates are from 16th August to 26th August.
The first products should have shipped. Does anybody have confirmation of a miner in route or has anybody already received their miner? I have a tracking number from fc that gets the hw to Hong Kong (based on prior experience). Then it's picked up by DHL. So, DHL number is next. |
|
|
|
The Mason coin will be presented to the Masons with all intention of it being the coin of choice. It is not a coin that will be carried by a theme bit rather represented by Free Masons. Our inside endeavors with the Free Masons will take the coin far. We are currently working with other Masons to make the coin not simply an adaptation to other coins but a preference. Also in due time we feel as if the Masons will openly feature the coin. With direct connection to Masons, we are confident this coin will not be a failure. The mining option has also is on the table for change. If at any point our affiliates would desire the mining option to be obsolete we will then work to discreetly distribute the coin. These methods will only be brought into play if requested by our affiliates. At this point we are confident the coin will be mined.
Are you a Mason? You plan to pitch this to Masons or you already have? |
|
|
|
The trust rating was intended for trade. I haven't made any trade.
It seems someone abuses this as I have got all the negatives just after launching the coin!
It was.... from my Trust summary: User Date Risked BTC amount
CanaryInTheMine 2014-08-17 0.00000000
I don't like such practises. It looks like slander. But why? Because CanaryInTheMine didn't like this coin? Outrage. Launching the coin with the sources only? Yesssss, I like it! You'd all prefer a coin with binaries, but without sources? Haha Having an expensive machine with a lot of GPUs is not enough  The one who wants to use it, should have some skills, too  at least the ability to build the wallet from sources himself Stay on topic: what I don't like is people getting scammed and zero vetting. Do you think this coin has been vetted? |
|
|
|
Release source code first.
You seem to misunderstand how coin launches work. If developers release source it will mean a launch. Unless you are willing to review the source code by yourself in private OP with negative rating , worst launch . Since CanaryInTheMine has found altcoin section all launches going to have negative rating devs (or at least ones that CanaryInTheMine will spot on his free time) No really... Where's github link with commit history etc? Uploading code at "release" is bull defecation. Newbie accounts? Code should be reviewed by community before launch. Otherwise, don't release on bitcointalk forums. Setup your own coin's forum. I love this guy! Nothing is cool about this guy. He missuses trust rating giving users false information about the dev. This dev did not scam anyone (yet  ). So there is no reason to mark him as a scammer preemptively. Anybody with a half of a brain may see that this is a new account and one should treat everything that dev releases with caution. But marking him as a scammer is just bullshit. There are million ways to hide some crap in the coin source so community will not find it until its too late. Bittrex guys told it many times already and they are security experts I understand that you are an alt coin dev for hire. So someone can pay you and order an alt coin from you then release under newbie account by posting with no source code or any info to vet against scams. So, if you were hired to create some altcoins, announce it. Stand behind it, it helps with vetting. Did you create this altcoin for hire? |
|
|
|
IF you do not like the coin do not mine it. We are not holding you down and making you mine it. We didn't even ask you to mine it. The information on the free mason can be a copy and paste. I didnt write it, so why take the credit for it. We are based on the foundations of the free mason so why not present you with the information of the masons. Also, yes it is a google image, again we used the real free mason coin as the coin is dedicated to the Free Masons.
Our supporters will be presenting themselves by Monday. Please refrain from negative comments until then.
Are you a Mason? |
|
|
|
 MASON COINLaunch Date Coming Soon X11 Algorithm Super secure hashing algorithm: 11 rounds of scientific hashing functions (blake, bmw, groestl, jh, keccak, skein, luffa, cubehash, shavite, simd, echo) Block reward is controlled by moore’s law: (11111 / (((Difficulty+51)/6) ^ 2)) CPU/GPU mining Block generation: 3.3 minutes Difficulty: retargets every minute using Grand Artificer Symmetry Supply: estimated 33 million maximum coins Block reward halves every 33 days Encrypted transaction network: Work In Progress Anonymous blockchain using coinjoin technology: Pre-Alpha What is your real forum profile? |
|
|
|
respect, guys! you can decide not to invest, no problem. we are not scam you anything.
those who made my trust profile minus, i hope you return it back.
we may not be able to build another coin successful like BTC, but please respect the endeavor we are undertaking... thanks!
I have no problems with removing my concerns if you get vetted. Start with your real forum profile, not a newbie account to hide behind. Show us history of your development work. Too many scams have happened and you are doing everything that screams Caution. Why? |
|
|
|
Code should be reviewed by community before launch. Otherwise, don't release on bitcointalk forums.
To which “community” do you refer? And could you give a few more details about the review process you're insisting upon? (Just because you paid several BTC for your Hero account doesn't entitle you to throw your weight around unilaterally.) Cheers Graham You can find a lot of good info in Meta, like how you don't buy Hero accounts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178608.0 |
|
|
|
The trust rating was intended for trade. I haven't made any trade.
It seems someone abuses this as I have got all the negatives just after launching the coin!
It was.... from my Trust summary: User Date Risked BTC amount
CanaryInTheMine 2014-08-17 0.00000000
@marada: Yes, the number of coins includes all the coins possible, POW and POS. It is quite common that devs claim the POW coin amount as total, but I want to be fair. There will be 1000*100+49000*50=2550000 coins n PoW period. The rest will be in the PoW/PoS period. A big glory to those who are solo-mining! You are tough cookies, guys! Have you gotten familiar with Trust yet? Read here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.0 |
|
|
|
This is just a sketch, not implemented so far. I will post actual screenshots later Post source code, not screen shots. |
|
|
|
Release source code first.
You seem to misunderstand how coin launches work. If developers release source it will mean a launch. Unless you are willing to review the source code by yourself in private OP with negative rating , worst launch . Since CanaryInTheMine has found altcoin section all launches going to have negative rating devs (or at least ones that CanaryInTheMine will spot on his free time) No really... Where's github link with commit history etc? Uploading code at "release" is bull defecation. Newbie accounts? Code should be reviewed by community before launch. Otherwise, don't release on bitcointalk forums. Setup your own coin's forum. |
|
|
|
|
Source code? White paper? What's your other forum account?
|
|
|
|
|
Release source code first.
|
|
|
|
CanaryInTheMine,
Lining up PSU etc. and I noticed that in the unit that Dogie does the guide on a separate barrel type power connector like used on some lcd screens is needed for the controller card. Is that the case for this one. Trying to have everything in place for before ships, thanks.
Here's the response from ASICMiner: "its 12V 1A, 2.1mm (actually 2.5mm is also available ,its compatible)" |
|
|
|
Can you release the source code for the Grid Storage piece of the software?
So far based on GitHub I just see source for a new X13 Coin.
Am I missing something?
Thanks
I highly encourage the dev to release source for this part and NOT release any binaries or updates that expose this functionality before source code is opened. |
|
|
|
So meenwhile I dont see any menu with storage space sharing in the wallet  this feature is still being tested. I will soon announce alpha test that will require an invite to participate Do I dare ask how a new account already has -6 trust??? And then launches a coin Because dev wanted to access your hard drive without any proof of this not being a scam. So I've been wondering what kind of proof do you want? Do you still think its a scam? Source code so that those in this community who want to check can. |
|
|
|
Thanks! Removing my note on not trusting. Hopefully released source code is helpful to the community. |
|
|
|
So meenwhile I dont see any menu with storage space sharing in the wallet this feature is still being tested. I will soon announce alpha test that will require an invite to participate Do I dare ask how a new account already has -6 trust??? And then launches a coin Because dev wanted to access your hard drive without any proof of this not being a scam. |
|
|
|
It actually can't steel nothing if you encrypt other wallets ...
This shouldn't provide ANY comfort. Once you have a file that contains private keys, brute forcing will crack some of the wallets. Enough of them to make it a viable exercise. Also, some unsuspecting folks have more than wallets on the drives. Financial info, bank accounts. Passwords to other systems/sites etc... This is up to dev. You either have an awesome coin or this screams CAUTION!!! If this is legit, please prove it. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
