Lols, had it on the previous page before you even posted it... PAY ATTENTION, STUPID PEOPLE! You constantly calling users of this coin stupid is only going to drive people away when you need them the most. Without users this coin is nothing. Your attitude will only hurt this coin. STUPID PEOPLE are what hurt this coin. I'm glad to see them folding their house of cards. Being a nancy boy is not going to purge the weak. Fuck off. Can you explain how users have caused the fork. |
|
|
|
u can still trade on crypt
I wouldn't recommend that. Crypt should disable trading asap. |
|
|
|
huge panic sells.. Will it ever go back up?
Yes. This coin is hype, so it'll go up and up. |
|
|
|
will the price move down after the market opens?
Developer screw up is good! Darkcoin can do no wrong! Masternodes are perfect! Price to hit 1 bitcoin once trading resumes. |
|
|
|
And the ship goes down you better be ready  Don't worry, the hype machine will be here soon to tell us all how a hard fork because of the developers mistake is a good thing and proves that Darkcoin is certainly on track to replace Bitcoin by years end. |
|
|
|
If there is to be a major reduction in PoW blocks though, the premine issue needs to be addressed eventually. If we are looking at just over 6 million PoW coins, the once small premine has now ballooned into over a 2% premine. You may have a lot of your plate right now, but best to fight off the FUD before it hits.
+1 If the premine is destroyed to equal proportion to the coin reduction, criticism regarding "unfair dev" will be crushed. Unless of course part of the premine is already sold. This made me laugh. Could be the NSA I suppose but I think that this statement would go better on the Conspiracy coin thread.
Well in DRK some say the nodes are being bought by the NSA, so, in that sense it's "the only crypto the government wants to buy from you"  If they see a legitimate threat they may want to move ahead of the game. Personally I believe they own secretely purchased ASICs that do ensure 51% POW supremacy in all crypto's right now including SHA256, Scrypt and X11. The premine before was way too small at only 0.4%. That is just too small for development costs and proper pay to this dev for his work. He needs a larger compensation if he wants to take this coin to the next level. I think we all can agree on that. It costs money to make a coin and hire out work. Trust me, I know this, as the dev of cinnicoin. So, my vote is overwhelmingly to let him keep what he already has no matter the total supply reduction. And why not? The dev deserves a hell of a lot more than this! Look at where he has taken us since May 8th! The premine is minuscule To be honest, $92,000 for a months work is quite a lot, I wouldn't call that minuscule. |
|
|
|
Yes I would like to know how to change or modify the wallet password.
When I open my wallet the first thing I do is enter a password. This is what I would like to change.
At the moment there is no option in the wallet to change password. Make a new wallet and send the funds from your old wallet to your new one. |
|
|
|
Xbit
Bitx
Altx
X2M
Dev said he wants to keep the XC symbol if possible, as it is already established. I think I agree with this so let's try to work within those bounds for now. Well, maybe someone can come up with a killer name outside of XC confines XCreation XCharge XCuddles XCrazy XCat |
|
|
|
I think it reminds me too much of experts exchange. It feels cheap and tacky, sorry bud. Be bold, try for a more powerful name. |
|
|
|
On the name front, I'm thinking at this point XC is recognized - and from that we have xcode, xchange... etc... personally I like xcode  Not such a good idea, Xcode is so popular, and these are techy people too. Try XCoin  maybe that just leaves XChange I really don't like XChange. :p |
|
|
|
Monero, my man, why are you tanking?  It's a fast release coin, I think it'll take a while before the QT wallet and I2P stuff is done before it stabilizes at a decent price. Remember the supply will increase 6 times in the next 52 weeks. |
|
|
|
On the name front, I'm thinking at this point XC is recognized - and from that we have xcode, xchange... etc... personally I like xcode Not such a good idea, Xcode is so popular, and these are techy people too. Try XCoin |
|
|
|
drawingthesun mining for this coin is apparently exceeding profitable for these big miners so much that they are cashing out quick rather than having any care or belief in the coin itself.
Once PoW ends in a few days then expect price to rocket.
The ship has already left the dock and sailing at increasing speed, the big miners are large waves and bad weather that are slowing down the ship but the engine is going into warp drive. Once the water settles the warp bubble will engage and the ship will sail right to the MOON!
Maybe, but I'm trying not to buy in on hype because I've been burned before. For now I'll just read the papers referenced for the anonymous function. |
|
|
|
It's only susceptible of 51% attacks if someone owns half the coin.
Yeah I was just thinking that as I hit the post button, at this early stage it might be possible for some powerful entity to buy up half the coins. It would kill XC and tarnish the reputation of all crypto for years to come. If someone tried to buy up enough XC you'd be very rich before they attacked. The volume on an exchange is deceptive, remember that volume is all the buys and sells of XC, If you're trying to day trade, you'll push this figure up fast. |
|
|
|
atcsecure could you please answer my question regarding whether a PoS only coin is susceptible to a 51% attack?
It's only susceptible of 51% attacks if someone owns half the coin. no chance it went way under the radar lol good to see you joined the team mate Haha I haven't bought any yet, I still have no good idea about the anonymous function, although I have some reference papers that the developer posted, so until I've read them I will not post anymore questions about that. However I will still post about certain things, such as the security offered by POS. Is XC using a similar scheme from Nxt or PPC? |
|
|
|
atcsecure could you please answer my question regarding whether a PoS only coin is susceptible to a 51% attack?
It's only susceptible of 51% attacks if someone owns half the coin. |
|
|
|
also the branding is a huge issue in my mind as once that ship has sailed (and it is about to) ... you can't go back and change it
Does the proof of stake in XC work yet? |
|
|
|
i see what ur saying and agree, but you need to rember XC dev was a CEO of a major company and this coin is capped 10million pow and 33 million total with pos DRK will reach 28mil before we reach 33mil you can be sure of that
We'll see how it turns out. It needs better distribution / scarcer supply / low inflation to become top notch in this department. I also made an error in my last post regarding the 33m cap vs infinity (I've added an EDIT comment in the end) - you are right. Alex, you're obviously a fan of low inflation, so how comes you've been supporting Darkcoin all this time? Darkcoin released more coin quicker than MRO and XC. Yes that's very good for inflation - even if by accident. Fast initial distribution + low distribution later on = lower debasement of the existing monetary base than a steady curve. That's also a strong point for pow+pos systems if the staking itself does not multiply the monetary base significantly. Compare that to LTC for example that will issue like another 10.5mn coins by this time next year and it's a disaster. Who the f*** will buy 10.5mn X 10 USD = 105mn in litecoins? It is not sustainable. MRO has a fast initial distribution and a lower distribution later on, yet you say that's bad too. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
