No blacks, no Asians only whites...
LOL.. Op, are you racist?

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1037962
Current Amount of Posts: 1350
SegWit eligible BTC Address: 36E2CHF1cR3NqUW6CyWmbGd56yQMzwfrRZ

True, I guess this study was not conducted putting other part of the countries in mind, because I have come to realise that countries and it state affects the respond it gets from it different genders.
For instant, most woman in some  developed part of the countries in Asia and western countries they tends not to find a greater part of woman interested in crypto related issues. But that those not mean they are not higher when it comes to other aspect of technology.

Well,  you never can tell,  Mankind have always been an explorer and it's this exploration is what makes him discover hidden potential. It's through this exploration that we came to know the importance and potentiality in Bitcoin.
All I'm saying is that, to some investors giving it a try won't be bad after all. They might just invest little in it,  to give it a try and know what might  will be the outcome.

'Hope' that is the word, and that's all we could ever wish for and exercise . In as much as the market is concern and trading keeps happening. We can only hope that the price of Bitcoin will increase towards the direction and price it has predicted that it will be. Cause all are just doing is prediction, no body have every been lucky to give a constant account or price of Bitcoin and got it right.

I think the emerge of IEO can help resolve issues like this,  I mean that's the only good it can offer. And not the profit part. Instead of giving out your information on every ICO that requires it, you give it out 'once' to one trusted exchange with their help you enter into ICO knowing that,  your data, funds and investment are protected. Remember it all depends on the exchange you participate on.

That's IEO (Initial Exchange Offering), even if developers adopt this, it won't still stop the fact that it's only the developers and the exchanges will be the one with a bigger pocket compare to the investors.
And it's still won't stop the fact that shitcoins won't stop coming into the market. What cryptocurrency developers needs are 'outstanding idea' not some kind of old recycled idea.

Exactly! People need to step up and live in reality.  The bank can't go away. To say that the bank will disappear this means or saying that Fiat will disappear also and it's impossible! 
Just like we have exchanges where we sometimes store cryptos (not advisable though)  and trade cryptos, we have the bank.  They can only hope that the two works in hand.

Illusion, this will not happen. These two coins have been prominent in their own way and non of them are replacing each other.  Gold have been for ages even before James discovered it on 1848 and know it importance. Natural resources are most times hard to replace.
We should stop this comparison between Gold and Bitcoin and Fiat and Bitcoin. All have their lane and importance.

Looking at his questions, OP,  have in some way answered his question by himself.  It's simple,  Binance has more higher volume that Coinbase. And this higher volume is more like a constant market activities.
Ask any trader, Binance is easier to use than Coinbase.
Another thing again  is that because one can trader certain amount on coin in Binance before KYC is required unlike in Coinbase.

I'm seriously interested in seeing how this goes. Just like the mentions above,  the Scam accusation thread have it all. But you can also create a thread and ask those who might have scammed before to provide their proves and links of their claims on that thread.
But in the main time,  do keep us updated on how it go. Won't be an easy battle though. Good luck!

I feel this strategy will be right and quite effective. Probably this might be a new working way to resolve this pressing issue.  If this will work then  there should be a regulation of altcoins too. Cause I see it as part of it though.
But another thing is,  how interested are developers in what goes on with their coins. The painful thing is that about a greater number of developers don't really care about what happens to their coin after ICOs. It's just the painful truth.

Of course there is manipulate, anything that has to do with cryptocurrency in Chinese, know that their government is involved. They countries everything so thus type of rating makes no sense.  And any reasonable investors shouldn't even consider it for.  All else the person in ready to have their investment and funds  being controlled too. 

You don't blame those producers when then create movies like this, the activities going on in the dark web have made many to regard cryptocurrency as 'evil'.
Bit the main thing is that if you truly know about Bitcoin and have been with it through out the years,  you won't be influenced by any sort of movies.

I also do use to experience same problem with 2FA with Binance. Don't why this problem keeps on persisting with Binance, they should seriously find a permanent solution to it and not something that goes on and off.
I also tried using my home phone for the 2FA after I experienced problem with my former number. It worked for some time but then stopped.
Now I have removed the 2FA but I don't leave any fund in my Binance account.

Both still focus on token purchase but the different is instead of the developers dispatching the coins, they give the tokens to the exchanges who will dispatch the tokens to investors.

One thing for sure is that; IEO do not  guaranty that a shitcoins will not go down the drill when the time comes.

The con there is that, (1)  investors will be free from scam developers who intend to steal from them.
2) Avoid littering their identity info through KYC in different websites. Since the exchange already have their information.

3) Since an exchange already have the token, listing won't be a problem. And also you get to choose on which project to invest in since many developers ends up listing coins in exchanges which are not even worth it.

If the token you intend to purchase is listed on Binance, you can take it as an additional plus. *Yet, it's not a guaranty that the coin will survive in the long run.

Did you read the thread at all apart from the post headline itself ? Things like this is actually the reason more people panic sell,  when they read a post title... Bang!  They rush to sell without bothering to read what the main content is all about. 
The OP is not talking about him investing in Bitcoin and getting rich quick... The title to his post is just about a series by one Dave Fishwick, creator of Bank of Dave, discussing Crypto currencies which method if used well can be use in other investment as well.

Post Edited: Payment received. Thanks Manager

The two can both have negative effects in both the trader gain and also to the market. I won't vouch any as been fair though cause I won't be caught doing any. 
I have seen a situation where by procrastinating of buying a coin cost a major loss and setback. It happened to me when I started out on Bitcoin and I know many encountered this too. Many who bought at the price if $20k might have been procrastinating on buying it.
And of course we know what panic sells has done to the market and it price.

I saw that information too but I don't think they have actually used it but they are setting it up and would first test it in a smaller scale election like a university election or any related to that to scale it before fully introducing it. You can read more of it here; https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ethnews.com/amp/thailand-to-introduce-blockchain-based-voting

But nevertheless, I think is decision is simply the best, election needs to be free and fair in states.