There is a difference between the folks who are trying to understand and those who willfully misunderstand.  
There are some folks who are just trying to wrap their heads around all this stuff for the first time and are confused by the conflation of the different merits of:
1) price stability
2) existential stability (or "resilience" if you prefer)

As to the first.
Bitcoin price stability is highly volatile.  If this were not true, it would still be 10 to a penny, or maybe up to 5 by now?  But no its more than 5 orders of magnitude more than that and still going strong.  Just ask Microsoft.

As to the second.
We are looking at decades ahead, and how to get there without requiring a military or regional regime (which are quite expensive things to maintain) to prop up a currency just so we can do our every day lives.  Let the government do the things that it is good at, and not managing a currency, which it isn't good at.

Nope, I up'd your 10% and gave you 0%
The USD is perfectly stable when measured in USD over all arbitrary time-frames.
Your tautology is just fine.

We can pick arbitrary exchange pairs and timeframes until your cartoon animals fade to black.  Bitcoin will still be around long after you waste your time trying to convince people of anything.

Straw man much?

You could probably figure it out from the rest of the sentence, but there is a hint for those without English language skills or dictionaries:  The first part of the word sounds like "exist".

Why, you can't handle the truth?

The USD hasn't remained within 10% of anything except the USD, which is all that it is redeemable for anyhow.

If we pick an arbitrary time-frame where that is true, sure.  Can say the opposite also.

Discussing existential stability, we still have to wait a while in order to see which one is here in the end.

Thanks for this.   Yes, good, not great, but certainly good.  The judge figured out a way to "split the baby" and not do too much evil.
It was a Record Setting long time coming, longest time between conviction and sentencing in the court's history.

The difference being that each of the national fiats rely on a particular regional taxation and military regime and those people pulling its strings to keep those strings untangled, unbroken, and well sorted.

There is nothing more unstable than people.  You are evidence enough of that.

You have something more stable than math?

What, gold?

Then you do understand.  Appreciate the clarification.
As to unambiguous, you offered only bullet points without stating your conclusion or position.

You are missing it entirely again little lamby.
The SoV isn't so much the feature that benefits here, so much as the existential stability of the money and not having the Argentine Peso yanked out from under them.

Your analysis shows how price rises with adoption not falls.
You do understand what the "Quantity theory of money" applies to don't you?
Try again?

(Or are you expecting a sudden "quantitative contraction" of all fiat?)

Must be a busy time for you teaching "the poor" how to secure their mansions and yachts?

Perhaps you are not understanding the effects of inflation on the poor?  By poor here, we mean the people that don't own banks and aren't the ones inflating the currency.  

When a national currency fails (as every nation's state's fiat currency eventually does) maybe rich people make or lose some money, but life is about the same.  Just get on a plane and fly somewhere else.  For the rest left behind it is a very big impact, and for the rest of their lives they will not ever forget it.

The prosecution made the claim, but they weren't able to find anyone of the 250,000 folks that had any who had suffered as a victim of this.

The truth is pretty much the opposite of what the prosecution claimed.  In every speech, in every discussion, in every communication of any kind, he made great efforts to DISTINGUISH the Liberty Dollars from US Coins.  He wouldn't even call them "coins" and if you did, he would yell at you.  The prosecution was totally full of shit.  The jury just swallowed that shit, but the judge could at least see through it.  

Yeah sure, mixing in with your other change and getting a quarter ounce of silver and mistaking it for a quarter dollar would nark you off.... up until the moment you realized that you had a quarter ounce of silver.

No one was pretending that Liberty Dollars were US dollars either. 

In the CFR's document describing how they are going to try to globally regulate Bitcoin using the IMF, they mention the Liberty Dollar precedent.  The tragic guilty ruling that was a horrific miscarriage of justice is still on the books.  That is not such a good thing.  I am happy that Bernard gets some of his life back, and maybe some of the seized gold and silver (one can hope) will be returned.

The relationship is more complicated than this.  When something is taxed this also puts the government in the business of that thing, as a partner.  It becomes reliant on the "revenue".  Consider cigarettes and gasoline.  In the production areas they are the most powerful political forces.

Banking companies may be disrupted, so expect places where these have the greatest influence to be the most hostile politically.  NY/Bitlicense/Lawsky should not be a surprise.

We agree.
My point was somewhat different.
Essentially:  If you look in garbage cans, you will probably find garbage.

The thread is pretty much just for trolling.  Anyone coming to this thread expecting something intelligent with a title like this is very likely going to be disappointed.

Thank you for this.  We also have some others...  With bugs inside.

They were found in the rubble washings, near the surface in NLQI.
We've been warehousing them.

Some of the ones without the bugs we may use to decorate the Long Gallery sun room in Noble Palace to celebrate a century of peace.  There are crates of this strange soft gold rock, but the geologist assures us that there is not any gold in it.
Still they are pretty with a bit of work.  If any of the nobles would like some crates to use for their own purposes, they may have them also.

In the RAQ we found some rocks with some strange shapes.

The geologist does not think them suitable for building but might be good for the University.

Here is an example:


So as a gift to Chancellor Smooth, please accept these strange rocks?
If you have no use for them, perhaps some museum would like them?