|
I read a few pages back about opening a (gui) client and being able to vote for delegates. Checking the lisk.io page I see that the clients are not available yet. Is the voting done via a web client instead, or could someone please point me in the right direction? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
What the hell? I just got this from one of my masternodes on Vultr: Abuse Team Vultr Staff 2016-04-20 15:13:42 We have suspended your VPS due to information we have received indicating that your account is in violation of our Terms of Service/Acceptable Use Policies, the full text of which is available online at the following URLs for your convenience: TOS - https://www.vultr.com/legal/tos.phpAUP - https://www.vultr.com/legal/use_policy.phpSPAM - https://www.vultr.com/legal/antispam_policy.phpMonitoring showed a large amount of outbound traffic matching an attack profile which triggered suspension. Our services are self-managed and we do not provide assistance for analyzing your traffic. You can use utilities such as tcpdump to investigate traffic patterns/data. Please respond as soon as possible with as much detail as you can provide regarding the activity in question and what you intend to do to ensure it does not occur in the future. If the VPS in question is compromised, you may launch a new one at any time. Instance destruction may occur if we have not heard from you within the next 18 hours. Thank you for your cooperation. -- Complaint Response Team -- What the hell are they talking about? Sorry, NOW YOU FUCKED UP  set limitation for connections configure a firewall and set 2 ruls open dash used ports close all port I did all that! The crappy thing is I can't log in, since it's suspended, so I can't even try to check the debug.log or anything. Nor can I see my usage graph. Qwizzie: 1000 GB per month. I've been running MNs for almost two years now with zero problems...it's really bizarre. Plus Vultr basically accuses me of launching an attack? WTF? Write to them and tell them what you're running, and ask them to reopen your server. They simply profiled you, and are mistaken. If you are not running a tor exit node, and just running a masternode, that does NOT violate their terms of service as far as I can see reading it here. Possibly hacked and used for a bot net or spam? Reading through the comments, I'm inclined to guess that perhaps the virtual box was not updated? Running an older sshd or another service? Weak password for the account? Running a masternode per se shouldn't generate such an abusive amount of traffic that it should get flagged by their automated scripts. If so, well then maybe writing to their support can get the problems solved. For whats it's worth, I have two masternodes on Digital Ocean but have never had any problems like this. I hope this gets resolved for you as soon as possible! |
|
|
|
What is the relationship between this coin's devs and PayCoin (XPY) ?
The coin developer for ION has zero relation or affiliation to anything related to Paycoin or XPY. So this Adam Matlack is a different Adam Matlack?  Adam helped write and edit the whitepaper, but is not a coin developer. good enough for me .. Im out .. I'm not trying make you change your mind because it is your right to think what you want, but in my memory Adam just tryed to make the best of a doomed coin after the scam of Josh G (which still has to be proven in court as far as I know). I think the only thing that we could blame him is that he didn't took this step one year ago. But imo he at least tryed to help so many who where scammed. Something so many of us including me and (most likely) you also didn't even think about. I exchanged my xpy for ion and an willing to give them a chance. I hope it works out well. I think that's pretty much the only alternative at this point. Paycoin is being sent to the grave so the only viable alternative is to get those xpy elsewhere. Personally I have transferred the little xpy I had left to ION as well. |
|
|
|
Of course nobody likes waiting, but the Waves team is busy working. A couple months of funding and initial developing isn't really that long of a time in the whole scope of the project. Have a coffee and feel happy that we are all on the frontier of a new exciting platform, that's at least what I am doing  |
|
|
|
None of the domains posted above seem to resolve here, so if anyone still has any doubts, please go mining elsewhere for any other coin. Don't be fooled into installing trojans or any other malware on your systems. Server not found Firefox can't find the server at www.adamcoinblockexplorer.comFirefox can't find the server at www.adamcoinpaperwallet.comFirefox can't find the server at www.adamcoin.infoIf, and that's a huge if, this happened to be legit, why are you not hosting your own software ldw-com? You obviously are claiming to have at least 3 different domains, surly you could keep your software on your own server or even at github? |
|
|
|
I'm new here but I have been watching the post since the beginning. What do you guys think the price of wave is gonna be at lunch? And is bitcoin halving gonna affect it?
I am unsure about the price at lunch. But at dinner I expect it to be around 10-20*ICO price. I have no clue about the nature of bitcoin halving consequences if there will be any at all. It's of course really hard to even make any kind of prediction or even a guesstimation in terms of launch prices for Waves, but looking at Lisk there could be a significant increase of value compared to the ICO. But in terms of BTC halving there is probably no influence. I personally don't think that the price for Bitcoin will rally up simply because the market has already had the chance to take this into consideration and that is already baked in to the current price. The last time BTC had a halving the prices where pretty much constant. The same goes for LTC. What could happen is the price BTC<->Waves could go down if a bunch of people start dumping once the ICO is over. |
|
|
|
Mist 0.7.1 is released. https://github.com/ethereum/mist/releasessmoking hot and ready to go! Got it synced and up and running. Works great and I like it as my daily ether driver. The release notes show the wallet includes eth version 1.2.4. |
|
|
|
..............
I see it thanks!!But where they came from all this tokens if lisk is not launched?
The Yobit virtual tokens are so called IOU ( I owe you) or kind of a credit. Once Lisk is launched, the credits are exchanged for real Lisk tokens. By initializing the trading I assume that they are trying to position themselves as the de facto exchange for Lisk, but we will have to wait and see whether this remains so once Lisk has indeed launched. So, please note that I am not supporting them in their efforts or anything. I just wanted to respond to your question as to where exchanges are already taking place. |
|
|
|
WTF??Waves' ICO has collected until this point a total of 5238.24198237 BTC? Holy shit this thing only started a few days ago!
Ya most of it was first 24 hours while there was 20% bonus This is what happens when an ICO gets to be marketed, to some extent, well before the ICO. Personally, I think it's a good thing. When Nxt came out, I can't recall if it was the first, or just one of the first ICOs. People didn't trust it, especially since no one knew who BCNext was. I can't fault the guy for wanting to be anonymous, but we've learned a lot since then. If people can know about the people behind a project, if they can show some work and if they market their concept, people will invest. Waves and Lisk both did this rather well. I wasn't paying attention to Ethereum back when it was in an ICO phase, but I imagine the same is true for them as well. Any timeline to buy Lisk and waves on the open market after the ICOS? Yobit is already trading virtual Lisk tokens for BTC so in that sense the trading has already started.. |
|
|
|
Hello, i have on question, i mining eth with 2 PC on suprnova one r9 270x and one r9 290x ..and i have near 45 mhs ... 15 + 30 mhs ...
now on eth mining profit calculator i have this results:
X Hours: 0,029
X Day: 0,69
X week: 4,89
But my real production on suprnova.cc is:
X Hours: 0,020
X Day: 0,397
X week: 2,19
Why? My near 45 mhs are unstable? Where i have the problem?
Thanks
am getting 0.25 ETH per day from 1 AMD 7950 that hashes @ 17-19mhashes just one day mining on suprnova, is bad earning, stick with dwarfpool is the best Solo-mining is the best. I too stick with dwarfpool, but have suprnova as a 3rd backup. But 1 day might be too small of a sample size to evaluate the payouts. Additionally, some of the online calculators are pretty inaccurate. Try this one and see what results you get http://karldiab.com/EthereumMiningCalculator/same here... dwarf is the most reliable pool, especially when you connect your rigs via proxy... I've seen other pools that support proxy too though I have not used them to any degree. But the dwarfpool proxy works great, I had a nice 20% boost once I started using the proxy and tweaking my settings a bit. 😀 |
|
|
|
|
Sounds like the wallet will be pretty neat with the exchange capabilities. Looking forward to the launch!
|
|
|
|
Hello, i have on question, i mining eth with 2 PC on suprnova one r9 270x and one r9 290x ..and i have near 45 mhs ... 15 + 30 mhs ...
now on eth mining profit calculator i have this results:
X Hours: 0,029
X Day: 0,69
X week: 4,89
But my real production on suprnova.cc is:
X Hours: 0,020
X Day: 0,397
X week: 2,19
Why? My near 45 mhs are unstable? Where i have the problem?
Thanks
am getting 0.25 ETH per day from 1 AMD 7950 that hashes @ 17-19mhashes just one day mining on suprnova, is bad earning, stick with dwarfpool is the best Solo-mining is the best. I too stick with dwarfpool, but have suprnova as a 3rd backup. But 1 day might be too small of a sample size to evaluate the payouts. Additionally, some of the online calculators are pretty inaccurate. Try this one and see what results you get http://karldiab.com/EthereumMiningCalculator/ |
|
|
|
My Waves balance hasn't declined much, ICO slowing down?
The first wave for enthusiasts/early investors has happened and if the pattern follows other ICOs, then we are likely to have a calm period before a rush at the end of the offering. |
|
|
|
What about this?
"..The maximum number of activity points you can get is 1 per day, but your activity score only updates every two weeks. Therefore, it will take about 100 days to get 100 activity if you post once per day on average..." - @schnötzel
What is this for? They are cheking our Bitcointlak user account? Why?
Don´t know exactly what do you mean: 1: The quote is from the link i posted above - please have a look into. This handicap was made by bitcointalk mods to make it harder for sockpuppets/ fudder / or whatever. 2: the 50 post minimum is to make it harder for sockpuppets Sorry but I still don't get it, maybe because I just know basic english, I'm taking the "Sockpuppets" literaly, what do you mean when you say it? (I guess is some kind of user bad-user, but I'm just guessing) But I can't see the relation between Buyn Waves into the ICO and the forum activity, the reason why I can't get this is because in this point I'm understanding that the users who hasn't made the 50 comments will not get their waves after ICO, Is that correct? Because if it is, I just can't understand why You may buy all the Waves you like and you will receive them once the ICO is over. The 50 post minimum is for taking place in the signature promotion campaign where the waves folks have asked every user to make at least 50 posts before the end of the ICO. |
|
|
|
Please add my on signature compaingn
I think you need to go sign up on a google form somewhere. Check the waves blog, I think there was a post about that there. |
|
|
|
Looks nice man, I'll have to check it out. Thanks for your effort I'm sure others will find it useful for quickly checking on their masternode(s) 😄 |
|
|
|
His lost his hair after ico !:) Haha some toxic green wave that was 😀 |
|
|
|
Eth bubble is over. Back to 0.003?  That would sure be a great opportunity to buy a lot more 😀 But seriously the price is around 0,02 BTC/ETH. I am currently holding at a loss, but I intended to keep my ether for my kids. Unless Ethereum tanks and everyone goes home, I am sure that whatever prices we have today will be laughable in 20 yrs time, if we have a global financial system that is based on crypto contracts. It's all what perspective we have, so at least in my eyes the current prices aren't something worth worrying about. |
|
|
|
I just resolved all of my wallet sync issues and have started mining ETH. In your guide your wrote "Spending 24 hours planning is 2-3 ether lost at 100 MH/s. Don't be silly and spend all your time planning." Is your reference to 100 MH/s the pool rate for the miner or is it the client measured rate? I ask because I put a little over 200 MH/s to mining ETH on nanopool and it shows me earning about .3 ETH per day. This appears to be backed up by the deposit I received last night. Also, nanopool is consistently underreporting my hash rate. I understand their calculation is based on shares but they show a 6 hour average rate of about 28 MH/s which is only 14% of my actual hash rate! I have seen pools for other coins pay as low as 80% but 14% seems ridiculously low. What are other people getting? I had about 175 MH/s giving ~2.5 something ETH per day. You should be getter my something similar. Only 0.3 per day is nearly 1/10 of what you should be getting! Try a different pool instead. I used suprnova and dwarfpool and was very pleased with both. My rigs are currently offline but I hope to get them running again. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
