Jetcoin isn't Bitcoin.

---

If elianite wants to waste his money on a collectible for a currency that will be even more irrelevant as time goes by then he can be my guest, though I can't say I much like the attitude of praising him for doing so. If I waste my money on a bunch of worthless shit I am an idiot, not a saint.

---

Also, anyone trying to pull "it's value comes with time" is just being silly. Value comes to anything with age, it doesn't mean that it has any more value currently.
If you disagree, will you buy a box of my cat's shit for $30? It will become more valuable eventually.

Please, enlighten us on how we can fix the system.
It's extremely easy to say that a system is broken. Providing a fix that makes sense and doesn't just move the issues somewhere else is significantly harder.

I couldn't care about what kiklo does providing he does it in a decent manner. However, he isn't.

kiklo's other negative feedbacks were removed. You would have to ask an admin why.
Previous to this, kiklo left negative feedback to Mitchell, phantastisch, qwk, Zepher, Lutpin, monbux and many others simply because they had relations to Lauda in some way. This isn't a fair way to go about doing things, and is extremely hypocritical when you're complaining about negative feedback being given for little to no reason.

Who would have thought, little interaction with the trust system = very few trust scores. Truly groundbreaking analysis.

I was given a negative trust when I first started using this forum. You want to know what I did about it? I had a sensible, private discussion with the user that gave me it and we worked out terms on what I had to do to have it removed. What a crazy idea, right?

You're a fool if you think that kiklo handled this in a good acceptable way. He may have gotten more people on his side if he acted like an adult.

I truly can't understand why people are constantly bringing up kilko's apparent age as an argument. If anything, I think that it's rather demeaning that the only reason that you are sticking up for him is because he is seen as some frail old man that is incapable of fighting his own battles.
If you're someone that can't handle some punk saying something bad about you online then turn off the computer. Otherwise, age (along with wealth, social status, gender etc) is irrelevant here.

I shouldn't think he would be banned for life unless he broke a different rule. I expect him to be back eventually.

---

Once again, please give us this magical fix that will make the trust system great for everyone involved.

These people come and go every so often, it happens.

kiklo isn't the first big 'revolt' over the trust system and absolutely won't be the last. All that kiklo has accomplished is making a complete and utter fool of himself over some red text.

---

You're telling me that some meaningless red text on an internet forum about magical money isn't you're number 1 priority right now? How insane.

0.011BTC

0.007BTC

Yes, you're correct.

This is a difficult case to solve. Older members complain that the Default Trust system is flawed (which it is to a degree), but if this trust system was removed then newer members would likely complain that there was nothing in place to stop them getting scammed. theymos did want to replace this system, however this replacement system had the downfall of requiring newbies to choose members that they have never interacted with to trust.

I can agree on this somewhat, however it's arguably useless to try and implement for the use that it would get.

Admittedly it could be easier to find, but there is a fair amount of documentation available to anyone interested in the trust system outlining what it is and how it can be used. It's a problem with the users that they do not care to find or read it.

3. kiklo was told exactly how to go about trying to change the trust left by Lauda, by Lauda themselves. It is not the fault of the system, nor the people of the forum that kiklo decided to disregard that advice and throw his toys out his cot.

4. Complaining that a user that you have never traded with has left you negative trust, then leaving negative trust to people you have never traded with makes you a hypocrite. Complaining about defamation of your character, then going to to defame the characters of people not involved makes you a hypocrite.

And the fact that you can come here and have a sensible conversation with me about these problems, even after all of the things that you have suffered through, gives kiklo no excuse to act like a child about it. Do you not agree?

And due to certain circumstances in my life, I do not believe that I fit either of those descriptions.

I give respect to people that give respect to others. kiklo has shown through is mass amount of threads, negative feedback spam and threats of legal action that he is incapable of giving respect to others. Therefore, I see no reason to give respect to him.

Only people who trust you can see your feedback by default on actmyname's avatar. Otherwise, it falls under 'Untrusted Feedback'.
Unlike what people like kiklo seem to think, these aren't directly hidden by theymos. Who can post a feedback that is trusted by default is decided by the user's personal trust list and/or the trust lists of those in the DT network. I can go further into detail about it if needed.

That is how the trust system works currently, which is what a huge amount of people seem to forget. If you do not want to see someone's trust ratings (whether they be trusted or untrusted by default) you can remove them on this page by inputting a ~ followed by their name. For example if you wanted to remove any ratings from Lauda being trusted by default to you, you could add this line to the trust page.
This would put every rating that Lauda gave into the 'Untrusted Feedback' section of the feedback page. It should be noted that, unless you are a part of the first tier of the Default Trust network, this change will only affect you personally.

Precisely, which is why when users such as kiklo complain about it constantly they are not met with open arms. Being an enormous hypocrite in whilst doing this doesn't help the case whatsoever.

Physical factors in a person's life shouldn't affect the way that they treat others. Kiklo wouldn't, and shouldn't, get a pass for spamming the forum like a child about some red text even if he was a war veteran with terminal cancer.
If after 84 years of living you haven't managed to grasp the concept that moaning, threatening and abusing the people and systems put in place to try and help you isn't a good way to carry yourself then I don't believe you deserve any respect.

Guidelines aren't rules.

Or send the BTC to each address like Wikileaks did.

---

There also appears to be a very small bug in your program.
This line:
should be
The character '0' also isn't allowed in vanity addresses.

It's just a mangled link, someone probably used the [url] bbcode wrong. If you follow link after this part - http://%22%20https// - then you will go to the trust page of wantt0sell.

This is a pretty common phishing attack going around recently. You can see another example of it here.

AFAIK the only harm that can come from these sorts of links is if you enter your password into them. Otherwise you should be fine, however changing your passwords and running a virus scan can never hurt.

Also, just for future reference, you don't really need to make a thread if you report the PM to an admin. The skepticism about the PM is good though, always check the URL and security certificate before signing in.

You should also post that signed message here so DT users can tag your account with a negative.

You're very naive if you don't think Lauda has covered their tracks on either of these fronts. They are the biggest privacy freaks I know.

theymos being here doesn't mean he will listen and fix any complaints that you bring up. Proof of this is in the blatant spam problem and inane account recovery system.

This software is still in development, granted he is deciding to piss away hundreds of thousands of dollars while this development continues.

I'm not sure how you came to this conclusion, but no. I don't have any say in the moderation or administration of this forum past the Report feature.

Agreed, I won't be posting in this thread again unless addressed. Best of luck with your project.

He wasn't replying to you. The OP was banned because he copy-pasted a piece of text originally written by Ron Paul, actmyname was simply clarifying this.

You're spouting about someone being a racist, but posts made by yourself indicating racism aren't relevant?

If you have broken the rules of a specific website, what obligation does that website then have to facilitate anything for you?

Precisely. If someone has had to have been forcefully removed from participating in a forum I see no reason for said forum to use it's resources to help that someone to communicate, especially so when there are 100s of other (possibly easier) options for doing so.

If you can find a method of contacting theymos and have him listen to the problems involving this forum then you will be even more sought after than it already seems you are. theymos doesn't care.

Believe it or not, if you continue to use the forum as normal after being banned, you're then evading that ban.
If Ban Evasion wasn't an enforceable rule, then there would be no point on ever banning anyone.

There is nothing you can do. Sorry.

Yeah man, it's totally unreasonable for someone to care about something that they've spent thousands of hours on. How dare he want to make the forum a better place for everyone that actually matters. He should just leave the forum for the next generation of quality posters who care so much for the forum, right?

Fuck off.

Lauda tried this and they received a lot of backlash for doing so. I don't much understand why myself, perhaps it was because Lauda was doing it, but regardless.

You'd be wasting it reporting spam posts anyway. Unless these posts are copy and pasted from somewhere else there is a cat in hell's chance they would be removed.

You should lock the thread very soon if you want it to stay that way. It's a matter of time before the cleanliness of this thread goes down the toilet.

This is also partly due to the section that the threads are in. Signature spammers don't go into the technical sub forums as they know they can't shitpost there easily. On the other hand, Bitcoin Discussion is possibly the easiest section to do so in.

Expect it to get much worse. I'm convinced that the majority of new active members only join here to post trash with shitty altcoin signatures.
theymos doesn't care; the staff don't care, not all signature managers care. It's a matter of time before the signal to noise ratio of this forum gets to unbearable levels for the majority.