|
I'll take it if you can prove it isn't stolen.
Do you have a receipt or something similar?
|
|
|
|
Before you and your group tried to extort the victim Zeroxal.
You seem to be very confused. Here's a timeline: -The extortion happened, -The threads were made, -The threads were removed, -Zeroxal and tman began talks. I also wasn't involved in the extortion. You seem to be missing that. You have strong evidence of his involvement of a crime that compiled you to do a sting operation on him. But after his request to you, You and your group deleted the evidence/threads right away just like that. Is that right?
I'm not the best person to ask about this; I just did as I was asked. |
|
|
|
After you presented evidence of your innocence. They deleted the threads knowing they did something wrong.
No, this is the other way around. We were asked to remove the threads in order for him to try and prove innocence. |
|
|
|
It sounds a lot like you are attempting to hold the risk of getting banned (and the potential to not be able to conduct further business here) over zeroaxl's head to me.
If the Staff think that I should be banned then they should ban me. However, I trust them to be impartial and not immediately jump to the conclusion that I was involved. In additional to the fact that people are generally not banned for behavior that breaks the rules that only comes to light as part of an extortion attempt, that you yourself called "silly unprofitable", undiscovered ban evasions are generally not acted upon when they come to light when the person has been here for a long time undetected and not caused any other major forum related problems. So one way or another I would predict that zeroaxl will not get banned for ban evasion.
I don't care; I will be remaking the thread regardless. Sorry for incrementally reducing the chances of you getting paid -- assuming of course payment has not already been made
Congratulations, you reduced 0 to 0. and also wondering how you would be able to authoritatively say that payment has not been made if you were not participating in the extortion personally  ) You misunderstood why I was using that quote. He asked why the threads were removed and asked if it was due to Zeroxal paying. In the case of my thread, as it is the only one I can comment on while knowing 100% why, this wasn't the case. I have no idea if Zeroxal paid, however by Zeroxal's behaviour I would guess that this isn't the case. |
|
|
|
These two statements are contradictory to each-other
No, they aren't. Once the threads were made tman and Zeroxal exchanged messages and decided that a mutual removal of the threads should be done while they negotiated on how to resolve the situation. While I am not part of the team who pulled off the extortion, I have contact with everyone involved and so was asked to remove my thread as part of the deal (I expect because it was assumed, as you are showing, that I was part of the group pulling off the extortion). As I have said openly to both you and Zeroxal, regardless of the outcome I will be reposting my thread if no action is taken on what I brought up in it. Currently, I see no reason to have that thread active so that people such as yourself can create unnecessary drama whilst a compromise is trying to be made. Negotiate what exactly See the above. I'm not sure what you're trying to imply with that emoticon, so I will add one too for good measure. I am also interested in finding out theymos' explanation as to why Lauda is still a moderator after explicitly admitting to attempting to extort someone.
The case would likely be reviewed faster if you and your puppets would stick to one thread. |
|
|
|
It looks like they are trying to delete the evidence.
How did you come to that conclusion? Lauda still even has their post available where they admit to it. Why? Did Zeroxal pay?
No, we all decided to take down our threads (at least temporarily) in order to try and negotiate with each other. I wasn't a part of the extortion; I would have made my thread regardless of whether Lauda had sent the message. The threads are made at the same time due to all evidence being gathered (and seen by me) at that time. If nothing is done about the subject my thread was about I will be remaking it in due time. |
|
|
|
Would it be possible for you to prove that this project is something that you own? Perhaps a html document on your server or post on your forum which says: Triple X Tycoon is up for sale on Bitcointalk.org by user Khepri. Thread link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1761626.0
It doesn't have to be publicly shown, however we have had people try to sell things that they don't own before. Hope you can understand. |
|
|
|
It's all a conspiracy! Google, Archive.is and Bitcointalk are all working together to give some nobody negative trust on a forum! It's obvious that poor OP is the victim here. |
|
|
|
From what I recall, wasn't Lauda paid 1 BTC from the bitfinex hacker dude?
They were donated 1BTC by someone who claimed to be the bitfinex hacker, the same person who then did the huge giveaway on the forum. What does this have to do with anything? |
|
|
|
Lauda wants to act against these things. but theymos doesn't.
Does anyone else wonder why that is?
I think it's more of a case of him not caring. I don't think he profits directly from any of this (not saying that he doesn't profit whatsoever), more that it doesn't cause enough of a fuss in his life for him to give a shit.
I think Lauda is doing a great job overall, even though I still don't understand the negative given to Roger in the first place? Although I don't like Roger ideas but the feedback was about "personal privacy"?
Lauda didn't trust Roger, therefore left them a negative rating. I believe the rating was to do with their stance on scaling solutions and how they dealt with promoting their own. The original rating can probably be found somewhere. btw Roger should be out of DT for sure..
HostFat is the person to ask about that.
This thread has also gone massively off topic for now. Any conversation about farmed accounts and the like should probably be moved elsewhere. |
|
|
|
There are three ways to get your feedback back to neutral: - Have a counter rating put on your account.
A counter rating will be a positive trust rating from another DT member that trusts you. This will counter the negative and should (I think) revert your feedback to 0. This probably isn't the best though, as the negative would still be there. - Ask the user to remove it.
No one else removes trust ratings other than the person that put them there originally. - Have the person that included the user in the DT network remove them.
In this case, it would be Blazed. If you can persuade them (or two other DT1 members) to remove/exclude the user from the DT network. This will automatically remove your feedback from being seen by default.
Other than that, there is little you can do. Sorry. |
|
|
|
I guess when this tag existed, it would've been put under someone's username after it has been objectively (clear evidence that could be assessed by anyone) determined that the user is a scammer
I have no doubt that it was, however it was only applied by a centralized body with control over most (if not all) the forum. If one of these people suddenly decided to add a SCAMMER tag to someone with no evidence, what could we do against it? (Hint: not much). so I think personal bias might not be an issue, however, it might be when giving negative feedback.
It may, however this is why the DT system is spread out over several people. If someone trusted left a fake negative feedback calling someone a scammer there would be several ways to combat it. A SCAMMER tag could not be combatted as such. Personally I do  and I think scammer tag or not, one should always look into the history of the person they're dealing with. Good. If everyone did that it would likely make a better environment for everyonr to trade in. Sadly, there are some users that like to spread the idea that negative trust = scammer, which makes a worse environment for everyone. However, this is off topic here, so I won't discuss it further. |
|
|
|
minifrij is probably not the best person to be asking the type of questions that require that kind of critical thinking.
 Similarly, Quickseller probably isn't the best person to be asking questions to. Considering he ignores anything that doesn't fit his agenda.
Please check all the posts of rizzlarolla and Quickseller and you will agree with me. Not only the writing style but also their way of thinking is almost identical.
I cannot agree with this. rizzlarolla has a strong negative stance on the topic of Bought/Farmed accounts when I would expect that QS is on the complete opposite side. I also disagree that their language is the same, although I may be wrong. |
|
|
|
Hopefully by the time users 10k activity, the price of bitcoin is over 10k
By the time that users hit 10,000 activity Bitcoin will either be over $10k or worthless I expect.
Logically thinking, if the forum is still here then I would expect that theymos would also be here with it. Considering that he currently has the highest activity by a decent margin, he would likely be the first to hit it providing the first case happens. However, I would personally be very surprised if the forum was still here by the time users could reach 10k activity. Prove me wrong though  |
|
|
|
Isnt there a program out there that was literally designed to compare the writing styles of quickseller to any other account?
There is, however it requires a large amount of written information. The accounts being mentioned do not have a large number of posts, nor are these posts very long. Therefore, they do not fit the criteria.
Yes, obviously. It was apparently purchased by someone who is a supporter of Lauda.....just sayin
Just as accounts like whothefuckareyou were bought/hacked specifically to shill against Lauda? Also, why do you ignore my questions? I'm only trying to help you make your case clearer for others to understand.
Investigating such case I can confirm like Gunthar that Quickseller is using not only gorgon as his alt account but also rizzlarolla. The way you write is almost identical so I have no doubts that you are alts of each other trying to fight Lauda for her good work that she is doing in the forum.
I really doubt that. It seems like you're just trying to take a jab at someone because they criticized you. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
