I would be very surprised if you got anywhere near $1500 for a domain that long.

It is hard to believe anything that you say when you have lied so freely in the past.

A bit hypocritical, isn't it?

Press the 'Ignore' button underneath the user's picture if you don't like what they're posting. The forum has no reason to mollycoddle you.

You can see a better image here. While a timestamp would be nice, it isn't always necessary. In this case, since the user would have to send the coin to you/an escrow prior to receiving funds there isn't much you can lose monetarily.

This sort of spam has been going on all over the forum for a long time now. Just ignore it and the staff will take care of it.

See rule number 5:
"No link shortners that requires users to view an ad."

At least it's a step down from the stupid amount he wanted before. Maybe in a few months he'll come back to planet earth and take something realistic.

For those that can't gather, the OP is talking about Lauda.

If you want to know why they are on DT, ask Blazed and/or hilariousandco why they have Lauda on their trust lists using PM. I can't imagine that both parties will read here.
If you want to know why they aren't off DT, ask any other DT1 member (other than OgNasty) as to why they haven't removed Lauda from their trust list. Once again, you should do so through PM as there is a next to zero chance that all of the parties involved will read this thread.

---

Yet another useless spam thread made by some sock-puppet of someone negatively tagged. With this and signature spammers, what an awesome forum this has become.

If people agreed with QS then Lauda and TMAN would have recieved more negatives than just yours. Don't you agree?

0.051BTC

While I don't agree with it taking accounts as collateral, especially for uses such as Gunthar's, does not inherently negatively affect the forum or it's atmosphere. Account farmers usually spam shit to benefit themselves financially, ruining the forum's usefulness and atmosphere.

---

I wonder how long it will take before QS replies here.

Ditch this account and create a new one. There is no chance of you getting a name change without donating 10BTC.
Not like you'll be losing much.

Or just use Keepass, which is free for as many passwords as you would like to put into it.

theymos does grant name changes, however these are fairly few and far between. You can ask, but without a Donator tag there is not a 100% chance that it will be granted.

I believe that one of the reasons the image proxy was implemented was to stop this, after this incident. The only way to check the number of views is to use the counter built into the forum, however that is not very reliable.

Alongside that, it is rather silly to host emojis when they are available for use in unicode.

No, it doesn't mean that the forum will end. The domain was likely renewed for 10 years in 2013, meaning that those 10 years will have passed in 2023. The domain can be renewed again after this expiration date is passed.

By using the words 'According to this source' I was showing that I was going off the best information we have currently. I wasn't implying that it is fact.
Work on your comprehension.

According to this source, the forum is hosted using AWS or a similar Amazon service.

---

All that tells you is that the domain is registered at (I assume) Namecheap. It tells you nothing about the hosting of the site.

To me, it is not so much the act of doing it than the person doing it.
If it were someone that I trusted collecting doxs, perhaps I would not feel so strongly against it. However with users like Quickseller and defcon23 that have been known to use backwards tactics in trying to get their own way in the past, I would not feel comfortable with people like that having my information and freely being able to do things with it.

Perhaps someone else can explain it properly, I feel that I am doing a fairly piss poor job at explaining why I feel the way I do.

Perhaps I worded it incorrectly. I agree that anyone has the right to do that, as in they can. I do not agree that everyone should do that.

While the definition of a dox is that it is made up of public information, this is not always the case. If I post a package to someone with my address and they then take that address and give it to others without my permission, that isn't me making my information public however it leads to the same end point.

It's a general uneasiness for me in regards to other people holding information that is somewhat personal to me, as I have stated above. It should also be noted that some value their privacy much more than others, and therefore having their dox passed around could be a drop in the ocean to a tsunami depending on who's dox it is.