I notice that you have a trade with xetsr for cash in the mail. The risked amount is 4BTC, and there is no reference. Due to this, I don't think that this trade happened and is a result of you farming trust with your buddies in an attempt to cover up your self escrow scandal.
In order to prove this isn't the case I require arbitrary proof of the transaction so that I can make a fair judgement about you (this is completely irrelevant to absolutely everything, and serves no purpose whatsoever). Please give me the TXid along with proof that you own the address(es) that received the BTC.

Does BCH have the longest chain of blocks? X
Does BCH have the most hash power behind it? X
Does BCH have the highest price? X
Does BCH have the most use cases? X
Does BCH have the highest market cap? X

There is absolutely nothing that BCH offers that should make it equal with Bitcoin. It is alternate chain with different consensus rules. It is an Altcoin. It belongs in the Altcoin section.
Perhaps if the above questions change over time this can be discussed again. For now, it belongs in the same place as the other 'Bitcoins'.

There are four other topics in the Other languages/locations board that have more activity than the thread for Slovenian. I wouldn't expect to get a subforum for Slovenian until you can surpass all of their activity (or all four of those topics receive subforums of their own).

Perhaps the board should be moved to the Archival section.

I don't think that this should be done immediately though, since there are likely still people using the Multibit wallet. Perhaps after the Segwit2x Hard Fork, if it goes through, as the wallet will be incompatible at that time.

I agree, there is no possible way that they can hide links like that. Just follow the link here to go to the Colombian version of Google - https://google.co.

Of course. As you can see, my 'group' has absolutely destroyed 8xbt's reputation for speaking out against me. You can see clearly just how merciless we all are.

My inbox is always open for people that want to tell me how much of a piece of shit I am, if you've not got the balls to say it publicly.

Please point to me where Emergent Consensus is shown in the Bitcoin whitepaper/endorsed by Satoshi. (Satoshi saying that the block size can be increased doesn't count).
Wanting to scale through increased block size is fine. Wanting to implement a broken, buggy system with limited peer review into a $4 billion dollar economy isn't.

Why are you being such a cunt? Regardless of what your opinions on scaling are, talking to people like they're challenged doesn't make you, your product or your ideas on scaling look any better. Grow up.

Don't hold your breath. I'm usually the only one dumb enough to take the bait.

I know you didn't. That's why I told you to.

It'd be really helpful if you could split up your posts to show what exactly you are replying to. I'm not sure what you're trying to say here.

Relating to me, this thread is drama because Quickseller doesn't like me. If you read about my 'involvement', you can see that I wasn't at all related to the extortion and was simply trying to enforce forum rules. This is something I'll be sure not to do again. Ban evaders can run wild for all I care; I'm not risking my reputation to try and make this place better.

As I said, I couldn't care less about the drama between Og and others. I have my own gripes with Og that I may or may not address in the future, but relating to his treasurer status I am indifferent.

Cool? I don't believe I ever asked you to.

I believe I have only ever ignored one user on this board and that was only temporary. I can't say I intend to start now, especially with people expressing semi-valid opinions.

---

Neither of these claims are accurate. TMAN no longer lives in the UK AFAIK, and he has never lived near Zepher.

Correct.

Not from my understanding. I was told that TMAN and Zeroxal had made an agreement and was requested to adhere to it.

I'm guessing you mean the OgNasty thread. In regards to that, Lauda and I like to keep up to date on current forum events. I couldn't give a fuck about the current situation between TMAN and OgNasty (or whoever else is involved), which you can see if you read my post.

Almost like we enjoy posting here. I'm truly glad that people would like to ruin that simply because I associate myself with select groups of people.

TMAN isn't. No idea about Lauda, but I also suspect not.

I'm assuming you mean me. Look on my profile.

In addition, this offer isn't just open to 8xbt:

I have one alt that I have noted myself publicly with 3 posts on it.

Seems to me, judging by your last posts, you're knee deep in some drama. Whatever floats your boat.

FTFY.

'Legendary' is given to anyone that passes a certain activity threshold. You'll even get it one day if you stay active enough, god forbid.

---

Regardless, when approaching situations like this I should remember the following saying:
"Arguing with an idiot is like wrestling with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig will enjoy it."
I just hope you can understand what this means more than you understand how this forum works.

You sure love digging up that quote, huh?

Regardless, my mistake. I apologize.

---

theymos said that the amount he holds currently varies. In the address listed, around 750BTC are held. This likely makes up a fair amount of what Quickseller is referring to.

Keep in mind that the forum no longer has access to the coins held by paraipan, so the figure is closer to 500BTC. see below for the correct figure.

Yes, paraipan passed away in 2014 while holding 250BTC of the forum's money. He is a practical example of when multisig would be helpful.

The only living treasurer (other than theymos) is currently OgNasty. paraipan is still holding the forum's Bitcoin, but I don't think I have to say why he isn't relevant. However, the source hasn't been updated in a while so I may be wrong.

How's about you stop having a mental breakdown for a few minutes, take a deep breath and post all of the proof of this before spamming both the forum and the trust system? That would be more helpful than throwing a paddy.

This is thread #1, #2, #3, #4, #5. He also posted on at least one of Og's topics with the same shit.

DeaDTerra has been removed from DT1. Thank you theymos.

This is just the service that the owners used to host the website, probably not the owner of the website themselves. You'd be barking up the wrong tree here most likely.

This is also a 'get out of jail free' card for not answering questions that don't go along with your narrative. This is a popular card in QS' hand.

OgNasty and a group of undesirables do not make up the rest of the community. Anyone credible that disagreed with what these users are doing would be fighting against them. It's just a big conspiracy that they're not, right?

Having a large number of people on the Default Trust system to do nothing but boost another user's trust score (as DeaDTerra has done) provides nothing to the system other than a larger attack vector for hackers. There is no negative to removing a user doing this.

---

My full name and the city I live in has been posted publicly by me in the past. Please report me to the authorities for my heinous crimes of creating threads on an internet forum.

I'm watching a sports game. Posting is something to keep me busy instead of waiting around during the breaks. That is the absolute opposite as far as I know.

That's a shame.

Perhaps now that you are not contributing to the forum you can finally fit in the time to actually learn how the systems that you are criticizing work so that you don't look like such a dunce when you do decide to post.

Bitcoin Unlimited is irrelevant now, and it is not the fork that could possibly happen on August 1st. This is instead BIP148 a.k.a UASF. There is also a risk of Bitcoin ABC/UAHF forking. You can read more here.
You should probably read more into the several possible forks that could occur; the situation has changed significantly since BU vs Core.