You 100% you definitely are trying the correct email?

Email Gian Carlo, Im sure everything is fine, if you have 2fa and email withdrawal confirmations I wouldn't be too worried.

 giancarlo@bitfinex.com 

Ive just logged in fine.

In what sense can you not log in. Wrong password? Cant get to the login page ?

Ai, but who can remain solvent long enough to test those bounds ? I gather we're talking about being leveraged as a bear can remain solvent for an infinite amount of time without it, as can the bulls but maybe less so due to borrowing fiat from other areas of their wealth.

Anyway there's a reason the saying goes "the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent" and doesn't substitute irrational for pessimistic or optimistic.

Same with the bulls though, no Market can remain pessimistic longer than you can remain solvent.

Nowhere did I say it wasn't innovative, I rode the DRK train... The initial innovation is what got the price so high in the first place.

This is about future prospects in regards to price and my opinion is that with all the anon competition and also the big drop in price that 0.025 won't be visited again, particularly if BTC rallies.

Yep, all that is true, don't get me wrong I'm not championing LTC in the slightest I sold all of those months ago and I said above I think its dying. LTC doesn't offer a lot over BTC but at the time of its creation it did. It only looks like no real advantages in hindsight due to all the features the new alts have.

I'm also not arguing that DRK's features aren't desirable at all or that at least at the time it was one of the first cryptos to go after anonymity, what Im saying is that I don't see it going back to 0.025 and definitely not if BTC goes on a major rally. As said, my opinion.

I have no interest in arguing with you, literally 0. In fact I'm not even sure what your argument is, compare the age of BTC, LTC and DRK is not a valid argument as to whether the coin will increase to its ATH again. That only holds water if you believe that it has the longevity of BTC and LTC and I provided reasons why I dont think it does (see first crypto, first accepted alt), the "other random information" are real arguments as to why it may not go to ATH again or has a long life ahead of it. In reality the fact that I think LTC is also dying doesn't really do your argument much favours either if such an old coin can dwindle away. Yawn, the alt section is littered with exactly these sorts of comments "Don't worry the coin is still young compared to BTC".

Do you even know how much trade 'Willy' did during that period compared to the global market? It was a small percentage of gox' trade and gox was a percentage of global trade. Funny, everyone after November were screaming from the rooftops that we were doomed due to China "banning" Bitcoin and the whole rally was lead by China, yet a few weeks later the same people say were doomed as it was all gox' leading. Make you mind up.

It is likely that "Willy" was just an account for high value clients that would not want a few million sitting in a customer account waiting to be hacked. Even if its not, the effect Willy had on the global market was small, if any, and its asinine to try and attribute a prediction that BTC won't go above $1000 for a long time to that.

First movers advantage, BTC as the first crypto and LTC as the first accepted alt.

Find another alt that has pumped, crashed ~60%. Then sustainably risen again (Not spiked). Not to mention one thats main feature is better implemented by other tech. Have fun.

You don't have to agree, as a holder I don't expect you to, doesn't make my opinion any less valid.

Why would you come to the conclusion that its LTC bagholders and not just people who couldn't care less about you promoting Quark...

Not really, in the crypto world its quiet old. Coins come and go, get pumped one or two times and then die, RC4 wont save this coin, too much competition and not unique enough. I'd like it to go back up, Ill buy some if I see any signs of that happening but a slide to 0.007-.008 is inevitable.

Thats understandable, however XBtec and I had been in contact regarding a few things since the beginning of his campaign so just giving me a yes to joining would have taken 0 time compared to organizing funds, sending payments etc. Like I say, understandable but no prioritizing will have had to take place and I have no doubt payments will be sent ASAP.

Ill admit I misread the question somewhat particularly after entering the conversation after the POS vs POW was in full flow. In regards to renting someones coins I was thinking more in terms of staking for coin profits rather than in regards to 51% on the network.

Continue people

Hmm I wasnt aware of any payment issues I thought they were planned for today/ tomorrow?

As I understand it, PM's are to be sent to yakamoto on a Tuesday for the payouts which are on a weekly basis, is that correct? If so you are personally still waiting for payouts from last Tuesdays PM's? Correct ?

Cheers

Pure PoS coins don't have miners in the conventional way, perhaps you know this but I am struggling to therefore see the point of the question. Why would a "hoarder" rent his coins to someone else to stake unless they were paying more than he would make by staking his coins? To that end then, why would a "renter" rent coins from someone to make less than they would by buying some?

Thats great news.

I urge anyone using Claymores miner to update and use the no fee command.

To make it clear I have no problem with claymore being compensated for his work but 5% of all GPU coins is far from fair compensation particularly when he will likely be dumping it on the market. People don't be fooled by a 10% hashing decrease and think you are better off not using the no fee command.

Starting Posts: 2115

Address: 16hRptrzQS8J2Fe3YdLCA19npERQhxjCmt

As per PM with XBTec.

People need to do this more. I dont understand how people can compare on the available supply, particularly with some coins being near the beginning of a slower emission curve.

Ill use XMR as an example as I was speaking to someone in that thread about it earlier but they were telling me there were aiming for 1% of the supply. When I asked how they were going to acquire 180k coins and how they had that much BTC I was told I had a zero too many

How can people aim for 1% of the supply and use the current supply for this calculation, particularly with a coin such as XMR that is only 10% minted.

Judging by your post yesterday ;



I don't think we have too much to worry about you being "slowed down temporarily"...

Its a brand new project that is completely different to BTC, in some environments that aren't standard 64 bit windows some degree of knowledge is required.

Precisely why a completely anon currency will be so vital