|
1983
|
Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Exchange development !
|
on: September 03, 2013, 08:51:03 PM
|
If I were u I would split the task "Exchange" to 2 smaller ones: "Exchange back-end" + "Exchange front-end". This will help to find programmers coz there are not so many good coders who can do both things.
This I for one could code the back-end but not the front-end |
|
|
|
|
1985
|
Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: [Choose the new Pywallet name] - Pywallet 2.1.0: manage your wallet
|
on: September 03, 2013, 08:37:10 PM
|
WalletGenie
WalletMender
WalletMinder
FixMyWallet
KeyMinder
WalletGenius
WalletEditor
WalletSurgeon
I like them all actually No love at first sight though pywallet-ng
As far as I understand 'ng', wouldn't it mean that pywallet isn't developped anymore? (it will be true for my fork but not for the original pywallet) PryWallet
Why not, but why the R? JackWallet.
I'm not that egocentric  Thanks everybody, keep them coming  |
|
|
|
|
1988
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: PYWallet Help - Dumping encrypted private key
|
on: September 03, 2013, 07:58:39 PM
|
I get a huge amount of string like this:
"scriptPubKey": "76a91474add11bbac1a5818aa3f64dc3f7bc8cc931a09f88ac",
"value": 6.4e-05
So now? Why i can't use the web utility as that user explained in the other topic?
It's normal, they are all the transactions that your wallet stores For it to be more practical, do this: python pywallet.py --dumpwallet --dumpwithbalance --datadir=/path/to/wallet --wallet=wallet.dat > keys.txt This put all the text in the file keys.txt Then open keys.txt In the beginning of the file you'll see the keys but now each one will have a "balance" parameter Most of them will have "Never used", you can avoid to import them in Electrum On the other hand, all the addresses that have something else than "Never used" must be imported Example of what you'll get: {
"addr": "1EuK1VCzdyGzXgk1AnJswC1Y46dCyyqyXW",
"balance": "Never used",
"compressed": true,
"encrypted_privkey": "43e93c600c4e76eecbdc1311d09713234dc1c8c3e37067383f74e910afd6321f989c9a49dd73f018e76d2e0f1d759f1d",
"pubkey": "03feb65c4b3a2f163e991803e47b28231c2b62366814c08ed816b1aa150e856fc0",
"reserve": 1
},
{
"addr": "1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa",
"balance": "64.19778513",
"compressed": false,
"encrypted_privkey": "36e537b86cf0c55966ffbd776edd4e1b4922187d12b3f3bb39833d2776c97bd6cde814750e8e785d7f75a666e52234b8",
"pubkey": "04678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb649f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5f",
"reserve": 0
},
|
|
|
|
|
1989
|
Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: New Mystery about Satoshi
|
on: September 03, 2013, 07:36:10 PM
|
There were long gaps in 2009 when no blocks were mined at all despite min difficulty. I doubt Satoshi would have been running Bitcoin on public computers, given his preference for privacy.
Indeed Maybe he owned 6 computers, each of them running ~10 instances of an own designed mining software. Look how each block of 10 LSB bytes has roughly the same value. To be clearer: - LSB=0-9: ~450
- LSB=10-19: ~0
- LSB=20-29: ~550
- LSB=30-39: ~450
- LSB=40-49: ~330
- LSB=50-59: ~300
I don't see the difference (at least in the first 20K blocks). But if a divergence appears, I would say that there were 6 machines, each on them running a limited range. The owner of the machine running 10-19 decided not to be part of the Bitcoin experiment and left the group, and Satoshi were 5/6 people. Nevertheless, as I said, I don't see any statistical meaningful difference. What do you mean "difference"? I'm talking about this:  There are the 6 values I've described Looks like 59 was not used but if the theory is correct it means that the last machine was also the least powerful (even with only 9 miners on it) so he/they may have decided not to run as many miners as on the others machines |
|
|
|
|
1991
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: PYWallet Help - Dumping encrypted private key
|
on: September 03, 2013, 07:08:18 PM
|
"Dump your wallet" does this and returns the result in JSON, "Dump you keys" returns a CSV file
Don't bother, just answer the following question and I'll tell you what to do:
How do you import private keys into Electrum? ie do you type the "fac86293d82838..." private key by hand?
I just click on Import -> Private Keys. Am i wrong? I don't know Electrum at all, that's why I'm asking We'll do something different actually: close the pywallet you're currently running Then run this: python pywallet.py --dumpwallet --dumpwithbalance --datadir=/path/to/wallet --wallet=wallet.dat (change /path/to/wallet and wallet.dat to the correct values of course) This will take a few minutes, but after this it will print all the keys that were in your wallet along with their balance Thanks to this you'll be able to check which addresses have funds |
|
|
|
|
1992
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: PYWallet Help - Dumping encrypted private key
|
on: September 03, 2013, 06:39:41 PM
|
|
"Dump your wallet" does this and returns the result in JSON, "Dump you keys" returns a CSV file
Don't bother, just answer the following question and I'll tell you what to do:
How do you import private keys into Electrum? ie do you type the "fac86293d82838..." private key by hand?
|
|
|
|
|
1993
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: ASIC Testing on Scrypt?
|
on: September 03, 2013, 06:06:58 PM
|
Price each ASIC at $2,000, and you'll start getting a positive ROI after 7,500 orders.
Isn't the better plan to "sell" them to get back your original investment, but due to whatever factors you want to make up, not ship them for say 6+ months and pocket the $20k-$28k /day ? Should a competitor come out just "release" them. Great idea! Oh wait |
|
|
|
|
1996
|
Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: New Mystery about Satoshi
|
on: September 03, 2013, 05:12:21 PM
|
There were long gaps in 2009 when no blocks were mined at all despite min difficulty. I doubt Satoshi would have been running Bitcoin on public computers, given his preference for privacy.
Indeed Maybe he owned 6 computers, each of them running ~10 instances of an own designed mining software. Look how each block of 10 LSB bytes has roughly the same value. To be clearer: - LSB=0-9: ~450
- LSB=10-19: ~0
- LSB=20-29: ~550
- LSB=30-39: ~450
- LSB=40-49: ~330
- LSB=50-59: ~300
|
|
|
|
|
1998
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: PYWallet Help - Dumping encrypted private key
|
on: September 03, 2013, 02:46:00 PM
|
Hello,
I can't dump keys. I installed pywallet but when I click on "Dump Keys" (on web page) i get "File not written" error.
Maybe it happens because .bitcoin directory is a symlink. So i tried to enter the right path, but the same error occurs.
How can i solve this?
Thank you.
What is written in the console? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
