Mini dump happening
And top wallet at trex buying back part of what he dumped... |
|
|
|
So any plans in posting this coin on Cryptsy maybe?
I'm sure it will be submitted to Crypsty (and others), but for now devs should stick to the most pressing matters at had: POS 3, website, roadmap/timeline, whitepaper... no more weekends off until this is up to par, ok? |
|
|
|
|
Seen better but keep 'em coming, pls.
|
|
|
|
Nice staking and mining amazing coin!!! Will invest more  Come on.... you can do much better than that. And, please, don't forget the memes. especially the animated ones. Those are usually really, really funny... |
|
|
|
|
What's wrong with the critics? Come on people, this project NEEDS to be controversial. Come and post your shit here, it's uncensored!
|
|
|
|
|
No takeover ever works. Ever.
Reason being that the purpose of the takeover is to salvage the investment of the bagholders that are the main holders of the taken over project, thus putting the project in the most disadvantageous situation possible with the unfairest distribution possible. Why would anyone in his right mind invest in a take over which is extremely unfairly distributed when they can choose hundreds of projects already working properly and/or fairly distributed if they want to go with new projects?
Failure is guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
Top wallet/s have reduced a bit at bittrex...
|
|
|
|
barabbas, according to your interests, you may be interested in buying hashing power from us. Many people do that instead of buying on exchange, because it is often cheaper way of accumulating coins.
Possibly. For now I have disengaged your miner and continue using the default. I don't even know if I am mining POW blocks. Only thing I know is that I receive staking (and maybe POWs) from two different addresses: My own and a different one (always the same), whatever that means. And I hope upcoming POS 3.0 has already all the optimization possible in the wallet and the playing field is level. |
|
|
|
I could be wrong but the pos blocks should have your wallet address, mined pow coins will have a random address. I have mined 2 blocks using the wallet both had a random address and both for 5 coins when I checked on the block explorer they both show as new coins. I got another mined tonight but this time for 5.00004 with my address so I checked block explorer again and this one was pos.
Those 2 mined blocks were in the last 24 hours using an i5 3470, maybe not likely to happen but it does.
Yes, each POW block is paid to a new address. POS blocks are paid to the same address as the input. So, if the address that comes with the block paid to the wallet, is yours, it is a POS block; if it isn't, is it a POW block? Then, besides the POW blocks NiceHash pays you (a pittance, but actually pays you) in BTC something extra? So fucking confused... In any case, I receive payments with two addresses only -so no randomness here-: Mine and another one, but all the blocks with one or the other, no other addresses whatsoever. what's the payout with Nicehash? What I believe I am getting is something like 2,800 sat for every 100 accepted blocks. which is next to nothing. Now, if the 5 axiom block come directly to my wallet, with a different address than my own, it could be significant, up to 4 blocks in one hour even, most times less than that but still significant. The Stake coming to my address with my address, is no problem at all, so I assume the wallet is unlocked for staking, yes. |
|
|
|
I could be wrong but the pos blocks should have your wallet address, mined pow coins will have a random address. I have mined 2 blocks using the wallet both had a random address and both for 5 coins when I checked on the block explorer they both show as new coins. I got another mined tonight but this time for 5.00004 with my address so I checked block explorer again and this one was pos.
Those 2 mined blocks were in the last 24 hours using an i5 3470, maybe not likely to happen but it does.
Yes, each POW block is paid to a new address. POS blocks are paid to the same address as the input. So, if the address that comes with the block paid to the wallet, is yours, it is a POS block; if it isn't, is it a POW block? Then, besides the POW blocks NiceHash pays you (a pittance, but actually pays you) in BTC something extra? So fucking confused... In any case, I receive payments with two addresses only -so no randomness here-: Mine and another one, but all the blocks with one or the other, no other addresses whatsoever. |
|
|
|
I'm going to ask this once more; does the dev have any ideas other than cpu mining and fake volume for this coin? I swear, I will never post again if he doesn't respond (this thread wouldn't be worth the time).
Hi Chesthing, It's obvious to us you haven't read the ann, or that you're just trying to passively imply that we've done these things you state we have so that newcomers to the thread are put off by your statements as the price continues to approach initial listing values. The volume is not fake, and the amount of people visiting this ann clearly defines that. We have many plans, one of which is to completely revamp current POS technology and fix several known exploits, the other is to continue to harden the algorithm against asic and gpu technology. We're also looking in to other forms of encryption to further the coin from the NSA tech that most coins are derived from. Ok, I'm impressed - I simply selected "engage miner" and my cpu has already mined 10 coins today. This is a big deal, sorry I didn't do much research. I believe what you did was "stake", not POW mining. The "engage miner" I believe renders minimal -if any- result in a normal CPU (and so does the enhanced system with NiceHash), nowhere near 10 coins a day. The POS staking is different and the results are much, much better... depending on how many mature coins you have staking. Those "mined" 10 coins are staked coins. 200 or more coins per day are to be expected if you have a balance around 20-25k mature axiom. By way of comparison, a NiceHash system with a non-recent computer (SSE), would mine around 20-25,000 sat in 24 hours... less than any decent faucet... Not worth it at all. I bought my first coins 3 hours ago, it says "not staking because coins are not mature" - I'm assuming they came in because my cpu was mining them. It must be. Makes no sense though. Not to me... I must be missing on something here. |
|
|
|
I'm going to ask this once more; does the dev have any ideas other than cpu mining and fake volume for this coin? I swear, I will never post again if he doesn't respond (this thread wouldn't be worth the time).
Hi Chesthing, It's obvious to us you haven't read the ann, or that you're just trying to passively imply that we've done these things you state we have so that newcomers to the thread are put off by your statements as the price continues to approach initial listing values. The volume is not fake, and the amount of people visiting this ann clearly defines that. We have many plans, one of which is to completely revamp current POS technology and fix several known exploits, the other is to continue to harden the algorithm against asic and gpu technology. We're also looking in to other forms of encryption to further the coin from the NSA tech that most coins are derived from. Ok, I'm impressed - I simply selected "engage miner" and my cpu has already mined 10 coins today. This is a big deal, sorry I didn't do much research. I believe what you did was "stake", not POW mining. The "engage miner" I believe renders minimal -if any- result in a normal CPU (and so does the enhanced system with NiceHash), nowhere near 10 coins a day. The POS staking is different and the results are much, much better... depending on how many mature coins you have staking. Those "mined" 10 coins are staked coins. 200 or more coins per day are to be expected if you have a balance around 20-25k mature axiom. By way of comparison, a NiceHash system with a non-recent computer (SSE), would mine around 20-25,000 sat in 24 hours... less than any decent faucet... Not worth it at all. |
|
|
|
Europe works; neither USA nor Japan do.
Where is my previous balance though? It re-started from zero...
Edit: The total balance, upon review, is correct though, just not in the interface.
Nicehash has always maintained separate balances for each algo AND location. However, a recent update will now calculate the total balance for the entire "account" (BTC address) across all locations and algos. That total balance is what is now used for payouts and now fixes the situation where someone could have a "dead-balance" on a particular location. Example: I mine primarily on USA servers and have accumulated 0.003 BTC across all USA algos. One day I had connection issues with the USA servers and decided to fallback to the EU servers, and gaining 0.001 BTC there. Before the recent change, even though my total "balance" was 0.004 BTC (the minimum for triggering a daily payout), payout thresholds were being calculated individually for each location, thus not triggering a payout at all for that day. You can switch the location using the drop down on the left side of your stats page (EU or USA/JP/HK). It is a little confusing at first, and possibly frightening if you don't realize how balances are stored with Nicehash, but you should be able to verify that you indeed do have exactly the amount you expected to have. You are right but I already posted that. |
|
|
|
|
And now the network weight at the high of the day, almost double what was 3 hours ago...
|
|
|
|
My location is near San Jose... |
|
|
|
|
Europe works; neither USA nor Japan do.
Where is my previous balance though? It re-started from zero...
Edit: The total balance, upon review, is correct though, just not in the interface.
|
|
|
|
I have been Axiom mining at NiceHash with the new miner all day and just started getting these errors, is anybody else getting them? How do you resolve this? I have restarted my router and PC.  I am. No idea how to resolve... |
|
|
|
Oh I'm already in and happily staking (the mining with the NiceHash guys, very disappointing though). I like what I see and that's why I am in, but I remain on the fence on a significant portion of it still. Hoping to be convinced by developments coming up. |
|
|
|
Stake weight is down and top wallet balances on Bittrex is up. Something's brewing.  Distribution at Bittrex hasn't changed one bit all day. But stake weight, at least per the wallet, is currently at it's lowest... Whatever that means... |
|
|
|
|
How are the website, roadmap/timeline and white paper progressing?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
