Deleting some old posts likely won't get you tagged. But if you erase a ton of stuff you posted, people might wonder why and the internet never forgets. Things you put out there are hard to take back completely.  Here on this forum, we have at least two archives keeping copies of posts even if you delete them from your profile. So once you hit publish, you cannot really hide it after that.

Merit-sources are supposed to look at the quality of a post, not who wrote it.  The whole point of merit is to reward good post that helps the community, even if it comes from someone you do not like.  but let us be real, we all have our preferences and can be hard to be totally fair and unbiased.
I mean there arent any hard rules here. Some merit-sources try harder than others to stay objective.  The important thing is using merit to recognize people who are making this place better, not just your buddies.  Easier said than done though.  We are only human.  

Where can we see a working demo of the market script? And the backend too.
What is the price?

Speaking of shitheads, take a look at this guy:


Did someone hurt you or something? Forgot to take your pills? 

Smart contracts, like any other form of code, can be vulnerable to exploits, and even well-audited contracts have faced challenges in the past. The concept of a "rug pull" may not directly apply in this case, but vulnerabilities can still exist within the contract itself.

Regarding your idea, I do not think the concept of lottery-style games is particularly popular in the crypto world. In fact, not sure if it is even popular among younger generations in the real world. The appeal of such games likely depends on demographics; generally, younger demographics tend to lean towards high-paced games with a significant adrenaline rush involved. That said, there could still be niches or unique features that could make your idea stand out and appeal to a specific group within the crypto community.

I understand that some members have no reason to hide their Bitcoin holdings, but I see no reason to make it public either. For example, I have nothing to hide, but I still want to exercise my right to privacy. No one needs to know how many Bitcoins I have in my possession, just as no one needs to know how much money I have in the bank or in a private safe.

As for the mods and admins, I believe most of them are very well aware of how to keep their Bitcoin holdings safe, and I doubt they have made their cold store addresses public.

@jvanname, I understand that you have a strong viewpoint on Bitcoiners, but I think it is important to acknowledge that people's perspectives and attitudes can vary widely within any group. While there may be individuals who hold strong opinions, it is not fair to generalize and label all Bitcoin enthusiasts in the same way.

Maybe I am in denial, but the impression I have formed from interacting with people here does not align with your perspective. Have you considered the possibility that the issue might not be with people at all? If you continue to use derogatory language like "stupid" and "worthless" when referring to individuals or groups, it is likely to create a hostile and unproductive atmosphere for discussion. While I may not agree with everyone's perspectives, I believe in the value of open and respectful dialogue to better understand each other and potentially find common ground. But that is just me.

Thank you.


Absolutely, I have had the opportunity to communicate with quite a few Bitcoin enthusiasts. However, I usually don't categorize people in such a way. Who are Bitcoiners really? Drawing such conclusions from a few sentences exchanged online, like here, seems unjust and unwise. People have diverse opinions, and it is true that some can be rather passionate about their views. I get that vibe a lot. But aren't we all guilty of similar behavior? In fact, if we take a step back and reflect, we may find that we all, at times, display passionate or strong-willed behavior about topics we deeply care about. Would you not agree?

I am sorry if my previous messages came across in a way that upset you. That was not my intention at all. My intention is to provide assistance and engage in friendly conversations, and I want to assure you that I will make every effort to engage respectfully in our future discussions.

Now, let us refocus on addressing your concern. I couldn't help but notice that the way you have been communicating suggests there might be some stress or tension on your end. If you are comfortable sharing, I am here to listen and offer support. I genuinely care about helping you.

That is your opinion, but you cannot know that. No one knows what the future holds.


That is wrong. History tells us that many have tried but none have succeeded.


I doubt that.

Seriously, Dr. Van Name, what is wrong with you? Why so grumpy? Who or what caused you such pain?

That is debatable. Yes, trust can be a bit tricky on the internet, but it is not entirely nonexistent. You may not know someone personally, but you can still trust some individuals or websites based on their reputation. For example, when you shop on a well-known and reputable online store, you trust that they will deliver your order as expected. Similarly, you trust your online bank that they have a secure website and provide encryption for your data, and that they will keep your data safe. Also, when you read reviews or recommendations from people on social media or review sites, you are placing some trust in their opinions to make informed decisions, even though they are just some "random anonymous individuals". So, yeah! Trust is still very much a part of the online world.

Not automation. I meant automatons - those mechanical beings (low-budget robots) designed to carry out tasks in a repetitive manner, like clockwork! They hardly ever bother with evaluations or handpick projects to support. They just keep on doing the same tasks in these bounty campaigns, hoping that at least a few of them will eventually pay off.

Yeah! Mindless automatons.


That is true. But I have a feeling that the majority of projects that organize these bounty campaigns are actually banking on that law of large numbers mentality. They do not care about quality; they only go after quantity. They do not care about low-effort tasks because they are throwing away a bunch of worthless tokens anyway. So, it is a bit of a numbers game for both sides.

Yes. It has already been confirmed that his account has been blocked and harizenbanappeal has already started a ban appeal thread in the Meta board. He claims that he did not post the ANN topic with the malware link and that his account was probably hacked.

Most online casino games are all about having fun and giving you that real casino vibe, even when you are playing online. Take online roulette, for exmple. There is no actual wheel or ball in the digital roulette and there is no "physics" that will determine the outcome. Instead, it is all about fancy computer programming like random number generators and provably fair algorithms. Those cool animations you see with the wheel and ball spinning are just for the show; they do not change a thing about the final outcome. The same goes for plinko and other games.

There! I fixed it for you. 

You said: "Same things is happened with alik111 he was also from the same community group and I was used to sell Bitcoin or other tokens in address as I can remember." So I ask you again: Is there any concrete evidence to support this claim? As I previously mentioned, the blockchain records do not seem to reflect any such transactions. There are no transactions that point to your involvement in coin trading with alik111 or to that specific address.

But that is not really true, is it? You used the specified address only once on the forum to apply for signature campaign (8 months after alik111). You never actually sent any funds to that address, so it cannot be the address that alik111 used to buy the coins from you.

Like I said, I am still waiting for any tangible evidence to convince me to remove the negative tag.

Maybe you would like to fix that?

No. Satoshi has not been gone for more than two decades. At least not yet. Bitcoin did not even exist two decades ago.