Yup, you are probably right. A lot of her posts seem like they came from a ChatGPT or a similar type of AI software. They have that typical AI language flow and word choice. Also, the articles are not very well researched. They are just regurgitated information from other sources that you can find on the internet.

I believe they are lying about that. Evidence from multiple snapshots on the Wayback Machine (web.archive.org)suggests that they are indeed operated by the Ole Group International B.V. However, the statements were altered in recent months for an unknown reason. Here are a couple of screenshots:


http://web.archive.org/web/20230101190359/https://ole7.io/en/#/main


http://web.archive.org/web/20220505091014/https://ole7.io/en/#/main


I think that you were already aware of this, or perhaps this comment has slipped your memory:

Looks like you have got some homework to do before buying a Bitcoin mining rig! Asking these questions is like trying to bake a cake without knowing the ingredients. Trust me, you do not want to bite into that! 

My advice is to do your research and make sure you fully understand what you are getting into. Mining Bitcoin has its ups and downs, and it is important to know all the ins and outs, including how it works, what kind of hardware you need, and what kind of returns you can expect. And don't just rely on advice from unverified sources, such as random individuals on online forums – take your time and gather all the facts before diving in.

This is yet another serious accusation against Ole777. The scam accusation board is already filled with numerous open accusations.

Ole777Official, in order to maintain credibility and trust among the community, it is imperative that you are transparent in your actions and provide clear explanations for any issues or controversies that arise. I think it is high time you start taking action and addressing these issues, as your reputation is on the brink of collapsing.

I also do not see anything particularly positive or negative here. It is certainly unusual. I trust that Royse meant well, but I am not so sure about his methods. It is my belief that the management of a bounty campaign should have discretion in their decisions, unless it impacts the larger community. Sure, the manager can choose whoever they want for the campaign, that is not the main issue here.


I have no idea what ulterior motives you suspect him of having. Do we know what kind of neutral tags he asked to be removed? I cannot find such information, and unfortunately, trust feedback is not archived anywhere.

Without a little proof, this statement is up in the air. A reference would anchor it down and give it some stability. 

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)


3. juwel509
4. ahmim
5. uszal509

Proof:



https://ninjastic.space/post/59690636




https://ninjastic.space/post/59880500

Reporting:

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust.

Related Addresses:


Miscellaneous:

• Another alt account from a known bounty cheater.
  
• Ban evasion

The earliest known reference to this particular term can be found in a post on the Bitcointalk forum, which dates back to 2011. This early mention suggests that the idea of using the term "provably fair" to describe a honest and transparent system for gambling with bitcoin was a novel concept at the time. It is possible that the term had not been used in this sense before the advent of bitcoin casinos, but this remains unverified.

Yeah, I totally get what you are saying. The concept of HODLing Bitcoin is heavily promoted in the community, causing some individuals to be hesitant to sell their Bitcoin. But, the notion that selling Bitcoin makes you an outsider in the crypto world is not accurate. Everyone should have the freedom to make their own financial decisions without fear of being ostracized. It is important to keep in mind that for every seller, there is a buyer on the other side. No big deal.

Recently, there was a similar discussion: "Members Asking For Neutral Trust To Be Removed". JollyGood responded to my query, stating that it was related to the sinbad.io campaign run by Royse777. It was claimed that he recruited members who had a neutral tag from certain DT members and later asked them to remove neutral ratings from their feedback pages.

As I previously commented in that thread, I have never witnessed such requirements from a bounty manager and I am not sure of its moral correctness. Every manager has the right to select participants in their campaigns, but they should not abuse their managerial position to sway the DT system.

It seems that Microsoft beat them to the punch, thanks to their deeper pockets. Apparently they were able to put much more money into the project, which gave them an edge.

Microsoft to Invest $10 Billion in OpenAI, the Creator of ChatGPT - nytimes.com

When it comes to accepting or signing any terms or conditions, it is important to take the time to fully understand what you are getting yourself into. Unfortunately, many companies use complex language, or "fine print," to hide or minimize the visibility of important information. This can make it difficult for the average person to truly comprehend what they are agreeing to. This is especially important when it comes to financial agreements, where the terms and conditions can have a significant impact on your finances. By taking the time to carefully review the fine print, you will be able to make more informed decisions and potentially avoid any unwanted surprises down the line.

So, even though it may seem like a hassle at the moment, taking the time to review the fine print can ultimately save you a lot of headaches in the long run. Unfortunately, many people still neglect to do so.

Yes. You can be banned from forum even if no one reports you to the moderators. The moderators' responsibility is to maintain the forum's integrity, regardless of whether there are user reports. However, the moderation policies of each specific board may vary. Some moderators use automated scripts to detect rule-breakers, while others manually review the posts.

For example, in recent days, a scammer has repeatedly attempted to post a topic for a fake "Bitcointalk wallet", which is simply malware in disguise. These accounts are promptly banned within minutes. Maybe I am wrong, but I believe moderators have the capability to automatically detect such posts, or at the very least, they manually monitor new posts and react appropriately.

I am not familiar with "crypto-exch.com", so I cannot speak to its legitimacy. In general, if a site is asking for a deposit for account verification before you can withdraw your funds, it is a big red flag. And in this case, it is probably a scam. Real exchanges do not operate this way, so proceed with caution.

I agree with you, as far as I know there is no evidence of such a scam. To my knowledge, signing a message using a private key does not reveal the private key itself. If a private key could be revealed simply by signing a message, it would compromise the security of the entire system.

Why do you need an Electrum server when you can check the balance of any address on any blockchain explorer or via numerous blockchain APIs??
Or am I missing something here?

Did I get it right?  You woke up after three years of inactivity, but now cannot remember your password? How did you know it a few minutes ago? And, you cannot access your email account anymore?

This is really fascinating case. I would love it if you could elaborate more on it.

---

He claims to have forgotten his password, so I am afraid that is not an option for him. (Not that i believe him anyway.)

Yeah, I also believe that following your gut and prioritizing your health is crucial. I have heard similar advice from the people I have talked to like weighing the pros and cons, exploring better job opportunities, and thinking long-term... But, there are many factors at play here: the type of job, your financial situation and more. For example, if you have an amazing job opportunity available right now, then by all means take it! Ultimately, it is up to you to decide what is right for your situation and what will make you feel good about yourself.

Typically, during the installation process, the operating system and its core components are installed. However, it is common for many systems to have outdated or missing software and libraries that are needed to run applications and perform certain tasks. To ensure that the system is up-to-date and functioning optimally, it is important to perform software updates regularly.

No distribution, as far as I know, carries out software updates during the installation process. Instead, the updates are done after the installation is complete. This is often done through a prompt or a notification from the operating system, inviting the user to update the installed software.

Why did you remove the content from the OP post?
The community has made countless efforts to educate and raise awareness about scams, but it's ultimately up to individuals to conduct their own research and exercise caution when dealing with suspicious websites or investment opportunities. Everyone has their own approach to addressing this issue, and it's not a given that one specific approach is better or should be followed by all.