Soooooo Kelsey, exactly what coin did you purchase before making this post...I warned you about going all in on Corgicoin...
Corgicoin too tha moon...  ....btw wtf is corgicoin  Its not perfect, and maybe some will find was around it yes, but its a start to ban newbie accounts from ann new coins. |
|
|
|
Why not just give your litecoin's to me, I'll make them anon, of course you'll never see them again |
|
|
|
good point, dev should have 3-6 months account at least
They need to implement some law minimum Full Member or Sr Member rank hope its works and we have some less scams I suggest also screening of all new coins by mods before they are allowed to be ann, clean this place up or it'll be totally closed. |
|
|
|
One after another like a plague newbie's are listing their scams and completely sucking everyone (well mostly newbies) in, BTT has to stop allowing these scamers, Mods here giving them a freeride.
I have been saying this for a year now Yes many of us have, but now its got to beyond stupid level, a complete insult to what cryptos are about. Now with paid for exchange votes some of the straight up no questions scamcoins are pumped to being some of the most popular. |
|
|
|
|
One after another like a plague newbie's are listing their scams and completely sucking everyone (well mostly newbies) in, BTT has to stop allowing these scamers, Mods here giving them a freeride.
|
|
|
|
Why were you guys not trading on Atomic-Trade, Cryptsy or Mintpal instead? Why trade on these anonymous exchanges? Who is to blame?
Don't blame the victims in this case, many were there trading coins that aren't on the exchanges you listed. From the very top to the bottom all exchanges are a risk, whether it be by fraud, hackers or regulators. Trick is not to use exchanges (or any online source) as storage. I have a pretty strong philosophy on this, was in and out of sharex for any trades, yet I still got caught with coinage there. |
|
|
|
|
thanks Goattrading, Snail2, yes I've noticed both (and a few others) are still there. Though some of the ones I sent have been moved to another address, whether that be another exchange or another sharex wallet I'm working on atm.
Yes I too sent them there simply for the change over. I had even bought a few on various exchanges earlier but always sent back to my own wallet for staking.
Initially planned on sending at the very last minute, but because transfers had grind to almost a halt thought I best send them earlier to give them time to get there.
|
|
|
|
It appears that sharex has been dumping qora on polo (and account on polo now frozen to prevent). https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=522102.4840Anyone who sent coffeecoin to sharex could u post the address you sent so I can track on block explorer, see if any funny business goes down. |
|
|
|
|
It would pay for everyone to keep an eye on the address' they sent coins to on sharexcoin exchange (via various blockexplorers) see if any are on the move to other exchanges and alert those exchanges.
|
|
|
|
Sadly, the currencies which stuck to their original plans, apart from a tiny handful, just withered away.
The flip side is any divergence from the original plan that alters the total coin supply or the rate in which coins are distributed, defeats the whole trust less system, this is lost on so many panic change quickly or die mentality of the old school coins of late. I think we are all (altcoins) really grinding through a tough patch as Bitcoin recovers from the recent hostile positions taken against it by government and big business alike. I bet there is a lot of soul searching going on out there. I know what you mean by the panic driven change, and have taken many opportunities in the past to present a calm and rational view. For us, it is a bit of a unique situation. Very few coins have had to deal with the turbulence of moving beyond the mining phase, which seems to attract all of the attention. We now have to forge ahead and create value in ways other than mining focused speculation. Details to follow shortly.. Coin original supply is one thing of course, but the opportunity for new entrants to acquire holdings introduces new blood and ideas. Revival is difficult without that. A higher % stake is a good way to reward existing holders. There also needs to be a cheap plentiful supply on the market for a while. Time , and price, will tell which are the dominant features in a CryptoCurrency. There are an immense number of competing coins, and most communities have their own good ideas, but they cannot all win (in fact I would say very few can be winners). Most coins are for 'Investors' because there are very few real payment applications. higher % stake does not reward existing holders at all (creates dilution which decreases each units price), it actually screws over everyone who bought in because of rarity (ie knowing the market cap would stay under 1 mil). instantly evaporating any trust. yes coins do it in panic mode as a bandaid approach to save a coin, but only those who either directly want to bail or honest people with very little real understanding of economics, market dynamics and/or the trustless system btc introduced. |
|
|
|
Possible rebirth COMM steps:
1. Take NXT sources and make clone as COMMv2.
2. Create automatic COMMv1 to COMMv2 swapper. Rate can be at 1 COMMv1 = 1 COMMv2.
3. Every COMMv1 stakeholder sends his coins to swapper and gets equal stake from COMMv2 genesis block. Of course, deadline exists.
4. Introduce COMMv2 with new features to world.
5. Promo, infrastructure, services and etc.
Why? nxt sucks. COMM is actually one of the best working stable pos clients I've seen. clients not the issue, promotion is. |
|
|
|
Sadly, the currencies which stuck to their original plans, apart from a tiny handful, just withered away.
The flip side is any divergence from the original plan that alters the total coin supply or the rate in which coins are distributed, defeats the whole trust less system, this is lost on so many panic change quickly or die mentality of the old school coins of late. |
|
|
|
To NewWorldCoiner: Yes, it is possible: It requires to change the MAX_SUPPLY variable to a higher value. However, that changes, also requires a hard fork. Given the past experience from migrating from 1.4 to 1.5, a month ago - I don't see that happening easily. Believe it, or not, when I checked this morning, there was still, at least, 10 people minting away on rev 1.4 client, on their own forked blockchain, of all things... Of course, they won't receive the latest Airdrop, but despite that incentive, it doesn't seem to bother them. So, to move from 1.5 to 1.6, would be a challenge, without any incentives to go for. The only people with enough incentives are the bagholders, that happen to be users with poppets. The distribution was meant to fail, more and more proof of poppet users are showing up, some with over 20 different addresses in the same wallet... Check the blockchain lately, it is impressive. I could only check half the users before the Airdrop today, because only ½ of them got coins in the first release. Now that everyone knows that the airdrop is over, and everyone got some, they are moving coins around, and they are showing up their true faces... I would even put forward that there was no more than 500 people on this coin - ever - in the world. And all the coins have been distributed, with the exception of the 1M giveaway next week. It is easy to find poppets, but they have to make a move to be unmasked - which they always eventually do, because of greed. Unfortunately, the donations from jrinterm and Dallas5 was not enough for them to make a move - but this last Airdrop was: Take, for example, recent block 25892 http://explorer.cryptoblox.com/block/5c6a10aad46c4b4bf877fdc3fc04e1b73b7054dc14e0861227d6980e66e890e5One of the transaction has multiple inputs, so they have to come from the same wallet. This wallet was minting before, therefore, not an exchange address. Well, this guy received 4 Airdrop shares today: with the addresses ending in "yGG", "yHy", "3hj", and "4VA". If you do a search in the google list, you will find that they belong to username: sienna, noelmal, and kelsey. kelsey is a Sr Member of BTCtalk since 2012!!! noelmal: Full member since may 2013!!! All the same person. This is just an example, there are so many others... do you own research. Those are proofs, not newbies discriminatory theories of Hippie Tech. I don't want to excuse them, but the rules were not clear, as long as the username had been active before the launch, you could put your name on the list. Some people took it textually... Well I think you better get your facts straight before lynching anyone, I guarantee you they aint the same person, I know because I am only one of them lol. |
|
|
|
I made a few bucks off of FeatherCoin when it was launched awhile back, so I'm not going to complain about that one.
It's STILL somehow traded on BTC-E, while more popular coins like Dogecoin are still banished from that site. It just doesn't make any sense to me.
as crap and instamined as feathercoin is its still 10x better then that joke of a coined called doge, dogecoin is for people with little understanding of basic math, and is destined to fail. |
|
|
|
I am having deposit issues all deposits pending |
|
|
|
POS type giveaway is a great concept and could be a hit if devs didn't constantly screw up distribution, or good distribution then leave  Oh well, as we hope for a better one. |
|
|
|
Bottlecaps
Hobo Nickels
Lebowskis
CENT
TEK
OSC
Lucky 7
21
42
66
81
Franko
Nanotokens
AndroidTokens
Noirbits
Spots
CopperBars
Lottery Tickets
Pretty much all of the Cryptsy 'in house' coins are garbage...
+21000000  |
|
|
|
The_Catman and shakezula haven't been online since April.  Should we consider a community take over? Maybe if we organise this well enough we could get a couple of new exchanges to accept Doubloons too. that sounds like a great idea! Doubloons great concept, extremely poor execution. If it was fixed, well rebuilt, keeping the same low coin vol it could be a hit. |
|
|
|
Applied first thread but never received received now, thanks  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
