I agree, he might not reach 8 division title as Pacman, but the way he is destroying everything that in his path, it's like Pacman when he was in the beginning of his career specially at lower weights. And Inoue can make another history, for Japan and then having won the unified title in bantamweight and super bantamweight in the 4 belt era.

If that happens then the situation will become more infuriating for investors and traders who took entries aorund $30k. But the risk is always there so they might not react tht much. But there are newbies too, to whom news outlets, titok, Twitter Influencers had motivated that BTC is going fo bullish cycle in 2024.\

Such news or statements attract many newbie to fall pray to FOMO. And not they might be suffering. Almost $100 million plus trades were liquidated just because market goes below 29,000$. I hope this will not occur and market would maintain its price at $29,000 at least.

__
Within 2 years, while the EC will file an appeal, new crypto legislation may appear in the US if the right president wins the 2024 elections

Don't understand how the decision doesn’t square with existing securities laws?
Isn't this decision issued by a competent judge? Is it possible for a judge to rule in favor of Ripple in a way that violates the law?

In any case, Ripple won the case in the first stage, and this will give them more confidence and time to enter the appeal with much more force, although I believe that the appeal will not change anything in the decision.

I have never seen Inoue's face like that in Fulton's face-off from his past face-off, he is challenged to not humiliate Fulton but knock him it, I wonder why Ebbis said that Fulton is bigger in their face-off because they have the same body build and almost the same height, I believe Inoue can carry his power in the Bantamweight division and if he ever capture the Bantamweight division he will reign this undisputedly for years before moving up to conquer more division, Fulton is the only top fighter in the bantamweight division, not even Marlon Tapales can match Fulton or Inoue.

I saw the update just now on his twitter.

I asked why deposits in the lightning network are restricted unlike other networks?

Or all this Binance FUD finally comes to an end.

I am Seeing Bitcoin Market is Not good Its Correction every Time  
It can Hit $25000  ?

Just imagine what will happen to Bitcoin exchange rates if Kennedy wins somehow. Not only the prices will reclaim the peak that was attained in 2021, but there is a good possibility that we will reach six digits. When Trump was elected in 2016, a lot of people had high hopes on him. But he didn't do much in favor of cryptocurrency. Let's hope that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will be different and will keep his promise in case he is elected. But then, the chances of Kennedy getting the Democrat nomination is close to zero.

^^ Right, Perhaps it was just bad stylistic matchup for Teo Lopez that time. As he can't adjust to the style of Kambosos as he was being beaten to the punch. Although he try to rally late in the rounds in that fight, was not enough for him to overcome the big lead early by Kambosos.

Ohh, this is not good but there might be some truth to this. I hope Fulton is aware of this tactics and be ready to whatever those Japs threw at them. Might be that "cake thing" was one of them.

I'm surprised they keep that much money in hot wallets. In my mind, hot wallets are only meant for amounts you can afford to lose. It makes me wonder how much money they process if they consider this "pocket change".

I'm now wondering whether you have actually read or understood the entire decision. It's not wrong to paraphrase the decision if only to make it brief and direct to the point, therefore, easier to digest, for as long as the point is there. Not saying everything verbatim is not equivalent to "mak[ing] it appear that something else was being said." We're not being tricked here. We're simply repeating what is there in the decision itself. But let me just bring you to the actual text of Judge Torres:

"For the reasons stated below, the SEC’s motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and Defendants’ motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part."

"For the foregoing reasons, the SEC’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to the Institutional Sales, and otherwise DENIED. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to the Programmatic Sales, the Other Distributions, and Larsen’s and Garlinghouse’s sales, and DENIED as to the Institutional Sales."

The decision does not declare that XRP is "sometimes it is a security, sometimes not". Those are your own words, your personal interpretation. And those are the wrong words and interpretation.

The decision is actually founded upon the fact that "the SEC alleges that Ripple engaged in three categories of unregistered XRP offers and sales:

(1) Institutional Sales under written contracts for which it received $728 million;
(2) Programmatic Sales on digital asset exchanges for which it received $757 million; and
(3) Other Distributions under written contracts for which it recorded $609 million in “consideration other than cash.”"

The court's decision is based on these three different categories, and they ruled as follows:

• On Institutional Sales: "the Court concludes that Ripple’s Institutional Sales of XRP constituted the unregistered offer and sale of investment contracts in violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act."
• On Programmatic Sales: "the Court concludes that Ripple’s Programmatic Sales of XRP did not constitute the offer and sale of investment contracts.
• On Other Distributions: "the Court concludes that Ripple’s Other Distributions did not constitute the offer and sale of investment contracts."

These different decisions are the reason why there is not only one winner in the case. Clearly, the court favored the SEC in one category and opposed as to the other categories. In the same manner that it also granted Ripple's motions in some categories and denied in the other one.

And I repeat that Judge's Torres decision is not based on the XRP token alone but upon consideration of "the economic reality and totality of circumstances."

I don't quite understand this, which I assume is irony. FYI, I have a good hairy head.


Instead of continuing to make fun of the bald guy, explain one thing to me: according to you, if Ripple and the rest of shitcoins are not securities, what are they?

Kambosos won the fight, but I was personally unimpressed on how he fight and it seems he was gifted with this win. Even after Kambosos won, and in his interview i the ring, you can hear the boos in the background.

But he justify that there are close rounds and he could have been favored by the judges. However, as we say, a win is a win, so Kambosos got lucky and so his career continues again with Top Rank.