I thought that you were going to report that you had dropped a boob.

From personal observation, I reckon that 80% of the UK has immunity. and one of the papers this morning puts it as high as 90% ( outside care homes ). It's hard to find sensible information, as the money Pharmers seem to suppress and distort everything. There is also considerable blocking of content as a result of legal threats. Just try to find information about the $500 million compensation fund that PayPal had to set up because it was misusing clients funds. That was all over the net for a week or two, and then it vanished, just as PayPal relocated outside the US.

One booming industry at the moment is the purchase or rental of sea containers. Find a bit of land, and buy some containers to give you fry, secure storage.

Wow! What a bargain governments are getting for the billions they are spending on vaccine research. Given that a lot of reputable scientists believe that we already have over 60% of the population with immunity, that is a negative result. Will you be one of the people who lose immunity through the vaccine? They don't even talk about the side effects either.. Then there is the massive amount of collateral damage from the lockdowns, the maskerades (sic), the job losses, and all the other problems the bankers have created.

The only good news is that it may have exposed the whole vaccination eugenics programme, and maybe we can leave vaccines alone in the future. That way we can see a reduction in the autistic kids, the allergies, and  :(the cripples that vaccines create.

Don't think of it as spreading infection, but as spreading immunity. Why would the health care workers be overloaded if they haven't already messed up people's immune systems? Many health care workers just seem to be providing pharmaceuticals that suppress the symptoms that indicate a person is fighting the infection. Examples of these are reducing the fever, and preventing diarrhoea. These can block the beneficial actions of the immune system.

I believe that some surveys that checked for side effects 8 years after vaccination have been suppressed. They were not very favourable, and showed some serious issues.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSMe1wAdMdg

I watched this video, and I found it interesting. Not so much because it was a flight crew coping with multiple disasters, but because of it's approach to some of the problems we encounter in life. One important message that I got from it was this - When you have multiple failures, don't focus on what is broken, but check to see what is still working. Then use that to work out how you are going to get out of the problem.

You are down one level with your comment. There is a super state that controls most of the world, and they appoint the governments of countries to benefit themselves. They control countries by creating controlling states within that country. Westminster, Washington, and the CCP are just three examples of these. All of these politicians are supra-national, and not national. It is almost impossible to get elected unless you are approved by the ruling dynasties.

but who gets the money they make?

Of course they don't, they want to extend the recovery period, and escalate the problems from infection. That way sheeple will believe that a poisonous vaccine is essential. Wearing a mask pushes some of your ( possibly ) virus infected exhalation up into your eyes, this spreads the infection into a different part of your body. They want you to use "sanitisers" as well to destroy the bacteria on your skin that neutralises the virus. I'm surprised that they don't want you to inject the virus into your body - Oh wait! Isn't that what a vaccine does?

The real social distancing comes from the wealthy elite buying islands and large estates, and living a long distance from Hilary Clinton's deplorables. The latter are having to live in cars and tents amidst human detritus, including faeces, in cities like San Francisco.

Corona viruses have been around since the 1930s, so they aren't something new to out immune systems.

The most optimistic of the proposed vaccines seems to predict a 40% success rate. Natural immunity has a 100% success rate in healthy people, and it is free. I you aren't a money Pharmer, which option do you think is better for society?

Corona viruses were first discovered in the 1930s, so this one is not really new. The big difference is the way that the bankers and globalists have latched onto it to expand their eugenics through vaccination programmes, and to force an economic reset to reduce nationalism and create larger global corporations. It is estimated that the memory R-cells that are retained in the immune systems of people who were infected by the SARS 2002/3 epidemic, and still active, and probably give 50% of many populations immunity to this virus.

If you reflect on the various government actions, and the distorted statistical results, you can get a feel for the real motives. For example, wearing face masks deflects the exhaled virus up into the eyes, and this helps to spread the infection in recovering patients. You don't need medical advice and stats to know this is true. Just wear a mask, and think about the effect it has on your face and eyes.

"Stay at home - save lives" is a nice catchy slogan, but it isn't true. I can think of several better ones -

" Spread immunity, join the community!
" Vitamin D - the health key"
" Be the healthy one - get out in the sun"
" Stop the slaughter - drink more water"

In the medical world, a healthy person seems to be one who has regular 'flu vaccines, and uses drugs suggested by the money Pharmers to stabilise and avoid normal virus exposure. Many of them seem to smoke, and I see quite a few obese care workers. None of those habits will make a person healthy.

Here is an article on the difference between natural and refined sugars

https://www.cancercenter.com/community/blog/2016/08/natural-vs-refined-sugars-what-is-the-difference

It just shows the virus for what it is - no. 36 on the historic severity list. The real pandemic is the creeping virus of the globalists that is screwing up food supplies, and stripping wealth from countries and the people. We are not longer capitalist societies, as you can't have capitalism without capital.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRo5Avw5Qp8&t=2528s

This is another interesting discussion, and it includes some interesting facts about the way we are destroying healthy food. He gives the example of ducks in public parks that are starting to have deformities. This is the result of them being fed on our modern bread.

Are there still members who don't have him on ignore?

There is also a ruling in one state that no official can attend a state function dressed as a penis.. Somebody must have known something about state officials.

I think there is a serious threat to the health of politicians who debate the latest rules and directives. In the UK, they are now mandating that masks should be worn when visiting aquariums.