austrian state printing btc?!?!
|
|
|
wow, dropped from #48 to out of top 100 in 6 days ($). has it ever done that this quickly?
|
|
|
69.9 on CMC
i will empty the other half of this great bottle of rum if we hit 70% tonight.
|
|
|
reaching 70% dominance. on cmc, which was always rigged in favour of alts.
BTC dominance was always over 80% until the BCH split happened. From that moment on. Or better to say a bit before that, was always uncertainty. Not just BCH steal dominance but also ETH, which many considered as BTC version two. But it ended just as a platform to crowdfund founds with illegal securities. And it seems it lasted for two whole years. There was an explosion of ICOs at that time. The BCH fork wasn’t a driver. From end of 2017 Feb to mid 2017 Jun, BTC dominance plunged from over 85% to below 40%. https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/#dominance-percentageThe beginning of 2017 is when blocks started becoming persistently full. https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-size.htmlThe loss of dominance was due neither to BCH nor ICOs. 'Twas the Blockalypse. Or more pecisely, Blockalypse I. why did i know you couldn´t resist to post here... ? full blocks are ok. fee market is ok. shitcoins are not ok. and bch/bsv... oh dear... i guess they solved the full blocks problem. a blockchain no fucker is using will not have full blocks...
|
|
|
Huh? So you are trying to say altcoins have all the growth potential and Bitcoin is headed for an early grave? i am a mountainbiker. bitcoin and shitcoins are NOT on the same bike. eventhough i like the idea of this meme, while btc might as well be on a bike, alts are ants trying to cross a 1 mile wide scotch tape.
|
|
|
Let's be real, altcoin investing can be profitable.
Just no need to be greedy.
as long as it is an altcoin WITH an use-case. i dont think they exist.
|
|
|
I know you'll hate me for this but is this the right time to get some shitcoins? Maybe with the 0.5% of the crypto portfolio? It can surely go down a lot more but what if It goes up? XMR and LTC looks so cheap. Especially LTC. Shiet it is 0.007. I dumped mine at somewhere around 0.016 or 0.018 Wew! Feelsgood man. I can get back more than double of what I sold now but not sure If i really want them. There will be a price point, it will become so cheap, some people won't be able to resist, no matter how pointless and shitty these alts are. It is all part of the speculation. Maybe It is better to wait for the BTC ATH before making that decision and only then invest %1-3 in shitcoins. *No need to mention: the aim is to get more bitcoins without getting bamboozled by the altcoin hodlers. ** I have that fuckface on ignore and I never ever read the post that quoted him. I advise you to do the same. wtf you are talking about. shit that goes to zero eventually looks cheap for sure. if you invest 1-3% in shitcoins, you might as well send those coins to charity. or cash em out and visit a casino. there you at least have a chance of winning...
|
|
|
altcoin bagholders are getting rekt royally.
reaching 70% dominance. on cmc, which was always rigged in favour of alts. alts get killed despite it is the only thing the majority of shitty exchanges make money with. (check coinbase). i am sure they are trying desperately to keep their business model alive.
since it is not retail investors who are fueling the btc uptrend the last couple of months (check google trends for "buy bitcoin")
it may just be shitcoiners that finally got a clue.
70% may not sound like overwhelming defeat but look at this:
bitcoin: 68.8 ETH: 7.75 XRP: 4.33 Bcash: 1.93 LTC: 1.86 Monero: 0.52
those are the top six. that is total defeat.
|
|
|
I am coming out, I am gay nazi and my synagogue are banning me from entry.
Man you are really funny. Don't quote him, a lot of people here have this scumbag's hate speak on ignore. all he wants is to produce an ongoing connection between his racism and hate to this forum. everyone quoting him is helping this fucked up retarded arsehole wanker. i doubt he is genuine. i personally ALWAYS login before reading anything in here, just to be sure i am not confronted with this fuckers shit who is no 1 on ignore list. dont feed the fuckers.
|
|
|
wtf those dumps?
who is trying to lose money here on purpose?
in addition they get weaker and weaker. if price manages to get a break out instead of a fake out it will be epic.
disclaimer: I have panic sold 8% of my stash end of june. with all those up and downs i got lost when to buy back or if at all or not. i thought we are going down to sub $8k and cannot really believe in new yearly highs. but there is some real bullishness and it makes me wonder.
tldr: as always, no clue other than hodl and enjoy the show.
|
|
|
Golly
I guess these alts really can go to zero.
Which one(s)? We have a lot of zombie coins, that's for sure. we live in times of ZIRP & NIRP, so I guess these shitcoins might as well go sub zero, too.
|
|
|
I wonder: Would a Trezor survive liquid nitrogen?
Reason I'm asking is I think I might get my head frozen after all when I die. Tattoo "I have bitcoins", include a couple of Trezors in my mouth with a good PIN, and in a thousand years when Bitcoin is worth infinite amounts it would be a reasonable reward to dethaw my brain and put me on a top of line body.
Hm....
that is the future! everyone dying will put a btc address on his grave stone and pretend to have the keys "in his brain". future grave robbers will have fun trying to figure out who was genuine. also: imagine the plebs trying this with IOTA. or Bcash/BSV
|
|
|
12181,- $ Wir sind durch das seid ihr. alle miteinander. grüne kerzen am morgen....
|
|
|
A good day.
Sold 30% of my assets for a +24% profit.
Best of luck everyone.
yes, good day. hodled 100% of my assets for a +8710% (unrealized) profit.
|
|
|
Find me a MW coin without dev penalty, that is decentralized and hasn’t fucked up the economics, and you will have my attention
Are people still fucking drooling over Mumble Wimble grin shit? I never understood why everyone had such a boner over it, no hardware wallet support, no gui wallet, pain to fucking actually use the damn thing. "use" and "altcoin" do not go together.
|
|
|
I know bitcoin, and you, litecoin are no bitcoin. Of course A is not equal to B, but they do share similarities in protocol design and proposed use/implementation. I'd be very interested to hear your take on the differences between litecoin and bitcoin, jiggy. Just like you really don't give any shits about what I think about litecoin, I don't give any shits about such topic. I'm beginning to lose my patience with you, jiggy; are you able to have a rational, back and forth discussion without immediately going on the defensive and resorting to inflammatory accusations? Stop proclaiming that you're the arbiter of my intentions, you aren't. First of all, you already failed and refused to engage in genuine responses (rather than poo pooing like a typical troll/shill no coiner) regarding your previous quasi-irrelevant dumbass no coiner / bitcoin naysaying points that I already responded to.. and further, this is not a thread to compare and contrast various shit coins. Helrow? Refuse to engage or respond? I'm on mobile most of the time, which makes it difficult to format long posts and reply to multiple users. With regard to our previous discussion, I was asking questions while you would answer; you never actually responded by asking me any specific questions of your own. If you would like me to answer some specific questions or provide information of some kind, please, ask away! But if you consider the one aspect of bitcoin that you proclaim to NOT accept or understand, you might want to look into network effects, but no, you claim to not understand or believe that such network effects are important in the discussion, Incorrect, as I specifically acknowledged the network effect and first mover advantage that bitcoin has, in my previous posts. instead you want to get caught up in distracting discussions about slight technical differences that may or may not exist Protocol differences between projects definitely exist, you should be aware of this. and in the end don't even matter in the scheme of things.. because bitcoin is not broken, so you have to overcome that presumption of brokenness first, I never claimed the bitcoin was broken in any way, you're simply being disingenuous. and you also have to show that your shitty ass project that you want to tout, whether litecoin or some other random project, whatever it is has sufficiently overcome whatever supposedly broken part of bitcoin that it is going to matter, instead of just being possibly absorbed into bitcoin as a tweak. I'm not touting anything, I'm asking basic questions about the differences in protocol between projects. Specifically, I've asked what makes bitcoin "better" or "best". If your answer to this question is "it's more popular and it got there first", that's fine. after 10 years of uptime, uncontested superioirity amongst all other "projects" aka shitcoins, various attacks from within the community (forks) after a full blown civil war, you really think we sit here and wait for guys like you to show up and compare bitcoin vs obvious scamcoins as to vanilla vs chocolate flavour and gladly engage in a discussion about this stupidity? we do not need to proof to you why bitcoin rules. it does rule and if you think other projects are better you could either fuck off and post in those specific forums with people that also don´t get it, or you could carefully and nicely explain your reasoning and hope anyone in here would take the time and listen and give feedback (which i doubt). but moving in here and asking questions the 1000th time that we all went though years ago while keeping your nose up as if you know what you are talking about... ...will not convince anyone in here. learn about bitcoin and come back afterwards.
|
|
|
aus gut unterrichteter quelle habe ich erfahren, dass die deutsche börse plant in den handel mit bitcoin einzusteigen.
|
|
|
wir müssen uns keine sorgen machen wegen zukünftiger bitcoin kurse. die zentralbanken unterstützen unseren lieblingscoin so gut sie können: https://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/unternehmen/ezb-mario-draghi-erwaegt-neue-geldflut-im-november-a-1278114.htmlWie der SPIEGEL aus dem Umfeld der Notenbank erfuhr, will Draghi bis November die umstrittenen Ankäufe von Staatsanleihen wieder aufnehmen, um die fragile Konjunktur in der Eurozone zu stützen. Draghi will erreichen, dass Unternehmen mehr investieren und Verbraucher mehr konsumieren. Darüber hinaus will Draghi das Inflationsziel der Notenbank lockern. Draghi will ferner erreichen, dass die EZB längere Zeit höhere Inflationsraten zulassen darf, wenn sie die Marke zuvor über Jahre unterschritten hat. alles in butter! man könnte fast meinen die notenbanker sind selbst bitcoin hodler.
|
|
|
|