What's your opinion of gun control?

[Dem-artini]

I strongly disagree with the idea citizens to have weapons to their homes under the rationale that will protect themselves and their families. Unfortunately it has proved that this is not true when people with psychological problems or teenagers bloodshed workplaces and schools. The weapons must be held only by professionals (police officers, port authorities and military troops) but also when they demobilize should not be allowed by law to have guns at their homes. If states want to protect their citizens must impose very strict laws for criminals and no let the victims to take the law in their hands.

I don't like when people say these statements not knowing the official statistics. Kill with illegal weapons. The legal weapons used only for self-defense. Look at the statistics of legal weapons and then will discuss this topic.

I am convinced that the killer or maniac will not kill pristoleta with which you registered. But, if you allow people to buy weapons for self-defense, the crime rate will decrease.

Exactly why the USA has the lowest crime rate in the world.

Just read this forum. Free weapons for all?
How the fuck can you give people who belive in reptile aliens and moon nazis weapons??

But well the US deserves every single mass shootings they had and will have.

Believe me if a person wants to kill someone he'll do it. The most common murder weapon is a knife. You propose to ban selling knives? In the presence of a gun you have a chance to confront the offender with the knife.

[criptix]

I strongly disagree with the idea citizens to have weapons to their homes under the rationale that will protect themselves and their families. Unfortunately it has proved that this is not true when people with psychological problems or teenagers bloodshed workplaces and schools. The weapons must be held only by professionals (police officers, port authorities and military troops) but also when they demobilize should not be allowed by law to have guns at their homes. If states want to protect their citizens must impose very strict laws for criminals and no let the victims to take the law in their hands.

I don't like when people say these statements not knowing the official statistics. Kill with illegal weapons. The legal weapons used only for self-defense. Look at the statistics of legal weapons and then will discuss this topic.

I am convinced that the killer or maniac will not kill pristoleta with which you registered. But, if you allow people to buy weapons for self-defense, the crime rate will decrease.

Exactly why the USA has the lowest crime rate in the world.

Just read this forum. Free weapons for all?
How the fuck can you give people who belive in reptile aliens and moon nazis weapons??

But well the US deserves every single mass shootings they had and will have.

Believe me if a person wants to kill someone he'll do it. The most common murder weapon is a knife. You propose to ban selling knives? In the presence of a gun you have a chance to confront the offender with the knife.

Of course, knives are totaly the weapon of choice if a criminal wants to kill someone, especially in the us.

Duh.

https://www.quandl.com/data/FBI/WEAPONS11-US-Murders-by-Weapon-Type

[C10H15N]

...the US deserves every single mass shootings they had and will have.

Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?

Those who want to shoot others don't really want their intended victims to shoot back.   

[criptix]

...the US deserves every single mass shootings they had and will have.

Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?

Those who want to shoot others don't really want their intended victims to shoot back.   

And you think it would help that every crazy person can get a weapon without problems?
And if you are white and dont look like a wannabe crip member you will get a weapon without ID too....

Atleast do some checks and centralize the laws about gun ownership.

[BADecker]

...the US deserves every single mass shootings they had and will have.

Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?

Those who want to shoot others don't really want their intended victims to shoot back.   

And you think it would help that every crazy person can get a weapon without problems?
And if you are white and dont look like a wannabe crip member you will get a weapon without ID too....

Atleast do some checks and centralize the laws about gun ownership.

Yes. It would help. Here's how and why.

If the crazy people got guns and started hurting other people, the rest of the people would get guns and get rid of the crazy people. Then there wouldn't be any expense for the rest of us, because the asylums would be empty.

If a family had members who were crazy, and they loved their crazy members, they would make sure their crazies didn't get a hold of guns.



The problem with everyone walking around with guns is, we aren't used to it... like in the days of the old West. We would have to get used to it again. Widespread guns, carried in the open, would breed respect among everyone. Things like racism would disappear. The gun would make everyone equal. Why? The expense would be too great to pick on someone with a gun, without thinking about what you were doing ahead of time.

[Dem-artini]

...the US deserves every single mass shootings they had and will have.

Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?

Those who want to shoot others don't really want their intended victims to shoot back.   

And you think it would help that every crazy person can get a weapon without problems?
And if you are white and dont look like a wannabe crip member you will get a weapon without ID too....

Atleast do some checks and centralize the laws about gun ownership.

Yes. It would help. Here's how and why.

If the crazy people got guns and started hurting other people, the rest of the people would get guns and get rid of the crazy people. Then there wouldn't be any expense for the rest of us, because the asylums would be empty.

If a family had members who were crazy, and they loved their crazy members, they would make sure their crazies didn't get a hold of guns.



The problem with everyone walking around with guns is, we aren't used to it... like in the days of the old West. We would have to get used to it again. Widespread guns, carried in the open, would breed respect among everyone. Things like racism would disappear. The gun would make everyone equal. Why? The expense would be too great to pick on someone with a gun, without thinking about what you were doing ahead of time.

I do not understand why someone should be interested in the question I have weapons or not. It's my choice and my personal right. If you are afraid of what I will use it against you prove it. Your thoughts are not interesting to me.

[BADecker]

...the US deserves every single mass shootings they had and will have.

Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?

Those who want to shoot others don't really want their intended victims to shoot back.   

And you think it would help that every crazy person can get a weapon without problems?
And if you are white and dont look like a wannabe crip member you will get a weapon without ID too....

Atleast do some checks and centralize the laws about gun ownership.

Yes. It would help. Here's how and why.

If the crazy people got guns and started hurting other people, the rest of the people would get guns and get rid of the crazy people. Then there wouldn't be any expense for the rest of us, because the asylums would be empty.

If a family had members who were crazy, and they loved their crazy members, they would make sure their crazies didn't get a hold of guns.



The problem with everyone walking around with guns is, we aren't used to it... like in the days of the old West. We would have to get used to it again. Widespread guns, carried in the open, would breed respect among everyone. Things like racism would disappear. The gun would make everyone equal. Why? The expense would be too great to pick on someone with a gun, without thinking about what you were doing ahead of time.

I do not understand why someone should be interested in the question I have weapons or not. It's my choice and my personal right. If you are afraid of what I will use it against you prove it. Your thoughts are not interesting to me.

In a society of people, certain rules regarding public activity are necessary.

If you are in your own house, on your own land, you can do anything you want. You can shoot your guns like crazy, if you want... as long as the bullets do not go beyond your property line.

When you are in public, keep that gun holstered, unless there is dire need to unholster it, or unless you are making a trade or showing it off.

There are those who will not follow the rules regarding carrying a gun in public. That is why everyone needs to have a gun in public... to protect himself/herself (and their kids) from the crooks who don't willingly obey the gun rules in public. And crooks there will be.

As has been said, when seconds count, police are minutes away.

[Sithara007]

Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?

In addition to that, the majority of the shooting attacks occur in states which are dominated by the Democrats (such as California and Washington). Why there are no mass shootings occurring in Oklahoma or West Virginia?

[JofryTheKing]

I have a house hunting rifles and I can use them to protect themselves, their families and their possessions. So I think it can and should have the right to do each. But laws prohibiting direction completely to another. They want to deprive people of weapons.

[DrVaribo]

I can not understand all this fuss around with a gun problem. You look at the statistics of car accidents because there are so many victims as if there is a war on the roads. So we have to worry about other problems and not weapons.

[chachaa]

Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?

In addition to that, the majority of the shooting attacks occur in states which are dominated by the Democrats (such as California and Washington). Why there are no mass shootings occurring in Oklahoma or West Virginia?

The bulk of the executions going on in the zones free of weapons. Where the offender knows that he will not get a response of resistance. This underlines the importance of the right to arms. The more weapons among the population the less crime.

[GooCust04]

Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?

In addition to that, the majority of the shooting attacks occur in states which are dominated by the Democrats (such as California and Washington). Why there are no mass shootings occurring in Oklahoma or West Virginia?

The bulk of the executions going on in the zones free of weapons. Where the offender knows that he will not get a response of resistance. This underlines the importance of the right to arms. The more weapons among the population the less crime.

Never offenders did not commit the crime of registered weapons. Always there was a black market to acquire all that is needed. That is why I also think that the legalization of weapons does not change the situation for the worse.

[Alfa123]

Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?

In addition to that, the majority of the shooting attacks occur in states which are dominated by the Democrats (such as California and Washington). Why there are no mass shootings occurring in Oklahoma or West Virginia?

The bulk of the executions going on in the zones free of weapons. Where the offender knows that he will not get a response of resistance. This underlines the importance of the right to arms. The more weapons among the population the less crime.

Never offenders did not commit the crime of registered weapons. Always there was a black market to acquire all that is needed. That is why I also think that the legalization of weapons does not change the situation for the worse.

I agree with you. Moreover. I'm sure that all of the attacks on the law on weapons come from corrupt politicians who are afraid of their own people with weapons. They don't care how many people die importantly by the sleep

[E-shipper]

Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?

In addition to that, the majority of the shooting attacks occur in states which are dominated by the Democrats (such as California and Washington). Why there are no mass shootings occurring in Oklahoma or West Virginia?

The bulk of the executions going on in the zones free of weapons. Where the offender knows that he will not get a response of resistance. This underlines the importance of the right to arms. The more weapons among the population the less crime.

Never offenders did not commit the crime of registered weapons. Always there was a black market to acquire all that is needed. That is why I also think that the legalization of weapons does not change the situation for the worse.

I agree with you. Moreover. I'm sure that all of the attacks on the law on weapons come from corrupt politicians who are afraid of their own people with weapons. They don't care how many people die importantly by the sleep

So these political fatty snout to fear not only for their stolen wealth, but also for his life. People who lose their patience, looking at the mess, can go to any politician or bureaucrat, and to call to account for the full program.

[pseexh]

Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?

In addition to that, the majority of the shooting attacks occur in states which are dominated by the Democrats (such as California and Washington). Why there are no mass shootings occurring in Oklahoma or West Virginia?

The bulk of the executions going on in the zones free of weapons. Where the offender knows that he will not get a response of resistance. This underlines the importance of the right to arms. The more weapons among the population the less crime.

Never offenders did not commit the crime of registered weapons. Always there was a black market to acquire all that is needed. That is why I also think that the legalization of weapons does not change the situation for the worse.

I agree with you. Moreover. I'm sure that all of the attacks on the law on weapons come from corrupt politicians who are afraid of their own people with weapons. They don't care how many people die importantly by the sleep

So these political fatty snout to fear not only for their stolen wealth, but also for his life. People who lose their patience, looking at the mess, can go to any politician or bureaucrat, and to call to account for the full program.

This fear. Let's see, the liberal in the country gun laws, the more democracy in the country. Switzerland is the most armed country in the world. Look like there the power belongs to the people? And the crime rate is not high.

[BADecker]

Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?

In addition to that, the majority of the shooting attacks occur in states which are dominated by the Democrats (such as California and Washington). Why there are no mass shootings occurring in Oklahoma or West Virginia?

The bulk of the executions going on in the zones free of weapons. Where the offender knows that he will not get a response of resistance. This underlines the importance of the right to arms. The more weapons among the population the less crime.

Never offenders did not commit the crime of registered weapons. Always there was a black market to acquire all that is needed. That is why I also think that the legalization of weapons does not change the situation for the worse.

I agree with you. Moreover. I'm sure that all of the attacks on the law on weapons come from corrupt politicians who are afraid of their own people with weapons. They don't care how many people die importantly by the sleep

So these political fatty snout to fear not only for their stolen wealth, but also for his life. People who lose their patience, looking at the mess, can go to any politician or bureaucrat, and to call to account for the full program.

This fear. Let's see, the liberal in the country gun laws, the more democracy in the country. Switzerland is the most armed country in the world. Look like there the power belongs to the people? And the crime rate is not high.

The birth rate isn't high in Switzerland either. When there are only a few Swiss left, their guns won't stop the Muslim immigrants, and the population will grow again... with Muslims. Then there will be lots of gun control in Switzerland.

[varyspro]

Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?

In addition to that, the majority of the shooting attacks occur in states which are dominated by the Democrats (such as California and Washington). Why there are no mass shootings occurring in Oklahoma or West Virginia?

The bulk of the executions going on in the zones free of weapons. Where the offender knows that he will not get a response of resistance. This underlines the importance of the right to arms. The more weapons among the population the less crime.

Never offenders did not commit the crime of registered weapons. Always there was a black market to acquire all that is needed. That is why I also think that the legalization of weapons does not change the situation for the worse.

I agree with you. Moreover. I'm sure that all of the attacks on the law on weapons come from corrupt politicians who are afraid of their own people with weapons. They don't care how many people die importantly by the sleep

So these political fatty snout to fear not only for their stolen wealth, but also for his life. People who lose their patience, looking at the mess, can go to any politician or bureaucrat, and to call to account for the full program.

This fear. Let's see, the liberal in the country gun laws, the more democracy in the country. Switzerland is the most armed country in the world. Look like there the power belongs to the people? And the crime rate is not high.

The birth rate isn't high in Switzerland either. When there are only a few Swiss left, their guns won't stop the Muslim immigrants, and the population will grow again... with Muslims. Then there will be lots of gun control in Switzerland.

I don't think that can be discussed about the use of weapons against migrants. Only when they commit crimes. The weapon is almost every citizen of Switzerland because they are all reservists in case of war are bound to come to the Assembly point.

[BADecker]

Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?

In addition to that, the majority of the shooting attacks occur in states which are dominated by the Democrats (such as California and Washington). Why there are no mass shootings occurring in Oklahoma or West Virginia?

The bulk of the executions going on in the zones free of weapons. Where the offender knows that he will not get a response of resistance. This underlines the importance of the right to arms. The more weapons among the population the less crime.

Never offenders did not commit the crime of registered weapons. Always there was a black market to acquire all that is needed. That is why I also think that the legalization of weapons does not change the situation for the worse.

I agree with you. Moreover. I'm sure that all of the attacks on the law on weapons come from corrupt politicians who are afraid of their own people with weapons. They don't care how many people die importantly by the sleep

So these political fatty snout to fear not only for their stolen wealth, but also for his life. People who lose their patience, looking at the mess, can go to any politician or bureaucrat, and to call to account for the full program.

This fear. Let's see, the liberal in the country gun laws, the more democracy in the country. Switzerland is the most armed country in the world. Look like there the power belongs to the people? And the crime rate is not high.

The birth rate isn't high in Switzerland either. When there are only a few Swiss left, their guns won't stop the Muslim immigrants, and the population will grow again... with Muslims. Then there will be lots of gun control in Switzerland.

I don't think that can be discussed about the use of weapons against migrants. Only when they commit crimes. The weapon is almost every citizen of Switzerland because they are all reservists in case of war are bound to come to the Assembly point.

Why not? Guns are for hunting. But they are also for protection.

With the low birth rate in Switzerland, soon most of the people will be foreigners. They will want to take guns away from the Swiss people who remain. There will be too many of them for the Swiss people to fight, even with the guns.

That is what gun control is all about... taking the guns away. Usually governments do it to their citizens. In the case of Switzerland, it will be the foreigners. Some Swiss will fight, but they will lose.

[yugo23]

I don't think that can be discussed about the use of weapons against migrants. Only when they commit crimes. The weapon is almost every citizen of Switzerland because they are all reservists in case of war are bound to come to the Assembly point.

Why not? Guns are for hunting. But they are also for protection.

With the low birth rate in Switzerland, soon most of the people will be foreigners. They will want to take guns away from the Swiss people who remain. There will be too many of them for the Swiss people to fight, even with the guns.

That is what gun control is all about... taking the guns away. Usually governments do it to their citizens. In the case of Switzerland, it will be the foreigners. Some Swiss will fight, but they will lose.

Protection means aggression.

Migrants aren't aggressing you. They're fleeing the war you started that's all.
Technically they're the one in need of protection... From you --'

[BADecker]

I don't think that can be discussed about the use of weapons against migrants. Only when they commit crimes. The weapon is almost every citizen of Switzerland because they are all reservists in case of war are bound to come to the Assembly point.

Why not? Guns are for hunting. But they are also for protection.

With the low birth rate in Switzerland, soon most of the people will be foreigners. They will want to take guns away from the Swiss people who remain. There will be too many of them for the Swiss people to fight, even with the guns.

That is what gun control is all about... taking the guns away. Usually governments do it to their citizens. In the case of Switzerland, it will be the foreigners. Some Swiss will fight, but they will lose.

Protection means aggression.

Migrants aren't aggressing you. They're fleeing the war you started that's all.
Technically they're the one in need of protection... From you --'

When they get used to their new freedom, they will try to adapt yours to theirs. You will fight.