What's your opinion of gun control?

[Wilikon]

ACTIVE SHOOTER AT LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE – At Least 2 Dead, Gun-Free Zone



http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/04/shooting-lackland-air-force-base-victims-reported-shooter-large/

[1714210740]

1714210740

[1714210740]

1714210740

[1714210740]

1714210740

[1714210740]

1714210740

[1714210740]

1714210740

[Wilikon]

Huffington Post Now Apparently Hiring Stoners To Write About Gun Policy



Have you ever read something so incoherent that you simply assume that the person who wrote it must have been high out of their minds?

That’s what it felt like to read a recent article on the Huffington Post by Justin Cormi, where he attempts to assert that lawful citizens using firearms for self-defense, like, denies criminals of their constitutional rights, man.

    The main problem with the notion of self-defense is it imposes on justice, for everyone has the right for a fair trial. Therefore, using a firearm to defend oneself is not legal because if the attacker is killed, he or she is devoid of his or her rights.

Cormi’s disjointed rant gets even more incoherent and illogical from there, but his basic premise is stunning.

He’s effectively arguing that violent criminals have more rights than their innocent victims, and that the act of defending your life using lethal force is illegal.

This is not only factually  incorrect as a legal matter, but is also at odds with thousands of years of human history, the morality of most modern and ancient cultures, and the theology of every major religion.

Put simply, Cormi couldn’t be much more wrong if he was trying to argue that “green” is a smell.

Where do they find these clowns, and why do they give them a voice?


http://bearingarms.com/2016/04/27/huffington-post-now-apparently-hiring-stoners-write-gun-policy/

[Spendulus]

Huffington Post Now Apparently Hiring Stoners To Write About Gun Policy



Have you ever read something so incoherent that you simply assume that the person who wrote it must have been high out of their minds?

That’s what it felt like to read a recent article on the Huffington Post by Justin Cormi, where he attempts to assert that lawful citizens using firearms for self-defense, like, denies criminals of their constitutional rights, man.

    The main problem with the notion of self-defense is it imposes on justice, for everyone has the right for a fair trial. Therefore, using a firearm to defend oneself is not legal because if the attacker is killed, he or she is devoid of his or her rights.

Cormi’s disjointed rant gets even more incoherent and illogical from there, but his basic premise is stunning.

He’s effectively arguing that violent criminals have more rights than their innocent victims, and that the act of defending your life using lethal force is illegal.

This is not only factually  incorrect as a legal matter, but is also at odds with thousands of years of human history, the morality of most modern and ancient cultures, and the theology of every major religion.

Put simply, Cormi couldn’t be much more wrong if he was trying to argue that “green” is a smell.

Where do they find these clowns, and why do they give them a voice?

Because, see, those criminals can be GIVEN THE VOTE, and then the Democrats can WORK FOR THEIR CAUSE AS AN OPPRESSED MINORITY!

[hasan7779]

Gun control is to comply with Newton's third law. When the gun is fired gun it go backwards. It is aiming for a strong hand to control the trigger is pulled.

[tabas]

Why people have gun primarily for self defense. But most of them abusing the use of gun for extortion and other crime related incidents. But I think, a country would find it hard to implement this kind of bill.

[TECSHARE]

Why people have gun primarily for self defense. But most of them abusing the use of gun for extortion and other crime related incidents. But I think, a country would find it hard to implement this kind of bill.

MOST of them? Uhh, no. Most legal gun owners are law abiding citizens.

[Akupuniard]

Why people have gun primarily for self defense. But most of them abusing the use of gun for extortion and other crime related incidents. But I think, a country would find it hard to implement this kind of bill.

It's true, using guns against people is so bad and goverment in many countries understand it. But in other countries that allows guns i think will be a lot of incidents anyway.

[Spendulus]

Why people have gun primarily for self defense. But most of them abusing the use of gun for extortion and other crime related incidents. But I think, a country would find it hard to implement this kind of bill.

The number of gun owners, both lawful and unlawful and in between, who use guns for some criminal activity is probably one in a thousand, or even much less.

That's in the USA.  I would think in places like UK and France, it would be much different.   Of course that's not considering the huge number of people who report "I have no guns" who actually have the secret family cache buried closeby....

[BADecker]

Why people have gun primarily for self defense. But most of them abusing the use of gun for extortion and other crime related incidents. But I think, a country would find it hard to implement this kind of bill.

MOST of them? Uhh, no. Most legal gun owners are law abiding citizens.

Yeah definitely true. Most legal gun owners are the ones who obeys the law because they can't get the permit if the authority doesn't investigate to them before giving them the rights to bring guns.

And most lawful owners don't need a permit. But they get one anyway, because they don't know how to answer government when government comes after them legally.

[Jasad]

Guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is to kill.
I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it.
Guns are especially dangerous in the hands of people who don't know how to use them (i.e., kids and teenagers) as well as those who are mentally ill and/or have a temper problem.
Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent.
After the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, support for gun control increased dramatically.

Generally in America, the support for gun control has outweighed the support for gun rights.
Are gun control laws constitutional?
What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms?

i think,gun control is good for us,for people who dont need any self protection,because there was so many police and we can call them easy as we call our family,and in my opinion,why must be have a gun if we have create good security in our home. and i think gun control will pretect people from wrong use of that gun.

[Saksham]

The ONLY thing standing between law abiding and honest AmeriKans.. and their government THAT WANT'S TO ENSLAVE THEM... is the fact the OWN GUNS... The founding fathers KNEW that a FASCIST GOVERNMENT could not enslave the people if they were ARMED... but the stupid... "I'd never own a gun crowd" is so hall bent on giving up their rights "for the children" or some such stupid reason, that they are willing to make it possible for the only guns in AmeriKa to be in the hands of the Police, the Military and the THUGS... and when that happens... THEY ARE ALL THE SAME PEOPLE

[sempak]

This is a good idea. too dangerous weapon used by the wrong person. thirsty there are specific regulations that prohibit the use of weapons. too risky weapon used in the present. The world needs peace. weapons are not needed in public life. arms only for military purposes and security !!!

[BADecker]

Sometimes I wonder where Obama really stands. He expresses formally that he wants gun control. He even makes laws that move towards the gun control idea somewhat. But all this does is to scare people so that they get more and bigger and more powerful guns. Didn't he know that this would happen if he made all this anti-gun ruckus?

[TECSHARE]

i think,gun control is good for us,for people who dont need any self protection,because there was so many police and we can call them easy as we call our family,and in my opinion,why must be have a gun if we have create good security in our home. and i think gun control will pretect people from wrong use of that gun.

Who are you to declare no one needs self protection? I am sure you feel safe in your nice little homogenized suburb. Move to Detroit and tell me more about how you don't need a firearm. Also if you are ever robbed or assaulted, make your you ask the assailant to kindly wait 5 to 20 minutes for the police to arrive before robbing, raping, and or killing you and your family, as that is the average response time. You are living in a fantasy land, you don't have a right to put everyone else in danger to preserve your fantasy.

This is a good idea. too dangerous weapon used by the wrong person. thirsty there are specific regulations that prohibit the use of weapons. too risky weapon used in the present. The world needs peace. weapons are not needed in public life. arms only for military purposes and security !!!

So the state should have a complete monopoly on force? That has never ended badly before has it? You gun control freaks talk about lofty notions of peace and harmony as if guns cause the violence and humanity has evolved past it, and if only we could get rid of the guns we would all be free from it! Sorry but humans are still the same violent hairless apes we have been for thousands of years, and your delusions of humanity some how evolving past this at our current stage is extremely dangerous. More dangerous than law abiding people owning firearms.

[hangar18]

The black market for guns is already a losing war. Gun control would apply only to those who choose to follow the gun control laws. So now the only civilians without guns are those who choose to follow the law

[nihilnegativum]

Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent.

So why not give them nukes? That would even stop the violence.

[Barbut]

There is good and bad things in this world. Simply as that. So guns are not good, I dont need to have opinion about it at all. And anyone who says guns are good have no brain, there is no logic to even talk about it. How someone mean to plant flowers of peace with guns in hands? Its the truth.

[Spendulus]

There is good and bad things in this world. Simply as that. So guns are not good, I dont need to have opinion about it at all. And anyone who says guns are good have no brain, there is no logic to even talk about it. How someone mean to plant flowers of peace with guns in hands? Its the truth.

Tell you want, dude.  When you and I are in a plane that crashes in Alaska, and I have my 308 hunting rifle, my 22 rifle, and a handy handgun, you will get none of the food I kill.

Because "there are good and bad things in this world.  Simple as that.  So guns are not good.  I dont need to have opinion..."

[Hugroll]

i believe that if the wrong person doesnt have access to the guns, then all these horror stories wont come to life. the thing is though, that almost everyone has the right to a gun ownership in america. imo if they just make private owned guns illegal, everything would be solved.

[Hugroll]

There is good and bad things in this world. Simply as that. So guns are not good, I dont need to have opinion about it at all. And anyone who says guns are good have no brain, there is no logic to even talk about it. How someone mean to plant flowers of peace with guns in hands? Its the truth.

Tell you want, dude.  When you and I are in a plane that crashes in Alaska, and I have my 308 hunting rifle, my 22 rifle, and a handy handgun, you will get none of the food I kill.

Because "there are good and bad things in this world.  Simple as that.  So guns are not good.  I dont need to have opinion..."

I dont understand why you would bring your guns onto an airplane. you wouldnt even be allowed so once you get stuck in alaska you and the gun hater are on the same level.