|
|
|
|
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Evil-Knievel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1168
|
|
April 08, 2016, 06:14:05 AM |
|
Yes, we have to rethink it then. Thanks for looking that up!
|
|
|
|
Evil-Knievel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1168
|
|
April 08, 2016, 06:16:29 AM |
|
Any suggestions for a different "ticker"?
|
|
|
|
|
dumple
Member
Offline
Activity: 170
Merit: 10
|
|
April 08, 2016, 06:21:42 AM |
|
ELSC
Can double as ELaStiC, and also ELastic Super Computer
|
|
|
|
Evil-Knievel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1168
|
|
April 08, 2016, 06:59:11 AM |
|
Good ideas :-) We could collect come more and then make a public poll?
|
|
|
|
xibeijan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
|
|
April 08, 2016, 07:01:13 AM |
|
They both periodically send "proof-of-works" that prove that they are working
This step could mean a significant overhead while performing the POW using ELC because they have to do additional proof of works beyond the one you are interested in. On the other side of it, the ELC network could be huge.
|
|
|
|
Evil-Knievel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1168
|
|
April 08, 2016, 07:08:01 AM |
|
They both periodically send "proof-of-works" that prove that they are working
This step could mean a significant overhead while performing the POW using ELC because they have to do additional proof of works beyond the one you are interested in. On the other side of it, the ELC network could be huge. I agree, this comes at a overhead. The reason why we have to do this here is that we have to measure how much everyone has contributed. People can submit work where they are interested in many many output, but they as well may submit a work which is impossible to be solved (like factor a 256bit number). In both cases we want even and constant payout for other people's contributed computation power, and so they must periodically give some kind of verifiable feedback. But in order to reduce the overhead, we can make this feedback relatively rare. We would have to think about what (security)implications the timespan between two proof-of-works has.
|
|
|
|
Vaccinus
|
|
April 08, 2016, 07:28:56 AM |
|
there will be a pow mining phase? what will be the algo if the answer is yes?
|
|
|
|
iSimantri
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Follow me @AlitFX
|
|
April 08, 2016, 07:53:59 AM |
|
XEL
|
|
|
|
YNWA2806
|
|
April 08, 2016, 08:03:56 AM |
|
Evil-Knievel you should put some of the tokens aside for better PR, allocate some for translation to get big markets, make a FB account for statements and allocate some ELC for likes, etc.......
|
|
|
|
YNWA2806
|
|
April 08, 2016, 08:04:51 AM |
|
This project is not being heard
|
|
|
|
BigBoom3599
|
|
April 08, 2016, 08:30:45 AM |
|
Greed, you've made your point. there's no need to repost it every other day. just leave this thread.
|
|
|
|
wosch76
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 942
Merit: 1026
|
|
April 08, 2016, 08:32:51 AM |
|
ELSC
Can double as ELaStiC, and also ELastic Super Computer
I vote for ELastic Super Computer
|
|
|
|
xxxgoodgirls
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1001
|
|
April 08, 2016, 11:33:32 AM |
|
I'd go for ELA(stic) or ELN(astic etwork).
|
|
|
|
cryptoheadd
|
|
April 08, 2016, 11:34:21 AM |
|
XEC sounds good. or XEL.
|
|
|
|
JanDzban
|
|
April 08, 2016, 11:42:29 AM |
|
ELSC
Can double as ELaStiC, and also ELastic Super Computer
I vote for ELastic Super Computer I like this, but imo better looks 3 letters- ESC
|
|
|
|
BigBoom3599
|
|
April 08, 2016, 11:52:32 AM |
|
Maybe we should have a poll to vote for the ticker, so far i've seen: ELSC, ESC, ELA, XEC, XEL, ELC, ELAS and ELP
|
|
|
|
nihilnegativum
|
|
April 08, 2016, 12:22:19 PM |
|
I like esc, but it will get lost in search because of all the escrow topics, so xel is better.
|
|
|
|
YNWA2806
|
|
April 08, 2016, 09:04:08 PM |
|
Any relation for TAU project? thought of co-operation?
|
|
|
|
|