Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)

[armyman]

I have finally managed to make my miner actually mine, apparently it was a driver problem+risers problem.

Now I have disabled 2 cards with bad risers, while I wait for the new ones to come, and I have installed the minimal version of the crimson 16.7.3, which looks like working pretty well on Win10.

So thanks to anyone that previously helped.

I am now doing some tests for solo mining on different, and since about 5 hours I am mining on nanopool, but I can not see any stats update on their website, is that normal?

Claymore 7.1 looks like is running smooth and finding a decent amount of shares, but I can not see anything on the nanopool website.

The only doubt that I have is that I am using an old address, but that was generated from the same wallet anyway, can that be the problem?

[1714239814]

1714239814

[1714239814]

1714239814

[1714239814]

1714239814

[1714239814]

1714239814

[Trimegistus]

@Claymore, what is the highest possible value for -ethi?

Anyone using values higher than 8? Any real improvement?

I've been mining with -ethi 16 and my rigs are very stable.

However, if I use -ethi 8 my ETH hashrate stays pretty much the same and my power consumption slightly decreases.

Anyone care to share experiences with the -ethi values?

PS: Running 480s  

[go6ooo1212]

Which levels the recent scores with 480/70 are , compared to the older generations ?

[xeridea]

I have finally managed to make my miner actually mine, apparently it was a driver problem+risers problem.

Now I have disabled 2 cards with bad risers, while I wait for the new ones to come, and I have installed the minimal version of the crimson 16.7.3, which looks like working pretty well on Win10.

So thanks to anyone that previously helped.

I am now doing some tests for solo mining on different, and since about 5 hours I am mining on nanopool, but I can not see any stats update on their website, is that normal?

Claymore 7.1 looks like is running smooth and finding a decent amount of shares, but I can not see anything on the nanopool website.

The only doubt that I have is that I am using an old address, but that was generated from the same wallet anyway, can that be the problem?

You should see stats on nanopool within ~5-15 minutes.  If not, you are checking the wrong address.  Copy address from start.bat on miner, and check on nanopool.  If miner is consistently generating shares, it is mining at a pool, so address probably wrong.

[Flotas]

Hello,

I have a problem when I overclock my six 480´s Sapphire 8Gb. I have 2 .bat´s, one with OC and another one with no OC. When I want to OC the cards I have to do this sequence:

- If I open the OC .bat, the cards run in the standard hashrate (25Mh/s) . I have to copy it to the "start folder" and reboot Windows 10.
- When Windows starts, it automatically runs the OC.bat but I get the standard hashrate again. I checked the file that was running was "OC.bat" in the top of the window.
- I have to copy the no OC.bat to the start folder and reboot Windows 10 and...voilá, I get the 27Mh/s.

If I have any problem and the Rig reboots it gets the standard hashrate again

I have checked the config.txt and it´s empty and I´m using the v7.1. Any idea of what´s happening?

Thanks

EthDcrMiner64.exe -tt 65 -r 1 -mode 1 -cclock 1220,1220,1220,1220,1220,1220 -cvddc 920,920,920,920,920,920 -mclock 2250,2250,2250,2250,2250,2250 -mport 3856 -epool eth-eu.dwarfpool.com:8008 -ewal 0xxxxxxxxxx...

Add a pause at the beginning of your bat file, seems like wattman is loading after the miner and then overriding your overclock

Someting like

Code:

choice /m "Please wait" /d N /T 10 /C N

to wait 10 seconds (change the /T value to change the delay)

Thank you but it didn´t work

I´ll try to reinstall Windows in a few weeks. Thank´s claymore, my Rigs are now more stable with the new option -lidag.

[dagarair]

@Claymore, what is the highest possible value for -ethi?

Anyone using values higher than 8? Any real improvement?

I've been mining with -ethi 16 and my rigs are very stable.

However, if I use -ethi 8 my ETH hashrate stays pretty much the same and my power consumption slightly decreases.

Anyone care to share experiences with the -ethi values?

PS: Running 480s  

I think default is 8 or 9 and yeah it drops power with little to no effect on hash.  I just erased the -ethi line on my 17 miners once i noticed that and have been running that way for months.

[dagarair]

I have finally managed to make my miner actually mine, apparently it was a driver problem+risers problem.

Now I have disabled 2 cards with bad risers, while I wait for the new ones to come, and I have installed the minimal version of the crimson 16.7.3, which looks like working pretty well on Win10.

So thanks to anyone that previously helped.

I am now doing some tests for solo mining on different, and since about 5 hours I am mining on nanopool, but I can not see any stats update on their website, is that normal?

Claymore 7.1 looks like is running smooth and finding a decent amount of shares, but I can not see anything on the nanopool website.

The only doubt that I have is that I am using an old address, but that was generated from the same wallet anyway, can that be the problem?

loosen your riser cards as they may be grounding out on the rails.  I have used 300+ risers and have had maybe 3-4 bad ones.  Normally its a grounding issue.  Swap them with known working ones on your system and they will prob work.

[Trimegistus]

@Claymore, what is the highest possible value for -ethi?

Anyone using values higher than 8? Any real improvement?

I've been mining with -ethi 16 and my rigs are very stable.

However, if I use -ethi 8 my ETH hashrate stays pretty much the same and my power consumption slightly decreases.

Anyone care to share experiences with the -ethi values?

PS: Running 480s  

I think default is 8 or 9 and yeah it drops power with little to no effect on hash.  I just erased the -ethi line on my 17 miners once i noticed that and have been running that way for months.

Yep, I've just done the same  

[armyman]

I have finally managed to make my miner actually mine, apparently it was a driver problem+risers problem.

Now I have disabled 2 cards with bad risers, while I wait for the new ones to come, and I have installed the minimal version of the crimson 16.7.3, which looks like working pretty well on Win10.

So thanks to anyone that previously helped.

I am now doing some tests for solo mining on different, and since about 5 hours I am mining on nanopool, but I can not see any stats update on their website, is that normal?

Claymore 7.1 looks like is running smooth and finding a decent amount of shares, but I can not see anything on the nanopool website.

The only doubt that I have is that I am using an old address, but that was generated from the same wallet anyway, can that be the problem?

You should see stats on nanopool within ~5-15 minutes.  If not, you are checking the wrong address.  Copy address from start.bat on miner, and check on nanopool.  If miner is consistently generating shares, it is mining at a pool, so address probably wrong.

Is very strange, as I have only paste and copied the address that was already working on another pool before.

Now I have stopped and restarted it with a new address generated from the same wallet and after 15 mins and several shares generated it even says that it can not found the account (with the old address it did found the account, but it didn't update the stats)

[armyman]

I have finally managed to make my miner actually mine, apparently it was a driver problem+risers problem.

Now I have disabled 2 cards with bad risers, while I wait for the new ones to come, and I have installed the minimal version of the crimson 16.7.3, which looks like working pretty well on Win10.

So thanks to anyone that previously helped.

I am now doing some tests for solo mining on different, and since about 5 hours I am mining on nanopool, but I can not see any stats update on their website, is that normal?

Claymore 7.1 looks like is running smooth and finding a decent amount of shares, but I can not see anything on the nanopool website.

The only doubt that I have is that I am using an old address, but that was generated from the same wallet anyway, can that be the problem?

loosen your riser cards as they may be grounding out on the rails.  I have used 300+ risers and have had maybe 3-4 bad ones.  Normally its a grounding issue.  Swap them with known working ones on your system and they will prob work.

I have tried to swap them but nothing changed, I am waiting for new risers in a couple of days and let's what happen...thanks though

[xeridea]

I have finally managed to make my miner actually mine, apparently it was a driver problem+risers problem.

Now I have disabled 2 cards with bad risers, while I wait for the new ones to come, and I have installed the minimal version of the crimson 16.7.3, which looks like working pretty well on Win10.

So thanks to anyone that previously helped.

I am now doing some tests for solo mining on different, and since about 5 hours I am mining on nanopool, but I can not see any stats update on their website, is that normal?

Claymore 7.1 looks like is running smooth and finding a decent amount of shares, but I can not see anything on the nanopool website.

The only doubt that I have is that I am using an old address, but that was generated from the same wallet anyway, can that be the problem?

You should see stats on nanopool within ~5-15 minutes.  If not, you are checking the wrong address.  Copy address from start.bat on miner, and check on nanopool.  If miner is consistently generating shares, it is mining at a pool, so address probably wrong.

Is very strange, as I have only paste and copied the address that was already working on another pool before.

Now I have stopped and restarted it with a new address generated from the same wallet and after 15 mins and several shares generated it even says that it can not found the account (with the old address it did found the account, but it didn't update the stats)

Make sure you are mining, and checking the ETH (not ETC) pool? I don't know what else it would be.  There is a delay with it showing initially, but not THAT long.

[armyman]

I have finally managed to make my miner actually mine, apparently it was a driver problem+risers problem.

Now I have disabled 2 cards with bad risers, while I wait for the new ones to come, and I have installed the minimal version of the crimson 16.7.3, which looks like working pretty well on Win10.

So thanks to anyone that previously helped.

I am now doing some tests for solo mining on different, and since about 5 hours I am mining on nanopool, but I can not see any stats update on their website, is that normal?

Claymore 7.1 looks like is running smooth and finding a decent amount of shares, but I can not see anything on the nanopool website.

The only doubt that I have is that I am using an old address, but that was generated from the same wallet anyway, can that be the problem?

You should see stats on nanopool within ~5-15 minutes.  If not, you are checking the wrong address.  Copy address from start.bat on miner, and check on nanopool.  If miner is consistently generating shares, it is mining at a pool, so address probably wrong.

Is very strange, as I have only paste and copied the address that was already working on another pool before.

Now I have stopped and restarted it with a new address generated from the same wallet and after 15 mins and several shares generated it even says that it can not found the account (with the old address it did found the account, but it didn't update the stats)

Make sure you are mining, and checking the ETH (not ETC) pool? I don't know what else it would be.  There is a delay with it showing initially, but not THAT long.

Is finally showing something, I have changed the pool address in the batch file from :

-epool eu1.nanopool.org:9999 to -epool eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999

So I have added "eth" before the pool address. That means the previous (pool) address was wrong and was therfore not mining even if the miner was generating shares?

[voidwalker]

Anyone have any idea why it takes 40-80 seconds for claymore to begin generating DAG on my rx 480 rigs with windows 10 ? this delay happens on all of them. have the latest stable driver (not hotfix, which causes a bit lower performance).

[Claymore]

Anyone have any idea why it takes 40-80 seconds for claymore to begin generating DAG on my rx 480 rigs with windows 10 ? this delay happens on all of them. have the latest stable driver (not hotfix, which causes a bit lower performance).

Is my answer not enough? Or may be you missed it:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1433925.msg16422035#msg16422035

[plggy]

Wrote a quick tutorial on how to use Claymore's Dual Miner Manager to send emails and texts:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1636133.0

[shadabahmed]

i am only getting 48.76MS/S with 3 R9 280x vaporx cards

pls advice how to increase hash rate

[fredeq]

i am only getting 48.76MS/S with 3 R9 280x vaporx cards

pls advice how to increase hash rate

These are normal values, 280x will keep hashing slower and slower.

[citronick]

Wrote a quick tutorial on how to use Claymore's Dual Miner Manager to send emails and texts:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1636133.0

I use the Android apps to achieve the same results but the blat method is cool if you are using non-smart phone.

I am looking for quick tutorial on how to use CDM on Ubuntu 16.04... anyone?

[mineromineroso]

i am only getting 48.76MS/S with 3 R9 280x vaporx cards

pls advice how to increase hash rate

In my opinion it would be better to sell those cards to some gamers and get a single rx480. You're getting 16,25Mh/s for each x280 with a power draw of 660W for all 3. This will be worse every day.
With a single rx480 and a proper bios you can get 30-32Mh/s with less than 150W, this is a -34,37% total hashrate (48,76 vs 32) BUT with a -77,27% less power draw, less hashrate decrease, greater resale value and warranty.

I sold my 7970 in july for 90€ with some other older cards (5850, etc.) to pay two rx480. Now those rx480 are amortized (ROI).

Also you can try to go for a dual rx470 and get a decent ROI for the second one.

EDIT: I pay close to 0,2€/kWh

[xeridea]

i am only getting 48.76MS/S with 3 R9 280x vaporx cards

pls advice how to increase hash rate

In my opinion it would be better to sell those cards to some gamers and get a single rx480. You're getting 16,25Mh/s for each x280 with a power draw of 660W for all 3. This will be worse every day.
With a single rx480 and a proper bios you can get 30-32Mh/s with less than 150W, this is a -34,37% total hashrate (48,76 vs 32) BUT with a -77,27% less power draw, less hashrate decrease, greater resale value and warranty.

I sold my 7970 in july for 90€ with some other older cards (5850, etc.) to pay two rx480. Now those rx480 are amortized (ROI).

Also you can try to go for a dual rx470 and get a decent ROI for the second one.

EDIT: I pay close to 0,2€/kWh

You can mine Expanse, the DAG is smaller and there is similar profitability last I checked.  Depending on power costs you may want to sell and upgrade.  Probably still decent resell on them, and 470s are easy to get now ($200-240)