Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2024, 12:17:17 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 [962] 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 ... 1412 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 6589782 times)
Lamsterpaul
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 12:15:50 AM
 #19221

How much stale shares per hour are normal ?
Got 5% average, and sometimes 10-12%

And does the GPU powersaving option in the settings reduce the Hashrate and power cosume too ? - never try this yet
Because I will get a overheating problem in my serverroom with my 18 r9 390 cards, any hints ?
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715170637
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715170637

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715170637
Reply with quote  #2

1715170637
Report to moderator
Call_Me_Bambi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 261


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 12:49:21 AM
 #19222

Hi Claymore.
Do you have any solution for Dual mining or we just have to accept defeat by the big daddy ASIC?   Cheesy

I think you will have to kiss Siacoin goodbye as far a GPU mining goes, with the influx of ASICs it's pointless now.
Look at this Siacon difficulty chart https://siastats.info/mining.html - unbelievable !
Call_Me_Bambi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 261


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 12:53:20 AM
 #19223

hello, I have put the rig of mined by wifi, the wifi works perfectly arrives all the signal and the rig has internet, the problem comes when I put the claymore to mine, it appears "Socket was closed remotely (by pool)", I have been investigating and I can not find any information so I had to put it back in the other room with the network cable. Any help around here?

Im using powerline adapter and i can move my rig where i want... try to search on ebay for powerline adapter (my one is 200mbps). i hope this helps.
Smiley

I think that if you use a WiFi dongle and put the dongle on a USB extension lead the problems with the WiFi interfering with Claymore is removed, I'm going to give this a try in the next couple of weeks and see what happens.
davidusz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 02:11:52 AM
 #19224

v10.4:

- fixed issue with rejected shares in ETH+SIA mode for Vega cards.
- improved watchdog for temperature/fan management thread.


I'm have a problem when running it as a Task, the gpu infos(temperature and fan speed) don't show on web monitor. If I run normally by clicking in the start.bat, it works as expected.

It is not a problem in just the 10.4 version, I have used the 10.3 for a while and it never showed the gpu info when running as task.

I have the problem in two computers, the same config, both with one with XFX Rx 580 8GB or other with 4GB;

The configuration on the task or in the start.bat file is the same, I tried -wd 1, which is the default, but didn't work.

Someone else has the same problem?


The same problem with the last version 10.5

10.3, 10.5 - I cannot control fan. I have Adrenalin 18.1.1.
MelioraCogito
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 04:00:28 AM
 #19225

Guys, is there a definite reference somewhere about what exactly you can set "-dcri" to?  Intensity 5-9 doesn't seem to make much difference for me as far as the output effective in MHash/sec, anyway.

I remember seeing "-dcri 30" somewhere, but I can't put my finger on it.  Seems way out of what I remember.

I am trying "-dcri 12" right now, just to see if it really moves the Mhash/sec

See the Readme.txt file.

The highest value for the "-dcri" switch is 100.  Typically the miner uses 30 by default.

As others above have pointed out, you can adjust the intensity on the fly in either direction by using the (+) or (–) keys on your numpad.
_voyager_
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 04:12:22 AM
 #19226

My rigs lost conection to the pool for ten minutes. After that I had "Failover 7" message in statistics? What is the meaning of this message?
Ratledge
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 1


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 04:19:12 AM
 #19227

Guys, is there a definite reference somewhere about what exactly you can set "-dcri" to?  Intensity 5-9 doesn't seem to make much difference for me as far as the output effective in MHash/sec, anyway.

I remember seeing "-dcri 30" somewhere, but I can't put my finger on it.  Seems way out of what I remember.

I am trying "-dcri 12" right now, just to see if it really moves the Mhash/sec

See the Readme.txt file.

The highest value for the "-dcri" switch is 100.  Typically the miner uses 30 by default.
Maybe, but for "-ethi" (I mistyped the OG message, and added "or '-ethi" later), it's 16 (for nVidia cards, at least).  If you try something higher than that, it displays a message that "16 is the highest" (and 8 is default - I finally found it in the "README" file).


As others above have pointed out, you can adjust the intensity on the fly in either direction by using the (+) or (–) keys on your numpad.
Actually, no - you can't.  Only works on AMD-based GPUs, not at all for nVidia even if you turn on "-asm 1" as it suggests when you try it with only nVidia cards.
x8664amd
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 129
Merit: 6

Long term HODLer since 2014


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 04:59:46 AM
 #19228

I've been running V10.6 with my 12 x 1070 overclocked rig. I think it's like 1-2% faster, but I am not sure because it might just as well be pure noise to be honest. I will see if my average hashrate changes on Nanopool.

Fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful. Just HODL.
NoOneLt
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 06:48:43 AM
 #19229

HI everyone, sorry for my ignorant questions, have been busy for a while to track news. How is AMD doing with DAG problem? Any official fix? While it was hardware level problem they made some workaround?

How much MH/s 570/580 BIOS modded/not modded can push at the moment?
xeridea
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 449
Merit: 251


View Profile WWW
January 30, 2018, 06:52:56 AM
 #19230

Guys, is there a definite reference somewhere about what exactly you can set "-dcri" to?  Intensity 5-9 doesn't seem to make much difference for me as far as the output effective in MHash/sec, anyway.

I remember seeing "-dcri 30" somewhere, but I can't put my finger on it.  Seems way out of what I remember.

I am trying "-dcri 12" right now, just to see if it really moves the Mhash/sec

See the Readme.txt file.

The highest value for the "-dcri" switch is 100.  Typically the miner uses 30 by default.
Maybe, but for "-ethi" (I mistyped the OG message, and added "or '-ethi" later), it's 16 (for nVidia cards, at least).  If you try something higher than that, it displays a message that "16 is the highest" (and 8 is default - I finally found it in the "README" file).


As others above have pointed out, you can adjust the intensity on the fly in either direction by using the (+) or (–) keys on your numpad.
Actually, no - you can't.  Only works on AMD-based GPUs, not at all for nVidia even if you turn on "-asm 1" as it suggests when you try it with only nVidia cards.

You can use + and - to adjust dual mining intensity on the fly on ANY GPU. Nvidia just don't have ASM kernels for mining, so they are pretty poor dual miners. They were poor in comparison before ASM was used to dual mining anyway, and Nvidia only likes to support CUDA so I don't see it changing.

You can set -dcri higher than 100, I have set it to several hundred when testing dual mining on certain cards with certain algorithms. It's a bit pointless though except on certain Nvidia cards.

Profitability over time charts for many GPUs - http://xeridea.us/charts

BTC:  bc1qr2xwjwfmjn43zhrlp6pn7vwdjrjnv5z0anhjhn LTC:  LXDm6sR4dkyqtEWfUbPumMnVEiUFQvxSbZ Eth:  0x44cCe2cf90C8FEE4C9e4338Ae7049913D4F6fC24
xeridea
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 449
Merit: 251


View Profile WWW
January 30, 2018, 06:56:43 AM
 #19231

HI everyone, sorry for my ignorant questions, have been busy for a while to track news. How is AMD doing with DAG problem? Any official fix? While it was hardware level problem they made some workaround?

How much MH/s 570/580 BIOS modded/not modded can push at the moment?
AMD released a blockchain driver nearly 6 months ago to fix the slowdown....

570/580 can get 28-30MH with reasonable clocks with bios mod.

http://www.overclock.net/forum/67-amd-ati/1604567-polaris-bios-editing-rx5xx-rx4xx.html

Profitability over time charts for many GPUs - http://xeridea.us/charts

BTC:  bc1qr2xwjwfmjn43zhrlp6pn7vwdjrjnv5z0anhjhn LTC:  LXDm6sR4dkyqtEWfUbPumMnVEiUFQvxSbZ Eth:  0x44cCe2cf90C8FEE4C9e4338Ae7049913D4F6fC24
mining4.me
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 07:16:09 AM
 #19232

Hey guys,
I just released an iPhone app that monitors claymore rigs remotely after figuring out that something like that would come very handy, at least for me Smiley
Focus was really to make it simple and running in few minutes without the hassle of configuring firewalls, port forwarding...., but still to be able to get the data out when i am away + get alerts if anything is wrong.

Take a look in iTunes store: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/remote-claymore-monitor-rcm/id1336048082?ls=1&mt=8

Hopefully it will be helpful for you as it is for me. Of course, as this is the first release it will evolve over time with with things you would like to see, let me know what features you would like in app like that.

It works free for few days then it's 1.99 monthly via itunes subscription. I think it's worth the value. If anyone has interest and time, try it off and let me know pls.


xaoc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 08:21:28 AM
 #19233

Is it possible one rig to mine to different wallets or pools in same time? I’m asking beginner question, sorry for that. Me and my friend have rig with 6 GPUs, 4 of them are mine, 2 are to my friend. We want to start mining GPU 0-3 to mine on my wallet, 4-5 GPU to mine on his wallet.

Any solution is welcome!

Thank you in advance
BSAlex
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 239
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 08:48:25 AM
 #19234

hello, I have put the rig of mined by wifi, the wifi works perfectly arrives all the signal and the rig has internet, the problem comes when I put the claymore to mine, it appears "Socket was closed remotely (by pool)", I have been investigating and I can not find any information so I had to put it back in the other room with the network cable. Any help around here?

HIVE OS https://hiveos.farm declares WIFI support. It is free up to 3 rigs. BTW I do not try the feature opting to Powerline connection. Works for me.
BSAlex
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 239
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 08:56:58 AM
 #19235

Is it possible one rig to mine to different wallets or pools in same time? I’m asking beginner question, sorry for that. Me and my friend have rig with 6 GPUs, 4 of them are mine, 2 are to my friend. We want to start mining GPU 0-3 to mine on my wallet, 4-5 GPU to mine on his wallet.

Any solution is welcome!

Thank you in advance


You can run two instances of miner. In miner initialisation string you can select what GPU will be used.

Something like that. Please note that I get example from other Claymore miner (provided by @CallMeBamby) but syntax is pretty the same
Just check it against README file.

Claymore copy No.1, this will enable cards 0 to 3.
Code:
NsGpuCNMiner -xpool stratum+tcp://pool.electroneum.space:3333 -xwal <address> -xpsw x -allpools 1 -d1 0123

Claymore copy No.2, this will enable cards  4 to 5.
Code:
NsGpuCNMiner -xpool stratum+tcp://pool.electroneum.space:3333 -xwal <address> -xpsw x -allpools 1 -d1 45
Haidong Liang
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 65
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 10:07:16 AM
 #19236

I've been running V10.6 with my 12 x 1070 overclocked rig. I think it's like 1-2% faster, but I am not sure because it might just as well be pure noise to be honest. I will see if my average hashrate changes on Nanopool.

I think you need to run it for 24 hours and check the shares from the pool to make sure the speed difference.
fpontilho
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 10:37:46 AM
 #19237

I would like to purchase the SimpleRigResetter but it is out of stock, is there an alternative to it that also works with simplemining?
xenonwon
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 11:00:03 AM
 #19238

hello, I have put the rig of mined by wifi, the wifi works perfectly arrives all the signal and the rig has internet, the problem comes when I put the claymore to mine, it appears "Socket was closed remotely (by pool)", I have been investigating and I can not find any information so I had to put it back in the other room with the network cable. Any help around here?

Im using powerline adapter and i can move my rig where i want... try to search on ebay for powerline adapter (my one is 200mbps). i hope this helps.
Smiley

I think that if you use a WiFi dongle and put the dongle on a USB extension lead the problems with the WiFi interfering with Claymore is removed, I'm going to give this a try in the next couple of weeks and see what happens.

Ok, when you try it on, let me know. Thanks
RIGED
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 12


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 11:08:26 AM
 #19239

got 12 x Vega64 (2rigs) mining ETH steady and stable at 44+MH/s

bought 2 Vega FE for trials, using the same settings as the 64s I'm getting 42+MH/s (im testing running 4 simultaneous threads on cryptonight, but thats a different can of worms)

any suggestions or thoughts as to why the FE is 4.5% slower? and how to rectify?

thnx


to mine or not to mine,
is not a question...
FFI2013
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 906
Merit: 507


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 12:05:14 PM
 #19240

Hi Claymore.
Do you have any solution for Dual mining or we just have to accept defeat by the big daddy ASIC?   Cheesy

I think you will have to kiss Siacoin goodbye as far a GPU mining goes, with the influx of ASICs it's pointless now.
Look at this Siacon difficulty chart https://siastats.info/mining.html - unbelievable !
Ya DCR has spiked way up also it's bullshit these asics companies cant leave shit alone they where making enough money selling scrypt and btc miners now they had to fuck this up the other problem is unless your a big miner, have connections or are lucky and check at the right time you cant get your hands on one without paying out the ass but its ok the asic miners will mine the fuck out of these few coins than they'll all be bitching about roi and how they got screwed
Pages: « 1 ... 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 [962] 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 ... 1412 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!